Brisbane woman sentenced to prison for importing illegal cacti and plants in fake lingerie packages
Kirsten Mae Fearn pleaded guilty to 14 biosecurity charges at Brisbane magistrates court in July after she repeatedly imported illegal plants to sell online.
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry officers discovered the scheme after packages arrived in Sydney via air cargo from Hong Kong between February 2021 and March 2024.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
The packages were declared to contain lingerie and shoes but when they were opened, biosecurity officers found 57 cacti and succulents.
Investigators then found another 50 illegal succulents at Fearn's Brisbane home nursery.
The deputy secretary of Biosecurity, Operations and Compliance, Justine Saunders, said Fearn was repeatedly warned about the behaviour but she continued the illegal activity.
'The department elected to deal with this via criminal prosecution because of the seriousness of the matter,' Saunders said.
'Our biosecurity laws are vital to the health of Australia's economy and environment.
'Those who risk Australia's environment by deliberately trying to bypass our strict requirements will be caught and face the consequences.'
During court proceedings, Fearn admitted to the ongoing illegal false declarations and importation of the plants, which she intended to sell online through her business.
She faced a maximum penalty of 10 years' jail and a $600,000 fine.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
After pleading guilty on 25 July, Fearn was sentenced to six months' imprisonment but she was released immediately on a recognisance release order, meaning she was required to agree to certain court conditions.
Saunders said this should serve as a warning to others who import biosecurity threats.
'Australia has an enviable biosecurity record,' she said.
'We protect this through education and targeted regulation. We all need to play our part in keeping Australia safe.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
One third of Queensland public servants have witnessed corruption and over half didn't report it, watchdog finds
A third of Queensland public servants say they have witnessed corruption in their workplace in the last five years, according to a survey by the state's anti-corruption watchdog. However, the state's Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) investigated fewer than 1% of complaints referred to it, and has only charged a single person with a corruption offence in a year, it revealed in parliament this week. The survey, which included 5,957 state government public servants, 928 employees of local councils and 114 employees of the police service, was conducted between March and May. About 55% of public sector employees reported they had either witnessed or potentially witnessed corruption in the past five years. Of 31% who believed they had witnessed corruption, '55% did not report it', the survey found. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The primary reasons those who said they would not report corruption gave were: fear of retribution, reprisals and concerns about confidentiality, safety, and privacy. 'I don't have faith that the complaint would be investigated confidentially, fairly or thoroughly,' one anonymous survey respondent said. The report quotes another saying: 'Because I will be identified to the parties that you are complaining about and the repercussions are I will lose my job. Seen it time and time again.' According to documents tabled in parliament this week, the CCC assessed 5,567 corruption matters in the 2024-25 financial year and retained 33. Of the matters, 3,700 were referred back to the 'unit of public administration' they were made about, and 1,834 were dropped. One person was charged with one corruption offence during that period, it reported. The continued practice of referring complaints back to the departments they were made against comes years after a landmark inquiry recommended it be ended entirely for police. The landmark November 2022 Call for Change inquiry into the Queensland police's response to domestic and family violence heard evidence of repeated failure by the integrity oversight system. It recommended creating a police integrity unit within the CCC 'within 18 months'. The body would be responsible for investigating all complaints about the police. The deadline was missed last year, under Labor. In July 2024 the CCC chair, Bruce Barbour, told parliament there had not been any progress on the 'urgent' recommendation 'in any meaningful way'. The new LNP government has not committed to implementing the reform and has repeatedly refused to answer questions about progress. Of public servants surveyed by the CCC, 41% reported they had not witnessed corruption in the past five years. Others weren't sure if witnessed behaviour constituted corruption. Of public sector employees, 90% agreed corruption happened in Queensland, with 65% agreeing that it was a problem in Queensland. 'Only two in five employees (40%) agree they would feel comfortable if their complaint was investigated by their workplace,' the CCC report stated. The survey was tabled in Queensland parliament in July.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Bruce Lehrmann's own lawyer calls him a 'national joke', 'the most damaged man in Australia' and 'probably Australia's most hated man' in astonishing list of insults about her own client
Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann is fighting to quash a civil finding he likely raped colleague Brittany Higgins, which led him to become 'probably Australia's most hated man'. The former federal political staffer is appealing his defamation loss against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson over an interview with Higgins on The Project in 2021. Justice Michael Lee found Higgins' claims she had been raped in parliament house in 2019 were substantially true in a ruling against Lehrmann in April 2024. But Lehrmann, 29, claims the judgment was rife with errors which will be ventilated during a three-day appeal hearing that got underway Wednesday. He arrived at the Sydney courthouse more than an hour before the hearing, wearing his trademark rectangular glasses and navy suit, carrying a brown briefcase. His lawyer Zali Burrows told the panel of judges that Justice Lee's serious ruling resulted in Lehrmann probably being 'the most damaged man in Australia'. Media attention, aggravated by commentary from Channel Ten and Wilkinson, had led to a flood of hateful social media comments aimed at Lehrmann, she said. 'He's pretty much become a national joke,' Ms Burrows said. 'He's probably Australia's most hated man.' The ex-Liberal staffer alleges he was denied procedural fairness because the events found by the judge were 'starkly different' from the case run by Ten. 'The primary judge found that the rape occurred in a particular way that wasn't put to Mr Lehrmann in evidence and he was taken by surprise as to the nature of the rape,' Ms Burrows said. Lehrmann was accused of committing a violent rape but Justice Lee found it was a 'non-violent' rape. 