WATCH: Red state gov urges firearms makers to ditch Colorado amid its anti-gun push
"Do you want to move back to America?" Gianforte is asking Colorado gunmakers, after Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed S.B. 25-003 into law earlier this month. The new law, which is slated to go into effect in August 2026, effectively bans the manufacture, sale or purchase of semi-automatic firearms that accept detachable magazines, which include most AR-15s and AK-47 rifles sold in the United States. Some tactical shotguns and a few select handguns will also be impacted.
"Our Second Amendment is very clear. It says the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," Gianforte told Fox News Digital. "This bill outlaws some of the most popular firearms used for sporting and self-defense. It's a violation of the Second Amendment."
Blue State Gop Rep Forced To Remove 2A Sticker From Laptop: 'Offensive'
Gianforte has helped spearhead greater protections for gun owners and sellers in his state, including through making Montana a constitutional carry state and through the passage of a law that prohibits law enforcement from enforcing federal firearm bans or regulations that infringe on Americans' Second Amendment rights to possess, transfer or use any firearm, magazine or firearm accessory.
The GOP Montana governor also spearheaded an effort to ban liberal environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards that served as a basis for private institutions, such as banks, to refuse to work with gun manufacturers and sellers.
Read On The Fox News App
However, Gianforte pointed to not only his state's defense of Second Amendment rights, but also to its pro-business policies and comparatively low tax burden for reasons why his state is ideal for law-abiding gun makers and sellers.
Excessive State Taxes On Guns, Ammunition Sales Are Target Of New Gop Crackdown Effort
"When this [Colorado bill] came out – this announcement – I personally cold called six Colorado firearms companies. Five of them, the five I've spoken to so far, are all planning visits to Montana," Gianforte recounted to Fox News Digital. The governor said that from his conversation with the companies, he deduced they were all "throwing in the towel on Colorado."
"My message to them was pretty simple," he said. "'See what's going on in Colorado? Do you want to move back to America? Because Montana is open for business, and we would welcome you here.'"
Gianforte also pointed out how officials from the state of Montana attend what the governor described as "the largest" firearms and gun trade show in the world, which the officials frequently return from with multiple leads on manufacturers looking to potentially move to Montana every year.
Trump Hailed For Restoring Gun Rights As Gop Fights Biden-era Policies
Gianforte estimated that officials walked away from the convention last year with about 10 potential new firearm businesses seriously interested in moving to Montana, while he said this year it was closer to 30.
"We have more firearms and ammunition manufacturers today than any other state in the country per capita," touted Gianforte. "We proudly defend the Second Amendment, not just for our firearms owners, but also for firearms manufacturers and ammunition manufacturers."
Fox News Digital has reached out to Gov. Polis' office for comment.Original article source: WATCH: Red state gov urges firearms makers to ditch Colorado amid its anti-gun push
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump steps up clash with DC, Democratic-led cities
As President Trump on Monday stepped up his fight with the District of Columbia, he signaled he could try to expand his efforts to exert federal control to other Democratic-led cities, citing what he described as out of control crime and squalor. Trump announced during a press conference at the White House that he was declaring a public safety emergency in the District and subsequently taking federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department. He was also activating 800 National Guard troops to aid local and federal law enforcement as part of an effort to crack down on crime. 'We have other cities also that are bad. Very bad. You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is,' Trump said. 'New York has a problem. And then you have of course Baltimore and Oakland, we don't even mention that anymore. They're so far gone. We're not going to lose our cities over this. And this will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C., and we're going to clean it up very quickly, as they say.' The president's comments came at the same press conference where his FBI director, Kash Patel, touted that the murder rate was on pace to be the lowest in modern history. But Trump and the GOP have for years positioned themselves as the tough-on-crime party. The president has frequently used major U.S. cities, which are overwhelmingly governed by Democratic mayors, as a political foil, depicting them as overrun with crime, vandalism and homelessness. While the law allows the president to impose his will on the District, Democratic leaders have already signaled they would push back on efforts to do the same elsewhere. 'Let's not lie to the public, you and I both know you have no authority to take over Chicago,' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) posted on the social platform X, responding to Trump's comments. 