Political deliberations: Lebanese Cabinet to tackle controversial arms control
All eyes are on the Lebanese Cabinet's upcoming session scheduled for Tuesday, with a key agenda item set to address the contentious issue of exclusive control over weapons.
The session may proceed in the absence of Ministers Yassine Jaber and Mohammad Haidar, both of whom are close to Hezbollah and currently abroad on pre-scheduled travel. Ministers are expected to continue discussions on the implementation of measures to assert state sovereignty across Lebanese territory using only national military forces.
A government statement is anticipated following the session, reaffirming the principle of arms exclusivity under the Lebanese state, while also calling on Israel to cease its ongoing violations, withdraw from Lebanese territory, and release detainees.
Army Commander General Rodolph Haykal is also expected to attend the session to present an overview of the Lebanese Armed Forces' efforts related to this matter and outline possible next steps toward arms collection.
Following Tuesday's meeting, the issue may be referred to the Higher Defense Council for the development of an appropriate implementation mechanism.
Leading up to the session, internal political consultations have intensified. The latest of these took place Thursday evening at Baabda Palace, where Hezbollah MP Mohammad Raad, head of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc, met with President Joseph Aoun.
According to LBCI's sources, Hezbollah expressed concern over recent presidential rhetoric, particularly references to the "withdrawal of Hezbollah's weapons."
The meeting, described as constructive and flexible, was focused on clarifying key points and avoiding statements that could provoke internal tension. Both parties reaffirmed the importance of Israel's adherence to the ceasefire and withdrawal from Lebanese territory.
With only days remaining before the Cabinet session, Lebanese leaders are expected to continue intensive consultations in hopes of reaching common ground on the arms exclusivity clause.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nahar Net
an hour ago
- Nahar Net
What options for Hezbollah after govt's decision to disarm it?
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 12:09 The government has decided to task the army with setting a plan to disarm Hezbollah. AFP looks at how the government's decision may be implemented, and whether the Iran-backed militant group can still block it. - Why is the move important? - Tuesday's announcement was the first time a Lebanese government has announced it would disarm Hezbollah, the only armed faction that kept its weapons in the aftermath of the 1975-1990 civil war. Hezbollah has kept its arms in the name of resistance against Israel, which occupied Lebanon's south until 2000. The decision effectively strips Hezbollah's weapons arsenal of political legitimacy, breaking with past government statements that recognized the "resistance" alongside the Lebanese army. The balance of power in Lebanon has shifted after a recent war between Israel and Hezbollah left the group badly weakened, and after the fall of the group's close ally Bashar al-Assad in neighboring Syria. Unprecedented Israeli strikes on Hezbollah backer Iran in June have further weakened its stance. Previous moves to limit or do away with Hezbollah's weapons and logistical network have led to major political and security crises. In May 2008, when the Lebanese government decided to shut down the group's wired communications network, clashes erupted with Hezbollah using its weapons against political opponents in Beirut and beyond. The violence killed at least 65 people. The group's arsenal has remained a divisive issue in Lebanon, with opponents demanding the state control all territories and the government have the sole power to declare war and peace. - What can Hezbollah do? - Hezbollah on Wednesday rejected the government's decision, calling it a "grave sin" and saying it will treat it "as if it did not exist". But the armed group has few choices, which all appear to come at a great cost. Hezbollah could escalate politically by having the four ministers affiliated with it and its allies resign. It could also disrupt the work of parliament, or incite chaos by mobilizing its armed supporters to the streets. Any domestic unrest blamed on Hezbollah would likely have major repercussions for the group's image among Lebanese. "Hezbollah, as much as possible, would want to reduce the chance of itself entering a confrontation with the army, because it knows that the entire country would be against it except for its supporters," said David Wood, a senior Lebanon analyst at the International Crisis Group. "It would be an absolute disaster for its image," he added. Hezbollah lawmaker Ali Ammar dismissed the possibility of any confrontation with the army, saying the two forces "understand" each other. Hezbollah could relaunch attacks against Israel, but this option could easily prove devastating with the country still reeling from last year's war. "Going into war right now, again, will be very devastating to Hezbollah because it does not have a supply line. It lost a lot with the collapse of the Syrian regime," said military analyst Riad Kahwaji. "Its intelligence capabilities, its logistical capabilities have all been severely affected." The war with Israel saw much of Hezbollah's senior leadership killed and a large part of its military arsenal destroyed, as did swathes of Beirut, Lebanon's south and other areas. Receiving weapons shipments from Iran via Syria has become more difficult as Lebanese and Syrian authorities have tightened border controls, and funding has come under stricter oversight. Hezbollah could agree to disarm, but a Lebanese source had told AFP it "would not do so without something in return". Tehran's position may also affect any decision. The Lebanese group may "play for time", according to Atlantic Council researcher Nicholas Blanford. "They can't fully disarm. I think that's impossible for Hezbollah." - How will Lebanon be affected? - Lebanon is under intense Arab and Western pressure to disarm non-state actors, a key demand to secure international support as it emerges from years of political and economic crises. "We must choose: either collapse or stability," President Joseph Aoun said last week. Should Hezbollah insist on keeping its arsenal, Beirut will find itself in a difficult position. "If Hezbollah is determined to keep the weapons, this would be very difficult for the Lebanese government to force it to give them up," said Blanford. "If they can't do it politically," the researcher said the government would not "send the Lebanese army against Hezbollah". "So it has to be a question of a compromise and some kind of agreement, which is not going to be easy." Meanwhile, Israel has already signaled it would not hesitate to launch destructive military operations if Lebanon fails to disarm Hezbollah, as stipulated in the ceasefire agreement that ended their latest war.
