Nintendo Switch 2 launches straight into Trump's trade war
Barely had Nintendo announced the pre-order date and price point of the hotly awaited new handheld console when the US president slapped tariffs on China and Vietnam, among others, prompting the Japanese gaming giant to immediately suspend US pre-orders of the Switch 2.
Today, Nintendo invited Sky News to be a part of the first group of journalists in the UK to try the console, and get to grips with a product that is fast becoming a totemic casualty of the global trade war.
It was already a challenging market for the successor to the third best-selling console of all time, the original Switch, which has sold more than 150 million units.
When the Switch first launched in 2017 it had next to no rivals - that landscape now looks very different.
Valve Corporation's Steam Deck, whose release was also anything but smooth thanks to supply chain issues caused by Taiwanese semiconductor shortages, has gained considerable market share.
Its ability to play most Windows-based games, of which there are many more than for the Switch, and the option to use it in desktop mode - essentially turning it into a handheld PC - made it appealing to consumers looking for a more powerful, versatile unit.
To make matters worse, few could have expected the extent to which Mr Trump would sanction countries in the Asia Pacific region.
China, a significant manufacturing base for the Switch 2, is now subject to 145% American trade tariffs. Vietnamese imports were due to be taxed at 46%, however these were paused for 90 days by Mr Trump following turbulence in the financial markets.
Nintendo announced pre-orders in the US would open on the 9 April, with the console costing $449.99 (£395.99 for shoppers in the UK).
However, before even a single American order could be placed, pre-orders were indefinitely suspended following sweeping tariffs imposed on east Asian countries by the US on the 4 April. UK consumers are still able to place pre-orders.
The delay could well come with further changes for gamers, said Gareth Sutcliffe, Head of Gaming at consultancy Enders Analysis.
"The other significant impact is the tariff consequences on Nintendo's physical game sales, given they are all produced in Japan, and whether they can be imported as a finished game or as a component."
He foresees the upset in global trade potentially leading to unprecedented prices for gaming hardware, saying: "The price points for consoles overall could hasten the decline of this generation of consoles if you suddenly have price points nearing the $1,000 (£764) mark."
Nintendo's rivals, Xbox and PlayStation, are not insulated from the trade war because their supply chains also run predominantly through east Asia.
Nintendo are hoping to sell 10 million units this year - whether they succeed, may well depend on the whims of the President of the United States of America.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Harsh reality behind Colbert's 'cancellation' as DNC spokesperson
The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission served a brutal dose of reality to Stephen Colbert (pictured) fans 'wailing' over the loss of the liberal comedian's show. Brendan Carr explained how the drama over Colbert's Late Show cancellation was nothing more than political theater - and the actual motive was just dollars and cents. On Thursday, CBS announced that the comedian's decade-long run as the host of CBS' late night flagship will end next May. The sudden move s parked immediate backlash from left-wing celebrities and politicians, who claim the decision was strictly politically-motivated. The cancellation was revealed two days after Colbert used the term 'big fat bribe' to describe Paramount's $16million settlement with President Trump. Paramount, which owns CBS, decided to settle on the lawsuit over deceptive editing of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. The entire affair came amid a pending merger between CBS parent company Paramount and Skydance - a deal still awaiting regulatory approval under the oversight of the Trump administration. CBS - long known as the 'Tiffany Network' - insisted that canceling Colbert's show was 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night.' 'It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount,' it added. Though the program regularly topped its timeslot on network TV, it reportedly hemorrhaged $40 million a year in revenue - a staggering loss that ultimately proved unsustainable. However, the network instantly faced widespread accusations, including from US senators, of cancelling Colbert for political reasons, particularly given the timing following his vocal criticism of Trump. 'Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late night host, slams the deal, days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO,' Bernie Sanders wrote to X. Actress Jamie Lee Curtis added her voice to the backlash, telling the Associated Press : 'They just cut NPR and, you know, public broadcasting. Yes, they're trying to silence people, but that won't work. It won't work. We will just get louder.' Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to X : 'CBS canceled Colbert's show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump – a deal that looks like bribery. America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons,' she added. 'If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better,' California Senator Adam Schiff (pictured) wrote to X. Jon Stewart, Colbert's former Comedy Central colleague, also weighed in on the controversy during Monday's episode of The Daily Show, questioning the network's decision to cancel the program. 'Watching Stephen exceed all expectations in the role and become the number one late-night show on network television has been an undeniable great pleasure for me as a viewer and as his friend, and now Stephen has been canceled for "purely financial reasons," Stewart said. Colbert ultimately gained a reputation as one of Trump's fiercest critics, departing from the traditional late-night in favor of a more overtly partisan approach. Following the announcement of The Late Show's cancellation, President Trump took to Truth Social on Friday to gloat over the news in a celebratory post. 'I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings,' he wrote. Colbert, who briefly addressed the move Friday, devoted much of his Monday show to the controversy, eventually uniting with almost every other liberal late-night talk show host in a show of support, as well as Adam Sandler and even Lin-Manuel Miranda. The 61-year-old comic opened after a standing ovation and a lengthy applause from the New York City crowd by saying 'cancel culture has gone too far' and then joked now that the show is ending, he can say whatever he feels. Colbert said sarcastically of Paramount: 'They made one mistake, they left me alive! For the next ten months, the gloves are off!' The Late Show host then referenced Trump's comments, turning to an 'Eloquence Cam' and said: 'How dare you, sir? Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism? Go [expletive] yourself.' He then referenced Trump stating in the same Truth Social post: 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next.' Colbert replied: 'Nope, no, no. Absolutely not. Kimmel, I am the martyr. There's only room for one on this cross. And the view is fantastic from up here. I can see your house!' He also said that cancellation meant he could finally admit what he felt about the president. In contrast to his often over-the-top anti-Trump monologues, he dryly, quietly said: 'I don't care for him. Doesn't seem to have the skill set to be president. Just not a good fit, that's all.' Colbert also referenced a story from The New York Post saying the show lost $40-$50million last year, though some have suggested its as high as $100million. 'I could see us losing $24 million but where would Paramount have possibly spent the other $16 million, oh...' he quipped, naming the amount the company settled with Trump for over his 60 Minutes lawsuit. He then went back to bashing Trump and the recent news accusing him of writing a 'bawdy' letter to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday. 'I'll have more to say about all this after the commercial break. The only other story is a small one... the president is buddies with a [expletive],' he said. In a follow-up post on X, Carr chimed in again, taking aim at the comedian and slamming him for his reaction to the cancellation. 'I'm surprised to learn that CBS didn't find this stuff profitable,' he wrote.