'If President Trump wants to help make Chicago safer, he can start by releasing the funds for anti-violence programs that have been critical to our work to drive down crime and violence. Sending in the national guard would only serve to destabilize our city and undermine our public safety efforts,' Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said in a statement on Monday afternoon. The White House has in recent days surged federal law enforcement across the District, with agents from the Drug Enforcement Agency, the FBI, Secret Service and other agencies patrolling the city. Trump on Monday used his authority under the Home Rule Act to take control of the city's police department. He can do so for 30 days, after which he would need congressional approval. The president also announced he was activating the D.C. National Guard, something he is able to do without local approval. District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser told reporters Monday she was not given a heads-up about Trump's plan to seize control of the city's police department, and she said she 'believed' the White House would activate the National Guard. 'While this action today is unsettling and unprecedented, I can't say that given some of the rhetoric of the past that we are totally surprised,' Bowser said at a press conference. Trump has long picked fights with Democratic cities, attacking mayors in Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Baltimore and other areas and using them to boost his own image as a tough-on-crime president. His outrage was a staple of the 2020 protests in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd. His administration moved to clear protesters in D.C., he railed against rioting in Minnesota and he urged Democratic leaders in Washington state to take action after demonstrators set up an 'autonomous zone' in Seattle. Earlier this year, Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles to quell protests over immigration raids, against the wishes of state and local authorities. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), who sued the Trump administration earlier this year over the deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles, argued the president had been laying the groundwork to exert greater power over the states. 'He was just getting warmed up in Los Angeles,' Newsom posted on X. 'He will gaslight his way into militarizing any city he wants in America. This is what dictators do.' FBI crime data released earlier this month showed violent crime decreased nationally in 2024 by roughly 4.5 percent compared with 2023. Data from the District of Columbia shows violent crime in the city is down so far in 2025 compared with the previous year and at its lowest level in years. The White House issued a fact sheet aiming to bolster its actions, which noted the District had the fourth-highest homicide rate in the country in 2024 at 27.3 per 100,000 residents. The administration also pointed to the volume of crimes reported thus far in 2025, despite statistics showing it has dropped year to year. And Trump highlighted a series of high-profile violent crimes in the city this year, including the killing of Eric Tarpinian-Jachym, an intern in the office of Rep. Ron Estes (R-Kan.), and the assault of Edward Coristine, a former Department of Government Efficiency staffer known by the nickname 'Big Balls.' While Trump and his administration can take a more proactive role in reshaping D.C., he would have a more difficult time doing the same in other major cities. It is common for local law enforcement to coordinate with federal partners, but Democratic leaders are unlikely to request that the National Guard be deployed in their states. And Trump cannot unilaterally commandeer control of local police forces elsewhere. Trump on Monday also railed against cashless bail, a policy adopted in some form by places including Illinois, New York and the District, under which a judge determines whether to release a defendant before their trial. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), a staunch Trump ally, said she would lead legislation seeking to outlaw cashless bail policies. The New York Post first reported on Stefanik's involvement, and she confirmed it on X on Monday afternoon. Trump indicated on Monday he may hold the prospect of federal intervention over other cities but also left the door open to allowing local governments to make changes on their own. 'Other cities are hopefully watching this … and maybe they'll self-clean up,' Trump said. 'And maybe they'll self-do this and get rid of the cashless bail thing and all of the things that caused the problem.' There is also some political risk for Trump in appearing to overstep. His poll numbers began to dip around the same time he deployed troops to Los Angeles. Some Democrats also moved quickly on Monday to dismiss the announcement in D.C. as a 'distraction' from negative headlines for the president. 'If the economy you promised to boost is lagging, w/prices rising…If the wars you vowed to end–'very quickly'–are still raging…If you continue to hide the Epstein files & dangle a pardon for his accomplice…you need a BIG distraction!' former Obama White House adviser David Axelrod posted on X. 'Introducing…The DC takeover!!'
