Zohran Mamdani ripped for using ‘Zionist' as punchline — as critics warn NYC mayoral race is at ‘code red situation'
Jewish New Yorkers were outraged over the recently resurfaced video of the mayoral race frontrunner speaking before the Democratic Socialists of America in 2023.
'If you don't clap for El-Yateem,' Mamdani said, 'You're a Zionist!'
3 A newly resurfaced video shows Zohran Mamdani calling someone a 'Zionist' as a punchline to an insulting joke.
YouTube/Democratic Socialists of America
He was referring to Lutheran pastor and Palestinian community organizer Khader El-Yateem, who ran unsuccessfully for a Brooklyn City Council seat in 2017.
Mamdani, the 33-year-old Queens assemblyman, then said, 'It's a joke, you don't have to clap.'
But Israel supporters weren't laughing.
'The turning of 'Zionist' into a slur in mainstream western liberal spaces is the most significant antisemitic development of the 21st century,' said podcaster Blake Flayton, who posted the video on X.
'This man is about to be mayor of New York,' said Flayton, host of 'We Should All Be Zionists,' of the Democratic nominee.
'I don't think people yet understand how much of a code red situation this is. The severity of the moment,' he added.
3 The Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City was seen speaking at an event for the Democratic Socialists of America in 2023 when he made the insensitive remark.
Instagram/@zohrankmamdani
Others defended Mamdani, noting he clearly said he was joking.
But Flayton was having none of it.
'It's not funny — racist/antisemitic jokes are not funny,' he posted.
Todd Richman, co-founder of Democratic Majority for Israel, responded, 'Disgusting.'
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
'Enough of the 'l'll protect the Jewish community.' I'm sorry but I don't believe him,' Richman continued.
'He has been perpetuating an anti-Zionist and therefore anti Jewish agenda since college. Now all of a sudden he is going to change?'
Joseph Potasnik, executive vice president of the New York Board of Rabbis, said to add Mamdani's 'You're a Zionist' quip to the pile of comments and positions that the City Hall hopeful will have to explain, particularly to the Jewish community.
'He has to address comments he has made in the past that are controversial — and in some cases offensive,' Potasnik told The Post Tuesday.
3 Mamdani was referring to Khader El-Yateem, a Lutheran pastor and Palestinian community organizer, when making the joke, as he told the audience, 'It's a joke, you don't have to clap.'
Facebook/Khader El-Yateem
New York City has the largest Jewish population outside of Israel, most of whom are pro-Israel or Zionists, said Potasnik, adding of Mamdani: 'We're going to hold him accountable.'
Former Queens Councilman Rory Lancman also highlighted Mamdani's history of anti-Israel statements and positions.
'Deploying 'Zionist' as an epithet comes naturally to someone like Mr. Mamdani who fundamentally, and unabashedly, opposes the right of the Jewish people — and only the Jewish people — to self-determination, freedom, and safety in their ancestral homeland, and demands of every Jew that they renounce this central aspect of their Jewish identity as the price for social and political acceptance into civil society,' said Lancman.
'Mamdani believes deeply that every Jew must bend the knee.'
During his 2023 speech, Mamdani praised the DSA for backing the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel.
'We mean what we say when we say we have a socialist politic. It is consistent, it is universal, and it stands for justice in every place with no exception,' he said.
The Anti-Defamation League calls the BDS movement antisemitic for seeking to undermine the world's only Jewish state.
Mamdani is a supporter of the boycott movement against Israel, even leading a pro-Palestinian rally chanting 'BDS!' and criticizing other elected officials for visiting the Jewish state.
The DSA was an an early endorser of Mamdani for mayor and the backbone of his successful Democratic primary campaign.
The candidate has been on a charm offensive since defeating ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo and other Dem hopefuls in the primary last month.
He has been seeking to expand his base of support for the November general election, meeting with business bigwigs, party leaders and Jewish officials.
His campaign declined to comment on the 'You're a Zionist' line.
Mamdani has come under fire for refusing to condemn the phrase 'globalize the intifada.'
After meeting with Jewish elected officials, he said he now discourages people from using the rallying call.
