Watch: How prosecutors went after Diddy in his sex trafficking trial
From a hotel video to baby oil – the BBC's Nada Tawfik breaks down the evidence and testimony heard on the stand so far.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'I'm concerned there's someone out there - there are a lot of missing cats'
A cat owner says she has been left terrified after two of her pets were shot with an air rifle. Leigh Rollison became concerned when she noticed rescue Candy began 'acting really odd'. She then noticed a small wound and took the animal to vet Sinéad Bennett, who recognised the type of injury from a previous case. It was then confirmed there was a pellet lodged in Candy's body, millimetres from the spine. Fortunately, the nine-month-old is recovering. Insurance worker Leigh, 40, said she saw a similar wound on two-year-old pet Molly. Another X-ray confirmed the presence of an air rifle pellet. Leigh, from Winton, Salford said: "I don't understand it. I thought the first one might be a child in the garden by accident. "I wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt, but I really am concerned now there's someone out there. There's a lot of missing cats around my area, I'm worried they're the unlucky ones. "We found our nine-month-old rescue kitten Candy in the morning and she was acting really odd. That pellet had gone to within millimetres of her spine, she was very nearly paralysed. She probably wouldn't have been able to get home. "Molly was probably hit first but she didn't show any signs because she's tough as old boots." Leigh, who has seven rescue cats, added: "I'm frightened... we don't know how to keep them safe. "What if someone has got a cat and they don't realise it's a pellet wound? We don't know who's doing this." Vet Sinéad said: "It's unthinkable that someone could deliberately harm such gentle and well-cared-for animals. We're deeply shocked but grateful we were able to help. The cats' owners are truly devoted and attentive people. These cats are their family.' MCR Vets sai in a statement: "In a previous case seen by Sinéad a few years ago, a cat that had been shot went missing for seven days before its devastated owners found it collapsed under a hedge. "The pellet had ruptured its intestines, causing widespread damage. By the time the cat was brought in, much of the bowel was no longer salvageable. "The surgery was extensive and life-saving, but the outcome could have been tragically different. Without intervention, the cat would have endured a slow and extremely painful death." The incidents have been reported to Greater Manchester Police. The Manchester Evening News has contacted the force for comment.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tennis player association files new complaint against ATP, WTA Tours, removes star complaints
The Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA) has submitted an updated complaint in its antitrust lawsuit against tennis' governing bodies. The organization, which was co-founded by Novak Djokovic in 2020, has taken out critiques of the tour schedule from players who are not named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit, including French Open champions Coco Gauff and Carlos Alcaraz. Advertisement It has also removed two defendants from a group it characterized as a 'cartel' in its initial action, which was filed in London, New York City and Brussels. The International Tennis Federation is off the suit filed in New York City, as is the tennis anti-doping and anti-corruption body, the International Tennis Integrity Agency. A source briefed on the PTPA's legal proceedings, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect relationships in tennis, said that the ITF and the ITIA had been removed to focus on the alleged antitrust violations by the men's (ATP) and women's (WTA) tennis tours. The PTPA filed its initial lawsuit in March. That filing described the biggest governing bodies in tennis as a 'cartel,' which suppresses wages, player opportunity and rival tournaments 'to the harm of players and fans alike.' The PTPA alleged numerous antitrust violations, all of which have been denied by the accused governing bodies, who last month filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit. The men's and women's tours argue that their bylaws require players to settle disputes through arbitration, rather than in court. In May, they and the ITF and ITIA filed a joint motion to dismiss the PTPA as a plaintiff, on the grounds that it cannot orchestrate such an action because it does not have a formal membership. A judge has yet to rule on that motion. Advertisement The original lawsuit listed 12 player plaintiffs, including co-founder Vasek Pospisil, and Reilly Opelka and Sorana Cirstea, who are active players. Djokovic was not a named plaintiff. There are now 14, with the addition of Sachia Vickery and Nicolas Zanellato, though there are still no top-tier stars among the named complainants, giving the impression, rightly or wrongly, that the PTPA's lawsuit does not have the support of most of the most powerful voices in the game. A spokesperson for the PTPA said at the time that more than 250 professional players across all tiers of the sport, as well as the organization's executive committee, which includes Djokovic, supported the action. Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, Djokovic said in a news conference at the Miami Open: 'To be quite frank with you, there are things that I agree with in the lawsuit and there are also things that I don't agree with. 