logo
Watch The First Ever Multi-Car Pileup Crash Test

Watch The First Ever Multi-Car Pileup Crash Test

Yahoo20-05-2025

If, like me, you're morbidly curious and you like to watch crash test videos in your free time then buckle up because last week PBS published a comprehensive documentary that recreates and investigates a multi-car pileup. Don't worry if you're on the squeamish side, the test is conducted without putting any living beings in danger. Instead of having humans behind the wheel, test engineers rigged up each test vehicle with remote controls that a group of test subjects operated safely from remote simulators.
This crash test was meant to simulate a multi-car pileup on a freeway, which in the real world poses a significant challenge for accident investigators to recreate without firsthand knowledge of how the accident actually took place. This experiment offers unique insight into what actually happens in the event of a devastating crash scenario, how real drivers react to a sudden road hazard, and how vehicle safety systems perform in such a complex crash.
PBS filmed the test which was staged on a two-mile long stretch of road on a decommissioned Royal Air Force base in Campbeltown, Scotland that was modified to mimic a freeway with a slow lane, middle lane, fast lane, and a shoulder. The film is 1 hour and 40 minutes long and provides a thorough deep dive into the methodology of the test as well as the investigation that follows, so it's perfect for diehard crash test aficionados and normies alike.
Read more: These Movies And TV Shows Have The Best Car Casting
As the first crash test of its kind, this high-speed pileup scenario required countless hours of preparation to ensure that no lives were harmed, no secrets were revealed, and that the accident occurred as it needed to. All eight passenger vehicles and one semi-truck used in the experiment had to be rigged up to operate as full-scale remote-controlled cars so test participants could best simulate a real-world crash, but only some of the vehicles were driven by unknowing volunteers. Half of the vehicles were piloted by test engineers who knew what to expect from the experiment, but the other half were unaware of the plan to simulate a multi-car pileup.
The four unsuspecting drivers were representative of different demographics: one very new female driver who remotely drove a 2002 Porsche Boxster, one mid-twenties male driver who describes himself as a "boy racer" who operated a 2009 Volkswagen GTI, one older woman who operated a 2012 Toyota Prius, and an older man who operated a 2012 Ford F-150. The other vehicles operated by engineers were a 2005 Audi A8, a 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan, a 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML, and a 2012 Vauxhall Vivaro cargo van. Each vehicle was selected to represent different vehicle classes, sizes, and engine layouts to provide a real-world representation of a diverse group of random cars.
Several Smart ForTwos were converted into simulators for the participants to operate their respective remote-controlled cars from, and a psychologist observed the volunteers as they practiced driving the remote-controlled cars and observed that their bodies were reacting to the situation as though they were actually behind the wheel of the moving vehicle. Dummies were placed into the remote-controlled cars, some wearing their seatbelts and others intentionally left unbuckled, and the stage was set for the test.
The accident staged in this test is meant to recreate an icy British motorway with a patch of black ice, as is sometimes the case in real-world high-speed pileups. To simulate a low-traction, icy surface on the airport runway, engineers found that gravel provided a loss of friction that was most similar to an icy roadway, and the test commenced. The team initiated the pileup by driving a remote-controlled semi-truck across the simulated lanes of oncoming traffic, directly in the path of the remote-controlled passenger cars right as the roadway suddenly became slippery. The unsuspecting drivers did their best to avoid the crash but could only do so much given the challenging road conditions.
The results are both alarming and fascinating, but I don't mean to spoil the ending, so give it a watch for yourself. On a totally related note, always wear your seatbelt and remain vigilant when you're behind the wheel of a car, as those are your best defenses against a potentially deadly accident like this one.
H/T to reader Steven Lance for sending this our way!
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster
Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster

There is a statistic in my colleague Laurence Iliff's story on the failure of full-size electric pickups that, pardon the pun, shocked me. The combustion and hybrid Toyota Tundra had more new-vehicle registrations during the first quarter than the entire industry's collection of full-size electric pickups — by a lot. That statistic is in no way a brag on the Tundra, which remains a distant No. 5 in what is now a five-horse segment since the death of the even slower-selling Nissan Titan. According to S&P Global Mobility, the Tundra recorded a meager 36,895 new registrations in the U.S. in the first quarter, while the Ford F-150 Lightning, Tesla Cybertruck, Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Hummer, Rivian R1T and GMC Sierra EV collectively posted about 22,000 registrations. By comparison, combustion-powered pickups from Ford, Chevrolet, GMC and Ram reached 478,823 registrations in the first quarter, S&P said. Were it not for investments and expectations that rival the size of the immense front fascias on virtually all of the aforementioned full-size behemoths, this failed experiment would already be over. The score: Newtonian Physics ∞, Hype & Hope 0. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. I can't begin to fathom how many tens of billions of dollars were spent by automakers and their suppliers developing and building those full-size electric pickups over the last decade. You can, however, get some sense of how bad the miss was when you look at the sales/production volumes auto executives anticipated, including Elon Musk's quarter- to half-million annual sales estimate for the Cybertruck, or Ford's initial F-150 Lightning estimate of up to 150,000 sales annually. So why did full-size electric pickups fail so badly? I would argue that it wasn't just physics — though the need for a bigger, more expensive battery to push these bigger vehicles farther as long as they are not towing anything shouldn't be minimized. But I think a share of the responsibility for this collective flop also lies with the companies' product planning departments. While all vehicles are compromised in some form or fashion by the time they reach consumers, full-size electric pickups lack a fundamental quality that has made their combustion-powered counterparts the U.S. sales champs for decades: Uncompromised utility. The legacy pickups are renowned for accomplishing whatever task their owners set them to. That unstoppable capability is what gave rise to the 'lifestyle' pickup in the first place, as consumers desired at least a taste of that confidence, even if they rarely, if ever, actually needed that power. Product planners and their auto executive bosses failed to account in their sales projections for just how much compromise an electric-pickup owner would face in everyday life. Sure, the trucks have some excellent features, including loads and loads of torque, but so do their combustion counterparts. And while it may cost extra fuel to tow a trailer with those combustion-powered vehicles, a heavy trailer sucks up a battery pack's juice quickly — and recharging is not nearly as quick and convenient as a gas station fill-up. It's the same reason that battery-electric semis are probably doomed to failure: It's just the wrong technology for that use case. Sorry. In a world ruled by logic and not emotion, society would consign new technologies to the areas where they have the greatest advantage. Battery-electric powertrains make the greatest sense in vehicles with limited mass and with limited demands, while hydrogen (and diesel) is more efficient in larger, demand-dependent vehicles where towing capability is paramount. We don't live in that world, unfortunately, which is why full-size electric pickups are failing. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

3 Used Luxury Trucks That Are Good Investments for Middle Class
3 Used Luxury Trucks That Are Good Investments for Middle Class

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

3 Used Luxury Trucks That Are Good Investments for Middle Class

A truck can be extremely valuable to a middle class family. There's ample space to haul items from stores, garage sales and road trips. Many trucks come with a backseat, too, so all the kids can fit comfortably. Drivers can even put a camper on the truck for an easy shelter during a camping trip. There's no question that a truck is worth the money, but are luxury trucks worth it? Trending Now: Consider This: Alex Black, the chief marketing officer at EpicVIN, says yes. 'They're good value because trucks last longer than most luxury cars,' Black said. 'They're made to work. And the luxury versions depreciate rapidly in the first few years, so the used purchaser gets the technology and comfort for half of the original cost.' Read on to find out which luxury trucks Black recommends buying, and how much you can save by getting them used. The 2025 Ram 1500 starts at more than $75,000 new. However, picking up a used one from 2019 through 2022 will be significantly cheaper, and the features are worth every penny, according to Black. 'They're full of amenities, ride extremely smoothly, and aren't expensive used,' he said. 'They depreciate rapidly, so you'll score a bargain a few years down the line.' Looking at Carvana, interested buyers can find a 2019 Ram 1500 Limited for as low as $26,000. Used Laramie Longhorn models were more expensive, starting at around $40,000 for a 2019, but still much less expensive than buying new. I'm a Car Expert: The Ford F-150 King Ranch is often praised for its comfort and powerful engine. It's certainly one of the more respected luxury trucks on the market. The same goes for the Platinum, which is also praised for its comfy seats and high-powered engine. '[These trucks] are extremely reliable, simple to work on, and there are many used ones available,' Black said. 'If you steer clear of the hybrid or the first generation of EcoBoost, you're generally good to go.' These models start at around $75,000 new. However, Carvana showed King Ranch models for as low as $35,000 for a 2018 model. Platinum models from 2018 can be found for right around that price, as well. Drivers can get all the features for half the price when shopping the used market. The 2025 GMC Sierra Denali boasts a powerful engine and seats with lumbar support for long drives. Black praised it for delivering a great experience for drivers. 'Smooth ride, luxurious interior, and good residual value.' However, the starting price for a new truck is $65,400. Black said although the Sierra Denali depreciates slower, you can find good deals for the 2019 through 2021 models. On Carvana, 2019 models start at $39,590. More From GOBankingRates 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks This article originally appeared on 3 Used Luxury Trucks That Are Good Investments for Middle Class