Mamdani also previously faced criticism for appearing to defend al Qaeda fiend Anwar al-Awlaki — and blaming America for turning the prostitution-loving cleric into a terrorist in 2015 tweets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
44 minutes ago
- New York Post
Anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil repeatedly refuses to condemn Hamas in tense CNN interview: ‘It's disingenuous to ask'
Anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas during a tense CNN interview – insisting it was 'disingenuous' for the anchors to demand his position on the terror group. The outspoken Palestinian activist, who was detained for over three months by the Trump administration for his prominent role in often-times violent Columbia University protests, dismissed co-anchor Pamela Brown's repeated grilling over his views on Hamas as both 'absurd' and hypocritical. 'Do you specifically condemn Hamas, a designated terrorist organization in the United States, not just for their actions on October 7?' Brown pressed the 30-year-old who appeared on 'The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer' Tuesday morning. 4 Mahmoud Khalil in a CNN interview. CNN A tongue-tied Khalil replied that he condemns the killing of 'all civilians, full stop,' but not Hamas. Brown interrupted Khalil and asked again if he would disavow 'Hamas specifically.' Mahmoud Khalil refuses to condemn Hamas because he IS a terrorist sympathizer not because DHS 'painted' him as one. He 'branded' himself as antisemite through his own hateful behavior and rhetoric. It is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card to live and study in the… — Homeland Security (@DHSgov) July 22, 2025 'No, I am very clear with condemning all civilians. I'm very straight in my position in that part,' said Khalil, who was visibly flustered, later blasting the question as 'selective outrage.' 'But it's disingenuous to ask about condemning Hamas while Palestinians are the ones being starved now by Israel. It's not condemning October 6, where 260 Palestinians were killed by Israel before October 7,' he continued. 'So I hate this selective outrage of condemnation because this is not, this wouldn't lead to a constructive conversation. And this is also, like what we want to deal with is the root cause of why that happened. And it's no way anyone can justify the killing of civilians.' 4 Khalil refused to condemn Hamas after being asked about three times during the interview. CNN Brown pushed back on Khalil's claims, arguing that her question was justified after the Trump administration accused him of sympathizing with the Palestinian terrorist group responsible for the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel, while he was studying at the Ivy League. He replied that he was 'simply' protesting the war in Gaza. 'That's my duty as a Palestinian, as a human being right now, is to ask for the stop of the killing in my home country. And that's consistent with who I am,' Khalil said, noting he's a 'firm believer in international law and human rights.' 4 Palestinians celebrating on top of a destroyed Israeli tank. AP 'As I said, disingenuous and absurd to ask such questions…That's why I wouldn't really engage much into such questions on condemnation or not. Because selective condemnations is not, wouldn't get us anywhere. It's just like hypocrite, to be honest.' Blitzer then stepped in and ended the heated back-and-forth. Khalil was arrested by federal immigration authorities on March 8 and spent 104 days at a Louisiana detention center as the Trump administration fought to deport the Syrian-born permanent resident. 4 Khalil was arrested back in March and detained in Louisiana for 104 days. Getty Images The administration said Khalil engaged in activities 'aligned to Hamas.' Khalil, who is now suing the federal government for $20 million over what he claims was false imprisonment and a smear campaign to label him as an antisemite, drew fresh backlash after the interview – with the Department of Homeland Security blasting him as a 'terrorist sympathizer.' 'Mahmoud Khalil refused to condemn Hamas because he IS a terrorist sympathizer not because DHS 'painted' him as one,' DHS wrote in a fiery post on X, arguing that the green card holder 'branded' himself as an antisemite 'through his own hateful behavior and rhetoric.' 'The Trump Administration acted well within its statutory and constitutional authority to detain Khalil, as it does with any alien who advocates for violence, glorifies and supports terrorists, harasses Jews, and damages property.'
