AI Can Diagnose You with This Progressive Illness — and It's 86% Accurate, Study Says
A tool accessible via smart home devices can help diagnose people with Parkinson's disease.
The AI-powered tool was developed as part of a study by scientists at University of Rochester.
The tool prompts users to perform neurological tests in their own homes that involve speech, facial expression and finger movementsA tool accessible via smart home devices can help diagnose people with Parkinson's disease.
The AI-powered tool, called PARK, was developed as part of a study by scientists at University of Rochester.
According to the website, the tool prompts users to perform a variety of web-based neurological tests in their own homes that involve speech, facial expression and finger movements.
The tasks are then analyzed to detect whether the user shows signs of Parkinson's disease. After the results are given, the tool provides personalized resources for treatment or care.
Newsweek reports that the test asks users to recite two short sentences that use every letter of the alphabet at least once. Then, in mere seconds, the AI can analyze the recordings to look for patterns linked to the disease.
The toll has an 86% accuracy rate, per Newsweek.
PARK can be accessed by any major web browser, but the researchers also note that it can be a useful tool for smart home devices, such as Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human-interest stories.
"While we haven't established partnerships with these companies yet, our model is very lightweight and well-suited for such integration," computer scientist Tariq Adnan told Newsweek.
"With appropriate privacy safeguards and user consent, it could operate passively or on-demand through such widely used home devices,' he added. 'Once integrated, [in theory] a user could say something like 'screen me for Parkinson's symptoms,' and the system would prompt a short sentence to be read aloud.'
The tool was trained with data from over 1,300 participants in home care settings, clinical settings and at the InMotion Parkinson's disease care center in Ohio, according to Newsweek. Possible indicators for the disease include uttering sounds, pausing, breathing and adding "features of unintelligibility," according to computer science graduate student Abdelrahman Abdelkader.
The researchers note that access to neurological care can be a barrier for people to receive clinical diagnoses, and believe the tool can be used to encourage people to seek medical evaluation if they suspect they have the disease.
"We envision a gentle, user-centered experience. The tool would never deliver a diagnosis, rather would only flag whether a follow-up with a clinician might be worthwhile," Adnan said.
Parkinson's disease is characterized by the loss of nerve cells in the brain, per Mayo Clinic. It is unknown what causes the disease, although genes and environmental factors may play a risk.
The average onset of Parkinson's disease is around 70 years old.
Symptoms of the disease include memory loss, trouble with language, feeling irritable, having trouble chewing and swallowing, and difficulty sleeping.
Parkinson's Foundation states that about 1.1 million people in the United States have the disease.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Elon Musk Called Out by Bill Maher
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Elon Musk was called out by Bill Maher on a new episode of his podcast about his comments regarding the declining birth rate in the United States. Newsweek reached out to Musk's representative via email for comment on Tuesday. Why It Matters Musk is the world's wealthiest man, with a net worth of $401.7 billion as of August 5, according to Forbes. The 54-year-old is the CEO of Tesla, founder of aerospace company SpaceX, and led President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) until May. He purchased Twitter in 2022 and changed its name to X the following year. Maher, 69, is a comedian and political commentator known for his talk shows Real Time with Bill Maher and Politically Incorrect, as well as his podcast Club Random with Bill Maher. (L) Elon Musk in San Francisco on January 24, 2023. (R) Bill Maher in Los Angeles on February 28, 2025. (L) Elon Musk in San Francisco on January 24, 2023. (R) Bill Maher in Los Angeles on February 28, 2025.;for Creative Artists Agency, LLC What To Know During Monday's episode of Club Random with Bill Maher, Maher spoke with musician Rick Springfield about the Earth's population. Despite Springfield's granddaughter being born just a couple of weeks ago, the "Jessie's Girl" singer said the world doesn't need more people. "I am really falling behind in this reproductive competition," Maher, who has never married or had children, told listeners. "We don't need more!" Springfield said. "I think that," Maher responded. "And yet there's a big movement out there—Elon Musk—many other people talk about, 'We have to have more babies.' This is like a thing." "Eh, everyone else is taking care of that," Springfield said. "But I think they're wrong. I think we already have too many," the television host said. "I think we have way too many," Springfield agreed. "The Earth cannot support what it has now." "Exactly, exactly. Right. Their argument is stupid," Maher said. "Their argument is, 'There's plenty of room.' There's plenty of room. There's not plenty of resources. We could fit them here, we just can't feed them and take care of all their s***." "Exactly, where will all that s*** go? Where does all the food come from and where does all the s*** go?" Springfield asked. "It's insane, there's way too many of us." Maher appeared to be referring to Musk's comments about the declining birth rate. Over the years, the businessman has encouraged people to have more kids. Musk is the father of 14 children. At a Wall Street Journal event in 2021, Musk said, per CNBC: "There are not enough people. I can't emphasize this enough, there are not enough people." He added that the birth rate is "one of the biggest risks to civilization." According to the Congressional Budget Office, the U.S. fertility rate is forecast at 1.6 births per woman over the next 30 years. A 2.1 births per woman average is required to maintain a stable population. Musk shared his thoughts on the topic in a June 26 post on X. "People who have kids do need to have 3 kids to make up for those who have 0 or 1 kid or population will collapse," he said. At the time of publication, his note racked up more than 43.7 million views and 173,000 likes. What People Are Saying In June, Musk hit back at Bill Maher after he said on Real Time With Bill Maher that the tech billionaire "developed a drug habit." Musk wrote on X: "I'm not on drugs ffs." What Happens Next New episodes of Club Random with Bill Maher air Mondays on platforms like Spotify, YouTube and Apple Podcasts.
