Simone Biles Fires Back at ‘Sick' Transphobic Comments About Athletes: ‘Make Sports Inclusive'
Simone Biles went toe-to-toe with political activist Riley Gaines after the former competitive swimmer allegedly made comments about transgender athletes playing sports.
OutKick podcaster Gaines, 25, reposted the Minnesota State High School League's Friday, June 6, X upload about winning a softball tournament.
Advertisement
'Comments off lol,' Gaines wrote on Friday. 'To be expected when your star player is a boy.'
In response, Biles, 28, called out the "Gaines for Girls" podcast host for her allegedly transphobic comments.
Simone Biles Explains Why It Was 'Important' to Stand Up for Teammates After MyKayla Skinner Comments
'@Riley_Gaines_ You're truly sick, all of this campaigning because you lost a race. Straight-up sore loser,' Biles wrote later that day. 'You should be uplifting the trans community and perhaps finding a way to make sports inclusive OR creating a new avenue where trans [people] feel safe in sports. Maybe a transgender category IN ALL sports!!'
Advertisement
She added, 'But instead … You bully them … One thing's for sure is no one in sports is safe with you around!!!!!'
Gaines, in response, said that she found the Olympic gymnast's comments to be 'disappointing.'
'It's not my job or the job of any woman to figure out how to include men in our spaces,' Gaines replied. 'You can uplift men stealing championships in women's sports with YOUR platform. Men don't belong in women's sports, and I say that with my full chest.'
Biles fired back, further defending the transgender community.
Simone Biles' Most Honest Quotes About Mental Health and Wellness Through the Years: 'We're Human'
Advertisement
'Bully someone your own size, which would ironically be a male,' Biles wrote, tagging Gaines' account.
In subsequent tweets and comments, Biles continued to advocate for allyship while Gaines doubled down on her perspective. Neither has further addressed their differing points of view.
Biles, for her part, has long been a supporter of the LGBTIA+ community.
'The world we live in makes me sad, but I'd do x1000000 more commercials with you just to piss everyone off,' Biles wrote via X in November 2020, referring to an Uber Eats commercial she did with nonbinary Queer Eye star Jonathan Van Ness. 'The LGBTQIA will always have my support and feel welcome on my socials.'
Advertisement
Biles' former teammates also praised her for advocating for others.
'After Tokyo, I said to [Simone], 'There has to be so many people around the world that were suffering in silence and struggling with their mental health. You have no idea how many of those people you helped,'' retired gymnast Aly Raisman told Sports Illustrated in January. 'She helps people feel less alone.'
In addition to supporting the LGBTQIA+ community, Biles has also shone a spotlight on mental health awareness. In 2020, she withdrew from the Olympic Games over mental health issues about suffering 'the twisties' mid-competition.
"I have to focus on my mental health. I just think mental health is more prevalent in sports right now,' she said at the time. "We have to protect our minds and our bodies and not just go out and do what the world wants us to do.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Schools Can Pay Their Athletes—and College Sports Will Never Be the Same
College sports are dying, college sports are dead, college sports aren't about college anymore—it's Christmas in June for anyone feeling apocalyptic about the state of college sports, now that a settlement has been approved allowing schools to directly pay their athletes. This isn't a salary, technically. This is compensation from schools to athletes for use of their 'name, image, likeness,' but it's not a measly NIL like a burly offensive lineman getting all the bratwurst he can eat. This is a real paycheck, directly from the college. It's really happening—for Division I schools that have opted in. It's set to start July 1. 'A new beginning,' NCAA boss Charlie Baker called it. Is it going to work? Will it cannonball Olympic and nonrevenue sports? How does it square with Title IX? Will it withstand legal challenges? Will it all fall apart? I have no idea! Neither does anyone else! Hold on to your helmets, everyone. We're all jumping off the diving board together. (I will now pause 90 seconds for you to climb the ladder and jump off the diving board with the rest of us.) The settlement of this class action—House vs. NCAA, in which current and former athletes sought name, image and likeness opportunities and a share of athletic department revenue—had been in the works for a while. On Friday, a federal judge signed off on the $2.6 billion settlement, which includes back pay to litigants but also creates a revenue-sharing system 'in which each Division I school will be able to distribute roughly $20 million a year to their