Independent Ireland TD under fire for 'fuelling racism' with comments on 'protecting' Irish culture
Limerick TD Richard O'Donoghue was speaking in reference to the upcoming presidential election, when asked who Independent Ireland might support as a candidate.
'We want someone who will represent our culture in this country, that it's not obliterated,' Mr O'Donoghue said.
'We welcome other cultures in here, we do that 100%. But we also want to make sure the Irish culture is recognised and set in stone for the future.'
Pressed on what he meant, Mr O'Donoghue referred to Irish people respecting the cultures of other countries when they travel abroad.
My son and his girlfriend went to Dubai, and the culture out there is that you cannot enter one of their mosques or whatever unless you are covered up...I want us protected the same way as we recognise other people's culture when we go to their country.
The comments were branded as a 'dog whistle' and 'untrue' by other opposition TDs, with the Social Democrat's Jennifer Whitmore rejecting them outright.
'It's fuelling racism, it's fuelling misinformation. It's fuelling a narrative out there that people are coming into this country and are not contributing, which is wrong,' Ms Whitmore said.
Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon described Mr O'Donoghue's comments as 'pathetic', while Rory Hearne said his comments were 'dangerous'.
We're seeing the real rise of the far right and sowing of division in communities, particularly around the housing issue. These comments have very real impacts in communities.
People Before Profit's Paul Murphy said it was 'dog whistling' by Independent Ireland, saying the comments were inappropriate.
When contacted by the Irish Examiner, Mr O'Donoghue doubled down on his comments around Irish people becoming the minority, saying it could happen by 2050.
He cited comments from then president of DCU Ferdinand von Prondzynski, who made the claim in 2005. Mr von Prondzynski cited unpublished UK-based research at the time, which was not identified.
However, Mr O'Donoghue rejected any assertions by the opposition that he was a racist.
"Under no circumstances am I a racist. I'm actually the opposite," Mr O'Donoghue said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
20 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Man convicted of murder in 1982 executed in Florida
A 67-year-old man convicted of the 1982 murder of a woman he abducted from her office has been put to death by lethal injection in the southern US state of Florida. Kayle Bates was sentenced to death in 1983 for the murder of Janet Renee White, 24, who worked at an insurance company in Lynn Haven, Florida. Ms White was attacked at her office by Bates after she returned from lunch and stabbed to death in nearby woods. Bates was executed at 6.17pm yesterday (11.17pm Irish time) at the Florida State Prison, according to officials. There have been 29 executions in the United States in 2025, the most since 2014, when a total of 35 inmates were also put to death. A total of 24 of this year's executions have been carried out by lethal injection, two by firing squad and three by nitrogen hypoxia, which involves pumping nitrogen gas into a face mask, causing the prisoner to suffocate. The use of nitrogen gas as a method of capital punishment has been denounced by United Nations experts as cruel and inhumane. Florida has carried out the most executions in 2025 with 10 being carried out in total. The death penalty has been abolished in 23 of the 50 US states, while three others - California, Oregon and Pennsylvania - have moratoriums in place. President Donald Trump is a proponent of capital punishment, and on his first day in office called for an expansion of its use "for the vilest crimes."
