logo
How Trump turned the tide in his trade war

How Trump turned the tide in his trade war

CNN3 days ago
President Donald Trump has pulled off an impressive feat: He is raising tariffs on some of America's most important trading partners, and the world is largely cheering the agreements as victories.
Placing historically high taxes on imports from around the world — particularly at a time when American consumers are still reeling from the highest inflation they've experienced in four decades — marked one of Trump's boldest gambles of his presidency. Trump was largely elected on his pledge to fix Americans' finances. Economists have widely shunned his trade policy, which is expected to raise costs for businesses and consumers.
But Trump zagged when everyone was zigging, and — so far — the bet has paid off. He achieved that with some old-fashioned psychology: setting the bar so high for potential tariff pain that anything that has come below that bar appears like a win.
Trump 'always has a plan, but it's not always obvious,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg Television Wednesday morning.
For example, Trump had threatened Japan with a 25% tariff earlier this month when negotiations stalled. But late Tuesday, a trade agreement between the two nations was announced, including a tariff rate of 15% on Japanese goods imported into the United States. US markets got a healthy bounce higher Wednesday. Japan's markets took off like a rocket.
But 15% is more than the 10% that US importers have been paying for Japanese exports since April, when Trump first rolled out his so-called reciprocal tariffs on trading partners — and much more than what the Japanese were paying before Trump took office.
The victory, some analysts say, is the certainty that the trade agreements provide investors, consumers and businesses.
'The positive is that hopefully we're coming to the end of all the tariff cloudiness in terms of what the ultimate rates will be so businesses can plan around them,' said Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer of One Point BFG Wealth Partners, in a note to investors Wednesday morning. Boockvar, however, acknowledged this is 'a bizarre political and economic theory world we now live in.'
The trade war is far from complete, and the long-term implications of Trump's decisions could yet be damaging — economically and politically. But, in the near term, Trump appears to be winning.
That tide began to turn on April 9, when Trump paused for 90 days his 'Liberation Day' tariffs announced a week earlier that had sent the stock market plunging and briefly entering bear market territory. The bond market had also begun to show signs that it might break — until Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent guided Trump away from his harshest tariff levels.
Markets have rallied from that point on, and consumer sentiment — which sank near all-time lows — has rebounded.
Several other events helped soothe fears since the tariff pause: On April 12, the Trump administration excluded smartphones and electronics from the historically high tariffs it had placed on China, leading to another market bounce-back. In mid-May, the Trump administration reached an agreement with China to lower tariffs dramatically and open some markets that both sides had closed off as tensions rose. Tariffs on Chinese imports fell to 35% from 145%, which had been a historic level that served as an effective shipping embargo.
A trade agreement with the UK, a reinforced China agreement and a slew of announcements Tuesday on trade, from Indonesia to the Philippines and then Japan also provided much-needed doses of certainty.
Trump has also used tariffs, deals and threats as a way to give US industry a boost. He has fought hard against so-called non-tariff barriers, including digital services taxes, which the administration believes put undue pressure on the American tech industry.
For example, late last month, Trump railed against Canada for imposing a tax on online companies and threatened to end trade talks. Trump also said he would set a new tariff for Canada by the end of this week. Days later, Canada backed down and dropped the tax.
Trump worked to include opening US exports to foreign countries as part of his trade agreements, too, including beef to the United Kingdom, rice and cars to Japan, and various items to Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines.
However, it's not clear Trump can claim victory on trade just yet. At least dozens of trading partners are expected to get higher tariffs set at the end of next week, and Trump has floated raising the 10% universal tariff he imposed on April 2 to 15% or 20%. The European Union, another major US trading partner, has found a trade agreement elusive, and tariffs could surge on both sides of the Atlantic as a result.
The US and global economies have largely been able to withstand Trump's tariffs over the past several months, but it's not clear that they can if those rates go higher — particularly as US importers work through warehoused inventories of goods that were brought in to the United States before tariffs were put in place.
'It remains too early to fully understand the longer-term implications, especially with another round of new tariff developments expected in August,' said Lynn Song, ING's chief economist for Greater China, said in a note to clients Wednesday morning.
Inflation is starting to creep higher. Business sentiment is improving, but earnings and growth expectations remain pretty stagnant. Consumer sentiment is on the upswing but still comparatively low to where it was before Trump started putting tariffs in place. The job market is showing some cracks.
As a result, the US dollar continues to sink sharply, in a sign of concern about potential US economic weakness to come. US and Japanese bonds sold off Wednesday, too.
That's the market's way of waying the certainty of the present could quickly turn into more tumult in the future.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why a 'garbage rally' powered by junk stocks could explain quant hedge funds' no good, very bad summer
Why a 'garbage rally' powered by junk stocks could explain quant hedge funds' no good, very bad summer

