‘A bit artificial': Shock unemployment figure exposes cracks in Australia's migration-fuelled NDIS jobs boom
The unemployment rate rose to a four-year high of 4.3 per cent last month, beating market expectations of 4.1 per cent, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) figures released on Thursday which showed there were an additional 33,600 people looking for work — the highest level since the pandemic in late 2021.
The shock jobless figure, which sent the Aussie dollar into free fall and raised market expectations of an August rate cut by the RBA to near certainty, came on the heels of fresh data showing a record number of arrivals in May despite the Albanese government's pledge to curb migration to 'sustainable' levels.
There were 33,230 net permanent and long-term arrivals in May, surpassing the previous record of 31,310 in 2023 by 6 per cent.
In the year to May there were 245,890 net permanent and long-term arrivals, also the highest on record, while the 12-month rolling number of 447,620 was the second highest on record after 482,450 in the 12 months to May 2024.
The Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), a conservative think tank, estimates that if current trends continue the number could reach 598,000 by the end of the calendar year.
'With Australia's unemployment rate trending up since December last year, yesterday's rise highlights some fundamental weaknesses in Australia's economy and jobs market — chief among them is Australia's worker shortage crisis,' said IPA research fellow Saxon Davidson.
'The simultaneous rise in unemployment and worker shortages shows how far out of alignment the Albanese government's labour and migration policies are. The federal government has fundamentally mismanaged the labour market. Despite allowing record levels of migration, Australians are not seeing the benefits of this in terms of per capita economic and overall productivity growth.'
Mr Davidson said it was 'unconscionable that in a time of rising unemployment the Albanese government continues to flood the Australian labour market with record numbers of migrants competing for jobs'.
'The latest ABS data shows that Australia's worker shortage crisis is 42 per cent higher than pre-pandemic levels, increasing by 2.9 per cent in May 2025 to 339,400,' he said.
'Job vacancies have been over 300,000 for four years straight. What the latest unemployment rate rise shows us is that we need to cut tax and red tape barriers to allow more Australians to get into work so businesses can grow to their full potential, as well as returning Australia's migration program back to a sustainable level.'
'It's a bit artificial'
AMP chief economist Shane Oliver agreed that immigration was a 'double-edged sword'.
'On the one hand it creates demand which is good, but on the other it also increases supply of workers,' he said. 'If underlying conditions in the economy are weak as they have been for the last few years, you have to generate a lot of jobs [to keep pace].'
Growth in the civilian working-age population has eased from a peak of 3 per cent in 2023, at the height of Australia's post-Covid immigration surge, to around 2 per cent, or about 29,000 per month — still well above the historical norm of 1.5 per cent.
'If you've got your working-age population growing at 29,000 per month and the participation rate at 67 per cent, that means every month you've got to create about 19,000 jobs,' Dr Oliver said.
'We seemed to be able to do that quite easily until a year ago because we were generating a lot of jobs in the care economy. The immigration situation was manageable because we were creating all these jobs in health and aged care, NDIS.'
Experts have previously warned that Australia's taxpayer-funded jobs boom, largely driven by the explosion in the NDIS, has masked weakness in the private sector jobs market.
Last year, 80 per cent of all new jobs created were either in the public service or taxpayer-funded 'non-market' sectors like healthcare and education.
'All of that surge in immigration was being absorbed into the workforce but going into the public sector or non-market jobs, whereas private sector employment growth was quite weak,' Dr Oliver said, noting growth in non-market sector jobs was now starting to soften.
'It's a bit artificial in a way, if you regard private sector jobs as more real. You're absorbing a lot of workers into the public sector, it may have a way to go as there is demand for some of those services, but unfortunately it can be detracting from overall growth in the economy. A lot of the jobs they were going into were also relatively low-productivity jobs.'
'Plainly unsustainable'
Australia has seen both declining GDP per capita and declining productivity — measured as GDP divided by hours worked — in recent years.
'They tend to go hand-in-hand,' Dr Oliver said.