athletes,' the Journal reported. That's right. Colleges can chop up $20 million and split it among their jocks. It will take some getting used to. Naturally, the revenue sharing is already provoking some to bemoan the demise of 'amateurism' and the college sports landscape. But schools have to be oblivious to not see who's to blame: They are! College sports did this to itself. The NCAA and its member schools set professionalization into motion with decades of arrogance and denial about the bountiful but warped economy they built around the games we love to watch. When college sports started chasing every dollar as a market-driven business—and frankly, there's a case that college sports has always been a business—paying athletes became inevitable. The bigger the money got, the harder the system was to defend. When college sports started indulging in the $10 million dollar coach, the billion-dollar television deal, the megabuck locker rooms and the assistant to the assistant strength coach making more than a surgeon, the hypocrisy was easy to see. Everyone was making a buck, except the talent on the field. It's why the Supreme Court more or less reacted to the NCAA's claims of amateur status with the following: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Public opinion shifted, too. A decade ago, I'd write about proposals to pay athletes and I could hear the jeering a mile away. Boooooooo! That's not what college sports are about, man! Eventually, those big-dollar media deals, private jets and Pop-Tart Bowls caught up with college sports. It was hard to argue there was anything amateurish about it anymore. Now schools will have to figure it out for themselves. I mean that literally: schools and conferences are navigating a new wilderness in which they are permitted to directly compensate athletes—but without a precedent or a clear road map. Yikes. We do know a few things: The bulk of those $20 million allotments are expected to go to high-revenue sports like football and men's basketball—that's where the money's coming from, after all. Other beneficiaries may be growing sports like women's basketball and softball. The settlement also attempts to inject some calm into the craziness around name, image and likeness. The revenue sharing payments will come from the schools, and third party NIL deals over $600 will be subject to review by 'NIL Go,' an oversight group overseen by Deloitte. The idea here is to put outside NIL deals under a microscope—find out what player deals are legitimate arrangements, and what are booster largesses masquerading as NIL. Good luck! Enforcement will be a headache. So will the invariable league challenges. Defenders of the settlement maintain it shouldn't be entangled with Title IX protections against gender discrimination. Already there are parties who want to argue. Also unknown is the impact on nonrevenue Olympic sports. Do schools start eliminating or rolling back certain sports because they're not big contributors to the bottom line? Possible! We'll see. The new setup isn't free of denial, either. While colleges are now entitled to pay athletes, the system still resists the idea that athletes are employees. Good luck with that, too. There will likely be challenges to the revenue sharing system—is the proportion of revenue (22 percent) given to athletes a fair amount, or should it be renegotiated? Is it tantamount to a salary cap? It's hard to not see this heading in the direction of classifying athletes as employees, and eventually, collective bargaining. If you're lying down on a couch right now with a bag of ice on your head, I understand. It's a lot. It's confusing. Imagine being an athletic director in 2025. No job has changed more. A new day is here. It might not be the apocalypse, but college sports will never be the same. Write to Jason Gay at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Post your questions for Emma Hayes
Emma Hayes has won a lot: seven league titles with Chelsea, five FA Cups and two League Cups – as well as the Olympic gold medal she secured last year in Paris with the USA women's team. She has hit heights that few football managers can even imagine. So, what do you want to know? Maybe you have questions about her younger years growing up in north London, when she played for Arsenal? Or perhaps you would like to know about her time studying Spanish and sociology in Liverpool, or her master's in intelligence and international affairs. Did she really want to be a spy – and has she used any of those espionage skills in her career, like Marcelo Bielsa? What about the upcoming Euros, how will England cope without Mary Earps, Mille Bright and Fran Kirby? And who will win it? Advertisement Then there are her days coaching in the US, before her unprecedented run of trophies at Chelsea. And what about her current role, perhaps the most high-profile job in the women's game? Callout If you're having trouble using the form click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
