
Modi pushes self-reliance amid US tariff tensions
Indian defence and policy circles have informally referred to the Russian S-400 air defence system — which played a key role during the fighting with Pakistan — as Sudarshan Chakra, after a Hindu mythological weapon. Modi was addressing the nation on the occasion of its Independence Day at a time New Delhi has been struggling with Trump's tariffs and the collapse of trade talks, largely due to differences over imports of American farm and dairy products.
"Farmers, fishermen, cattle rearers are our top priorities", Modi said in his customary annual address from the ramparts of the Red Fort in New Delhi. "Modi will stand like a wall against any policy that threatens their interests. India will never compromise when it comes to protecting the interests of our farmers", he said.
Last week, Trump imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil in a move that sharply escalated tensions between the two nations. The new import tax will raise duties on some Indian exports to as high as 50% — among the highest levied on any US trading partner. Modi has never spoken about the tariffs directly, only alluding to them in a speech last week, where he swore to protect the interests of farmers, even if it came at a personal price. Farmers are a key political constituency in India and they violently protested against Modi's last big push to reform the sector, forcing him to repeal three farm laws in 2021 in what was a rare defeat for him.
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses the nation. — Reuters
Although local manufacturing and self-reliance have been Modi's key focus areas for years now, the push is seen to have gained urgency amidst ongoing global trade tensions and supply chain disruptions. "The need of the hour is to take a resolve for building a strong India ... I want our traders, shopkeepers to display boards for 'Swadeshi' products", Modi said, using the Hindi word for made in India goods. He said made in India semiconductor chips would hit the market by the end of this year and that India was pushing for self-reliance in producing critical minerals with exploration underway at more than 1,200 locations.
Trump's tariffs threaten to disrupt India's access to its largest export market, where shipments totalled nearly $87 billion in 2024, hitting sectors like textiles, footwear, shrimp, gems and jewellery. In retaliation, some supporters of Modi have sought to stoke anti-Modi's promise to cut GST by October's Diwali festival, which encompasses one of India's biggest shopping seasons, follows previous commitments to overhaul it by reducing the number of rate brackets under the 2017 tax regime.
A group of ministers have been preparing a report that will consider merging tax slabs and lowering rates on some products. In February, India cut personal income tax for some individuals to boost spending. Earlier this month, the central bank kept interest rates steady, following a 100 basis point cut this year so far. The government has proposed to the ministers' panel that it recommend reducing taxes on mass use items as well as on goods used by women, students and farmers to boost consumption and enhance affordability, the finance ministry said in an X post. The government will move towards making GST a simple tax with two rate slabs, one standard and another merit, it said. Special rates will be applicable only for a few select items. — Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
an hour ago
- Observer
Trade War: US tariffs cripple Indian exports and competitiveness
The Trump administration's trade negotiations with India aimed to secure better access to India's agricultural and dairy markets. The inconsequential outcome of the talks, India's Russian oil imports, and the potential reduction of Indian exports to the US contributed to the escalation of the trade war. Initially, the Trump administration imposed a 25% tariff on goods imported from India, effective August 1, 2025. In continuation of this development, on August 6, 2025, the US administration announced an additional punitive tariff of 25%, effective August 27, 2025, if no deal is reached. This makes India the most heavily taxed trading partner in Asia. The trade tariffs were aimed at disrupting the India-Russia energy ties and isolating Russia in the Ukraine conflict. The US is India's top export market, accounting for 18% of its exports. This development in the trade war is expected to impact $87 billion in Indian exports, and it is predicted that the country's GDP will decline to 6%. Indian MSMEs risk losing their global competitiveness to rivals, with tariffs on India at 50% compared to China's 30% and Vietnam's 20%. The US has also issued a warning of new 'secondary tariffs' on countries trading with Russia. The tariffs aim to coerce India to diversify its 35% to 40% crude oil imports from Russia. Several sectors, including engineering & automobiles, gems & jewelry, and textiles & leather, will be severely affected, and India faces a potential threat of supply chain shifts. Semiconductors, critical minerals, and the pharmaceutical sector are exempt from additional tax for now. It is estimated that Indian exports to the US will drop by 70% if tariffs reach 50%. The textile and apparel market is very vulnerable. Already, many US companies have shifted orders to Bangladesh and Vietnam, and this could further trigger job losses for millions. India is the world's largest cut diamond industry, employing 2 million workers and generating exports worth $10 billion. Approximately 32% of Indian auto parts are exported to the US. The tariffs will make many products uncompetitive. India exports 40% of its seafood, mainly Shrimp, to the USA. The fears of tariffs have resulted in farmers halting sowings. Labor-intensive industries, such as textiles, garments, automobiles, and jewelry, face a significant threat of job loss. There is a major fear that 1,00,000 to 2,00,000 people in textile hubs alone will lose their jobs. The sentiment is that most entrepreneurs are accelerating shipments before the tariff implementation date and exploring alternative diversification destinations, such as China, Russia, and Japan. India also plans to shift towards being self-reliant and to diversify its exports. The Indian export-driven economy faces a significant challenge with the US tariffs imposed in August 2025. It has the potential to disrupt $35 billion in annual losses, impact key industries such as seafood, gems, and textiles, and collectively displace millions of jobs that significantly contribute to GDP growth. In the broader context, it will impact the global competitiveness of many products, drag GDP into a downward trajectory, and increase inflationary pressures. India needs to focus on accelerating its market diversification and enhancing domestic manufacturing, while simultaneously pursuing diplomatic negotiations. India has taken a firm stand that these tariffs are unjustified and unwarranted. India's energy imports are from 40 different countries, which are decisions based on market dynamics and should not be at the mercy of geopolitical escalations. The tariffs have prompted India to expand and diversify its exports to maintain strategic autonomy. From a broader perspective, if the trade war is not de-escalated, it could significantly strain US-India bilateral trade relationships and affect defense ties, prompting India to strengthen its relationships with Russia, China, and many other countries, thereby profoundly reorienting global power dynamics.


