China passes private sector law, addressing gripes of beleaguered businesses
China passed a much-anticipated law to shore up the country's private economy on Wednesday, as Beijing delivers on its oft-repeated promise to protect and promote the non-state sector at a time when the Chinese economy looks to hinge more on domestic dynamism to ensure growth amid a trade war with the United States.
The 78-article Private Economy Promotion Law was passed following its third reading by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, China's top legislature. It will come into force on May 20.
As China's first law focused on promoting the private sector, it stipulates measures to promote fair market competition, encourage the involvement of private firms in scientific and technological projects, and safeguard their economic rights and interests, according to state media reports. The full text of the legislation has yet to be published.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
Li Zhaoqian, president of the China Society for the Study of the Private-Sector Economy, wrote in an article published in Communist Party newspaper the People's Daily on Wednesday that the law's success would depend on it being thoroughly implemented.
'There are still difficult issues and choke points such as market access, unpaid debts owed to private enterprises, financing barriers, as well as protecting the rights of entrepreneurs,' Li said. 'To tackle these, we need more vigorous coordination to strengthen implementation supervision [of the law].'
Tang Dajie, a senior researcher with the China Enterprise Institute think tank in Beijing, said a key provision in the law was a measure aimed at preventing local authorities from unfairly targeting private businesses – so-called 'profit-driven' law enforcement.
'In the past two years, the business community has responded strongly to profit-seeking law enforcement and officers going beyond their jurisdiction to collect fines or seize assets,' Tang said. 'The law will restrict the law enforcement power of the public security department and promote strict, standardized, fair and civilized law enforcement.'
China's leaders hope the new law will be a morale booster. There had been expectations that the law would be deliberated over – and possibly passed – during last month's annual legislative session, but it was not.
The passage of the law appeared to have been accelerated since the latest meeting of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress began on Sunday, with legislators voting after the third reading, Tang noted.
The move comes at a crucial moment for China, as government efforts to boost domestic demand and investment gain increasing urgency with the Chinese economy beginning to feel the impact of sky-high US tariffs.
The drafting and crafting of a law dedicated to the private sector began in 2024, led by the top economic planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission. A draft was released for public feedback in October.
And the law's second review in February sparked wider discussions on market entry and enforcement issues. That month, President Xi Jinping raised expectations when he assembled the country's most prominent private entrepreneurs to rally the sector and seek its help in stabilising the economy. It was the first such meeting held since 2018.
China's private sector is responsible for more than 60 per cent of the nation's gross domestic product, 70 per cent of its technological innovation, and 80 per cent of urban jobs, according to the National Bureau of Statistics.
But China's unbalanced economic recovery, sluggish consumption, and regulatory uncertainties have sapped investor sentiment for years. The private sector's long-standing complaints, including the curtailment of market access and perceived favouritism towards the state sector, have yet to be fully addressed.
Private investment has contracted for years. But in an encouraging sign, the sector's new investment edged up 0.4 per cent, year on year, in the first quarter.
More from South China Morning Post:
For the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Meta and TikTok challenge tech fees in second highest EU court
LUXEMBOURG: Meta Platforms and TikTok said a European Union supervisory fee levied on them was disproportionate and based on a flawed methodology as they took their fight with tech regulators to Europe's second highest court on Wednesday. Under the Digital Services Act that became law in 2022, the two companies and 16 others are subject to a supervisory fee amounting to 0.05 per cent of their annual worldwide net income aimed at covering the European Commission's cost of monitoring their compliance with the law. The size of the annual fee is based on the number of average monthly active users for each company and whether the company posts a profit or loss in the preceding financial year. Meta told judges at the General Court it was not trying to avoid paying its fair share of the fee, but it questioned how the Commission had calculated the levy, saying it had been based on the revenue of the group rather than of the subsidiary. Meta's lawyer Assimakis Komninos told the panel of five judges the company still did not know how the fee was calculated. He said the provisions in the Digital Services Act, or DSA, "go against the letter and the spirit of the law, are totally untransparent with black boxes and have led to completely implausible and absurd results." ByteDance-owned Chinese online social media platform TikTok was equally critical. "What has happened here is anything but fair or proportionate. The fee has used inaccurate figures and discriminatory methods," TikTok lawyer Bill Batchelor told the court. "It inflates TikTok's fees, requires it to pay, not just for itself, but for other platforms and disregards the excessive fee cap," he said. He accused the Commission of double counting the companies' users, saying this was discriminatory because users switching between their mobile phones and laptops would then be counted twice. He also said regulators had exceeded their legal power by setting the fee cap at the level of group profits. Commission lawyer Lorna Armati rejected both companies' arguments and defended the Commission's use of group profit as a reference value to calculate the supervisory fee. "When a group has consolidated accounts, it is the financial resources of the group as a whole that are available to that provider in order to bear the burden of the fee," she told the court. "The providers had sufficient information to understand why and how the Commission used the numbers that it did and there is no question of any breach of their right to be heard now, unequal treatment," she said. The Court is expected to issue its ruling next year.