
How to spot greenwashing and buy actual green products
These words and images may look environmentally friendly, but they could also stem from a marketing strategy known as greenwashing. The practice occurs when companies sell the idea of 'green' products while accomplishing little or nothing for the environment.
There is a growing market for products that minimize damage to the environment, according to Todd Larsen, executive codirector for consumer and corporate engagement at Green America, a nonprofit that certifies environmentally responsible businesses and promotes ethical consumption.
Forty-six percent of people said they are purchasing more sustainable products to help the environment in a 2024 PricewaterhouseCoopers survey of 20,000 participants across 31 countries and territories.
Purchasing more sustainably is prevalent especially among younger people, Larsen said, leading some companies to engage in deceptive marketing practices that exploit consumer values.
Greenwashing misleads the public to 'believe that a company or other entity is doing more to protect the environment than it is,' all while promoting false, distracting solutions to the climate crisis, according to the United Nations.
The UN has identified several tactics commonly used in greenwashing: making unsubstantiated net-zero claims, in which a company says it balances the amount of greenhouse gas emissions with the amount it removes from the atmosphere; highlighting minor improvements in which a product meets minimum regulatory requirements; and emphasizing a single attribute while ignoring the product's or company's broader environmental impact.
Greenwashing occurs mostly when companies 'overcommunicate or under-communicate' on sustainability performance, according to Andreas Rasche, a professor of business in society at the Centre for Sustainability at Copenhagen Business School in Denmark. Misleading branding, vague claims and unregulated labels on products make it difficult for consumers who are aiming to reduce their environmental footprint to make informed decisions, Rasche said.
But not all greenwashing by companies is intentional, he said. Rather than outright deception, 'greenwashing can be an outcome of poor management rather than a deliberate strategy,' Rasche said. These companies may want to produce their products in ways more beneficial to the environment but may fall short internally, he added.
On the other hand, some companies overcompensate out of fear of appearing to greenwash through the practice of 'greenhushing,' which Rasche defines as individuals or organizations 'deliberately not talking about sustainability despite them actually having a sustainable track record.'
Buying sustainable products does not have to be an overwhelming endeavor. If something sounds too good to be true about being kinder to the planet, it probably is. When it comes to spotting green products, 'a lot of it is also about common sense,' Rasche said.
Here are some red flags to watch out for to avoid greenwashing:
Overly vague claims: Look for terms such as eco-friendly, green or nontoxic without explanation.
Companies can essentially slap those terms onto a package without proof, according to Scott Faber, the Environmental Working Group's senior vice president for government affairs. With a lack of oversight, 'it's just another way to sell a story,' Faber told CNN via email. EWG is a nonprofit research and advocacy group that focuses on consumer health, toxic chemicals and pollutants.
A newer term circulating is 'regenerative,' Faber said, which companies often use to mean extending beyond sustainability to actively restoring, renewing or improving components of the environment and resources.
People should expect to see that term more frequently despite there being no widely accepted or legal definition of what it means, he said.
Unlike organic labeling, which is required to undergo audits and meet legal standards, 'most claims that foods regenerate soil aren't tied to such standards and don't require third-party verification,' Faber said.
Nature imagery: Visuals such as windmills, green packaging or leafy visuals, suggestive of sustainability, mean nothing if they omit evidence of any environmental claims, according to Faber.
No verification: No backup of a product's claims or credible third-party certification means those assertions might not be true.
'Companies should really substantiate in what way their product actually is green. So that could be a trusted certification, like USDA (US Department of Agriculture) organic,' Green America's Larsen said. 'Or they could have information on their website where they go into detail about things like their supply chain and how it's truly green, and they actually are showing you information that's verifiable.'
Homemade labels that lack verification: Check if a company provides transparent information about its practices online.
Claims that defy logic: What about a carbon-neutral airline? Carbon-neutral means achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by balancing 'those emissions so they are equal to, or less than, the emissions removed,' according to the United Nations. Ask yourself, 'Is this actually possible?' Rasche advised. 'Can an airline at this point in time really be carbon-neutral?'
Doing your homework about a product, especially one you buy a lot, can be worth it.
Experts advise looking for certifications, questioning unsubstantiated language and visuals, and conducting an online search for a product and company to learn about how goods are made and whether there is evidence for what the company says.