Observer
an hour ago
- Observer
Valentino CEO steps down for personal reasons, WWD reports
Valentino CEO Jacopo Venturini has stepped down from the Italian luxury house for personal reasons, Women's Wear Daily reported on Thursday, leaving the Mayhoola- and Kering-backed business searching for a new leader to reboot sales and profit. Valentino and Venturini reached a mutual agreement to terminate his employment and board roles, WWD reported, with Valentino saying the executive "has decided to take a break for personal reasons". Spokespeople for Valentino did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. Venturini, previously executive vice president of merchandising at Gucci, became CEO at Valentino in June 2020. Valentino had said in June that he was on sick leave, after media reports of his imminent departure from the business which reported declining revenue and profit last year. Creative director Alessandro Michele, who joined Valentino in March last year from Gucci, is staying on in his role, WWD said, citing sources. Valentino, founded in Rome in 1960 by Valentino Garavani and Giancarlo Giammetti, is part-owned by French luxury conglomerate Kering, which bought a 30% stake in the label from Qatari fund Mayhoola for 1.7 billion euros in 2023, with a commitment to buy the rest by 2028. According to a LinkedIn post by fashion journalist Astrid Wendlandt, Valentino chairman and Mayhoola CEO Rachid Mohamed Rachid sent a memo to staff on Thursday announcing Venturini's departure, and saying he would share further updates on the appointment of a new CEO in due course. Reuters could not immediately verify the authenticity of the memo, and Mayhoola and Kering did not immediately reply to requests for comment on the reports of Venturini's departure. Mayhoola last month denied a newspaper report that the two shareholders were considering selling Valentino. Kering declined to comment at the time. —Reuters


Observer
an hour ago
- Observer
In high-stakes summit, Trump, not Putin, budges
Donald Trump wanted to go bold - a high-pomp, high-stakes summit with Vladimir Putin to test whether the Russian leader would compromise on the Ukraine war. In the end, it looks like it was Trump, not Putin, who budged. Putin, visibly delighted as he stepped foot in the West for the first time since ordering the 2022 war, made no apparent concession at the talks at an Alaska air base. In a brief joint media appearance with Trump, who unusually took no questions, Putin again spoke of addressing the "root causes" of the Ukraine war and warned Kyiv and Europeans against disrupting "emerging progress" with the United States, the top defender of Ukraine under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden. Trump, who bills himself as a master negotiator, acknowledged there was "no deal" but said there were "very few" areas of disagreement, although he was vague on what they were. But posting hours later on his Truth Social account, Trump said he wanted Russia and Ukraine to "go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war" and not a ceasefire. Trump's own administration had been pushing a ceasefire for months, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signing on after intense pressure from Trump. Putin had repeatedly rejected truce offers and kept up attacks on Ukraine, seeking to maximise battlefield advantage. Trump had vowed to be firm with Putin after wide criticism of the US president's cowed appearance before him at a 2018 summit in Helsinki. But Putin again found ways to flatter and trigger Trump, who in his second term constantly speaks unprompted about his many grievances. Putin told Trump before the cameras that there would have been no war - which Putin himself launched - if Trump were president in 2022 rather than Biden, a frequent Trump talking point. Trump bemoaned the effect on ties with Putin of what he again called the "hoax" of the findings by US intelligence that Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help him. In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity after the summit, Trump said that "one of the most interesting things" Putin told him was about... the US voting system. Trump said approvingly that Putin - who has held power in Russia since 2000 and was declared the winner of elections last year with 88 per cent of the vote - told him of the risks of mail-in ballots and said of Trump's 2020 loss to Biden, "You won that election by so much." US election authorities and experts have found no evidence of wide-scale fraud from mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, which Trump, uniquely in US history, refused to concede. Trump's Democratic rivals voiced outrage that the summit secured no breakthrough and said it only served to normalise Putin, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. Experts said it was too early to write off the summit completely, as much is not known about what was discussed behind closed doors. Trump will meet Zelensky on Monday at the White House. Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defence Priorities, which backs US restraint, said that Trump's critics have been proven wrong in saying he would "give Ukraine to Putin or force Kyiv to accept surrender." "His focus has been and remains getting Putin to the negotiating table. Mr Trump deserves credit rather than condemnation for his efforts so far," she said. But Kristine Berzina, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, said an initial read was that "Putin scored a victory by showing up, and Trump's limited words and tense demeanour left Putin to control the narrative." "For a man so attached to showmanship, Trump unusually allowed Putin to be the star of what should have been the Trump show," she said. - AFP The writer covers State Department for the international news agency AFP