Jittery markets await Fed as Middle East conflict rages on
Concerns over escalating hostilities in the Middle East stayed front and centre in markets on Wednesday, sending oil prices higher and leaving investors hesitant to scoop up risk assets.
Investors have grown increasingly nervous over the possibility of more direct US military involvement as the Israel-Iran air war entered a sixth day, with US president Donald Trump calling for Iran's unconditional surrender and warning US patience was wearing thin.
'Clearly the Middle East issues have not been solved, and comments by president Trump just mean that things could get more dangerous in that part of the world,' said Joseph Capurso, head of international and sustainable economics at Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA).
'The markets are trying to figure out that risk of a big US military intervention. It's hard to say exactly what the market is thinking, but judging by the oil price and currencies, they're certainly pricing in at least some risk that something goes very bad there.'
READ MORE
Oil prices extended their climb on Wednesday, with Brent crude futures up 0.3 per cent to $76.67 per barrel while US crude rose 0.43 per cent to $75.16 a barrel. Both had jumped more than 4 per cent in the previous session.
While the broad risk-off moves across markets from earlier in the week abated slightly, the overall mood remained downbeat.
MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan fell 0.3 per cent as did Eurostoxx 50 futures, which declined 0.34 per cent.
Dax futures similarly slid 0.54 per cent, while Ftse futures edged 0.06 per cent higher.
S&P 500 futures added 0.12 per cent while Nasdaq futures tacked on 0.17 per cent, after the cash session on Wall Street ended in the red on Tuesday.
In currencies, the dollar held to most of its gains against its peers.
The euro struggled to recover from its 0.7 per cent fall on Tuesday and last bought $1.1501. Sterling edged 0.12 per cent higher to $1.3443, having slid 1.1 per cent in the previous session.
The dollar fell 0.2 per cent to 144.98 yen, after rising to a one-week top against the Japanese currency earlier in the session.
The spike in oil prices is a negative for the yen and euro at the margin as both Japan and the EU are major importers of energy, while the United States is an exporter.
'The war has demonstrated that the US dollar still retains a bit of haven status in certain situations, such as when the war is seen to raise the risk of disrupting global oil supply, and when the war diverts traders' attention away from those risks that are US-centric,' said Thierry Wizman, global FX and rates strategist at Macquarie Group.
The conflict in the Middle East, combined with prolonged uncertainty over Trump's tariffs and signs of fragility in the US economy, make for a challenging backdrop ahead of the Federal Reserve's policy decision later on Wednesday.
US retail sales fell by a larger-than-expected 0.9 per cent in May, data showed on Tuesday, marking the biggest drop in four months.
Expectations are for the Fed to stand pat on rates, though focus will also be on the central bank's updated projections for the economy and the benchmark interest rate.
'We do not anticipate much novelty from the Fed,' said Erik Weisman, chief economist at MFS Investment Management.
'The only area of interest may come from the new set of forecasts under the summary of economic projections, which may point to slightly slower growth, combined with slightly higher inflation.'
US Treasury yields were steady in Asia after falling on Tuesday, as investors poured into the safe-haven bonds in the wake of latest developments in the Israel-Iran conflict. Bond yields move inversely to prices.
The benchmark 10-year yield was last at 4.4067 per cent, having fallen roughly 6 basis points in the previous session. The two-year yield stood at 3.9582 per cent.
Elsewhere, spot gold rose 0.13 per cent to $3,392.61 an ounce. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
I was given a promotion at work but it was rescinded before I started - and that's the second time
Q: Recently, I applied for a role internally that would lead to significant financial and senior progression in my career . The company offered the role and presented the terms and I accepted the offer. A month after I was due to start my new role, they told me that the offer had been cancelled due to a hiring freeze. The approach to HR and internal promotions is appalling. There has been no clarification and the impact on my work and personal life is significant as it's not the first time I had an offer rescinded by my company. Is there anything I can do? READ MORE The rescinding of an offer of a promotion would be rare, but the rescinding of two offers of promotion would be almost unheard of, according to experts in human resources and recruitment. Such an act can lead to a breach of trust but may also constitute a breach of contract, according to Michelle Halloran , independent HR consultant and workplace investigator, of Halloran HR Resolutions. 'You can't just go around offering people a promotion, confirm the promotion and then change your mind,' she says, adding that such a move can cause a lack of confidence among employees in their employer. 'It's very bad for their reputation, because nobody knows where they stand,' she says, describing the actions of the employer as outlined by the reader as 'very poor practice.' 'It's very difficult to see how a relationship of mutual trust can be built or maintained if this kind of U-turn keeps happening because as an employee, you just don't know where you stand,' she says. Halloran, who has never heard of a hiring freeze affecting a promotion offered and agreed, says legal advice could be sought and correspondence could potentially be sent to the employer concerning the rescinding of the promotion, arguing a breach of contract. However, given the 'adversarial' nature of taking such a move, 'it depends on how much the job matters to them', she says. 'They might not be happy if the reader does that, but especially if this is the second time they've done it, if it were me, I would absolutely not accept that. 'If you've been offered a promotion with a new salary and this has been agreed and they've then rescinded it, I think that is a breach of contract and I would object to it in the strongest terms, particularly if it's not the first time it's happened. 