Faber suggests asking yourself a series of questions: Who is verifying the claim? Is the claim specific or too general to be proven? What's missing? Is the packaging more prominent than the product?
The 'what's missing' question is often the most important to ask, Faber said. 'A cereal box might brag about recycled packaging but still use pesticide-laced oats,' he said. 'A meat company might call their beef 'regeneratively raised' without saying anything about antibiotic use.'
Experts also recommend turning to the US Environmental Protection Agency's list of more than 100 ecolabels recommended for consumers on its website. Ecolabels are marks on products that show they meet specific environmental standards.
'It's a bit of work, but on the other hand, you're really learning about the products you're purchasing, and you can feel better about those products,' Larsen said. 'You can tell other people what you learned about those products and encourage them to purchase them as well.'
The United Nations also suggests consumers consider a product's entire life cycle — from the extraction of raw materials to its disposal — while taking into account potential environmental consequences from the packaging materials.
There is also the option to buy secondhand goods, a double win by granting new life for products and preventing further landfill waste or emissions.
Spotting greenwashing in the food industry requires a little bit of work, too. You can identify deceptive packaging and vague labels, and there are additional clues in ingredient lists to see how processed a product may be.
When it comes to packaging, 'if a product screams 'natural' in bold letters but the ingredient list reads like a chemistry textbook, that's a red flag,' Faber noted. 'These claims are often designed to cover up ingredients linked to serious health harms.' Such ingredients include potentially harmful additives like food dyes.
He pointed to the Environmental Working Group's Food Scores, which can help consumers 'see past the front-of-pack claims and understand what's really in their food.'
An effective way to avoid misleading marketing of food is to make your own meal or snack without unhealthy additives. And although not always feasible, Larsen suggests going straight to the source when possible by speaking with a farmer at a farmers market to learn about growing practices and products.
In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission has Green Guides designed as guidance for marketers to avoid making environmental claims that are deceptive or could mislead consumers. However, there is a lack of strong legal enforcement for them and federal oversight beyond that guidance, according to Larsen and Rasche.
'While the Green Guides are just that, guides and not rules or regulations, they are enforceable under Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prevents unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce,' FTC spokesman Mitchell Katz told CNN via email. Consumers can file complaints about alleged fraud and deception from companies on the 'report fraud' tab on the FTC's website.
The gap between guidance and regulation leaves room for companies to make environmental claims that may not hold up. Well-known brands have faced consequences for statements found to be misleading about the recyclability or sustainability of their products.
Keurig Dr Pepper settled charges filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission last year after labeling its K-Cup single-use beverage pods as recyclable, even though two of the largest US recycling companies rejected the pods.
A Keurig Dr Pepper spokesperson told CNN via email that the company has taken steps to make its products recyclable and to support modern recycling systems across North America.
'In 2020, we changed all of our K-Cup pods to be made from polypropylene — a more widely accepted material in curbside recycling programs,' the spokesperson said. 'We also provide clear recycling instructions on our packaging and encourage consumers to check locally as each community determines what it accepts into its recycling program.'
With sustainability regulations facing rollback in the United States, it is increasingly incumbent on individuals to protect themselves in their consumption habits, Larsen said.
'We all are investors. We all have pension savings. We all go to the supermarket, so it depends also on us and on our day-to-day behavior,' Rasche noted. 'And we shouldn't feel too disempowered, because, in a sense, we also have action' in our everyday choices.
Be sure to know what is real, he said, because when you really buy green, you're contributing to a more sustainable future.
Sign up for CNN's Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis — and reduce your eco-anxiety.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Have you already started holiday shopping?
