logo
Mortgage Rates and the Fed: Everything to Know Before This Week's Meeting

Mortgage Rates and the Fed: Everything to Know Before This Week's Meeting

CNET5 hours ago

The Fed's interest rate decisions impact mortgages, but the relationship isn't straightforward.
Tharon Green/CNET
On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve is expected to extend a pause on interest rate cuts for a fourth consecutive time this year. Though mortgage rates could see some volatility, many economists expect them to stay somewhat flat until the economic picture drastically changes.
Rates will stay in the 6.75% to 7.25% range unless the Fed signals multiple cuts soon and backs it up with data, said Nicole Rueth, of the Rueth Team with Movement Mortgage. "Homebuyers waiting on rates to drop drastically might be disappointed," Rueth said.
The relationship between the central bank's interest rate decisions and home loan rates isn't direct or immediate. Case in point: The Fed's three interest rate cuts in 2024 didn't translate into cheaper mortgages. The average rate for a 30-year fixed home loan has hovered around 6.8% since late fall.
Often, what the central bank says about future plans can move the market more than its actual actions. Mortgage rates are driven by the bond market, investor expectations and a host of other economic factors.
"Mortgage rates move on expectations, not announcements," said Rueth.
The focus will be on what Fed Chair Jerome Powell says following the meeting. Should Powell express concern over lingering inflation or a reduced number of rate cuts, bond yields and mortgage rates are expected to rise. If he conveys optimism about inflation and suggests further policy easing, mortgage rates may decline.
"It's most often the case that longer-term interest rates begin to decline before the Fed cuts rates," said Keith Gumbinger, vice president at HSH.com.
Here's what you need to know about how the government's interest rate policies influence the mortgage market.
What is the Fed's relationship to mortgage rates?
The Fed sets and oversees US monetary policy under a dual mandate to maintain price stability and maximum employment. It does this largely by adjusting the federal funds rate, the rate at which banks borrow and lend their money.
When the economy weakens and unemployment rises, the Fed lowers interest rates to encourage spending and propel growth, as it did during the COVID-19 pandemic.
It does the opposite when inflation is high. For example, the Fed raised its benchmark interest rate by more than five percentage points between early 2022 and mid-2023 to slow price growth by curbing consumer borrowing and spending.
Changes in the cost of borrowing set off a slow chain reaction that eventually affects mortgage rates and the housing market, as banks pass along the Fed's rate hikes or cuts to consumers through longer-term loans, including home loans.
Yet, because mortgage rates respond to several economic factors, it's not uncommon for the federal funds rate and mortgage rates to move in different directions for some time.
Why is the Fed putting off interest rate cuts?
After making three interest rate cuts in 2024, the Fed is now in a holding pattern. With President Donald Trump's unpredictable tariff campaign, immigration policies and federal cutbacks threatening to drive up prices and drag on growth, economists say the central bank has good reason to pause.
"The Federal Reserve is in one of the trickiest spots in recent economic history," said Ali Wolf, Zonda and NewHomeSource chief economist.
Lowering interest rates could allow inflation to surge, which is bad for mortgage rates. Keeping rates high, however, increases the risk of a job-loss recession that would cause widespread financial hardship.
Recent data show inflation making slow but steady progress toward the Fed's annual target rate of 2%. But given the uncertainty surrounding Trump's economic agenda, the central bank isn't in a hurry to lower borrowing rates.
6 Ways to Reduce Your Mortgage Interest Rate by 1% or More 6 Ways to Reduce Your Mortgage Interest Rate by 1% or More
Click to unmute
