logo
People on £10,000 to £96,000 tell us what they want from the Spending Review

People on £10,000 to £96,000 tell us what they want from the Spending Review

Yahoo3 days ago

This week the government will set out how much it is going to spend over the next four years on the public services that millions of people use every day.
That includes the NHS, schools and public transport as well as welfare benefits, armed forces, energy projects and a whole range of other government spending.
We asked a handful of readers, who had contacted the BBC via Your Voice, Your BBC News, what they would like to see in Wednesday's announcement.
Lewis Eager, 26, works two shifts a week in the on-demand delivery service for a supermarket in Southend-on-Sea, earning £850 a month. He lives with his parents who he pays £120 a month.
He would like the Spending Review to include a plan to help young people like him find well-paid, full-time jobs.
Lewis completed a business administration apprenticeship and an Open University degree, but says he cannot find full-time work.
He estimates he has applied for more than 4,000 jobs without success.
"Getting knocked down all the time is horrible."
Even entry-level jobs seem to require experience, he says.
He sees a "looming crisis" among young people unable to get on the jobs ladder, and would like to see more money go into adult education.
"I live with my parents which I have nothing against, but I thought I would have achieved more by now," he says.
Resheka Senior, 39, is a nursery nurse and her husband Marcus, 49, a school caretaker. Between them they take home more than £50,000 a year. But the couple say they are still struggling, particularly while Resheka is on maternity leave.
When she goes back to work, Resheka says she won't be much better off because she will have to pay for childcare before and after school for her five-year-old and all day for the younger children, aged two and nine-months.
They have debts that they are shuffling between credit cards and no prospect of moving out of their two-bedroom council flat in Woolwich, London.
"I don't want to stay at home. I've been working since I was 15 years old," says Resheka. But she would like to see more support for couples who are "making an honest living".
She wants the government to pay for free breakfast and afterschool clubs or more free childcare on top of the 30 hours a week currently provided.
"It's not as if I'm saying I want benefits," she says. "We're putting back into the economy. We just need some help."
Ollie Vass works for a nutritional supplement company, where he earns £31,000. His girlfriend Grace Sangster also 19 is on an apprenticeship scheme earning £40,000.
They each started saving from the age of 13, earning money mowing lawns and working in restaurants.
In April, with the help of a small inheritance and their Lifetime ISAs, the couple completed on a £360,000 two-bedroomed terraced house near Slough.
Ollie and Grace would like to see more support for young people starting out, especially first-time buyers, and more apprenticeships.
They also think the tax-free allowance, which has been frozen since 2021 should rise so that people on low wages can keep more of their earnings.
Ollie also wants to see cheaper rail fares: "At the moment it's too expensive to use."
Leah Daniel, 23, and her partner are entitled to £800 a month in Universal Credit and the council pays £900 a month rent for the flat in Birmingham they share with their two-year old daughter.
But currently around £100 a month is being deducted from their Universal Credit to pay for advances they took while homeless for a short time.
Leah says they run out of money every month and have to borrow from friends and family, sometimes having to skip meals to make sure their daughter is fed.
If the government decides to cut the welfare budget in the Spending Review, that would be "absolutely heartless", she says.
"It's one thing to make sure the country's growing and we aren't wasting money and people aren't taking advantage of the system.
"It's another thing if you aren't giving more support to help people out of poverty and help them look for work," she says.
Above all she and her partner want stable jobs so they can "build up their lives".
"So many times we haven't eaten and we're worried about tomorrow," she says. "I just want this situation to change."
As a GP and practice partner earning £96,000 a year, Dr Kirsty Rogerson says she is aware she is well-off.
She and her husband, a hospital consultant, own their own house, and are putting some money aside to support their sons through university.
But she sees plenty of people in her surgery in Sheffield who aren't so fortunate and face what she thinks are impossible choices.
If she could choose one thing for the government to take action on it would be to subsidise fresh fruit and vegetables and make processed food more expensive.
"What [the government] shouldn't be doing is just tackling it at the other end with weight loss drugs," she says. "That's going to bankrupt the NHS."
She would also like to see more money spent on public services.
"As a mother, I'd rather pay more tax and know my children were being well educated and there's a good healthcare system," says Dr Kirsty Rogerson. The same goes for the police.
"I'd rather go to bed each night knowing those things were there," she says.
Sylvia Cook, 72, used to sell accounting software, then published books about Greece, before she retired.
Living on a pension of £20,000 means being careful with her outgoings, so she welcomes the government's u-turn on winter fuel payments as "a good decision, if a little late".
The extra £200 "obviously eases things", she says.
But in general she thinks that rather than increasing spending, the government should look at where it can save money.
"You can spend a lot of money and achieve nothing," she says.
Instead she suggests changes to the tax system, efficiency savings across government and cutting perks for MPs and civil servants.
"There are so many inefficient things they haven't got the common sense to sort out."
The health service is a case in point she says.
"Throwing more money at the NHS doesn't necessarily help if they don't sort that out," she says.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police attacked as Northern Irish violence spreads to another town
Police attacked as Northern Irish violence spreads to another town

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Police attacked as Northern Irish violence spreads to another town