'If you increase the supply of labour which is what we've done dramatically in the last few years, it can have the effect of depressing productivity. So what's happened is we've pumped a lot of people into the economy, that's pushed up employment numbers to some degree but also pushed up hours worked, but we haven't seen the commensurate rise in GDP.'
Innes Willox, chief executive of the Australian Industry Group, said the June labour market data 'points to the impact that our weak private sector is having on the labour market'.
'For over a year, there has been negligible jobs growth in the private market sector, with government-supported employment in the public and non-market sectors doing the heavy lifting,' he said in a statement on Thursday.
'During 2024, approximately four in five new jobs created in Australia were in these government-supported sectors. As the Australian Industry Group has been warning since the start of this year, this level of dependence on the taxpayer for job creation is plainly unsustainable.'
Mr Willox said with the private sector accounting for two-thirds of employment in Australia, 'it was inevitable that its sustained weakness would eventually spill over to the broader labour market'.
'It appears this problem is now coming home to roost,' he said.
'It is therefore imperative that government takes immediate action to return the private sector labour market to health. There is much that can be done — on tax, energy, regulatory burden, industrial relations and more — to provide better policy settings for private sector investment and jobs creation.'
He added, 'We look forward to working with the Treasurer through the upcoming Economic Reform Roundtable in August to build a package of sensible reforms that can restart private sector growth.'
August rate cut looms
Dr Oliver said strong population growth had 'artificially kept up demand' in the economy, which had contributed to inflation pressures and forced the RBA to keep interest rates 'higher than they would have been' even as growth in the underlying economy and private sector was weak.
'Arguably the jobs figures are starting to expose that,' he said.
The RBA surprised markets last month when it decided to keep the official cash rate on hold at 3.85 per cent. Money markets and experts had been widely predicting a rate cut due to weaker-than-expected economic data.
After the latest unemployment figures, money markets are now pricing in an August rate cut at 100 per cent as of Friday morning.
'It should be a lock,' Dr Oliver said. 'You've got inflation figures [still to come], there's always a risk [it surprises on the upside] and the RBA could say we've got to hold.'
In its official statement last month, the RBA board said while inflation was falling, it wanted to wait for a 'little more information' before moving on rates.
RBA governor Michelle Bullock said the board had opted to reconsider cutting in August after full quarterly inflation figures were released.
AMP is forecasting inflation will come in at 2.6 per cent or slightly below.
'I'm not going to put a number on if it comes in at 2.6 will cut or if it comes in at 2.7 we won't,' Ms Bullock previously told NCA NewsWire.
'What we'll be doing is we'll be looking at it in the context of where the forecast think it is leading us.'
ANZ's Brian Martin and Daniel Hynes said in a note on Friday that the 'soft' June labour force data were pointing to a 25 basis point cut next month.
'The small increase in overall employment, the decline in hours worked and the increase in the unemployment rate (the latter to a new high for this cycle, albeit after some extraordinary stability) are all consistent signals,' they wrote.
'Within the details, it appears the group rotating into the labour force sample had a higher propensity for being unemployed than the group it replaced, which helps explain the jump in unemployment. That is, there is both statistical noise and signal in the survey.'
Aussie dollar crashes
A number of commentators have now suggested the RBA got it wrong last month.
'The July post-meeting statement described the labour market as 'strong', although given today's results, we would expect the RBA to note an easing in labour market tightness in the June quarter,' Mr Martin and Mr Hynes wrote.
IG market analyst Tony Sycamore said 'combined with last month's fall in employment, there are clear signs of deceleration emerging in the labour market'.
'This calls into question the RBA's decision to prioritise inflation over growth and jobs at its board meeting earlier this month,' he said.
Employment as a whole rose by 2000 people in June, following a fall of 1000 in May, and was up 2 per cent year on year.
That was against expectations of 20,000 jobs to be added in the month and the unemployment rate to hold.
Markets immediately jumped on Thursday's news, with the ASX200 rising 0.9 per cent to hit a new record high as investors bank on a future rate cut.