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Google's Smart Home Ecosystem Is Crumbling
When I started using a Google smart speaker six years ago, I was all in. Voice assistants have never been perfect—in fact, they always kind of sucked—but I found (having also used Alexa and Siri) that Google Assistant sucked just a little bit less than the competition. And the fact that it was actually linked to Google search for real web queries made it even better. Flash forward to now, and everything I just wrote couldn't be further from the truth. Things are arguably worse for the Google Assistant and Google's entire smart home ecosystem than they've ever been, and the transition (or full-on enshittification, if you're feeling spicy) into the dumpster was seemingly fast. As a result of that dysfunction, people who use the Google Home platform as their hub for smart home products like lights, cameras, and speakers have been pouring their frustrations onto forums like Reddit en masse over the past month. For those not-so-happy customers, the Google Home app seemed to be flat-out broken, meaning some affected couldn't even turn their lights on or off. When I say shit was broken, I mean shit was broken. Those problems were, in fact, so bad that Google addressed issues publicly on social media and promised to do better. Things did not improve, however. Issues for lots of people have persisted, and last week, news of a possible class action lawsuit started to percolate. Yikes. Hey everyone, I want to acknowledge the recent feedback about Google Assistant reliability on our home devices. I sincerely apologize for what you're experiencing and feeling! — Anish Kattukaran (@AnishKattukaran) July 23, 2025If you haven't been using Google products for your smart home needs, it may seem surprising that Google could so suddenly and rapidly drop the ball on an entire ecosystem of hardware and software. If you have been using Google Home and Google Assistant for your smart home needs, however, you're less likely to be surprised by the recent fallout. As someone who has been in this ecosystem, I can say from experience that recent blowback isn't the product of some bug or anything spontaneous, for that matter; it feels more like the product of years of erosion and neglect. The complaints over Google Home and Google Assistant date back so far that I initially ignored recent issues bubbling up on forums. More dissatisfaction with Google Assistant? In my line of work, we call that a day that ends in 'y.' And I'm not the only one. I'm just going to quote this full post below, not because it's special, but because it's a common complaint—a part that summarizes the whole. One Redditor wrote on r/GoogleHome two months ago: 'It used to be amazing. Then it started being more and more unreliable for activation. Then not being useful at all for opening times. Then being useless for pretty much any question that involves some thinking. Now I can't even stop a timer that is actively going off because it thinks that nothing's playing. I'm so tired of it.' It's hard to say when the slide toward the garbage bin started to happen; maybe it was when Google stopped collecting and listening to people's voice commands years ago; maybe it was when Google started to pivot more towards chatbots and generative AI, leaving its other platforms to rot; maybe the whole Google Home team got locked in some Severance-style room inside of Google's Mountain View HQ and no one has been able to find them for a few years. Regardless of how we got here, the fact that we're here now of all times feels almost ironic. By Google's estimation—and the estimation of competitors like Amazon and Apple—this is supposed to be a golden age of voice assistants. Thanks to large language models, voice assistants are supposed to get a major glow-up and should be more capable of understanding natural language and multistep commands. Maybe that will still happen, but for now, all of that promise is still in the future, with Siri delayed and Amazon's Alexa+ idling in early access. I don't know, maybe you just have to hit rock bottom in order to make progress, but at this point, it's hard to take Google's word for it, so all we're left with is a broken home, so to speak. From the outside, it looks to me like Google's smart home empire is crumbling, and for the sake of all of us and our stupid smart lights, I hope a fix is in sight.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Florida Issues Raw Milk Warning After 7 People Hospitalized
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Florida Department of Health issued a public warning this week after 21 people, including six children under the age of 10, fell ill and seven were hospitalized due to multiple illnesses linked to drinking raw milk. Campylobacter and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) infections were both linked to the consumption of raw milk from a single farm in Northeast and Central Florida. At least two patients have experienced severe complications, prompting state officials to intensify alerts about the health risks of unpasteurized dairy products. Newsweek reached out to the Florida Department of Health outside of regular working hours via email for comment. Why It Matters The state health alert highlights the potentially serious risks of consuming raw, or unpasteurized, milk, which can contain harmful bacteria. Pasteurization, a heat-treating process required for most dairy sales nationally, kills these germs. However, raw milk remains available in Florida solely for animal or pet consumption, which complicates oversight and regulation. According to the Florida Department of Health, vulnerable groups, including children, older adults, pregnant women, and people with weakened immune systems, face a heightened risk of developing a severe illness. STEC bacteria can, in severe cases, result in complications like hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a type of kidney failure, which especially endangers children's health. File photo: bottles of raw milk. File photo: bottles of raw milk. JoNel Aleccia/AP What To Know Health officials reported that the current outbreak originated from a single farm, though the farm's name has not yet been