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
5 things to know as California moves forward with redistricting
California Democrats are moving forward with plans to potentially redraw the state's congressional maps as a response to GOP-led redistricting efforts in Texas. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has said the Golden State is planning to put redistricting before voters during a special election this November, with the aim of adding several Democratic House seats to the blue stronghold. California's move is a direct response to redistricting efforts in Republican-led Texas, where Democratic state legislators have fled the state in a last-ditch bid to block a redraw backed by President Trump. Here's what to know as California moves forward: Why is Newsom calling for a special election? Newsom announced Friday that his state will move forward with plans to get a measure on the ballot that would, if approved by voters during a special election, let Democrats pass a new House map. California state lawmakers are out for summer recess, with plans to return on Aug. 18. They're expected to take up the matter as soon as they return, as they're up against a deadline to make a November special election official. 'We have 'til Aug. 22nd. With the leadership behind me, they will get this on the ballot,' the governor said. Newsom needs to call a special election to move forward because California, unlike Texas, has a bipartisan commission that is responsible for redistricting every decade. In order to circumvent the commission and redraw mid-cycle, he must put the redistricting question directly in front of voters to seek their approval before a new map can be put in place. The push to draw new congressional lines in the Golden State comes as Democrats across the country are looking to blunt potential gains in Texas ahead of the midterms. The Lone Star State is expected to pick up as many as five additional seats with their new lines, making it potentially easier for the GOP to hold onto its slim House majority next year despite electoral headwinds. Newsom has repeatedly said that he will only move forward with redistricting if Texas does so, but since the Lone Star State has signaled it has no intention of backing down, it seems likely the California governor will go forward with the special election. What will voters be asked to consider? The exact details of the ballot question remain unclear, raising questions about how the plan will move forward, even if voters approve it. Newsom's office has underscored the potential ballot measure would reaffirm California's commitment to independent redistricting, while also allowing voters to 'temporarily adjust' the congressional map for the next several cycles. But how the question will actually be formulated remains up in the air. The measure is also expected to include 'trigger' language, explaining how and who decides to move forward with redistricting in the Golden State if it happens in Texas or elsewhere. There's also the possibility, however unlikely, that the Texas GOP will not move forward with redistricting, thereby negating Newsom's push to redraw California's lines. However, most observers see this as an unlikely outcome. Another possibility is that California voters don't approve redistricting. The chances of that happening in the deep-blue state also appear remote, though some experts say the popularity of the independent commission, which Californians approved in 2008 and 2010, may stoke hesitance about the proposed changes. 'I think the voters understand what's at stake,' Newsom said when asked about this last potential outcome. When could new maps go into effect? California's goal would be to counteract the planned GOP gains in Texas during next year's midterms, and the ballot measure would aim to push the changes through before the midterm election in November 2026. If the maps go through, the mid-census redistricting will last 'for the '26, '28 and '30 ballots, just for congressional ballots alone,' Newsom said on Friday. Proponents of the plan have stressed that the proposal would maintain the framework of California's independent redistricting commission, though the bipartisan body's maps would be effectively paused in the meantime. California would then revert to the existing system after the next census at the end of the decade. The proposal appears to be a 'a one-time request to voters to subvert the commission, if other states were to engage in such a process,' Sara Sadhwani, a member of the commission that redrew California's lines in 2021 and a politics professor at Pomona College, told The Hill last week. What could the new maps look like? California's Democratic leaders have said they're planning to release new congressional map proposals sometime this week. The exact contours of the new maps are unclear, but Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the chair of the California Democratic Congressional delegation, told local outlet KCRA 3 over the weekend that they're expected to target five House Republicans. That would be an exact counter to the five GOP seats that would be created by the Texas plan. Such a change would boost Democrats' advantage in the congressional delegation to a whopping 48 of 52 House seats, by cutting into the districts held by the state's current nine Republican lawmakers. Among the potential targets are Republican Reps. Ken Calvert, Darrell Issa, David Valadao, Doug LaMalfa and Kevin Kiley. What opposition does the push face? Newsom's move has drawn criticism from some notable figures — perhaps no one more so than former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R), who has threatened to campaign against the plan, according to Politico. 2024 Election Coverage 'He calls gerrymandering evil, and he means that. He thinks it's truly evil for politicians to take power from people,' spokesperson Daniel Ketchell told the news outlet. 'He's opposed to what Texas is doing, and he's opposed to the idea that California would race to the bottom to do the same thing.' Kiley, another California Republican who could be vulnerable under the new maps, has also emerged as a vocal critic of the plan. The lawmaker has proposed federal legislation that would prohibit mid-decade redistricting nationwide. Furthermore, the unprecedented plan is entering 'legal murkiness,' said Justin Levitt, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University who founded the database All About Redistricting — while also being pressed for time, given the November goal and scheduling rules for special elections.
