Special cell nabs Babbar Khalsa man from MP
The accused, identified as Akashdeep alias Baj, a resident of Batala, was apprehended from Indore following an intelligence-led operation, the officials added.
Deputy commissioner of police (special cell) Amit Kaushik said that Akashdeep played a facilitating role in the grenade attack. 'Following the incident, BKI had released threatening messages on social media, which included references to Delhi. The special cell, which has been proactively working against terrorist and gangster networks, initiated a targeted operation to trace and apprehend those behind the attack,' he said.
Eluded capture by shifting locations
Initially, intelligence inputs suggested that Akashdeep had fled to Gujarat. He was tracked briefly there, but he kept changing locations to evade arrest. Eventually, he surfaced in Indore, where he had taken up work as a crane driver at a construction site. Officials said he was deliberately avoiding contact with known associates and relatives.
'He was maintaining a low profile, making it challenging to trace him. However, based on continuous surveillance and technical inputs, he was finally located and arrested from Indore,' Kaushik said.
Links to BKI handlers abroad
Police said that during interrogation, it was revealed that Akashdeep was allegedly in direct contact with BKI handlers based abroad and played a role in facilitating the logistics of the grenade attack.
'He was a key facilitator in all BKI-led attacks. We are still verifying the extent of his role. While he is not named in any previous criminal cases and appears to be a first-time offender, his links to terror operatives are being thoroughly probed,' the DCP added.
The National Investigation Agency (NIA), which is also investigating the larger BKI module operating in North India, has been informed.
The Delhi Police has recently set up a dedicated operational cell within the Special Cell to focus on Khalistani and terror-related threats. Officials said this cell is actively monitoring pro-Khalistani networks, particularly those operating in or targeting Delhi and its neighbouring states.
'The post-attack threats issued on social media by BKI operatives had specifically named Delhi as a target. Since then, our teams have been on alert. This arrest is a part of our broader counter-terror operations to prevent any untoward incident in the Capital,' another senior officer of the special cell said, asking not to be named.
Pan-India conspiracy under scanner
When asked whether the accused had any role in planned activities in Delhi, officials said that while the threat perception remains high, it would be premature to disclose operational intelligence. 'The accused is being questioned about his links to other operatives and any possible plans targeting Delhi or other states. Further revelations will depend on the ongoing investigation,' the officer said.
Officials, however, did not rule out links with other terror suspects arrested in Punjab earlier this month, including individuals allegedly associated with ISI-backed networks. 'BKI, in coordination with ISI, continues to carry out subversive activities, particularly in Punjab and surrounding states. We are closely examining any common linkages between the arrested individuals,' added Kaushik.
While financial transactions and digital footprints are being scrutinised, the police maintained that they will share detailed findings once corroborated evidence is available.
After the powerful explosion near the Qila Lal Singh police station, BKI had claimed responsibility for the attack via a social media post. The group stated that a rocket launcher was used in the assault, which targeted the vicinity of the police station. The group stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the deaths of Sikhs in past encounters in Pilibhit (Uttar Pradesh) and Batala.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Arrest of Mukhtar Ansari's son Umar sparks political row, SP cries foul, BJP says law taking its course
The arrest of deceased mafia-turned-politician Mukhtar Ansari's younger son Umar Ansari from Lucknow in a forgery case on Sunday night sparked a political controversy with the Samajwadi Party alleging that Umar was taken into custody as the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party wanted to affect the by-polls for the Mau Sadar assembly seat in eastern Uttar Pradesh and the BJP asserting that the law has taken its course and legal matters should not be politicised. Umar Ansari was arrested on Sunday night. (FILE PHOTO) The Ghazipur police, which arrested Umar Ansari from the MLA residence at Darulshafa in Lucknow on Sunday night, produced him in court in Ghazipur on Monday morning. Umar is accused of forging the signatures of his mother Afsha Ansari, on whom there is a ₹50,000 bounty, and submitting it to the court to reclaim his family's ₹10 crore attached property. The property was related to Mukhtar Ansari, the former head of the IS (Inter State) 191 gang, according to the police. The Mau Sadar seat had fallen vacant after the conviction of Umar Ansari's elder brother Abbas Ansari by a special MP-MLA Court in Mau in a hate speech case on May 31. Abbas's father Mukhtar Ansari represented the Mau Sadar assembly seat five times, from 1996 to 2017. Mukhtar did not contest the 2022 polls and died two years later on March 28, 2024 at the Banda Medical College hospital in Uttar Pradesh. He had been in Banda jail prior to his death. The Allahabad high court on July 30 reserved its judgment on a petition filed by Abbas Ansari challenging the order of the Mau court that had rejected his application for a stay on his conviction in the hate speech case. 