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why a 'garbage rally' powered by junk stocks could explain quant hedge funds' no good, very bad summer

Quant hedge funds have been losing money since the start of June. The causes are unclear, though execs, traders, and banks have pointed to a few factors. Wednesday was another rough day, as the average quant lost 0.8%, according to Goldman Sachs. As the fundamental investing world marvels at another potential bubble made up of meme stocks and retail traders, quant hedge funds are trying to solve a much more complex problem. The smartest people at the smart money firms have been on a weekslong losing streak starting at the beginning of June, with firms like Qube, Two Sigma, and Point72's Cubist suffering losses over that time. Wednesday was another rough day of trading for many funds as the average quant lost 0.8%, according to Goldman Sachs. The bank's prime brokerage unit said July was on track to be the worst month in five years and pointed to similar factors as it did earlier in the week: A momentum sell-off, crowded trades, and high volatility in certain stocks. Business Insider previously reported that quant firms have been trying to pinpoint the cause of the steady-drip losses that have eroded a hot start to the year in systematic trading. Goldman isn't the only firm that's begun to wrap its head around what's happening. Computer-run managers have come up with theses, found parallels to past markets, and are even planning for a quick rebound. A belief taking hold is that broader market calamity is unlikely to spread, as the sources of pain aren't fundamental market weakness or a lurking economic maelstrom, but rather the opposite: a surprisingly strong economy that has flooded the markets — and questionable stocks — with liquidity that happened to catch quants wrong-footed. Dark Forest Technologies founder Jacob Kline wrote in a Friday note to investors that the current scenario is "not at all like 2007," when forced deleveraging inflicted rapid losses across the systematic space. Kline, who was previously on the investment committee at Bridgewater, said this summer's swoon is a byproduct of "what we politely call a 'garbage rally.'" He theorizes that the resurgence in heavily shorted junk stocks in recent weeks has forced some smaller quant firms to sell their positions, adding to the pain for everyone still holding on. "It's a bad month but not a crisis; the drivers are atypical but not surprising," the note reads. It's not Sydney Sweeney and the memestock crowd Don't give too much credit to Sydney Sweeney and the memestock crowd. They were late to the ball game. One executive at a multimanager fund involved in quant strategies said some large funds started noticing losses before June. Weeks before Kohl's and American Eagle became retail darlings, some micro-cap stocks and thinly traded Chinese names "had been running for three weeks doing silly things." "There's no underlying malady. No COVID. No great financial crisis," the multimanager exec said. He ascribes blame largely to a broader surge in market liquidity and risk appetite, a result of positive macroeconomic developments that began burbling months ago. A "peculiar set of circumstances" preceded the quant bleeding, according to Kline. The broader stock market rally heading into June was largely driven by retail and systematic trend-following. Hedge funds had relatively low net exposure — but they had been hedging the quality stocks by shorting weak ones, which was profitable. The market reached all-time highs in June, and with prices so rich, hedge funds stopped adding to those high-quality stocks but also stopped betting against the weak ones. Removing their short positions boosted "garbage" stocks, which attracted the attention of retail traders and meme stock enthusiasts, driving those positions up further. Because quants, in simplistic terms, use their mathematical firepower to "sort good from bad," as Kline put it, this rally in low-quality companies set many of them up for pain. "Quants are generally going to be on the other side of that kind of arbitrary move," Kline said. Strategies that jump on short-term trends "may be exacerbating" the surge, said Antoine Haddad, founder of $1 billion Bainbridge Partners, a multistrategy hedge fund