World's most relaxing city revealed as a surprising US destination tops the list - with 266 parks and 3,000 yearly hours of sunshine
And, for those who want to chill out, the world's most relaxing city has been revealed in a new study.
The research compared 50 cities on spa access, air quality, total number of nature and parks, sunshine hours, happiness and traffic congestion.
With a whopping 266 parks and nature reserves - more than any other city on the list - as well as 3054.6 hours of sunshine a year, San Diego, in California, came out on top.
Known for its beautiful beaches and great weather, San Diego has everything needed for a summer getaway.
It also has a relatively high happiness score compared to other locations on the list.
What's more, it's a perfect place for travellers wanting to unwind, with 359 spas and wellness centres to choose from.
Overall, San Diego earned a relaxation score of 68.7 out of 100.
With a whopping 266 parks and nature reserves - more than any other city on the list - as well as 3054.6 hours of sunshine a year, the US city came out on top
Singapore ranked second in the study conducted by Hofaly, and also has plenty parks and nature reserves - 242, to be exact.
Visitors are spoilt for choice with 698 wellness centres, too.
And there's plenty of sunshine - 2,022 hours - and good air quality, so tourists can be outside without worrying.
Singapore also scored the highest for happiness, meaning locals enjoy a good quality of life.
Vienna placed third in the study overall, boasting 91 parks and nature reserves, and basking in 2,048 hours of sunshine a year.
The Austrian hotspot has one of the best air quality scores on the list, offering some of the cleanest air in Europe.
When it comes to relaxing, there's plenty of choice. with 137 spas and wellness centres.
The city also has the shortest average traffic time at just 21.5 minutes.
Australia placed high in the rankings, with Sydney and Melbourne coming fourth and fifth.
Meanwhile, Berlin and Auckland ranked sixth and seventh.
In eighth place, was Portland, USA, and Rome came in ninth place.
Bringing up the rear was Helsinki, Finland, Madrid and Barcelona - in tenth, eleventh, and twelfth place, respectively.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Holidaymakers with pet separation anxiety simply pack the pooch
It's not a dog's life if you are a pet in Britain. Our national capacity to spoil our furry friends extends to taking them on holiday with us, according to research. A study has found that growing numbers of people are taking their dogs — and sometimes other animals — on trips because they cannot bear to be separated from them. The study found that roughly one in four (26 per cent) of owners have taken their pets on foreign holidays, and the trend is driven by young people. Half of 24 to 34-year-olds have travelled abroad with their animals, compared with less than one in ten over-55s (9 per cent). Londoners are the most likely to take their pets with them. Holidaymakers may not have noticed the trend because the law forbids pets, except guide dogs, from travelling in the cabin of aircraft to and from the UK. However, most flag carriers, such as British Airways and Air France, have long-established pet cargo schemes. You won't see touring pets in the cabin of the aircraft, they have their own area ALAMY The research found that two thirds of owners would like to be able to travel on a plane with their pets, a practice that is allowed for animals below a certain size and weight on many European and American routes. Most owners who take their dogs with them on holiday to Europe use ferries and Eurotunnel, which both accept animals. Pets are allowed to leave and return to the UK under the Pet Travel Scheme, provided they meet the entry and exit requirements, such as having a microchip, a rabies vaccination and an animal health certificate. The certificates must be issued by a vet within ten days of travel. Ferries and Eurotunnel allow for fuss-free travel, but get the paperwork in order ALAMY The survey of more than 1,200 pet owners by the Co-op found that more than half (56 per cent) of those who take their pets abroad do so because 'they're part of the family'. However, roughly one in eight (12 per cent) said they do so because pet boarding facilities are too expensive. Most licensed kennels charge £17 to £20 per dog per day. Rates in London are often far higher — up to £90 a night for standard kennels and even £120 a night for high-end 'canine country clubs'. A third (33 per cent) of owners said they take their pets along because it ensures they will stay active on holiday, but one in three (31 per cent) said they 'couldn't bear the thought of leaving them at home' and would miss them too much. Another factor is that veterinary services are considerably cheaper on the Continent. An investigation by The Times in 2023 found that some procedures are up to three times more expensive in the UK than in France. • 13 of the best dog-friendly Airbnbs in the UK The Co-op says owners need to be careful when travelling abroad with pets because most standard insurance policies do not cover them for emergency treatment overseas. Andrew Nevitt, of Co-op Insurance, said: 'If you are taking your pet abroad, it's important that you ensure you have the correct documentation and they have had the necessary vaccines.' He added: 'Having the right insurance policy in place is also crucial as it will provide you with peace of mind that, should your pet require any treatment, any vet bills will be covered.