'On a personal note, I would be asking myself if this is the organisation I really want to work for,' she says. Although Lisa Holt , group managing director at Cpl Recruitment, has heard of companies postponing promotions due to internal organisational changes or challenges, it would typically happen before any promotion process takes place. 'If it happens afterwards, it is a very challenging situation to manage and to navigate,' she says. Holt advises contacting the HR department and raising concerns about the experience to date concerning promotions being rescinded. 'As this has happened twice I feel this candidate needs an opportunity to sit down opposite HR and find out the background and reasoning to the decision and give them the opportunity to air their disappointment,' she says. Noting that it would be 'very unusual' for an employer to withdraw a promotion offer without just reason and an explanation, Holt notes that companies do not have hiring freezes without good reason. 'Post-Covid-19, we heard of a lot of hiring freezes due to companies wanting to rightsize their business, or sometimes when it is coming up to budget time they will put a freeze in place so they have a chance to look at their organisation structure, stand back and consider their future hiring plans,' she says. Still, the reader's experience as described, in which they have had promotions rescinded twice is almost unheard of. 'It is not something we would come across at all, to be honest, and it is very strange that it happened twice,' Holt says. Sign up for push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date Listen to our Inside Politics podcast for the best political chat and analysis
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish SMEs braced for costs to rise amid ongoing trade uncertainty
Nearly three quarters of Irish SMEs are bracing for costs to rise amid global trade uncertainty, while one in three businesses expect their imports and exports to fall, new research predicts. The research based on a study of 300 senior finance decision makers at SMEs in Ireland found that sentiment among Irish SMEs has taken a hit since the onset of tariffs, with 40% of firms reporting a deterioration in business confidence. The trading sentiment tracker by global financial services firm Ebury reported that 72% of SMEs expect their business costs to increase in the next 12 months as a consequence of US tariffs, with these businesses predicting an average 22% uptick in costs. Only 16% of exporting firms expected exports to increase, while just 13% expected imports to grow. When asked what the biggest fears were, the SMEs pointed to tariffs and trade barriers (31%), currency fluctuations (23%), geopolitical risks (23%), supply chain disruptions (19%), and increased operational costs (18%). 'Our data shows that global trade tensions are clearly weighing on sentiment and trading activity. Despite a recent deescalation in the trade war, many SMEs remain uneasy, not just about tariffs but also the wider volatility in currency markets and heightened geopolitical tension,' said Ebury head of dealing in Ireland, Robert Purdue. Since the announcement of tariffs, SMEs have responded in different ways with nearly a fifth (18%) of those surveyed diversifying trading partners, 16% changing suppliers, 15% shouldering additional costs while 12% have frozen hiring and 9% have laid off staff. However, over a quarter (26%) say they haven't taken any steps since the announcement, despite the uncertainty and the expectation of greater costs. US president Donald Trump has threatened to impose 50% tariffs on imports from the EU if an agreement is not reached by July 9. On Tuesday, Mr Trump said the EU are "either going to make a good deal or they'll just pay whatever we say they have to pay" as negotiations continue. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said the talks were "complex but we are advancing". The EU's total exports to the United States last year totalled about €500bn, with Ireland exporting €72bn.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Amazon boss says AI will mean fewer ‘corporate' jobs
Amazon has told its white collar employees that their jobs are at risk from artificial intelligence in the next few years, marking a rare explicit warning from a senior tech executive that AI will lead to lay-offs. Andy Jassy , the ecommerce giant's chief executive, told employees in a memo on Tuesday that the company was deploying AI across its operations, particularly in its logistics network, to help lower costs. He said the company wants to increase its use of AI, which would mean job losses. 'We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs,' Mr Jassy said. 'It's hard to know exactly where this nets out over time but in the next few years we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce.' READ MORE The memo comes as Amazon and other Big Tech groups are under pressure from investors to show they can deliver efficiencies from their vast investment in AI. The company also faces a threat to its business from Donald Trump's volatile trade policy. Amazon's shares are down about 2.5 per cent this year. The Seattle-based conglomerate has committed to invest roughly $100 billion (€87 billion) in the current fiscal year, with the bulk directed towards AI infrastructure. Amazon is racing against rivals Google and Microsoft to take a lead in the AI boom and power its fast-growing profit engine, Amazon Web Services. Mr Jassy last year said the company was striving to 'eliminate bureaucracy' and would pursue a flatter structure with fewer middle management. The group eliminated 27,000 roles in two big rounds of job cuts in 2023, while Amazon Web Services slashed hundreds of roles in 2024. Technology company bosses have been reluctant to publicly espouse the view that AI will lead to job cuts, preferring to emphasise the increases in efficiency that these models offer. Microsoft cut 3 per cent of its global workforce in May. Job losses at its headquarters in Washington state disproportionately affected software engineers, according to state filings. Chief executive Satya Nadella has touted AI's ability to replace humans in writing code. 'I'd say maybe 20 per cent, 30 per cent of the code that is inside of our repos today and some of our projects are probably all written by software,' Mr Nadella told Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg in April. Microsoft maintained the cuts were not precipitated by AI. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