with quant portfolio managers. This includes "AI-driven algos too," he said. The big-picture driver of this frenzied trading is the strong macroeconomic backdrop — low inflation, muted tariff impact, lack of rate hikes from the Federal Reserve — which has attracted more money into the market. During Covid and the original memestock craze four years ago, the market was awash in liquidity, and money gravitated to odd places, including seemingly worthless stocks — not to mention NFTs, cryptocurrencies, and SPACs. What's happening in 2025 is an echo, similar but far less intense. Another wrinkle and outgrowth of the increasing liquidity and risk appetite is the thaw in equity capital markets, which "have lit up like a Christmas tree," the multimanager exec said. While capital raising was dead much of this year, companies in June began raising money again through initial public offerings, follow-on raises, and convertible bonds, all of which "accelerated towards the end of the quarter, as global issuers and investors gained confidence amid a market rebound," according to Morgan Stanley's mid-July earnings call. This allows companies, "garbage" or otherwise, to improve their prospects by injecting their coffers at attractive valuations, potentially boosting their stock price as well. While many hedge funds closely monitor such activity, it's not traditionally the bailiwick of quants. "Quants don't sit in that business and they don't see that flow," the multimanager exec said. All eyes on the industry's largest quant funds Understanding the source of the quant carnage is one question. Identifying when the pain will abate is equally important. One trader who works at one of the industry's largest quant funds told BI that the actions of the biggest firms will be the most significant factor over the next week. If these funds are forced to sell, then there could be serious pain that could impact everyone from Fidelity mutual funds to Robinhood retail traders. "Some small players don't have a choice but to capitulate," the multimanager exec said, adding that the larger firms know that if a major peer cuts its exposure, "then it becomes a bigger contagion and gets out of hand." This hasn't happened yet, and some are betting that the bigger players will just sit tight. The size of the funds, the pain tolerance of their executives, and the trust they have in their models is where the quant heavyweights have the ability to shine. They either have investor capital locked up for years or a giant horde of internal money — meaning they can withstand losses for longer, especially if they anticipate a bounceback. Dark Forest compared the situation to the end of 2023, when some smaller quants were stung by the Federal Reserve's signalling that lower rates may be coming. This increase of liquidity in the stock market caused a similar surge in stocks that quants were either short or not invested in. Those who "pulled back missed out badly," while funds that held firm saw substantial gains in the following months. "Like 2023, the losses are big enough to where they are inducing the weaker hands to delever, which is exacerbating the losses this week," the note reads. But this time around, the "strong hands" will let their models continue because "the ARKKs of the world are unlikely to keep outperforming the market by 10% a month," Kline said, referring to the innovation-focused ETF managed by Ark Investment Management. "We think strong hands should be levering up into this headwind," the note concluded. Another executive of a small quant fund said they planned to ride out the "froth in sexy sectors." "We are not going to suddenly switch our models over this," he said. "It had been a great year before the summer. Those conditions can come back." The multimanager exec believes the worst is over. It can take time for markets to recalibrate the junk stocks, but "now that everyone is writing about it, we're probably done." Read the original article on Business Insider

CGTN: President Xi Jinping calls on China, EU to provide more stability, certainty for world
CGTN: President Xi Jinping calls on China, EU to provide more stability, certainty for world

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CGTN: President Xi Jinping calls on China, EU to provide more stability, certainty for world