'I found that maybe some wording was quite strong in there.' Advertisement The updated complaint, filed in New York Tuesday evening, has changed some wording. The original was written with the kind of confrontational language that is typical of U.S. lawsuits, with the four Grand Slams — Wimbledon and the Australian, French and U.S. Opens — described as 'co-conspirators' alongside the defendants' alleged 'cartel'. Some of that language is still there, including in the opening salvo: 'Professional tennis players are stuck in a rigged game. Not on the court, where fierce competition between players delights millions of fans worldwide, but off of it, where players are forced to endure grueling schedules, capped earnings, abusive and invasive investigations and discipline, and have limited control over their own careers and brands. This is because a cartel of professional tennis tour organizers and tournament operators have conspired to avoid competition amongst themselves and to shut out outside tournaments, affording them complete control over the players' pay and working conditions.' The four Grand Slams will not be named as defendants for at least another 90 days, amid settlement discussions between them and the PTPA, according to a filing lodged this week. Advertisement The updated complaint focuses more closely on alleged violations of antitrust law by the two tours, while countering the arguments that they have made to convince the court to dismiss the case. It also focuses more heavily on the governance structures of the tours, outlining how the players are not equal partners in the operations, as the tours' leaders have claimed. The original, which included reference to complaints by Alcaraz, Gauff and five-time Grand Slam champion Iga Świątek, has omitted those complaints. It had used quotes from those players in news conferences and interviews in which they criticized how tennis is scheduled. Since the initial complaint was filed, a group of top-10 ranked male and female players has held meetings with the four Grand Slams to discuss an increased proportion of their revenues being shared with players as prize money. This is one of the goals of the PTPA lawsuit, and the PTPA has also held meetings with leaders of the Grand Slams. In the past, those leaders have expressed a desire to restructure tennis, creating a streamlined event calendar that revolves around their events and the 1,000-level ATP and WTA events, which are one rung below their tournaments. The discussions between the Grand Slams and PTPA aim to develop a framework for a new structure for professional tennis. That structure would then be circulated to the ATP, WTA, and ITF for their input. The Grand Slams and other governing bodies, however, have been doing this dance since last year, when the Grand Slams presented the tours with a plan for a so-called 'premium tour,' with fewer events and a pooling of their lucrative media rights. Advertisement That plan never went beyond discussions, and earlier this year, the ATP and WTA presented the Grand Slams with their own plan to reform tennis, which the Grand Slams rejected out of hand. The PTPA believes that the spectre of lengthy and expensive antitrust litigation will create more urgency for change. Thus far, this has not been the case. While their complaints have been eliminated from the formal PTPA complaint, top players on the ATP and WTA Tours remain in discussions about the schedule and revenue sharing in their sport. To achieve a high ranking, players typically need to participate in around 20 tournaments each year worldwide. The top players, who regularly go deep in those tournaments, have said that they don't receive necessary rest and that the sport's roughly four-week off-season is far too short. They are also subject to financial penalties and other punishments if they skip mandatory tournaments. Advertisement The players — and the PTPA — also want the Grand Slams and ATP and WTA tournaments to share a higher proportion of revenue with players. They could offer to share more than the roughly 20 percent of their revenues with players by significantly increasing prize money. Major American sports leagues, such as the NBA and NFL, share approximately 50 percent of their revenues with players. Grand Slam prize money typically amounts to between 13 and 18 percent of each tournament's annual revenue, while for ATP and WTA events, that figure rises closer to 25 or 30 percent. The courts will next address the defendants' motions to dismiss the case or to move it to arbitration. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. Sports Business, Tennis, Women's Tennis 2025 The Athletic Media Company
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
Tennis player association files new complaint against ATP, WTA Tours, removes star complaints
The Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA) has submitted an updated complaint in its antitrust lawsuit against tennis' governing bodies. The organization, which was co-founded by Novak Djokovic in 2020, has taken out critiques of the tour schedule from players who are not named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit, including French Open champions Coco Gauff and Carlos Alcaraz. Advertisement It has also removed two defendants from a group it characterized as a 'cartel' in its initial action, which was filed in London, New York City and Brussels. The International Tennis Federation is off the suit filed in New York City, as is the tennis anti-doping and anti-corruption body, the International Tennis Integrity Agency. A source briefed on the PTPA's legal proceedings, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect relationships in tennis, said that the ITF and the ITIA had been removed to focus on the alleged antitrust violations by the men's (ATP) and women's (WTA) tennis tours. The PTPA filed its initial lawsuit in March. That filing described the biggest governing bodies in tennis as a 'cartel,' which suppresses wages, player opportunity and rival tournaments 'to the harm of players and fans alike.' The PTPA alleged numerous antitrust violations, all of which have been denied by the accused governing bodies, who last month filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit. The men's and women's tours argue that their bylaws require players to settle disputes through arbitration, rather than in court. In May, they and the ITF and ITIA filed a joint motion to dismiss the PTPA as a plaintiff, on the grounds that it cannot orchestrate such an action because it does not have a formal membership. A judge has yet to rule on that motion. The original lawsuit listed 12 player plaintiffs, including co-founder Vasek Pospisil, and Reilly Opelka and Sorana Cirstea, who are active players. Djokovic was not a named plaintiff. There are now 14, with the addition of Sachia Vickery and Nicolas Zanellato, though there are still no top-tier stars among the named complainants, giving the impression, rightly or wrongly, that the PTPA's lawsuit does not have the support of most of the most powerful voices in the game. Advertisement A spokesperson for the PTPA said at the time that more than 250 professional players across all tiers of the sport, as well as the organization's executive committee, which includes Djokovic, supported the action. Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, Djokovic said in a news conference at the Miami Open: 'To be quite frank with you, there are things that I agree with in the lawsuit and there are also things that I don't agree with. 'I found that maybe some wording was quite strong in there.' The updated complaint, filed in New York Tuesday evening, has changed some wording. The original was written with the kind of confrontational language that is typical of U.S. lawsuits, with the four Grand Slams — Wimbledon and the Australian, French and U.S. Opens — described as 'co-conspirators' alongside the defendants' alleged 'cartel'. Some of that language is still there, including in the opening salvo: 'Professional tennis players are stuck in a rigged game. Not on the court, where fierce competition between players delights millions of fans worldwide, but off of it, where players are forced to endure grueling schedules, capped earnings, abusive and invasive investigations and discipline, and have limited control over their own careers and brands. This is because a cartel of professional tennis tour organizers and tournament operators have conspired to avoid competition amongst themselves and to shut out outside tournaments, affording them complete control over the players' pay and working conditions.' The four Grand Slams will not be named as defendants for at least another 90 days, amid settlement discussions between them and the PTPA, according to a filing lodged this week. The updated complaint focuses more closely on alleged violations of antitrust law by the two tours, while countering the arguments that they have made to convince the court to dismiss the case. It also focuses more heavily on the governance structures of the tours, outlining how the players are not equal partners in the operations, as the tours' leaders have claimed. The original, which included reference to complaints by Alcaraz, Gauff and five-time Grand Slam champion Iga Świątek, has omitted those complaints. It had used quotes from those players in news conferences and interviews in which they criticized how tennis is scheduled. Since the initial complaint was filed, a group of top-10 ranked male and female players has held meetings with the four Grand Slams to discuss an increased proportion of their revenues being shared with players as prize money. Advertisement This is one of the goals of the PTPA lawsuit, and the PTPA has also held meetings with leaders of the Grand Slams. In the past, those leaders have expressed a desire to restructure tennis, creating a streamlined event calendar that revolves around their events and the 1,000-level ATP and WTA events, which are one rung below their tournaments. The discussions between the Grand Slams and PTPA aim to develop a framework for a new structure for professional tennis. That structure would then be circulated to the ATP, WTA, and ITF for their input. The Grand Slams and other governing bodies, however, have been doing this dance since last year, when the Grand Slams presented the tours with a plan for a so-called 'premium tour,' with fewer events and a pooling of their lucrative media rights. That plan never went beyond discussions, and earlier this year, the ATP and WTA presented the Grand Slams with their own plan to reform tennis, which the Grand Slams rejected out of hand. The PTPA believes that the spectre of lengthy and expensive antitrust litigation will create more urgency for change. Thus far, this has not been the case. While their complaints have been eliminated from the formal PTPA complaint, top players on the ATP and WTA Tours remain in discussions about the schedule and revenue sharing in their sport. To achieve a high ranking, players typically need to participate in around 20 tournaments each year worldwide. The top players, who regularly go deep in those tournaments, have said that they don't receive necessary rest and that the sport's roughly four-week off-season is far too short. They are also subject to financial penalties and other punishments if they skip mandatory tournaments. The players — and the PTPA — also want the Grand Slams and ATP and WTA tournaments to share a higher proportion of revenue with players. They could offer to share more than the roughly 20 percent of their revenues with players by significantly increasing prize money. Advertisement Major American sports leagues, such as the NBA and NFL, share approximately 50 percent of their revenues with players. Grand Slam prize money typically amounts to between 13 and 18 percent of each tournament's annual revenue, while for ATP and WTA events, that figure rises closer to 25 or 30 percent. The courts will next address the defendants' motions to dismiss the case or to move it to arbitration.