PORTADOWN, Northern Ireland (Reuters) -Rioters attacked police with petrol bombs, rocks and fireworks in the Northern Irish town of Portadown on Thursday, a Reuters witness said, as a fourth night of anti-immigrant violence moved to a different part of the British-run province. Violence first flared on Monday after two 14-year-old boys were arrested and appeared in court, accused of a serious sexual assault on a teenage girl in the town. The charges were read via a Romanian interpreter to the boys, whose lawyer told the court they denied the charge, the BBC reported. One of a number of anti-immigration protests on Thursday was held in Portadown, 50 kilometres from the capital Belfast. A large policing operation of officers in riot gear and armoured vans closed off a number of roads in advance. Debris was strewn across streets and wheelie bins were set on fire. Other protests passed off without major incident, including in Ballymena, the primary flashpoint of the first two nights of more intense violence, local media reported. Paul Frew, a member of the regional assembly from Ballymena, said that while some people gathered on the streets again amidst a big police presence, it was much quieter and that heavy rainfall had helped keep people away. "Hopefully we're through the worst of it," Frew, a member of the Democratic Unionist Party, told the BBC. (Reporting Clodagh Kilcoyne and Ben Makori in Portadown, Amanda Ferguson in Belfast; Writing by Padraic Halpin; Editing by Daniel Wallis)

Police chief warns of 400 job cuts due to funding
Police chief warns of 400 job cuts due to funding

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Police chief warns of 400 job cuts due to funding

The chief constable of Lincolnshire Police has warned 400 staff and officer jobs could be cut if the force cannot secure extra funding by October. It comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the government's Spending Review, which includes a 2.3% real terms yearly funding increase for policing in England and Wales. Chief Constable Paul Gibson said this was not enough for Lincolnshire and would leave the force facing a deficit of almost £70m. He said he had begun negotiations with the Home Office. But Reeves told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme she did not "accept" the need for cuts to police jobs. Speaking during a hotseat with BBC Radio Lincolnshire presenter Frances Finn, Mr Gibson said the Home Office had recognised Lincolnshire as a "significant outlier" in terms of funding. "If we don't get more money by October, then, unfortunately, I have to start consultation to reduce our organisation significantly," he said. Mr Gibson said cuts to officer numbers could result in reductions to services that were "hugely important" to communities, including neighbourhood, roads and rural policing and crime prevention work. He said: "I have to make sure that I balance the budget, and if I can't do that then I have to reduce resources, which obviously will be felt within the communities across our great county." The chief constable said he had a meeting planned with Policing Minister Dame Diana Johnson for early July, and he would be "pitching for more money". "I'm as optimistic as I can be, but I can't guarantee money will come along," he said. In April, Lincolnshire Police announced previous planned cuts to 400 jobs had been delayed due to a new £5.7m government funding package. But speaking on BBC Radio Lincolnshire, Mr Gibson said this was "one-off money" to provide "stability" for six months. A report by His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue, released in May, rated Lincolnshire Police inadequate at investigating crime, responding to the public and managing offenders and suspects. Mr Gibson said he appreciated the findings of the report would be "concerning" for residents, but he said funding had a "massive impact" on the level of service the force could give. He said: "It's [the report] not as good as I wanted it to be, that's absolutely clear, and there's no doubt that there are things we need to do better. I completely accept that. "We're working incredibly hard in the background to make sure we are investigating crimes better, supervising criminal investigations better, meeting the requirements of victims better." Caller Chris Fairweather, from Old Leake, near Boston, told the chief constable she had not been visited by officers after reporting a garage break in at her home. She said tools and equipment had been stolen, but she had received a letter from police a week later to say the case had been closed. Mr Gibson said it was "just not possible" to visit the scene of every crime, and officers had to work out the likelihood of solving a crime. He said: "Finance, whether we like it or not, has a major impact upon what you're able to do, in terms of the quality of service you can deliver." Later in the discussion, Mr Gibson said: "I know that people are concerned about policing – they always want more, quite understandably. "But I also need to make sure that I balance that with my staff, who are operating in difficult circumstances. "They get assaulted quite frequently. I write to them, I speak to them, almost daily, in terms of someone who's been punched, kicked, spat at." The Home Office has been approached for comment. Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Police cuts postponed after funding boost Winners and losers: Who got what in the spending review? 'Serious concern' over police crime investigations Lincolnshire Police

UK Spending Review 2025 delivers 'mixed bag'
UK Spending Review 2025 delivers 'mixed bag'

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UK Spending Review 2025 delivers 'mixed bag'

Owen Mapley, CEO of the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA), has called the Spending Review 2025 a 'mixed bag'. 'Much to welcome, but long-term sustainability remains unresolved for many public services,' Mapley said in response to the UK government's Spending Review announced on 11 June 2025. Mapley noted that while additional funding for the NHS and defence was confirmed, many unprotected areas received little relief. 'For frontline services, significant pressures and concerns around long-term stability are likely to endure,' he said. Local government was highlighted as a sector set to benefit from a longer-term funding settlement. However, Mapley expressed reservations, stating: 'Serious concerns remain about the sector's overall sustainability.' He said that key challenges including funding gap for social care remain unaddressed. On the NHS, Mapley acknowledged the positive impact of increased investment but cautioned that 'the demands on these resources will be immense.' He emphasised that delivering transformation through technology and modernisation would be crucial for the NHS to achieve sustainability and support the forthcoming ten-year health plan. Mapley concluded by noting the complexity of the review, saying, 'Crunching the Spending Review numbers, and considering the multiple documents released alongside the review, may reveal a clearer picture. CIPFA looks forward to considering the details over the coming days and weeks.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced an additional £29bn per year for the NHS in England, alongside increased funding for defence and housing, as part of the government's spending plans extending to the end of the decade. Reeves also pledged further investment in artificial intelligence and transport projects. However, the review brought tighter budgets for some departments, with the Foreign Office and environment department facing constraints on day-to-day spending. "UK Spending Review 2025 delivers 'mixed bag'" was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store