Chinese President Xi Jinping met with European Union leaders during their visit to Beijing for the 25th China-EU Summit on Thursday. CGTN published an article exploring China-EU relations in two-way trade and investment, emphasizing the need for both sides to embrace multilateralism, openness and cooperation to bring greater stability and certainty to the world. BEIJING, July 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fifty years ago, China-Europe trade was a trickle. Now, as the two sides mark half a century of ties, a single day's trade equals what they exchanged in the entire year when relations were first established. Noting that this year marks the 50th anniversary of diplomatic ties between China and the European Union, Chinese President Xi Jinping said on Thursday that China-EU relations have come to another critical juncture in history. There are no fundamental conflicts of interest or geopolitical contradictions between China and the EU, Xi told European Council President Antonio Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. "The current challenges facing the EU do not come from China," he said, adding that the fundamentals and prevailing trend of China-EU relations featuring cooperation over competition and consensus over differences have remained constant. Xi put forward three proposals for the future of China-EU relations: both sides should uphold mutual respect and consolidate the positioning of their relations as partnership, embrace openness and cooperation while properly managing differences and frictions, and practice multilateralism and uphold international rules and order. Trade and investment At Thursday's meeting, the Chinese president said the China-EU economic and trade relationship is by nature complementary and mutually beneficial and can indeed achieve dynamic equilibrium through development. China's high-quality development and opening up will provide new opportunities and potentials for China-EU cooperation, Xi noted, calling on both sides to strengthen green and digital partnership and boost mutual investment and cooperation. In 2024, trade between China and the EU soared to $785.8 billion, an increase of over 300 times compared to when diplomatic relations began in 1975, according to China's customs authorities. Two-way investment flows have also shown sustained growth in recent years, indicating a positive trend. Chinese battery manufacturer CALB, for instance, is building a $2.2-billion plant in Sines, Portugal, expected to create 1,800 jobs. Xi expressed hope that the EU can remain open in the trade and investment market, refrain from using restrictive economic and trade tools, and foster a sound business environment for Chinese enterprises investing and operating in the EU. At the 25th China-EU summit on Thursday, both sides agreed to forge an "upgraded version" of the China-EU export control dialogue mechanism, have timely communication on each other's concerns and jointly keep the industrial and supply chains between China and Europe stable and unimpeded. Multilateralism Xi said China has always viewed and developed China-EU relations from a strategic and long-term perspective, regarded the EU as an important pole in a multipolar world and consistently supported European integration and the strategic autonomy of the EU. China-EU relations are not targeted at, subjugated to, or controlled by any third party, he said, calling on both sides to deepen strategic communication, enhance understanding and mutual trust, and foster a correct perception of each other. Pascal Lamy, the former European commissioner for trade, told CGTN that despite differences, China and the EU share crucial common ground in defending multilateralism and cooperating on global challenges like climate change, biodiversity loss and ocean protection. Among the outcomes of Thursday's summit, leaders of China and the EU issued a joint statement on climate change, highlighting their shared commitment to addressing climate change and pursuing green development. Xi underscored the importance of China and the EU as constructive forces for multilateralism, openness and cooperation, and called on both sides to provide more stability and certainty to the world. CONTACT: Email: cgtn@

US-China trade talks: Can China reduce its export dependence?
US-China trade talks: Can China reduce its export dependence?

San Francisco Chronicle​

time11 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

US-China trade talks: Can China reduce its export dependence?