'As far as we can understand, it is clear that Abbas Ansari has been framed. Muslims MLAs were the target of this government. Azam Khan and his entire family were targeted. Now, when the decision regarding membership of Abbas Ansari in the UP assembly is about to be given, then his younger brother Umar Ansari has been arrested. The government wants that no one from his family should be able to contest the by-election,' SP spokesperson Ameeque Jamei said. 'An FIR is registered against Umar at 6pm and by 9pm he is arrested. Meanwhile, some mafias are roaming freely in Purvanchal, the STF and police are unable to see them. But Umar is arrested in a fake signature case. We want to ask if the accused has no right to go to the court and secondly did the court take notice of the alleged fake sign? Is there any report by FSL (forensic science laboratory) which proves the sign is fake? This is an attempt to put all the members of the Ansari family behind bars by misusing administrative powers,' the SP spokesperson said. Abbas Ansari had won the Mau Sadar assembly seat on a Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party ticket as the OP Rajbhar-led party had contested 2022 Uttar Pradesh assembly elections in alliance with the SP. Rajbhar later left the SP camp and joined hands with the BJP-led NDA to become a minister in the Yogi Adityanath government. 'SBSP chief and minister OP Rajbhar should take a stand for his MLA, instead of trying to create a communal divide in the society,' Jamei said. UP BJP vice-president Vijay Bahadur Pathak said, 'In Umar Ansari's arrest, the law has taken its own course. All due legal process was followed before arresting Umar Ansari. It is a case related to presenting forged documents in court. Legal matters should not be politicised.' According to police, Umar Ansari filed a petition in court with a forged affidavit to seek release of the property that was attached under the UP Gangster Act. When the Ghazipur police came to know about the forgery, the Mohammadabad police registered a case against Umar Ansari and his lawyer Liaquat Ali. Mukhtar Ansari's wife, Afsha Ansari, is still at large. According to a statement issued by the superintendent of police, Ghazipur, the properties were seized under provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act. It is alleged that Umar Ansari intended to secure illegal gains and submitted forged documents reportedly bearing the fake signatures of his mother, Afshan Ansari, in the court, the statement said. Afshan Ansari is currently absconding and carries a reward of ₹50,000 on her head. 'Upon learning of the fraudulent activity, a case was registered against Umar Ansari at the Mohammadabad police station, with charges filed under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS),' read the statement. The Supreme Court had granted interim bail to Abbas Ansari on March 7, 2025 in a case under the Gangsters Act. Over two months later, he was sentenced to two years in prison in a hate speech case related to Mau in May, resulting in his disqualification from the state assembly. The case in which Abbas Ansari was convicted stems from a speech delivered during the 2022 assembly election campaign in Mau. On July 5, 2025, a local court in Mau upheld the conviction of Abbas Ansari in the hate speech case but allowed further hearings on his plea specifically challenging the quantum of the two-year sentence initially awarded. The court also granted Ansari interim bail on a bond of ₹50,000 and stayed his sentence, but maintained his conviction. ARREST BASED ON INVESTIGATION, EVIDENCE: DGP Responding to a media query, director general of police Rajeev Krishna confirmed that Umar Ansari was taken into custody from Lucknow on Sunday night in connection with a case registered in Ghazipur. 'The arrest has been made based on investigation and available evidence,' he said. Emphasising the due legal process, Krishna stated, 'There are clear directives from the Supreme Court, the high court, and the law itself. Our role as a police force is to ensure that any action taken is backed by solid evidence that can stand up in court.' He stressed that all police efforts must be carried out within the framework of the law to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
India beat England in a thriller at Oval, level series 2–2, MP's chain snatched in Delhi