Leader Live
4 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Japanese PM Shigeru Ishiba denies reports of resignation amid pressure
Mr Ishiba has been under growing pressure to step down as his ruling Liberal Democratic Party and its junior coalition partner, Komeito, lost their majority in the 248-member upper house, the smaller and less powerful of Japan's two-chamber parliament on Sunday, shaking his grip on power and Japan's political stability. The loss means Mr Ishiba's ruling coalition, which also lost a majority in the more powerful lower house in October, now lacks a majority in both houses of parliament, making it even more difficult for his government to achieve any policy goals and worsening Japan's political instability. Mr Ishiba had announced his intention to stay on to tackle pressing challenges, including tariff talks with the US, without creating a political vacuum, sparking calls from inside and outside his own party for a quick resignation to respond to the election results. With the tariff deal with the US paving the way for his possible departure, Japanese media said he is expected to soon announce plans to step down in August. The Yomiuri newspaper, in an extra edition on Wednesday, said Mr Ishiba had decided to announce his resignation by the end of July after receiving a detailed report from his chief trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, paving the way for a party leadership vote to choose his successor. Mr Ishiba denied the report and said he wants to focus on the US trade deal, which covers more than 4,000 goods affecting many Japanese producers and industries. The Prime Minister, who met party heavyweights and former prime ministers Taro Aso, Fumio Kishida and Yoshihide Suga on Wednesday at party headquarters, told reporters afterwards that they did not discuss his resignation or a new party leadership contest. They only discussed the election results, shared the sense of crisis and confirmed the need to avoid party discord, he said. Mr Ishiba welcomed the trade agreement on Wednesday, which places a 15% tax on Japanese cars and other goods imported into the US from Japan, down from the initial 25%. He said it was a product of tough negotiations to protect the national interest and that it would help benefit both sides as they work together to create more jobs and investment. But Mr Ishiba declined to comment on his possible move and only told reporters that he has to closely examine the trade deal first. In Sunday's election, voters frustrated with price increases exceeding the pace of wage hikes, especially younger people who have long felt ignored by the ruling government's focus on senior voters, rapidly turned to emerging conservative and right-wing populist parties, like the Democratic Party for the People and Sanseito. None of the opposition parties have shown interest in forming a full-fledged alliance with the governing coalition but they have said they are open to cooperating on policy.
Leader Live
4 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Tech minister Kyle vows action on children's ‘compulsive' use of social media
Peter Kyle said he wanted to tackle 'compulsive behaviour' and ministers are reportedly considering a two-hour limit, with curfews also under discussion. The Cabinet minister said he would be making an announcement about his plans for under-16s 'in the near future'. He told Sky News: 'I am looking very carefully about the overall time kids spend on these apps. 'I think some parents feel a bit disempowered about how to actually make their kids healthier online. 'I think some kids feel that sometimes there is so much compulsive behaviour with interaction with the apps they need some help just to take control of their online lives and those are things I'm looking at really carefully.' Sky reported that a two-hour cap per platform is being considered, while night-time or school-time curfews have also been discussed. Mr Kyle said: 'We talk a lot about a healthy childhood offline. We need to do the same online. 'I think sleep is very important, to be able to focus on studying is very important.' He said he wanted to 'tip the balance' in favour of parents so they were 'not always being the ones who are just ripping phones out of the kids' hands'. Mr Kyle also said it was 'total madness' that some adults were able to use apps or gaming platforms to contact children online. He said 'many of the apps or the companies have taken action to restrict contacts that adults, particularly strangers, have with children, but we need to go further'. 'At the moment, I think the balance is tipped slightly in the wrong direction. 'Parents don't feel they have the skills, the tools or the ability to really have a grip on the childhood experience online, how much time, what they're seeing, they don't feel that kids are protected from unhealthy activity or content when they are online.' 🔒 Children in the UK will lead safer online lives as we've finalised safety measures for sites and apps to introduce from July. Tech firms must act to prevent children from seeing harmful content, and meet their duties under the Online Safety Act. ➡️ Swipe to read more. — Ofcom (@Ofcom) April 24, 2025 A series of already-announced measures to protect children will come into effect from Friday. The codes of practice set out by Ofcom include requiring firms to ensure that any algorithms used to recommend content on their platforms must be configured to filter out harmful content from children's feeds. In addition, the riskiest platforms, such as those hosting pornography, must have effective age checks to identify which users are children. The checks could be done using facial age estimation technology, asking users to provide photo-ID for verification or a credit card check.