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Next playlist item
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
2:31
Loaded :
23.60%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
2:31
Share
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background
Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background
Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Close Modal Dialog
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Close Modal Dialog
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
6 Ways to Reduce Your Mortgage Interest Rate by 1% or More
What is the forecast for interest rate cuts in 2025?
Though Powell remains noncommittal on any specific time frame, experts now predict an interest rate cut in the fall.
"I'm eyeing September for the first rate cut, if inflation keeps cooling and the labor market weakens," Rueth said.
However, tariffs are the big wildcard. Rueth said that if a trade war fuels inflation, rates could jump even without a Fed move. Political dysfunction, rising debt and global instability are also a recipe for rate volatility.
"The mortgage market reacts fast to uncertainty, and we've got no shortage of it this summer," Rueth said.
On the flip side, if unemployment spikes -- a real possibility given rising jobless claims -- the Fed could be forced to implement interest rate cuts earlier than anticipated. In that case, mortgage rates should gradually ease, though not dramatically.
Most housing market forecasts, which already factor in at least two 0.25% Fed cuts, call for 30-year mortgage rates to stay above 6% throughout 2025.
"We might see rates settle into the low to mid-6% by year-end," Rueth said. "But we're not going back to 3%."
What other factors affect mortgage rates?
Mortgage rates move around for many of the same reasons home prices do: supply, demand, inflation and even the employment rate.
Personal factors, such as a homebuyer's credit score, down payment and home loan amount, also determine one's individual mortgage rate. Different loan types and terms also have varying interest rates.
Policy changes: When the Fed adjusts the federal funds rate, it affects many aspects of the economy, including mortgage rates. The federal funds rate affects how much it costs banks to borrow money, which in turn affects what banks charge consumers to make a profit.
Inflation: Generally, when inflation is high, mortgage rates tend to be high. Because inflation chips away at purchasing power, lenders set higher interest rates on loans to make up for that loss and ensure a profit.
Supply and demand: When demand for mortgages is high, lenders tend to raise interest rates. This is because they have only so much capital to lend in the form of home loans. Conversely, when demand for mortgages is low, lenders tend to slash interest rates to attract borrowers.
Bond market activity: Mortgage lenders peg fixed interest rates, like fixed-rate mortgages, to bond rates. Mortgage bonds, also called mortgage-backed securities, are bundles of mortgages sold to investors and are closely tied to the 10-year Treasury. When bond interest rates are high, the bond has less value on the market where investors buy and sell securities, causing mortgage interest rates to go up.
Other key indicators: Employment patterns and other aspects of the economy that affect investor confidence and consumer spending and borrowing also influence mortgage rates. For instance, a strong jobs report and a robust economy could indicate greater demand for housing, which can put upward pressure on mortgage rates. When the economy slows and unemployment is high, mortgage rates tend to be lower.
Read more: Fact Check: Trump Doesn't Have the Power to Force Lower Interest Rates
Is now a good time to get a mortgage?
Even though timing is everything in the mortgage market, you can't control what the Fed does. "Forecasting interest rates is nearly impossible in today's market," said Wolf.
Regardless of the economy, the most important thing when shopping for a mortgage is to make sure you can comfortably afford your monthly payments.
More homebuying advice