The top focus of this episode 5ive Live is on India's six-run victory against England in the fifth Test at the Oval. India pulled off an incredible six-run victory over England in the seesawing fifth and final Test to secure a creditable 2-2 draw in a five-match series. The programme also reports on a chain-snatching incident involving Congress MP R. Sudha in Delhi's high-security Chanakyapuri area, raising concerns about women's safety. It delves into the Supreme Court's stay on a defamation case against Rahul Gandhi and the Pahalgam terror attack investigation, which identified Suleiman Shah as the mastermind. Evidence recovered from Operation Mahadev includes Pakistani voter ID slips, chocolate wrappers, and biometric data, confirming the terrorists' Pakistani citizenship.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Challenges to PMLA: CJI to speak with Justice Surya Kant on listing of review, other pleas
New Delhi, Chief Justice of India B R Gavai on Monday said he would speak to Justice Surya Kant on the issue of listing fresh petitions along with the pleas seeking review of a 2022 verdict upholding the key provisions of the PMLA including ED's powers to arrest, conduct searches and attach property. Challenges to PMLA: CJI to speak with Justice Surya Kant on listing of review, other pleas In 2022, the top court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case upheld the key provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act . The judgment has since faced several legal challenges, including review pleas and the fresh writ petitions, challenging the verdict and seeking the reference of the matter to a larger bench. On July 31, a bench headed by Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh said it would first hear arguments on the issue of maintainability of petitions seeking a review of its 2022 verdict. It, however, did not agree to hear the main pleas with review petitions and asked senior advocate Kapil Sibal to approach the CJI for directions. Accordingly, Sibal mentioned the issue before the CJI-led bench on Monday urging that both types of matters be heard together. Sibal was referring to the matter titled as ED v. M/s Obulapuram Mining Company Private and said in this matter, a three judge bench was constituted to decide whether the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary judgment should be referred to a larger bench. He said the bench comprising former judges Justices S K Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M Trivedi had heard the matter on several occasions. Sibal further said in November 2023 the bench was dissolved in view of the retirement of Justice Kaul and the matter was not listed after that. A Justice Surya Kant-led bench agreed to hear review petitions on August 6 to deliberate upon preliminary objections. "The review petitions in the PMLA matter are listed for hearing on August 6 and 7. There was another 3-judge bench qua the PMLA matter where hearing could not be completed since Justice Kaul retired. I mentioned it to the other bench. They said mention it before your lordships for both the matters to be heard together," Sibal informed the CJI. "If your review is decided, this will also be covered," the CJI said. "Those matters were for the purposes of finding out which of the matters should be referred to the larger bench," Sibal said. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, on the other hand, objected to the submissions, saying by way of mentioning, petitioners were trying to overcome the recent order of Justice Kant's bench which said ED's preliminary objections to the maintainability of review would be first heard. "In review, notice was issued on a limited ground. To come out of that, they started filing other petitions raising all grounds," Mehta said. "Why should both the matters be heard differently?" Sibal asked. "Suppose, if review itself is found to be maintainable then..." the CJI asked. "I can still argue the reference. Because review is a limited jurisdiction. I can still argue some of the issues should be referred to a larger bench," Sibal said. "I will speak to the learned judge," the CJI offered. On July 31, the Justice Surya Kant-led bench said the ED proposed three preliminary issues, primarily dealing with the question of the maintainability of the review petitions. The bench said the review petitioners proposed 13 questions for its consideration. "Since the proposed issues are arising in the review proceedings, we propose to firstly hear the parties on the issue of maintainability of the review petitions, followed by the hearing on the questions proposed to be raised on behalf of the review petitioners," the bench said. It said eventually, the questions that might finally arise for consideration would also be determined by the court, if it holds that the review pleas are maintainable. The bench posted the matter for hearing on August 6. On May 7, the top court asked the parties to frame the issues to be adjudicated in the matter. The Centre contended that the hearing of the review petitions cannot go beyond the two specific issues flagged by the apex court bench that issued notices on the petitions in August 2022. Mehta said the bench which considered the review petitions for admission in August 2022, issued notices only on two aspects the supply of the ECIR copy to the accused and the reversal of the burden of proof under section 24 of the PMLA. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