Nahar Net
an hour ago
- Nahar Net
Aoun: Arms monopoly to be achieved despite difficulties, obstacles
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 12:42 President Joseph Aoun has said that 'arms monopoly will be achieved despite the difficulties and obstacles,' adding that authorities are 'awaiting the army's plan' on weapons monopolization to 'discuss it and approve it.' 'The implementation of the U.S. paper also requires approval from Syria and Israel as well as guarantees from the U.S. and France,' Aoun added, in remarks to Al-Arabiya TV. 'Achieving arms monopoly in the hand of the state does not harm Lebanon's rights and sovereignty,' he emphasized, adding that 'Cabinet's session today will continue the approval of decisions to implement arms monopolization.' 'We will press on with the implementation of the presidential inauguration speech and the Ministerial Statement,' the president went on to say. His remarks come after Cabinet approved Tuesday a historic decision to disarm Hezbollah and all other armed groups by the year's end, with the army being tasked with presenting a plan to the government before the end of August. Hezbollah rejected the decision and said it will deal with it 'as if it does not exist,' after the ministers of the Shiite Duo walked out of Cabinet in protest.
Nahar Net
an hour ago
- Nahar Net
Israeli strikes on south kill two, including child
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 11:26 Israel launched a series of air strikes on southern Lebanon on Wednesday night, killing two people including a child. The strikes wounded at least three people according to the health ministry. An Israeli strike on the southern town of Toulin killed one person and wounded another, the health ministry said, adding later that another person of Syrian nationality was killed and two were wounded in a separate strike on Deir Seryan. The Israeli military said it struck "weapons storage facilities, a missile launcher and Hezbollah terrorist infrastructure which stored engineering tools that allowed for the re-establishment of terrorist infrastructure in the area". Hezbollah said Israel must halt the attacks before any domestic debate about its weapons and a new defense strategy could begin. The strikes come ahead of a cabinet meeting scheduled for Thursday to continue talks on Hezbollah disarmament. The government had tasked the army in an earlier session Tuesday with developing a plan to restrict weapons to government forces by year end. The plan is to be presented to the government by the end of August for discussion and approval. Hezbollah said it would treat the decision "as if it did not exist", accusing the cabinet of committing a "grave sin". It "fully serves Israel's interests and leaves Lebanon exposed to the Israeli enemy without any deterrence", the group said. The Amal movement, headed by parliament speaker Nabih Berri, accused the government of "rushing to offer more gratuitous concessions" to Israel when it should have sought to end the ongoing attacks. It called Thursday's cabinet meeting "an opportunity for correction". Hezbollah opponent the Lebanese Forces, one of the country's two main Christian parties, said the cabinet's decision to disarm the militant group was "a pivotal moment in Lebanon's modern history -- a long-overdue step toward restoring full state authority and sovereignty". The Free Patriotic Movement, the other major Christian party and a former ally of Hezbollah, said it was in favor of the army receiving the group's weapons "to strengthen Lebanon's defensive power". Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a televised interview that any decision on disarmament "will ultimately rest with Hezbollah itself". "We support it from afar, but we do not intervene in its decisions," he added, noting that the group had "rebuilt itself" following setbacks during its war with Israel.