With expectations of lower rates, the Australian dollar slumped back below 65 US cents.
Despite Thursday's data, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said Australia's unemployment remains historically low while the participation rate remains near record highs.
'The ongoing resilience in our labour market over the past three years remains one of our best defences against the volatile global economic conditions we face, which is a big focus of my discussions here at the G20,' Dr Chalmers said from the G20 finance ministers meeting in South Africa.
'The Australian economy is not immune from global uncertainty but we are well placed and well prepared to face the challenges ahead.'
Speaking to ABC Radio on Friday again about the job numbers, Dr Chalmers said the result was 'unwelcome' but 'unsurprising' and that the 'modest tick up in the unemployment rate' had been expected.
'And here at the G20, there are only two economies, including ours, where last year we saw continuous growth inflation with a two in front of it, and unemployment in the low fours,' he said.
'But it remains the case that over the last three years, the labour market in Australia has been a real source of strength at an uncertain time. More than 1.1 million jobs created on our watch [and] the lowest average unemployment of any government in the last 50 years.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Daily Telegraph
an hour ago
- Daily Telegraph
Campaigners say tanker carrying Russian oil to dock in WA
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. A tanker purportedly full of Russian oil is set to dock in Western Australia within days, despite sanctions being in place against Moscow, Ukrainian and anti-Russian oil campaigners According to DFAT, the 'import, purchase or transport' of several goods is prohibited 'if they were exported from, or originated in, Russia'. That includes oil and petroleum products. The ship Seferis left Sika in India two weeks ago full of oil from the Jamnagar refinery, and it is due to arrive in the outer-Perth suburb of Kwinana by 4am Sunday. The Jamnagar refinery is notoriously fed by Russian crude oil, with as much as 55 per cent of their 2025 stock coming from the European pariah. This means the imported oil, which originated in Russia, could end up fuelling Australian vehicles on the road. Anti-Russian oil campaigners allege this ship is full of covertly imported Russian oil The alarm has been raised about a 'loophole' that allows Russian oil to be bought and sold in Australia, with local campaigners and parliamentarians calling for immediate action. Independent federal MP Andrew Wilkie raised the issue in Question Time on Thursday, asking the Defence Minister Richard Marles 'Why are the loopholes in our sanctions so big you can drive a tanker through them?' 'In July, two vessels reportedly docked in Botany Bay, with some 175,000 tonnes of petrol from the Jamnagar refinery in India, which uses up to 55 per cent Russian oil,' Mr Wilkie said. 'So these vessels effectively carry some 90,000 tonnes of Russian-sourced petrol, paid for by Australians, which will help fund Putin's war in Ukraine.' Independent MP Andrew Wilkie questioned the government about the 'loophole'. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman Mr Marles largely avoided the question instead focusing on the sanctions that had been put in place. 'Sanctions, which is the topic of the question the member has asked, is an important part of what we are putting in place to stand with Ukraine,' Mr Marles said. 'And our government will stand with Ukraine. 'I know the Australian people will stand with the people of Ukraine for as long as it takes for Ukraine to resolve this conflict on its terms.' The loophole has recently been closed in the European Union, which has banned the importation of petroleum products refined form Russian crude oil in its 18th sanctions package against Russia. Defence Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles defended Australia's sanctions. NewsWire / Simon Bullard. The Australian Federation of Ukrainian Organisations has urged Australia to take similar action. 'This decisive action closes a glaring and deeply exploited loophole that has allowed Russian crude to enter global markets through refineries in third-party countries – undermining sanctions and fuelling the Kremlin's war machine. 'We urge the Australian government to take similar action and close this loophole in Australia's own sanctions regime. 'Since February 2023, Australia has imported an estimated $3.7bn worth of Russian crude, as a component in refined petroleum products from Indian refineries – sending around $1.8bn in tax revenue to the Kremlin. 'This flow of profits directly helps fund Russia's brutal war against Ukraine.' Originally published as Tanker carrying Russian oil set to dock in WA despite sanctions, campaigners say

ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Geraldine Doogue takes on the future of journalism in 2025 Andrew Olle lecture
