China's overcapacity crackdown faces litmus test in solar sector
Under the plan, devised by industry players in the presence of Chinese regulators, big producers will pool 50 billion yuan (S$8.9 billion) to buy out the least efficient facilities and shut them down, then form a cartel to halt relentless price wars.
Ideally, when prices rise, the loss-making producers will turn profitable and reimburse the debt incurred in the process. Reduced output and higher polysilicon costs would force solar panel makers – which can produce roughly twice as much annually as the world buys and have been a source of trade tensions between China and the West – to consolidate.
But analysts see risks at every stage of this plan.
First, it is unclear if the industry can agree who's in or who's out of the cartel.
GCL Technology Holdings, one of the biggest producers, said earlier this month cartel planning was close to wrapping up but declined to provide details of the other participants.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Banks – whose incentive to finance this acquisition is to ensure that what they rate as a 'safe' sector doesn't turn to 'risky' – would likely be involved in the process, said Dan Wang, China director at Eurasia Group.
Analysts warn local authorities, who have strived to fulfil Beijing's strategic green energy vision by handing out subsidies, tax breaks and cheap land to the sector, may not want the solar supply chains on their turf to shut.
'Which local government is going to let go of their industry first?' said Max Zenglein, senior economist for the Asia-Pacific at The Conference Board research group. 'They're going to be very cautious.'
Finally, even if the cartel does form, any success creates the conditions for failure: after prices climb, members might be tempted to raise output and reap the profits.
Reformers face all these risks despite the industry having fewer players and fewer supply chain inputs than most other sectors in the world's second-largest economy, where overcapacity is endemic and deflationary, and threatens trade relations and long-term growth.
'Success is hardly a foregone conclusion,' Gavekal Dragonomics analysts Tilly Zhang and Wei He said in a note.
If the overcapacity crackdown 'fails to get traction in polysilicon, it will struggle in the many other industries' where the government has less capacity to foster swift changes, they said.
GCL's peer Tongwei declined to comment. Polysilicon producers Daqo New Energy and TBEA did not respond to requests for comment.
The solar and metals industry associations, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC)- China's state planner – and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology also did not respond to requests for comment.
Is everyone game?
Over the past five years, the top four Chinese manufacturers alone built about two-thirds of the industry's capacity, which stood at 3.25 million tonnes at the end of 2024, according to Bernreuter Research, a consultancy.
In 2025, Bernreuter anticipates an average utilisation of 35 per cent-40 per cent, down from 57 per cent last year.
Morningstar estimates about 965,000 tonnes of polysilicon capacity was built or is still under construction this year, citing the China Photovoltaic Industry Association.
Past attempts to get the solar industry to self-regulate have failed. Last October, the solar industry body proposed a price floor for solar modules, but the temptation for manufacturers to undercut competitors proved too enticing.
The NDRC called for a ban on new production in an online meeting in February.
Still, Karamay, a city in the northwestern region of Xinjiang announced a three billion yuan solar module manufacturing plant as recently as May, Chinese media reported. The Xinjiang energy regulator did not respond to phone calls from Reuters.
A new 140,000-ton polysilicon manufacturing plant in Qinghai, a major provincial investor, also started test operations in March, according to a trade media report. The energy regulator for northwestern China, which includes Qinghai, did not respond to a faxed request for comment.
Pain threshold
In the event that the polysilicon cartel overcomes industry and local government opposition, it can raise prices to levels that the least competitive firms in the downstream solar panels sector cannot afford, forcing their exit, analysts say.
'Unless I see a lot of defaults all of a sudden really shrinking the size of the industry, I don't see how this is going to work,' said Alicia Garcia-Herrrero, Asia-Pacific chief economist at Natixis.
She said that would test the Chinese leadership's tolerance for a bloodbath in an industry that it had championed as a national priority.
The case for protecting strategic priorities also applies to other sectors, from electric vehicles and batteries to shipbuilding, all with supply chains much more complex than solar.