'I'm not sure that's a concept I understand,' Justice Craig Colvin said when questioning whether that had been the finding. Ms Burrows noted the judge had not been satisfied about a number of the violent elements argued by Ten, including that Lehrmann had held open Higgins' legs or pinned her to the sofa. She said there had been 'a really unfair denial of natural justice' because her client was not questioned on the details of rape found by the judge on the balance of probabilities. But Justice Michael Wigney noted Lehrmann had denied the sexual intercourse took place, so quizzing him on additional factors would have been fruitless. 'This is not a different case. This is a case where much of what was identified was found,' he said. The trial judge found Lehrmann had been so 'hell-bent' on having sex with Higgins that he was reckless as to whether or not she was consenting. But Justice Lee's definition of rape has been criticised by Lehrmann, who claims it is inconsistent with the meaning conveyed to an ordinary person. Ms Burrows asked the court to reassess the finding that Lehrmann would only be entitled to $20,000 in damages, if he was found to be defamed. She said it was inadequate and a much higher figure was needed to address the reputational damage of the very serious imputations of what she has dubbed a false charge of rape. Lehrmann continues to deny he sexually assaulted Higgins and a criminal case in 2022 was abandoned without any findings against him. 'Having escaped the lions' den, Mr Lehrmann made the mistake of going back for his hat,' Justice Lee said in his decision in 2024.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
University of Melbourne breached students' privacy by using wifi network to monitor pro-Palestine protest
The University of Melbourne (UoM) breached Victoria's Privacy and Data Protection Act when it used its wifi network to surveil students and staff holding a pro-Palestine protest last May, which could have resulted in a 'significant breach of trust', the state's deputy information commissioner has found. The investigation, released on Wednesday, was prompted by media reports alleging UoM digitally tracked people at the sit-in to uncover potential misconduct. The deputy commissioner found the university used a combination of wifi location data, student card photographs and CCTV footage to identify 22 students who failed to comply with orders to leave the university's Arts West building on 20 May. The investigation found the university did not give adequate notice or justification for how the data would be used. Sign up: AU Breaking News email It took less than a day for the university to authorise the use of data for surveillance purposes and only 'superficial' consideration was given to privacy protection, the report found. The UoM used analysis of wifi location data, CCTV footage, and a review of 10 staff members' email accounts to identify staff involved in the protest, the report found. As a result, three staff members received formal written warnings. Misconduct proceedings were brought against 20 of the students, with 19 receiving a 'reprimand and caution'. The deputy commissioner found the UoM had not contravened information privacy principles (IPPs) in the state's Privacy and Data Protection Act with its CCTV footage use. But it found the UoM had breached two IPPs by failing to adequately inform students and staff about how their personal information had been used, and because using wifi location data to identify individuals in a misconduct investigation was an unauthorised reason. It also found that the university's accessing of staff email accounts for disciplinary proceedings 'fell below the standard' expected. 'The university failed to obtain a social licence for the use of this technology,' the report found. 'Because the collection and use of the data involved the surveillance of students and staff, and surveillance by its nature is antithetical to human rights, the breach was serious.' The deputy commissioner did not issue a compliance notice because of the remedial steps taken by the UoM during the investigation, including developing a new surveillance policy and amending its terms of use and associated policies. The chief operating officer of the UoM, Katerina Kapobassis, said the university acknowledged it could have provided 'clearer active notice' to students and staff about its use of wifi location data. 'However, we maintain that the use of Wi-Fi location data in student misconduct cases was reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances, given the overriding need to keep our community safe and conduct our core activities of teaching, learning and research,' she said. 'The university takes its privacy obligations seriously and has cooperated openly and responsively to the deputy commissioner in the conduct of her investigation. 'The university has already completed a number of actions that are proposed in the final report, and all others are progressing.' The investigation also found the university's wifi terms of use, IT policies and privacy statements were 'poorly presented, contained misleading headings and titles, and contained information that made the purpose of collection and use unclear'. 'The extent of the impact on the individuals whose Wi-Fi location data was used to determine their physical whereabouts was significant,' the report found. 'Each was subjected to a form of surveillance … They are likely to have experienced a significant breach of trust. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The deputy commissioner remains concerned by the university's practices … and will continue to seek evidence and assurance that it has completed the actions it has agreed to.' The Unimelb for Palestine group welcomed the investigation's findings, which it said exposed the 'deep structural failures in how the university governs data, communicates … and respects fundamental human rights'. The group said it found the decision not to issue a compliance notice 'deeply disappointing'. 'The report does not undo the harm the university has inflicted – through both its past mishandling of misconduct proceedings against Mahmoud's Hall [Arts West] protesters, and its ongoing efforts to expel and suspend other student protesters based on unauthorised and unlawfully obtained data,' the group said. 'So-called liberal institutions – including the UoM - have acted exceptionally to suppress solidarity with Palestine amidst a genocide.' In April, the Human Rights Law Centre, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International wrote to the UoM's vice chancellor, citing serious concerns over its wifi policy, which they said permitted the surveillance of all users without suspicion of wrongdoing or misuse of the network. Principal lawyer Berndaette Zaydan is appealing the suspensions and expulsions of UoM student protestors and said she would use the findings to strengthen their legal fight. The UoM branch president of the National Tertiary Education Union, David Gonzalez, said the deputy commissioner had reinforced what staff had been saying 'all along', that 'they were misusing this information, and it was wrong'. 'There was never an expectation that we would be tracked using Wi-Fi previously,' Gonzalez, who sat in on disciplinary proceedings with staff as a result of the protest, said. 'A large amount of my members are very concerned with their privacy. This is validating for a lot of people who felt gaslit … It's just an erosion of trust.'