This is an edited version of the 28th annual televised Andrew Olle Media Lecture delivered by ABC journalist Geraldine Doogue in Sydney on Friday, July 25. What a year to be delivering the lecture on the media of the future — or on any subject that requires some certainties or good prophecy — because nothing seems certain in our lives. For quite a while after the invitation to present the 2025 Andrew Olle Media Lecture arrived, I'd settled on those immortal WB Yeats lines as my title: "The centre cannot hold … The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity." Yes, those words certainly describe our times. But it just felt too defensive and grim, and I didn't want to leave you all like that. So I settled on "Not Drowning, Waving" as my title, which somehow seemed more apt, with a touch of irony. It is all a bit grim: no doubt about it for those of us who love the media, love working inside it, consuming it, believing it's vital to our way of life. Roy Greenslade, the UK media analyst, was pretty blunt back in 2016 when he said: "It is time to recognise that the whole UK newspaper industry is heading for a cliff fall, that tipping point when there is no hope of a reversal of fortune." The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford has been forensically examining this. Prospect magazine headlined their coverage of the institute's latest report with: "Journalism is in freefall — and the public doesn't care". That rider has stayed with me. "The public doesn't miss yesterday's news, but journalists miss the public," writes the article's author, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. As he explains, current trends suggest at best a continued retreat, as the press serves fewer people. It may ultimately end up with a role akin to contemporary art or classical music: highly valued by a privileged few, regarded with indifference by the many. That's our existential crisis, though the fine print of the Reuters research does indicate that the public, in theory, is still with us. It's just that other options loom as better. An article by 360 Info, an outlet that bills itself as "Research Reuters", argues that media players are involved in a war of attention, competing against outlets whose stock-in-trade is harnessing rage and anger. Of course, it is also true that media consumers have become our competitors by creating their own bespoke news outlets — a great irony. "Scare stories about the problems associated with digital media will not bring people back to news," Nielsen writes. "A wiser course of action might be to impress people, rather than try to depress them. "The people best positioned to forge a different path are those journalists and publishers who accept that the next step is to meet people where they are. The aim should not be to take journalism backwards, but to create something new." But what would that look and sound like? Christopher Clark, a professor of modern history at Cambridge University, recently wrote an essay called "The End of Modernity". "A crisis is unfolding before our eyes — and also in our heads," its subtitle read. Before the modern age, people obtained information "from individuals, by word of mouth". With the advent of the modern media industry, "rumour-mongers gave way to trained journalists". The media of the modern era, he writes, "created its own mythology, a story we could tell ourselves, a means of situating ourselves in time, of understanding where we came from and where we were heading". But this modern system, Professor Clark says, is disintegrating before our eyes. "The multi-faceted nature of contemporary politics, the present of turmoil and change without a clear sense of direction, is causing enormous uncertainty," he writes. "It helps explain why we are so easily unsettled by the agitations of the present and why we find it so difficult to plot our course." Maybe, he wonders, there's a general reversal taking place. The gossip-mongers of the internet have once again seized the initiative, leading to the fragmentation of knowledge and opinions. "It has never been so difficult to think calmly," Professor Clark writes. And yet, how necessary it is. Perhaps our journalistic egos have become wrapped up in hitting the headlines ourselves. Who among us can honestly say we were impervious to the Woodward-Bernstein achievements around Watergate? Two young bloods, nobly jousting with the deeply flawed Richard Nixon and his establishment and bringing him down. Journalistic nobility, then super-stardom! We media workers will always have a duty to warn citizens of danger and incompetence, alert them to what's not solved, why today might be different from yesterday: the classic role of the fourth estate. However, I do wonder whether the breadth of the community and its range of tastes and interests are sufficiently canvassed, and whether we're more energised by displaying incompetence rather than searching for competence. The latter could be a real service, though