'It's very easy to build capacity to burn money, but then to scale it down and direct that in a healthy manner is much more difficult,' said The Conference Board's Zenglein. REUTERS

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
US seeks Intel stake without governance rights: Lutnick
[WASHINGTON] Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed discussions between the US and Intel for the government to take a stake in the chipmaker, casting the plan as a bid to convert Chips and Science Act grants into equity. Lutnick on Tuesday (Aug 19) said the plan would not give the US governance or voting rights in the company, even though it could make the federal government Intel's largest shareholder. He assailed the chips law signed by former President Joe Biden for giving semiconductor manufacturers subsidies without any return for US taxpayers. 'It's not governance, we're just converting what was a grant under Biden into equity,' Lutnick said in a CNBC interview. 'Non-voting.' Bloomberg News previously reported that the Trump administration has discussed taking about 10 per cent of the beleaguered chipmaker, as SoftBank Group announced a surprise bet on Intel's revival by agreeing to acquire a US$2 billion stake in the company. Intel rose as much as 11 per cent in New York trading on Tuesday, while SoftBank fell 4 per cent in Tokyo. 'Why are we giving a company worth US$100 billion this kind of money? What is in it for the American taxpayer? And the answer Donald Trump has is we should get an equity stake for our money,' Lutnick said. 'So we'll deliver the money which was already committed under the Biden administration, we'll get equity in return for it.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The discussions underway with Intel would mark a sea change in US policy towards semiconductors. The arrangement, if finalised, could potentially lay the groundwork for similar agreements with other chipmakers. 'Imagine this: the Biden administration was literally giving Intel – for free, and giving TSMC money for free and all these companies just giving them money for free,' Lutnick said, referring to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, another major chipmaker. 'Donald Trump turns that into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money,'' the secretary continued. 'How could that not be smarter, better and more important for the American taxpayer than just free money?' Lutnick said the US wants to reshore some chipmaking for national security purposes. 'We need to make our own chips here. We cannot rely on Taiwan,' he said. At the same time, Lutnick did not rule out allowing Nvidia to sell a new artificial intelligence chip it is developing for the Chinese market. Reuters reported the semiconductor would be based on its Blackwell architecture and more powerful than the H20 model it's currently allowed to export there. 'Of course, he would like to sell a new chip to China,' Lutnick said, referring to Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang. 'I've listened to him pitch the president, and the president listens to our great technology companies, and he'll decide how he wants to play.' Trump last week signalled he was open to allowing Nvidia to sell a scaled-back version of its Blackwell model to China. The administration hammered out an unusual deal with Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices to pay the government 15 per cent of revenue tied to Chinese chip sales. BLOOMBERG

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
US targets steel, copper, lithium imports under Uighur forced labour law
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: A view shows the U.S. Department of Homeland Security signage in New York City, U.S., July 21, 2025. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon/File Photo WASHINGTON - The Trump administration on Tuesday said it was targeting more imports of Chinese goods, including steel, copper and lithium, for high-priority enforcement over alleged human-rights abuses involving the Uighurs. The Department of Homeland Security, in a post on X, said it was also designating caustic soda and red dates for high-priority enforcement under the Uighur Forced Labour Prevention Act. "The use of slave labour is repulsive and we will hold Chinese companies accountable for abuses and eliminate threats its forced labor practices pose to our prosperity," US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said separately on X. The Uighur-related law restricts the import of goods tied to what the US describes as China's human-rights abuses and ongoing genocide in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region. US authorities say Chinese authorities have established internment camps for Uighurs and other religious and ethnic minority groups in China's western Xinjiang region. Beijing has denied any abuses. REUTERS
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Trump says Putin may not want to make a deal on Ukraine
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday (Aug 19) he hoped Russia's Vladimir Putin would move forward on ending the war in Ukraine, but conceded that the Kremlin leader may not want to make a deal at all, adding this would create a 'rough situation' for Putin. In an interview with the Fox News Fox & Friends programme, Trump said he expected that Putin's course of action would become clear in the next couple of weeks. Trump also again ruled out American boots on the ground in Ukraine and gave no specifics about the security guarantees he has previously said Washington could offer Kyiv under any post-war settlement. 'I don't think it's going to be a problem (reaching a peace deal), to be honest with you. I think Putin is tired of it. I think they're all tired of it, but you never know,' Trump said. 'We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks… It's possible that he doesn't want to make a deal,' said Trump, who has previously threatened more sanctions on Russia and nations that buy its oil if Putin does not make peace. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by Trump's promise of security guarantees to help end the war during an extraordinary summit on Monday, but face many unanswered questions, including how willing Russia will be to play ball. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky hailed Monday's talks at the White House with the US president as a 'major step forward' towards ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and towards setting up a trilateral meeting with Putin and Trump in the coming weeks. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Zelensky was flanked by the leaders of allies including Germany, France and Britain at the summit, and his warm rapport with Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous Oval Office meeting in February. But beyond the optics, the path to peace remains deeply uncertain, and Zelensky may be forced to make painful compromises to end the war, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Analysts say more than one million people have been killed or wounded in the conflict. While the Washington talks allowed for a temporary sense of relief in Kyiv, there was no let-up in the fighting. Russia launched 270 drones and 10 missiles in an overnight attack on Ukraine, the Ukrainian air force said, the largest this month. The energy ministry said Russia had targeted energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine's only oil refinery, causing big fires. 'The good news is that there was no blow-up (at the White House). Trump didn't demand Ukrainian capitulation nor cut off support. The mood music was positive and the transatlantic alliance lives on,' John Foreman, a former British defence attache to Kyiv and Moscow, told Reuters. 'On the downside, there is a great deal of uncertainty about the nature of security guarantees and what exactly the US has in mind.' Ukraine's allies were to hold talks in the so-called 'Coalition of the Willing' format on Tuesday to discuss the way forward. Nato chiefs of defence will also discuss security guarantees for Ukraine on Tuesday, a source close to the matter said, without mentioning further details. Russia has made no explicit commitment to a meeting between Putin and Zelensky. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday that Moscow did not reject any formats for discussing the peace process in Ukraine but any meeting of national leaders 'must be prepared with utmost thoroughness'. 'It doesn't smell like peace yet. I think Putin will not go for it, he is not that kind of person,' said a 63-year-old resident of Kyiv, Oksana Melnyk. 'I really wanted it all to end peacefully, but, unfortunately, a lot of our people died, and it is very bitter.' Putin has warned that Russia will not tolerate troops from the Nato alliance on Ukrainian soil. He has also shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, following his summit talks with Trump last Friday in Alaska. Trump has not specified what form any US security guarantees could take. In Alaska, he backed away from insisting that Russia agree to a ceasefire before any peace negotiations kick off in earnest. Neil Melvin, international security director at the Royal United Services Institute think tank, said Russia could drag out the war while trying to deflect US pressure with a protracted peace negotiation. 'I think behind this there's a struggle going on between Ukraine and the Europeans on one side, and the Russians on the other, not to present themselves to Trump as the obstacle to his peace process,' he said. 'They're all tiptoeing around Trump' to avoid any blame, he continued, adding that on security guarantees, 'the problem is that what Trump has said is so vague it's very hard to take it seriously'. REUTERS