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Nvidia, Perplexity partner with European firms to boost local AI models
A NVIDIA logo is shown at SIGGRAPH 2017 in Los Angeles, California, U.S. July 31, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -Nvidia and artificial intelligence search firm Perplexity on Wednesday said they are partnering with more than a dozen AI firms in Europe and the Middle East to refine those firms' AI technologies and distribute them to local businesses. Nvidia said it will work with model makers in France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and Sweden to help make AI models in local languages become what are called reasoning models, which are capable of carrying out more complicated tasks. AI technologies built in English and Chinese have started to shift to that technology, but that transition is more difficult in languages where less training data is available. Kari Briski, vice president of generative AI software for enterprise at Nvidia, said the company will help model makers generate new data - known as synthetic data - in local languages to help improve them. "We're doing a lot of synthetic data generation to bring to these low-resource languages and translating our reasoning data so that they can train on it," Briski said in an interview Tuesday. "Europe needs strong models that reflect each nation's unique language and culture." Once those local models are trained, Perplexity will help distribute them in Europe, where businesses can run them in local data centers and use them to carry out business tasks such as researching a new topic. Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas said Germany is already Perplexity's second largest market by revenue. "That's the kind of system we are heading to in the future, where models are basically doing a few hours' worth of work in one single prompt," Srinivas said. The deal was part of a number of announcements Nvidia made at an AI conference in Paris on Wednesday. Nvidia and Perplexity did not disclose any financial terms of the deal. (Reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing by Sam Holmes)
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Meta and TikTok challenge tech fees in second highest EU court
Meta logo is seen in this illustration taken, August 22, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) -Meta Platforms and TikTok said a European Union supervisory fee levied on them was disproportionate and based on a flawed methodology as they took their fight with tech regulators to Europe's second highest court on Wednesday. Under the Digital Services Act that became law in 2022, the two companies and 16 others are subject to a supervisory fee amounting to 0.05% of their annual worldwide net income aimed at covering the European Commission's cost of monitoring their compliance with the law. The size of the annual fee is based on the number of average monthly active users for each company and whether the company posts a profit or loss in the preceding financial year. Meta told judges at the General Court it was not trying to avoid paying its fair share of the fee, but it questioned how the Commission had calculated the levy, saying it had been based on the revenue of the group rather than of the subsidiary. Meta's lawyer Assimakis Komninos told the panel of five judges the company still did not know how the fee was calculated. He said the provisions in the Digital Services Act, or DSA, "go against the letter and the spirit of the law, are totally untransparent with black boxes and have led to completely implausible and absurd results". ByteDance-owned Chinese online social media platform TikTok was equally critical. "What has happened here is anything but fair or proportionate. The fee has used inaccurate figures and discriminatory methods," TikTok lawyer Bill Batchelor told the court. "It inflates TikTok's fees, requires it to pay, not just for itself, but for other platforms and disregards the excessive fee cap," he said. He accused the Commission of double counting the companies' users, saying this was discriminatory because users switching between their mobile phones and laptops would then be counted twice. He also said regulators had exceeded their legal power by setting the fee cap at the level of group profits. Commission lawyer Lorna Armati rejected both companies' arguments and defended the Commission's use of group profit as a reference value to calculate the supervisory fee. "When a group has consolidated accounts, it is the financial resources of the group as a whole that are available to that provider in order to bear the burden of the fee," she told the court. "The providers had sufficient information to understand why and how the Commission used the numbers that it did and there is no question of any breach of their right to be heard now, unequal treatment," she said. The Court is expected to issue its ruling next year. The cases are T-55/24 Meta Platforms Ireland v Commission and T-58/24 TikTok Technology v Commission. (Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; editing by Barbara Lewis)