it may not yield that fabulous rush of revelation and schadenfreude. I have long believed that reporting achievements makes for a very good first paragraph. It might in fact persuade doubters that we really are interested in the wider community, not just overturning governments or winning a scalp. Mathias Döpfner, head of German media group Alex Springer, believes one of the reasons people are losing trust in the media is because many confuse "journalism for activism". "More and more young people want to become journalists because they want to improve the world," he told The Sunday Times. "I think that's a dangerous misunderstanding of journalism." In this communitarian model I'm reflecting on, I see a renewal of the covenant between the public and the journalist, of clearly making the effort to be fair and accurate. We're not there to tell people about the comfortable status quo. To some extent, we are there to bother them, to introduce some alert and alarm. And no, we can't guarantee we'll be fully objective, but we can observably try, and be seen to be doing so or judged for not. The public can draw its own conclusions. Intellectual openness is, for me, the glittering prize. That's what I look for in colleagues. And I suspect the public does too. This all dovetails with other, bigger needs within the culture. I would argue that we might well have reached peak-individualism, a sociological urge that manifests in all those solitary searches on the net for some bliss — maybe sometimes found. And yet so many of them are seeking ways to avoid loneliness, separateness or alienation. I don't think we thrive on individualism. We're all looking for green shoots: that's the truth of it. After all, the BBC had to invent all those looks and props and sounds around news presentation, which we simply take for granted now. Moving past individual gossip to something more formal involved massive creativity. We clearly need it again. And to my mind, we need to lionise creativity and service beyond individual achievement to routinely engage lots more people, more regularly. Otherwise, we simply won't have an industry at scale. It won't be prosperous enough to offer careers or cadetships to young people. All sorts of people will end up as artists working in garrets, rationing their time and money, occasionally striking it rich, mostly doing something else. That's no answer. I haven't talked about AI, or the innards of dis- or misinformation. I can't even give you specific new models of this communitarian emphasis I'm discussing. I wish I could. But if we're passive, we might lose this gem of ours, this buoy of modernity. We might lose this industry that I adored from day one, back in 1972, when I wandered up the corridor of Newspaper House at 125 St Georges Terrace, Perth, on a hot January day and said, "Is there a way in, I wonder?" Thank goodness they said yes.


West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
Australia, UK solidify AUKUS deal as Pentagon review raised at high-level Australia-UK talks in Sydney
Despite fears the Trump administration could abandon AUKUS, Australia and the UK have pressed ahead, preparing to sign a 50-year agreement they hope will cement the submarine pact. Defence Minister Richard Marles, Foreign Minister Penny Wong, and their UK counterparts John Healey and David Lammy unveiled the new treaty during the annual AUSMIN meeting in Sydney. The Pentagon's review of the trilateral submarine plan had been raised during the high-level talks on Friday, Mr Marles said. Both defence ministers sought to ease concerns, welcoming the still-ongoing review, with Mr Marles cushioning it as 'the most natural thing in the world' for a new government to reassess such a major deal. 'We've welcomed the review, which is being undertaken by the Trump administration. We spoke today about how both of us — both countries — can contribute to the review,' he said. 'When we came to Government back in 2022, we undertook the Defence Strategic Review. When the UK Government came to power, they, in turn, undertook a review. This is a very, very natural step.' Australia had spearheaded the AUKUS pact in 2021 under then-Prime Minister Scott Morrison, after recognising the country needed to rapidly upgrade its defence capabilities. Labor then agreed to continue it. But Mr Trump's return to the White House in January has sparked new doubts over the pricey pact, as Washington slaps controversial tariffs on multiple countries, including close allies UK and Australia. Australia has also been pressured to increase defence spending in line with the NATO agreement for governments to raise their expenditure to 5 per cent of their country's GDP by 2034. While Australia currently spends about two per cent of its GDP on defence — on track to rise slightly above 2.3 per cent by the end of the decade — Washington has signalled that may not be enough. The UK's increase to 2.5 per cent of GDP by the end of the decade, equivalent to an extra £75 billion, was announced at last month's NATO summit and welcomed by US officials. The Coalition welcomed the UK-Australia treaty but called for defence spending to be increased, urging the Albanese Government to show greater commitment to the US. 