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
The White House launches TikTok account
The White House launched a TikTok account, as President Donald Trump continues to permit the Chinese-owned platform to operate in the United States despite a law requiring its sale. "America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?" read a caption on the account's first post on the popular video sharing app, a 27-second clip. The new account, @whitehouse, went live yesterday evening with an initial video showing footage of Mr Trump as he declares: "I am your voice." The account had about 4,500 followers an hour after posting the video. Mr Trump's personal account on TikTok meanwhile has 110.1 million followers, though his last post was on 5 November, 2024 which was Election Day. TikTok is owned by China-based internet company ByteDance. A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Mr Trump's inauguration on 20 January. But the Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media and who has said he is fond of TikTok, put the ban on pause. In mid-June Mr Trump extended a deadline for the popular video-sharing app by another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the US. That extension is due to expire on 17 September. While Mr Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, he reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform - which boasts almost two billion global users - after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election. Mr Trump's official account on X, formerly Twitter, has 108.5 million followers - though his favored social media outlet is Truth Social, which he owns, where he has 10.6 million followers. The official White House accounts on X and Instagram have 2.4 million and 9.3 million followers, respectively.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Siobhán Kangataran: Our migrant communities need your voice
In response to a recent spate of violent attacks against members of the Indian community in Ireland, the Embassy of India issued a warning to its citizens here to 'take reasonable precautions for their personal security and avoid deserted areas, especially in odd hours.' This warning, while well-intentioned, seems misdirected and ineffective in its intended protection against these unwarranted attacks on innocent people. I sincerely doubt the gangs of violent teens undertaking these attacks are carrying out citizenship tests before they pick their unlucky target. Nor would I imagine they are able to discern between Indian, Sri Lankan, Bangladeshi, Pakistani or any person of another South Asian heritage. I am of mixed white Irish, Indian and Sri Lankan descent, but I am often mistaken for being of Mediterranean origins, so should all people with a tan be asked to stay constantly vigilant for fear of clashing with racist attackers? Would it not be more effective for everyone — regardless of ethnicity or citizenship — to stop racism long before it gets to the stage of violence? Racism doesn't start with physical attacks. The Irish Network Against Racism 'Pyramid of Hate' demonstrates how racism begins with bias, stereotyping, and insensitive remarks. Then it progresses through acts of prejudice to discrimination before we get to acts of violence and eventually the ethnic cleansing and genocides that we are seeing in Palestine, Sudan and the Congo. To paraphrase George Orwell, some lives are clearly less equal than others. As a woman of mixed ethnicity, I am very aware of the benefits that brings — I have an Irish first name, an Irish passport, an Irish accent, and am light skinned enough that only Indian people seem to be able to identify my Indian heritage. In the past, I might have kept my head down and avoided speaking out about an issue I could choose to avoid, but if I have learned anything from the Black Lives Matter movement in 2020 and the Palestinian solidarity movement since 2023, it is that the people who are not directly affected by a crisis are often in the best position to effect change. Who are people more likely to listen to? Who is more likely to change people's minds? Is it the people who stand to benefit directly from a change in society — people who may already look, sound or act differently from the majority? Or are we more likely to listen and learn from people who feel familiar to us and can communicate in a way we are open to receiving? People take part in a silent assembly for migrant workers and their families outside the Department of the Taoiseach in Dublin, following the recent attacks on members of the Indian community. Picture: PA One of the reasons I moved back home to Ireland from London after 11 years away was the awe (and envy!) I had for the progressive changes in Irish society. This progress was hard-earned through grassroots movements and conversations over the kitchen table. We still have a long way to go before we achieve full reproductive freedom, but we would not have 'repealed the 8th' if people had not been willing to sit down and have uncomfortable conversations with their nearest and dearest. Similarly, while we are far from achieving full equality and inclusion of our LGBT+ community, we would not be celebrating the 10th anniversary of marriage equality if allies had not listened to their LGBT+ friends, family and colleagues. Working in equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI), it is technically my job to educate people about racism (and sexism and ableism and all the other 'isms and phobias), but that is a choice I have made. Not all members of a minority are willing or able to also be an advocate for their identity. Some people want and need (and deserve!) to just exist, as human beings, without having to also constantly fight for their right to do so in peace. So while in EDI we often say 'nothing for us without us', it's important we all remember that this means listening and learning from people with lived experience (and then taking action), rather than leaving it to a minority to solve a problem that is not of their making. Racists have recently become more emboldened in society, fuelled by high-profile public figures and politicians playing identity politics to point the finger at more marginalised groups. Blaming immigrants for issues within a government's control turns all black and brown people (regardless of their citizenship) into vulnerable targets, scapegoated for problems caused by people in power. While we have not quite descended to the depths of the racist immigration raids in the US, we cannot ignore the increasing encroachment of subtle but harmful racism into Irish politics In 2024, then taoiseach Simon Harris made comments that were problematic, to say the least, erroneously linking asylum seekers to homelessness in Ireland. This not only conveniently shirked any responsibility for the government to solve the housing crisis, it further fuelled the disinformation peddled by people pushing racist 'Ireland for the Irish' rhetoric. (For anyone not aware, international protection applicants are not included in the homelessness figures — sadly we have plenty of unhoused Irish people before we even get to those vulnerable people fleeing their home countries seeking a safer place to live). Angela Davis, the Black American academic, philosopher, and activist once said: 'In a racist society, it is not enough to be non-racist, we must be anti-racist.' If you do not support racism, it is not enough for you to stay silent while racists get louder and more brazen. If you do not want to see racist acts committed in your town, county or country, then you must take action to stop them from happening wherever you see it. Name it. Call it out. Condemn it. Hold people accountable for it. You may feel awkward at first, and you will make mistakes, but you will get better with practice. Surely a little discomfort is a small price to pay to make society safer for everyone?