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Booking.com parent in $9.5 million 'junk fee' settlement with Texas
Aug 19 (Reuters) - The parent of and other travel websites will pay $9.5 million to settle a Texas lawsuit claiming it deceptively marketed hotel rooms by omitting mandatory "junk" fees, enticing consumers with artificially low prices. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said on Tuesday the settlement with Booking Holdings (BKNG.O), opens new tab is the largest by a U.S. state related to junk fee practices against any hotel or online travel agency. Booking also operates the websites and Kayak. Paxton accused Booking of "drip pricing" in which it improperly bundled hotels' resort fees, amenity fees, destination fees and utility fees in a taxes and fees line item at checkout. The practice gave Booking an unfair advantage over rivals that avoided such "bait and switch" tactics, he said. The settlement agreement requires Booking to disclose such fees up front. A copy was not immediately available. Paxton said he reached similar settlements in 2023 with the Choice (CHH.N), opens new tab, Hilton (HLT.N), opens new tab and Marriott (MAR.O), opens new tab hotel chains. Booking, whose U.S. headquarters are in Norwalk, Connecticut, said it was pleased to settle and said it has always been committed to transparency and providing clear information. Cracking down on fees that boost consumer costs without visible benefits had been a goal of former U.S. President Joe Biden. In December, the Federal Trade Commission announced a final Junk Fees Rule requiring hotels, ticket sellers and vacation rental operators to disclose total prices up front. Current FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson dissented, opens new tab, saying Biden was about to leave office and the incoming Trump administration should decide which rules to adopt.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
United Airlines faces lawsuit after selling ‘windowless' window seats
United Airlines is facing a class action lawsuit for allegedly selling 'windowless' window seats to passengers. The potential lawsuit, which is still recruiting members, claims that the airline 'misled customers' by charging for aircraft window seats without windows. According to Top Class Actions, plaintiffs are seeking compensation for the 'false advertising' practice that they say violated air passenger rights. California passengers who paid extra for a window seat on a United Airlines flight within the last four years but did not sit next to a physical window may be eligible to join the lawsuit. Airlines often allow passengers to reserve popular window seats for an additional fee. Passengers pay from $24 (£18) per person for preferred seating in United's standard Economy class. That charge rises to $36 (£27) per person for those in 'Basic Economy'. However, different aircraft designs require different configurations, with some rows falling on a blank wall that is not reflected on the plane's seating chart when booking online. The class action would seek to 'hold United Airlines accountable' for the 'misleading and unfair practice', reported Top Class Actions. The lawsuit is being organised by Greenbaum Olbrantz LLP, a legal firm based in New York. According to the airline, no lawsuit has currently been filed against United. In June, a Ryanair passenger who did not pay to reserve a seat found himself bumped from a flight to Mallorca after the airline switched planes at the last minute for an aircraft with fewer seats. Gym coach Scott McCormick and his girlfriend were due to fly with Ryanair on flight FR1954 from Birmingham Airport to Palma de Mallorca on 1 May. The couple said that when they booked their flight, they opted out of paying for a reserved seat, which can range from €4.50 (£3.85) to €33 (£28.20) per flight. 'They put us through at the end, and they said, 'as you are last to check in and you haven't reserved a seat, we have one seat remaining.'' They eventually paid another £100 for a new ticket and waited around four hours to board the next flight to Palma.