BEIJING (AP) — China's high dependence on exports will likely be a key focus of a new round of U.S.-China trade talks this coming week in Stockholm, but a trade deal would not necessarily help Beijing to rebalance its economy. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said he hopes the negotiations can take up this issue, along with China's purchases of oil from Russia and Iran, which undercut American sanctions on those two countries. Hopes rose for a breakthrough in talks after U.S. President Donald Trump announced deals with Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines this week. The U.S. wants China to do two things: Reduce what both the U.S. and the European Union see as excess production capacity in many industries, including steel and electric vehicles. And secondly, to take steps to increase spending by Chinese consumers so the economy relies more on domestic demand and less on exports. 'We could also discuss the elephant in the room, which is this great rebalancing that the Chinese need to do,' Bessent told financial news network CNBC. He said China's share of global manufacturing exports at nearly 30%, 'can't get any bigger, and it should probably shrink.' China is tackling the same issues — for domestic reasons The issues are not new, and China has been working to address them for years, more for domestic reasons than to reduce its trade surpluses with the U.S. and other countries. Bessent's predecessor as treasury secretary, Janet Yellen, made industrial policy a focus of a trip to China last year. She blamed government subsidies for flooding the global market with 'artificially cheap Chinese products.' The European Union, whose top leaders met their Chinese counterparts in Beijing on Thursday, has cited subsidies to justify EU tariffs on electric vehicles made in China. In the 1980s, the U.S. pressured Japan to boost consumer spending when American manufacturing was overwhelmed by exports from the likes of Toyota and Sony. Economists have long argued that China likewise needs to transform into a more consumer-driven economy. Consumer spending accounts for less than 40% of China's economy, versus close to 70% in the United States and about 54% in Japan. Chinese leaders have spoken about both factory overcapacity and weak consumer spending as long-term problems and have sought over the past 20 years to find ways to rebalance the economy away from export manufacturing and massive investments in dams, roads, railways and other infrastructure. Fierce price wars have prompted critical reports in official media saying that companies are 'racing to the bottom,' skimping on quality and even safety to reduce costs. With strong government support, they've also expanded overseas, where they can charge higher prices but still undercut local competitors, creating a political backlash. Economists say China needs a consumer-driven economy All that competition and price cutting has left China battling deflation, or falling prices. When companies receive less for their products, they tend to invest less. That can lead to job cuts and lower wages, sapping business activity and spending power — contrary to the long-term goal of increasing the share of consumer spending in driving overall growth. To counter that, the government is spending billions on rebates and subsidies for people who trade in their cars or appliances for new ones. But acknowledging a problem and solving it are two different things. Economists say more fundamental changes are needed to boost consumption and rein in overcapacity. Such changes can only come incrementally over time. Private Chinese companies and foreign-invested companies create the most jobs, but they've suffered from swings in policy and pressures from the trade war, especially since the pandemic. Demographic changes are another challenge as China's population shrinks and ages. Many experts advocate expanding China's social safety net, health insurance, pensions and other support systems, so that people would feel freer to spend rather than save for a medical emergency or retirement. Yan Se, an economist at Peking University's Guanghua School of Management, warned at a recent forum that deflation will become a long-term issue if China doesn't step up its welfare benefits. 'Chinese people deserve a better life," he said. Facing external threats, China wants to be more self-reliant One possibility, put forward at the same forum by Liu Qiao, the dean of the business school, would be to change incentives for local government officials, rewarding them for raising consumption or household incomes instead of meeting an economic growth target. He doesn't see that happening nationwide but said it could be tested in a province. 'That would send out a message that China needs a different approach,' he said. Chinese leader Xi Jinping has made transforming the country into a technology superpower a top priority. It's a goal that has gained urgency as the U.S. has tightened restrictions on China's access to high-end semiconductors and other advanced knowhow. Output in high-tech manufacturing is growing quickly, adding to potential overcapacity, just as what happened with the government's encouragement of 'green' technologies such as solar panels and wind turbines. Various industries, including EV makers, have pledged to address the issue, but some local governments are striving to keep money-losing enterprises afloat, reluctant to lose tax revenues and jobs, or to fail to meet economic growth targets. Going forward, the government is calling for more coordination of economic development polices in fields such as artificial intelligence so that not every province champions the same industry. But government moves to counter the impact of higher tariffs tend to support sectors already in overcapacity, and the share of consumption in the economy has fallen in recent years. 'A sustained improvement in household consumption will require greater reform ambition,' the World Bank said in its most recent update on China's economy."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store