'The Albanese Government must urgently demonstrate the same clarity and commitment with the United States,' a joint statement by shadow ministers Michaelia Cash and Angus Taylor said: 'Particularly in light of the Pentagon review, to reassure our partners that Australia can deliver on its contributions and, in turn, secure continued US backing for the agreement. 'Australia must do what we can to ensure AUKUS' longevity and success.' 'At a time of rising global instability, sustained underfunding risks weakening Australia's deterrence and damaging trust in our alliances,' they said. 'The Government must match its rhetoric with investment, and we stand ready to support a bipartisan pathway to deliver the capabilities our nation needs.' Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior analyst Euan Graham said it could be contributing to current alliance tensions. The pressure comes ahead of summit season, where the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hopes to land his first meeting with Donald Trump. The Prime Minister has dodged questions on when he'll meet the US President after their planned G7 meeting fell through, with Opposition Leader Sussan Ley attacking the lack of progress during the first sitting of the new Parliament this week. Dr Graham said while the UK could support long-term ambitions, Australia still faced a near-term capability gap it would need the US to fill. He said Australia still had an interim reliance on US-made Virginia-class submarines — set to be acquired in the early 2030s, while waiting for the AUKUS subs to be delivered in the 2040s. 'It doesn't solve the issue of the gap between now and when those submarines start being delivered,' he said. 'That's where the American Virginia class gap-filling really comes into play.' But he reiterated that the AUKUS arrangement was a three-nation pact and can be reinforced by each side, saying if confidence dips in one party, strengthening ties with the others can help balance it out. 'This is a clear commitment from the UK to honour its side of the bargain, and I think hopefully that should steady some of the nervousness around Washington's commitment levels,' he said. Greens Senator David Shoebridge blasted the new treaty, calling it a backward step that enriches foreign arms companies and damages regional ties. 'Australia needs to look to our region, not tie our future to a dying empire a world away. All this will do is line the pockets of foreign arms companies and alienate our neighbours,' Senator Shoebridge said. But Dr Graham said Australia must pay to play, and it was necessary to offshore work because Australia lacks the technology to produce the subs on its own. 'If Australia wants capability, it has to buy it. It can't produce it itself,' he said. 'As part of that, Australia is committed to directly investing in the defence industrial base of both countries. 'That's money that's going to leave Australia and go into other countries, but those other countries are providing a service. It's like anything else.' Mr Marles expressed the importance of Australia's 'oldest relationship' with Britain amid global uncertainty and a 'great power contest' in the region. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy labelled the AUSMIN talks as ' focused and constructive' and the pact a 'landmark treaty' which was necessary in a 'turbulent world'. 'It's clear that the UK-Australia relationship is an anchor in what is a very volatile world, providing stability in troubled waters and a relationship that holds steady,' he said. 'Whichever way the geopolitical winds are blowing . . . I think we're sending a clear signal, a signal of the UK's commitment to this region of the world.' He said the UK was determined to keep the Indo-Pacific 'free and open'. Senator Wong said the relationship was rooted in shared values and interests, but it was important to 'modernise' the partnership to meet current global challenges. 'We all know we face the most challenging, strategic circumstances since World War II. More conflict, more contest, a multilateral system under strain,' Senator Wong said. 'And against that backdrop, the partnership between our nations matters even more. And we are determined to work together to modernise our partnership, to take the world as it is, but to work together to shape it for the better. 'We've had an excellent set of discussions today.' Both parties will travel to Mr Marles' Geelong electorate tomorrow, where the agreement is expected to be officially signed. Mr Marles and Ms Wong will also join their UK counterparts in Darwin on Sunday for the visit of the UK Carrier Strike Group, the first such deployment to Australia since 1997, taking place during Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025.