Media's glaring double standard exposed: Musk vilified while Dem senator gets a pass for identical gesture
Media's glaring double standard exposed: Musk vilified while Dem senator gets a pass for identical gesture

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Media's glaring double standard exposed: Musk vilified while Dem senator gets a pass for identical gesture

Elon Musk and Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., made similar gestures this year that were handled very differently by the press, according to a study conducted by the Media Research Center. Musk was famously accused of doing the Nazi salute in January while celebrating President Donald Trump's inauguration at the Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., when the Tesla mogul placed his hand over his heart and quickly extended it in a motion that alarmed liberal pundits. Booker made a similar gesture on Saturday when he capped off a speech to the California Democratic Party's convention by placing his right hand on his chest before raising it to the crowd. When Musk made the motion, he told the crowd he wanted to thank Trump supporters "from my heart to yours," but many quickly accused Musk of the Nazi-era salute. When Booker did it, many conservatives took to social media to remind them that Musk's critics frowned upon the move, but their point was essentially disregarded by the press. Booker Slammed For Alleged 'Nazi Salute' To Cali Dems Just Months After Musk Was Dragged For Same Gesture CNN, MSNBC and PBS spent 16 minutes and 17 seconds on the Musk ordeal in the week immediately following his gesture, according to the Media Research Center. The outlets found time to cover Musk during the midst of the inauguration as President Donald Trump made nonstop news with a bevy of executive orders. Booker's similar gesture was completely ignored by CNN, MSNBC and PBS, along with the broadcast networks, according to the MRC. Read On The Fox News App ABC, NBC and CBS didn't cover either gesture, according to the MRC. NewsBusters senior research analyst Bill D'Agostino, who conducted the MRC study, noted that pundits continued to cover Elon's "salute" long after the first week. "Musk's salute has been brought up a total of 55 times on left-wing cable – CNN/MSNBC – and PBS, but only 22 of those occurred during the first week immediately following the incident," D'Agostino told Fox News Digital. Elon Musk And Cory Booker Made Similar Salutes But Media Reacted Much Differently "The longest single discussion about it took place more than a month after the actual incident, on the February 23 edition of MSNBC's 'Velshi,' during a larger segment which solely focused on the question of whether Musk is, in fact, a crypto-Nazi," D'Agostino added. "Musk was rarely given the benefit of the doubt for the gesture." D'Agostino found that much of the CNN and MSNBC coverage featured commentators or journalists calling it a "Nazi salute" or "Hitler salute." "The vast majority were eager not only to describe it as such, but to draw connections between it and Musk's subsequent speech to Germany's AFD party," D'Agostino said. "They're still talking about it," he added, noting that Democratic congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh even mentioned Musk's gesture this week on CNN. Elon Musk's Mother Urges Him To Sue Cnn, Other News Outlets For Peddling 'Nazi Salute' Narrative Booker's team has attempted to downplay the similar hand gesture. "Cory Booker was obviously just waving to the crowd. Anyone who claims his wave is the same as Elon Musk's gesture is operating in bad faith. The differences between the two are obvious to anyone without an agenda," a Booker spokesperson told Forbes. Booker's office did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Heritage Foundation media fellow Tim Young told Fox News Digital he believes the ordeal is yet another "of the many instances where you see a clear media bias" against Republicans, as Musk was still tied to Trump when the incident occurred. Musk and Trump have had a messy public spat this week, but it remains to be seen if that will improve Musk's standing in the anti-Trump article source: Media's glaring double standard exposed: Musk vilified while Dem senator gets a pass for identical gesture

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store