Los Angeles Times
24 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
ICE processing center is all but empty when California Congress members arrive to inspect
For two months, several Democratic members of Congress have been unable to enter a downtown L.A. processing center run by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, prompting widespread complaints and a federal lawsuit. On Monday, the Congress members got their first look at the basement facility known as B-18. But Reps. Brad Sherman, Judy Chu and Jimmy Gomez said that they were left with more questions than answers — and accused the government of sanitizing the center. 'They wanted to show us nothing,' said Gomez, whose district includes parts of downtown L.A. 'It was nothing, it was like no one was there. It was deliberate so members of Congress cannot conduct oversight.'' Scores of migrants, as well as some U.S. citizens, have been taken from Home Depot parking lots, car washes, and other locations by masked and heavily armed agents and brought to B-18 since early June. Some detainees have complained of overcrowding and being held for multiple days. The facility can hold up to 335 migrants, but there were just two people in one of the holding rooms on Monday, the members said at a news conference in downtown L.A. after their visit. The group's previously scheduled visit was canceled by ICE. Monday's visit took days of planning and advance notice, according to the politicians. They described a sparse scene inside B-18, with nine holding rooms, each with two toilets. Chu, whose district includes Monterey Park, described the floors as concrete and said that there were no beds. She said ICE detainees are supposed to be held at the facility for only 72 hours, but she has heard stories of people kept there for 12 days. Some detainees have reported receiving one meal a day, she said. On Monday, she visited the food pantry at B-18, which Chu described as 'scanty.' 'I am deeply disturbed by what I saw and what I heard,' Chu said. Chu also said she has been told that detainees have no soap or toothbrushes. A representative for the Department of Homeland Security didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about the politicians' complaints. 'It's alarming that it's taken so long for congressional members to gain access to this site,' said Sergio Perez, executive director of the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law, a nonprofit that seeks to protect the rights of immigrants. Perez was able to visit Narciso Barranco, a Mexican national whose three sons are U.S. Marines, in June. Perez said he saw Barranco after he'd been held at the facility for three days. Perez said that Barranco, who was punched and pepper-sprayed during his arrest, did not receive medical attention. The Department of Homeland Security shared video of his arrest on social media and said Barranco attacked an agent with his gardening tool. Barranco told Perez that each of the rooms held 30 to 70 people at the time and that some had to sleep standing up, Perez said. Food was scarce and they didn't have access to showers. The ICE facility was designed as a processing center, not a detention facility, Perez said. Sherman, who represents parts of the San Fernando Valley and Pacific Palisades, said that one of the two detainees at B-18 on Monday rested with his head on a table. Sherman said he 'illegally' took a picture during his visit and that he shouted out to several people being brought into the facility for processing, asking them if they were U.S. citizens or green card holders. No one replied, he said. Sherman, Chu, Gomez and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Los Angeles), who joined the group after their visit, criticized the ongoing immigration enforcement, and in particular the use of masked, roving agents. A federal judge last month temporarily barred the government from mass sweeps in Los Angeles and cities in seven other counties without first establishing reasonable suspicion that the targets are in the U.S. illegally. The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, which sued the federal government over the sweeps, described a 'dungeon-like' area and accused the administration of failing to 'provide basic necessities like food, water, adequate hygiene facilities, and medical care.' Detainees were allegedly subjected to overcrowding and did not have adequate sleeping accommodations. 'Under such conditions, some of those arrested are pressured into accepting voluntary departure,' the lawsuit stated. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin has said that claims of poor conditions at ICE detention centers are 'false' and that the agency 'has higher detention standards than most U.S. prisons that hold actual U.S. citizens.' On Monday, Chu said that she asked ICE representatives during the tour why people were jumping out of vans with masks, and no identification. She said the representatives replied, 'That's not us, and we go in if there's probable cause, if there's a warrant out there.' Gomez, who has been repeatedly turned away from entering the B-18 facility since the crackdown started earlier this year, is part of a group of Democratic House members suing the federal government over the lack of access. The lawsuit, filed last month in federal district court in Washington, said the individuals attempted to visit a detention facility, either by showing up in person or by giving Homeland Security Department officials advance notice, and were unlawfully blocked from entering. ICE recently published new guidelines for members of Congress and their staff, requesting at least 72 hours' notice from lawmakers and requiring at least 24 hours' notice from staff before an oversight visit. Times staff writer Andrea Castillo contributed to this report.