U.S. Olympic hockey: Projecting the men's First 6, stock watch on the rest of the roster
Bill Guerin has been preaching for years that it's incumbent on more American NHL players to participate in the World Championship if they're not playing in the postseason. Historically, it's been tough for USA Hockey to convince players after the grind of an 82-game season, plus the start of the playoffs for some, to suit up in red, white and blue. Advertisement Guerin was general manager of the U.S. 4 Nations Face-Off team that lost to Canada in overtime 3 ½ months ago and is GM for the upcoming Winter Olympics in Milan. His day job is managing the Minnesota Wild, and even in his season postmortem with Wild beat writers, he made an impassioned argument for players to go annually to worlds. 'When are we going to win that tournament?' the three-time Olympian said. 'We need to win that tournament soon. We need our best players, though. Sidney Crosby and Nathan MacKinnon are going. That should say something. Our team is good this year and we have a lot of good players going. I hope it's not just because it's an Olympic year. I get it. It is an Olympic year. But we need this more consistently from our players to go over and play and try to win that tournament.' Now, Guerin was talking a little out of both sides of his mouth. Obviously, he wanted the Americans to win the worlds. But last March, Guerin publicly — and no-so subtly — made it clear that if U.S. players blew off worlds, it could be remembered when he and his staff picked this past February's 4 Nations Face-Off roster. So clearly when it comes to picking next year's Olympic team, some American players heard the U.S. boss loud and clear, because this year's World Championship roster featured just two players who took part in the 4 Nations — Jeremy Swayman, who didn't play a game, and Zach Werenski — and a slew of Olympic hopefuls, including Tage Thompson, Clayton Keller, Alex Vlasic and Logan Cooley. The result? The Americans won their first gold medal since 1933 with the Buffalo Sabres' Thompson, a 4 Nations snub, scoring the Golden Goal in overtime. Good bet Thompson is now firmly on the radar to be an Olympian, as are others who didn't make the 4 Nations roster. 'Tage impressed me. Clayton Keller impressed me. A lot of guys did,' Guerin, who technically wasn't on the management team for worlds, told The Athletic. 'They just played really freaking well. They played like a team. Like when I was over there, you could feel that there was something good going on there. You could feel the guys had really come together.' Advertisement Olympic rosters don't have to be submitted until Dec. 31 for the Feb. 11 to 22 tournament. In late August, the United States is expected to hold an Olympic orientation camp in Plymouth, Mich. Guerin and his staff plan to invite up to 45 Olympic hopefuls. The worlds and the strong performances by some complicated the process, so the United States brass will again be keeping close tabs next season on which players get out of the gate strong and potentially earn themselves a roster spot, especially if some who made the 4 Nations roster sustain early-season injuries or struggle. 'It's a good problem to have,' Guerin said of having so many top-notch candidates. 'But it's not just that. It's the importance of the World Championships and the pride that we have to have in it and having more players go. Yes, it's an Olympic year. I'm glad I got a chance to see the guys play. But on top of that, it's making sure that we are putting a premium on that tournament. 'It was unbelievable. It was awesome to see us win. And on top of that, some guys really helped themselves potentially make the Olympic team.' Next week, as early as Monday, the first six players for each Olympic team will be revealed. Last June, the first six Americans named to the 4 Nations Face-Off were forwards Auston Matthews, Matthew Tkachuk and Jack Eichel, and defensemen Quinn Hughes, Charlie McAvoy and Adam Fox. Who will make it this time? Our projection has five of the six again chosen next week. Auston Matthews: The U.S. captain led the NHL in goals in three of the past five seasons for the Toronto Maple Leafs and won the Hart Trophy in 2022. Matthew Tkachuk: Tkachuk was a heart-and-soul guy in the 4 Nations before sustaining a significant injury that he tried to play through in the championship game. The Florida Panthers right wing won a Stanley Cup in 2024 and is vying for another. Advertisement Jack Eichel: One of the top two-way centers in the NHL won a Stanley Cup with the Vegas Golden Knights in 2023. Quinn Hughes: The 2024 Norris Trophy winner and Vancouver Canucks captain had to bow out of the 4 Nations because of an injury, but the superstar defenseman is an Olympic lock. Charlie McAvoy: The Boston Bruins' top