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Time Inc. CEO on embracing AI: It's better to have a seat at the table
Time Inc. CEO on embracing AI: It's better to have a seat at the table

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Time Inc. CEO on embracing AI: It's better to have a seat at the table

Time Inc. CEO Jessica Sibley is embracing AI even as it's triggering a massive upheaval in the publishing industry. For the longtime media exec, it just makes better business sense to do so. "We want to have a seat at the table and be with these top executives," Sibley told Yahoo Finance at the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity on Monday. "We started early in this journey, and we've decided to start with a guiding principle, which was are we going to negotiate, litigate, or do nothing? We decided if we were going to negotiate, we were going to opt in. We want to be part of this technology," she explained. Time Inc. has pressed forward with a major reinvention under Sibley, partly by leaning into AI. In 2024, it signed a multiyear deal with OpenAI to give it access to Time's 102-year-old content archive. More recently, the company said it'll launch an on-demand podcast with Meta (META)-backed Scale AI that features two AI hosts summarizing four top stories from its newsletter The Brief. Sibley said the company has been leveraging AI across "every single department" to become more efficient, from the newsroom to legal and HR. The push for cost savings comes as Time Inc. laid off around 30 staffers in January 2024 and another 22 last August. Sibley cited industry headwinds at the time for the cuts. In the fall, Time Inc. expects to enable multilingual, personalized AI interactions on the site, such as AI search, chat, and translation. "The acceleration of how consumers are demanding finding ways of personalized content, multimodal content, and with the AI answer results, we wanted to again embrace it and be part of it as opposed to litigate," Sibley said. Time Inc. was purchased from Meredith Corporation in September 2018 by Salesforce (CRM) co-founder Marc Benioff and his wife, Lynne, for $190 million in cash. Sibley began as its CEO in November 2022, joining the magazine from Forbes, where she was COO. Prior to Forbes, she held leadership positions at Condé Nast and Bloomberg BusinessWeek. The publication has also expanded its high-profile events business and modernized its tech stack while continuing with its high-quality journalism. To that end, Time Inc. named Donald Trump "Person of the Year" for 2024 and followed up with a headline-making interview with the president to mark his first 100 days in office. Sibley said in a recent note that Time Inc. is forecasting 24% advertising revenue growth in the first half of the year. Other media players are navigating the tricky balance between negotiating and litigating against AI. Big Tech has been forking over large sums of money for licensing agreements to use publishers' archives to train large language models. The New York Times (NYT) recently inked a multiyear deal to license content to Amazon (AMZN) for AI-related uses, marking its first generative AI contract. The company had sued OpenAI and Microsoft (MSFT) in 2023, alleging the tech companies illegally used millions of its articles to train chatbots. News Corp. (NWS), owner of Wall Street Journal, signed a five-year licensing deal with OpenAI in May 2024 worth a reported $250 million. Reddit (RDDT) is claiming in a new lawsuit that Anthropic scraped its users' personal data without consent, then used it to train its large language model Claude. As this is playing out, Google traffic to publisher websites continues to be pressured as the tech giant leans into its new AI snippets. The byproduct: shrinking news jobs. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that organic search to HuffPost's desktop and mobile websites has plunged by 50% in the past three years. Organic search traffic to Business Insider cratered by 55% between April 2022 and April 2025. Business Insider slashed 21% of its staff in late May, blaming the need to evolve the business model in the age of AI. About 6% of the Los Angeles Times staff was let go in early May, Variety reported. In January, the Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post gave 4% of its staff pink slips. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email

Instagram users complain of mass bans, pointing finger at AI
Instagram users complain of mass bans, pointing finger at AI

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Instagram users complain of mass bans, pointing finger at AI

Instagram users have for weeks complained about a significant increase in accounts being mistakenly banned or suspended. Many suspect, without direct evidence, that the issues may have to do with the use of AI automation. Reached for comment, Meta has so far not offered an on-record statement. According to a growing number of social media posts, including on sites like Reddit and X, Instagram users report that their accounts were banned even though they had not violated the company's terms of service or other policies. In addition, when they submitted an appeal to have their account reviewed, some claimed they received no response. Others pointed out that they have no other way to directly contact a member of Meta's support team, leaving them at a loss for what to do next. 'I've already submitted multiple appeals, uploaded my ID, and tried reaching out to Meta through all the official channels, but I've been completely ignored. It feels like I'm shouting into a void,' wrote one Reddit user (u/Dyrovicious) about having their personal Instagram account banned. (We should note that Meta offers Verified account subscriptions for creators and businesses that offer priority access to customer service.) The Instagram Reddit community's top posts are nearly entirely focused on the ban wave and have been for weeks. On X, users are flooding Instagram's replies with pleas for the company to do something about the account suspensions or, at the very least, acknowledge the problem publicly. A petition about the bans now has over 4,000 signatures. The situation has gotten so tense that some are now threatening to file a class action lawsuit against Meta over the bans. Of course, large internet companies will inevitably encounter a certain number of false positives due to their reliance on automated moderation systems, which occasionally make mistakes. However, an excessive number of bans is something that's become a more recent focus — and one where many immediately suspect AI may be at fault. For instance, Pinterest earlier this year was facing a similar problem with mass bans, which saw users complaining that their actions and posts hadn't violated the company's policies. One group of users had also threatened legal action over the bans at the time. Pinterest in May finally admitted that the mass bans were a mistake caused by an 'internal error,' but wouldn't pinpoint the exact cause. The company claimed that the error was not due to AI moderation, though. In Instagram's case, the issues aren't just affecting personal use of the app but also people's livelihoods, as businesses have been caught up in the mass bans. 'This is my livelihood, my full-time job. I heavily rely on Instagram for leads,' wrote one Reddit user (u/Paigejust) about their suspension. 'This ban has directly affected my business and all of the hard work and branding that I've spent countless hours pouring into my business, my gym, and my students,' a gym owner on Reddit (u/CourtShaw) shared. Without access to internal company data, it's hard from the outside to tell whether recent bans represent an uptick in the number of typical false positives or not. To date, Meta has not publicly acknowledged the issue. In addition, some of the Instagram users affected have reported that they're being falsely banned for serious offenses, including CSE (child sexual exploitation). They pointed out that this is a career and reputation-ruining accusation, leaving them highly concerned. Sign in to access your portfolio