released. The infections have been traced directly to the consumption of raw milk products from this farm, prompting concern over its sanitation protocols. Federal agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), strongly advise against consuming raw milk due to the risk of serious illness. Between 1998 and 2018, at least 202 outbreaks linked to raw milk were reported in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, resulting in 2,645 illnesses and 228 hospitalizations. However, some believe that drinking raw milk is healthy, a stance supported by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Some people believe raw milk is "more nutritious, with higher levels of enzymes, beneficial bacteria, and vitamins that may be reduced during pasteurization," Darin Detwiler, a food safety adviser and professor at Northeastern University's College of Professional Studies, told Newsweek. "Others say it tastes better or supports local farming practices. There's also a cultural or nostalgic appeal for those who grew up drinking milk straight from the source," he said. Kathryn J. Boor, a professor of food science at Cornell University, told Newsweek that "some people claim that they feel better after drinking raw milk relative to after consuming pasteurized milk." Raw milk may also be considered by some to be "more natural than pasteurized milk, which is appealing to some consumers," she said. However, "to say that raw milk is more nutritious than pasteurized milk is a fallacy," Detwiler said. "Pasteurization only slightly reduces some heat-sensitive vitamins, like B12, but overall nutrient loss is minimal," he said, adding that the "core nutritional value of milk remains intact." "While raw milk may contain probiotics, these are unpredictable and unregulated. The risk of harmful bacteria often outweighs any potential probiotic benefit," Detwiler added. On farms, "milking areas are never sterile, which is how milk can become contaminated," Boor said. The problem is that "milk that has become contaminated with soil of some nature, for example any material that may be on the cow's body, generally does not look, taste, or smell different from milk that is not contaminated," she said. This means that "raw milk may become contaminated with bacteria from an unclean environment," Boor said, adding that in some cases, the bacteria can make people sick. "Those who choose to consume raw milk are at greater risk of exposure to such microbes than those who choose to consume pasteurized milk," she said. What People Are Saying Kathryn J. Boor, a professor of food science at Cornell University, told Newsweek: "Pasteurization was developed scientifically with one goal: to ensure milk's safety while simultaneously minimizing changes in flavor, nutrition, and functional characteristics. I grew up on a dairy farm and have focused much of my career on dairy science. Just as I don't choose to drive my car without wearing my seatbelt, I also don't choose to drink milk that has not been pasteurized. At this time, there is no substitute for pasteurization in terms of risk reduction." Darin Detwiler, a food safety adviser and professor at Northeastern University's College of Professional Studies, told Newsweek: "Raw milk can carry harmful bacteria like E. coli, Listeria, Salmonella, and Campylobacter, which can cause severe illness or even death. Raw milk has a troubling history of outbreaks of these pathogens, resulting in life-threatening illnesses, especially for vulnerable populations—children, pregnant women, older adults, and people with weakened immune systems. Even healthy adults can experience serious complications from contaminated raw milk." He added: "Hospitalization rate is significantly higher for raw milk outbreaks than for pasteurized milk. Fatal cases have occurred, especially in young children and immunocompromised individuals. Listeria is a primary concern due to its high fatality rate. While raw milk accounts for a small percentage of total milk consumed, it causes a disproportionately high number of outbreaks." He also said: "There are steps that can reduce—but not eliminate—risk, such as sourcing raw milk from farms with excellent hygiene practices, regularly tested animals, and chilled transportation. However, even with best practices, raw milk remains inherently risky because harmful pathogens can exist even in seemingly healthy herds. Pasteurization is still the most reliable way to kill those pathogens without significantly impacting nutrition." Kalmia (Kali) E. Kniel, a professor and associate chair in the Department of Animal and Food Sciences at the University of Delaware, told Newsweek: "I believe that people want to consume raw milk based on the perceived benefits. In reality, the only benefits that have been identified in the published literature are those from children who grew up on small farms in Europe and were exposed to microorganisms on the farm. I believe this is more related to the hygiene hypothesis and stimulation of the immune system. There was some reduction in allergies shown in these children, which was likely based on exposure to the dust and soil on a farm. "Again, these were very small farms in Europe, and these were not random clinical trials or complete scientific studies, so we should be cautious with interpretation. There is no scientific study to support the consumption of raw milk by children or adults that shows a lifelong benefit." She added: "Milk has been historically pasteurized to reduce risk of illness and to increase the shelf-life of the product. Issues surrounding raw milk sales and consumption are not limited to those of food safety and public health, but also include issues of burden and capacity of state inspections, investigations, and potential for impact on the health care system." "Following good hygiene practices on the farm and during milking can reduce the chance of milk contamination, but not eliminate it." What Happens Next State health officials are continuing to investigate the issue, and the Florida Department of Health said in its warning that those in the state are "encouraged to use this information to make informed decisions about their health and sources of raw milk should they choose to consume it."