defenseman was having a terrific 4 Nations until he sustained a shoulder injury and then missed the rest of the tournament with an infection. He'd ultimately miss the rest of the season for Boston, but he's a shoo-in. Brady Tkachuk: Like his brother, Brady also got hurt in the tournament, but he may have been the United States' best player in terms of energy, physicality and big goals, tying Jake Guentzel for the team lead. Couple that with a tough tournament by defenseman Adam Fox that likely no longer makes the New York Rangers former Norris Trophy winner an Olympic lock, and there's just no way that there aren't two Tkachuks in the first six. In the Olympics, each team can have 25-player rosters, meaning the U.S. will likely have one extra forward and one extra defenseman. Up front, it's likely Chris Kreider is out after a tough 4 Nations and season with the Rangers. The same could be true for Brock Nelson, although coaches love his ability to win draws and kill penalties. That's also what makes right-shot center Vincent Trocheck valuable. It'll be interesting to see what happens with Kyle Connor, who started the tournament on the first line, was almost instantly demoted to the fourth line and scratched in the championship. He had one assist in three games. Here's betting the ginormous and versatile Thompson makes the team. From there, the U.S. will be watching a number of forwards next year. Keller would offer speed and offense and somebody who's exceptional from the right circle on the power play, but the Americans also have Jack Hughes, who was not very good in the 4 Nations, with one assist in four games, as well as Matt Boldy and Connor. They are all similar, and you probably don't want too many of the same style. Advertisement Other non-4 Nations forwards who could be invited to Plymouth include Cooley, Frank Nazar (who was outstanding at worlds with six goals and 12 points in 10 games), Jason Robertson, Alex Tuch, Bryan Rust, Patrick Kane, Conor Garland, Shane Pinto, Matty Beniers and Cole Caufield, who was conspicuous in his absence at worlds. The Americans could also invite youngsters such as Cutter Gauthier, Will Smith, Isaac Howard and Ryan Leonard. The U.S. was essentially a shot away from winning 4 Nations before Connor McDavid ruined its hopes. Could that change the roster construction? 'Look, we could say we're going to take the same team, but we don't know what's going to happen with injuries or guys not playing well at that time or what,' Guerin said. 'We've got to go through the process again. But the Canada-U.S. games, they weren't high scoring, but they were high-checking, and you've gotta be able to play that type of hockey. 'We're not gonna play Canada every night. So we're gonna have to be able to play a lot of different ways. The roster that we had has the ability to score goals. But the good thing is that we had the ability to check as well.' McAvoy, Hughes, Werenski, Jaccob Slavin, Brock Faber and Jake Sanderson are almost surely locks. That leaves two spots. Fox likely will have to play himself on the team at this point. He struggled mightily with the pace of the tournament and made multiple mistakes leading to McDavid's winning goal. But his new Rangers coach, Mike Sullivan, will coach the Olympic team, and his GM, Chris Drury, is part of the U.S. management group. So perhaps that will help. Noah Hanifin is also likely on the bubble. Who could pass Fox and Hanifin by? Vlasic has a real shot if he gets off to a good start with Chicago. Neal Pionk had a great season with the Winnipeg Jets. The Panthers' Seth Jones has been superb in the playoffs. And then there's Calder Trophy winner Lane Hutson, who also didn't go to worlds, and youngster Zeev Buium, who didn't play a lot at worlds but scored one of the biggest goals in the tournament. Advertisement Other potentials include K'Andre Miller, Jackson LaCombe, Ryan McDonagh, Brady Skjei and Luke Hughes. The U.S. will likely return with the same goaltending cast of Connor Hellebuyck, Jake Oettinger and Swayman. Who gets the nod will be determined closer to the tournament, but even though Hellebuyck is coming off his third consecutive subpar postseason with the Jets, he was great in the 4 Nations and likely has the inside track. Oettinger started one meaningless game in the 4 Nations and played well, but lost. And even though his postseason with Dallas started terrifically, it sure ended poorly with him getting chased after allowing two early goals to the Edmonton Oilers in an elimination game during the Western Conference final. Swayman had a rough 2024-25 season after arriving late to the Bruins following a contract dispute, but if he has a solid start next season, his World Championship performance (1.69 goals-against average and .921 save percentage in seven games) could, shall we say, sway things. (Top photo of Matthew and Brady Tkachuk: Maddie Meyer / Getty Images)