One way a prolonged Israel-Iran conflict could accelerate Fed rate cuts
One way a prolonged Israel-Iran conflict could accelerate Fed rate cuts

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

One way a prolonged Israel-Iran conflict could accelerate Fed rate cuts

A prolonged conflict between Israel and Iran may do more than rattle energy markets. One argument on Wall Street is that it could push the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates sooner than expected. "A sustained rise in oil prices could cause the Fed to strike a more dovish tone," Oxford Economics chief US economist Ryan Sweet wrote in a recent note to clients, arguing that an extended oil shock could dent demand and potentially spill over into an otherwise resilient labor market. That's because historically, sudden spikes in oil prices tend to cause only a temporary rise in inflation that the Fed usually overlooks. But with the economy already softening, a persistent surge could pose a bigger threat to growth and jobs than to inflation itself. "The economy has slowed and is vulnerable to anything else going wrong, including a sudden and persistent increase in oil prices," Sweet said. "If the Fed views the hit to the economy and the labor market as greater than the temporary boost to inflation, the central bank could signal that it's open to cutting interest rates sooner." On Monday, the Wall Street Journal reported that tensions between Iran and Israel had eased, sparking a rally in US equities and stabilizing crude oil prices to around $70 a barrel following last week's biggest price surge in three years. Still, Sweet, whose baseline forecast is that the Fed will deliver its first rate cut in December, noted it may take weeks before markets gain a clearer sense of the direction of oil prices. Read more: How jobs, inflation, and the Fed are all related While the Fed can afford to be patient, Sweet said, "a significant and sustained increase in oil prices could bring forward the rate cut by a meeting because of the damage it will do to the economy, which is harder to fix than waiting out the temporary acceleration in headline inflation." "This is a potential hot topic at a future Federal Open Market Committee meeting, but not next week's," Sweet added, echoing others on Wall Street who firmly believe the Fed will remain on pause for the foreseeable future. That said, the inflationary impact is the other side of the coin. Wall Street analysts have warned that a prolonged conflict and the potential closure of the critical Strait of Hormuz could drive oil prices as high as $130 a barrel, pushing US inflation back toward 6%. This would likely lead to higher gas prices, which have been a key factor in the disinflationary trend over the past several months. According to the latest May CPI report, gas prices have fallen 12% over the past year. The government's energy index declined 1% month over month in the most recent reading. If those trends reverse, economists warn that a sharp inflation surge could delay rate cuts until early 2026 as the central bank balances its dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment. While the Fed tends to focus on inflation metrics that exclude volatile categories like energy, there's concern that higher energy costs could cause ripple effects through the supply chain and result in price increases for other goods and services. "You're looking at a potentially more 'stagflationary' scenario out of that," Bank of America senior US economist Stephen Juneau told Yahoo Finance on Monday. "Of course, this has to persist. We're still at a point where oil prices are relatively low compared to a year ago, so we'll just have to see how things unfold from here. I think it's too early to say." Allie Canal is a Senior Reporter at Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X @allie_canal, LinkedIn, and email her at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store