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Senate takes first bipartisan step on government funding ahead of September shutdown cliff
The Senate cleared the first hurdle Tuesday toward passing a government funding bill meant to keep federal cash flowing for several federal agencies beyond September. The 90-8 vote was a major bipartisan overture in cross-party government funding talks strained by the GOP's partisan moves to cut and boost federal cash without Democratic buy-in, while President Donald Trump withholds billions of dollars more that Congress approved in bipartisan votes. Sen. Mike Lee of Utah was the only Republican to vote 'no,' joined by other Democratic Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff of California, Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Peter Welch of Vermont. Welch's fellow Vermonter, Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders, also opposed moving ahead with consideration of the package. But the bipartisanship is not guaranteed to last. Though Democrats helped overcome Tuesday's hurdle, they aren't committed yet to helping pass the bill, which will at the very least contain funding for the Department and Veterans Affairs and military construction projects. And as lawmakers stare down the Sept. 30 government shutdown cliff in just 10 weeks, fiscal conservatives and the White House are again calling for Republicans to abandon funding negotiations with Democrats. Ahead of the procedural vote Tuesday, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer praised the Senate's veterans funding bill as containing 'some important steps to reverse a number of the awful cuts' posed by the Department of Government Efficiency and White House budget director Russ Vought. But Schumer also warned Republicans not to bank on automatically having Democratic votes to pass the bill, adding: 'We will see how the floor process evolves here on the floor. Given Republicans' recent actions undermining bipartisan appropriations, nothing is guaranteed.' The contents of the package are also still in flux. The measure will certainly contain funding for the VA and military construction projects, but Republicans also plan to add largely non-controversial funding for federal agriculture programs, the FDA and operations of Congress. 'I'd like to make it a package of bills, and get as many bills going as we can,' Majority Leader John Thune said in a brief interview, adding that there was a 'discussion' about what to do with more controversial funding for the Justice Department and FBI. Thune could get heat from his own members. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said in an interview he objected to leadership's desire to attach the agriculture and legislative branch spending bills to the pending package, saying he wanted to vote on each measure 'separately' and that the bill funding congressional operations would cost 'too much money.' On the other side of the aisle, Schumer is trying to hone the Democratic government funding strategy after caving to Republicans' strong-arm tactics in March. Democrats haven't settled on what their demands should be heading into September — and there are competing factions split over how hard the party should fight against even bipartisan funding bills in the wake of Republicans green-lighting Trump's $9 billion funding clawbacks package.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Schumer, Jeffries hone funding message in shutdown-cliff countdown
Democratic leaders from both sides of the Capitol met Tuesday night to define their government funding demands — avoiding explicit ultimatums to their Republican counterparts with 10 weeks left before federal cash lapses. Emerging from their closed-door meeting, party leaders took pains to show unity in their ranks after Senate Democrats caved in March to a government funding patch Republicans negotiated without any input from the minority party. 'House and Senate Democrats are in complete and total alignment,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters after the meeting with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. The two leaders privately huddled before bringing in a larger group of Democratic leaders. Democrats are ready to join bipartisan funding negotiations with their Republican counterparts in good faith, the Democratic leaders said, as the Senate moves forward this week with debate on a funding bill with buy-in from both sides of the aisle. But they knocked House Republicans for forging ahead with partisan funding bills that would cut the budgets of most federal agencies. 'House Republicans are in fact marching us toward a possible government shutdown that will hurt the American people,' Jeffries said. The leaders warned that funding negotiations could be complicated by Republicans' embrace of clawbacks packages like the $9 billion rescissions bill Congress cleared last week and President Donald Trump's moves to withhold funding Congress already approved. While Democrats 'want to pursue a bipartisan, bicameral appropriations process,' Schumer said, 'the Republicans are making it extremely difficult to do that.' Democratic leaders have privately discussed the need to focus on how government funding affects 'people,' rather than how Republicans are undermining the government funding 'process,' according to two people granted anonymity to discuss the private talks. 'We are all united in making sure that we're doing the right thing for the people we represent,' Washington Sen. Patty Murray, the Senate's top Democratic appropriator, said after the Tuesday meeting. 'They're worried about their housing, their health care, whether or not they can put food on the table. And our process here is to make sure that we are doing the right thing and funding the programs that they count on to be able to support their families.' Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro, the House's top Democratic appropriator, said this is the worst appropriations process she has seen in her more than 34 years in Congress. 'It has not been what we have experienced,' DeLauro said. 'There's always been that give and take to pass the bills.'