Retail consumerFacebookTweetLink Follow Even if it's sweltering hot outside, winter holiday gifts may be on your mind as you shop online and in stores. Perhaps you've already started making gift purchases, whereas in past years you would've waited until November to do so. Whatever the reason — be it tariffs, anxiety about the economy or your financial situation in months to come, or just a general urge to get your gifts squared away before the holiday rush — we want to hear from you for possible inclusion in an article. To share your story, please fill out the form below. We will not include anything in an upcoming article without first reaching out to you and interviewing you.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Retail Looks Up As Inflation Eases, But Consumer Uncertainties Cloud The Picture
An increasingly complicated picture is emerging for retailers. While retail has remained strong through the first half of the year, there are indications that American consumers may lack the flexibility to absorb further retail price hikes, especially those that could result from Trump tariff policies, even though tariff-driven price increases are largely late on arrival. Wage Growth Slows Wage growth is slowing, dropping from 3.7% year-over-year in June to 1.2% in July, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. And the economy added fewer new jobs after May and June job numbers were revised sharply downward, and July came in well under expectations. 'Thus far, wage and income growth has helped most households absorb rising expenses. However, if income growth falters, it may become harder for consumers to keep up with increasing prices – potentially weighing on retail spending,' shared Mike Skordeles, Truist head of U.S. economics. Retail Continues To Thrive While retail sales remain strong through June, up 3.4% to $3.6 trillion excluding restaurants and food services, experts speculate some of that growth was due to pulling forward purchases before the worst of the tariffs hit. Yet that can't explain all of it. There are only so many advanced purchases customers can make. Further, the National Retail Federation reports that July's core retail sales, excepting autos, gasoline stations and food services, could advance nearly 6% year-over-year in July, citing strong summer sales events led by Amazon Prime Day and the pull-forward effect. We'll have to wait till Friday, Aug. 15, to get the authoritative Census Bureau retail report for July. Historically, July is one of retail's stronger months, after May, August and the final three months of the year. Early back-to-school shopping also provided tailwinds in July. The NRF projects back-to-college spending will total $88.8 billion this year, up 2.6% over 2024, while BTS will inch up 1.5% to $39.4 billion. NRF vice president of industry and consumer insights Katherine Cullen said in a statement, 'As shoppers look for the best deals on clothes, notebooks and other school-related items, retailers are highly focused on affordability and making the shopping experience as seamless as possible.' Inflation Moderates Despite doom-and-gloom predictions about tariffs driving prices higher in retail, the July consumer price index, which measures price inflation, held steady last month – up 2.7% year-over-year and below expectations. However, core inflation, excluding food and energy, rose 3.1%, above forecasts. Yet, the core inflation uptick was driven primarily by a 3.6% increase in services, such as shelter, medical care and transportation services, most especially car repair. It excludes energy services, including electricity and utility gas, that rose 7.2%. On the other hand, consumers are getting relief at the gas pump, down 9%, and in fuel oil, off 9.5%. In more reassuring news, grocery food prices rose only 2.2%, though food away from home increased 3.9%. In the grocery aisles, eggs experienced the fastest increase, up 16.4% year-over-year, and beef wasn't far behind, up 11.3%. Rising beef costs contributed the most to the 4.6% increase in meat poultry and fish overall. Nonalcoholic beverages increased 3.6%, including a 14.5% rise in coffee. Milk prices rose 2.6% and bread was up 1.3%, while fruit and vegetables were about even with last year, up only 0.2%. Commodity prices, excluding food and fuel, rose a modest 1.2%. Commodities are where much of tariffs impact will be felt, and so far, it isn't showing up. In fact, prices in several categories went down even after 10% across-the-board tariffs went into effect in April, with additional reciprocal tariffs levied thereafter. For example, in the kitchen, appliances dropped 0.3% and dishes and flatware prices declined 5.6%. Apparel was down 0.2% overall, including women's and girl's clothing dropping 0.8%. Information technology prices declined 5.9% with cellphones off 8.8%, and television prices dropped 9%. However, prices rose 12.4% in audio equipment, 7.2% for linens, window and floor coverings, 3.2% in furniture and bedding and 3.3% for tires, yet these are typically occasional purchases for most households. Credit Card Debt Headwinds Should increase commodity prices kick in, many American consumers will have to think twice about putting new purchases on credit cards. Credit card debt reached $1.21 trillion in the second quarter, level with the high seen in the fourth quarter 2024, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Credit card debt began its rapid rise in 2022 – it started the year at around $850 billion – after post-pandemic inflation drove prices through the roof. The New York Fed also reported elevated delinquency rates on credit card debt during the second quarter. Increasingly, consumers are turning to credit cards when facing inflationary pressures for everyday expenses. A survey conducted in March found more than one in three of the 1,000 adults surveyed said 'price increases from inflation caused them to use credit cards to make ends meet.' The percentage using credit cards to make ends meet was highest among Millennials (43%). This generation also has the highest share who have maxed out their credit cards (42%) versus 32% overall. Millennials are aged 29 to 44 years old this year and are in a highly acquisitive life stage – getting married, starting families and buying first homes. 'I think most people are generally doing OK, but it wouldn't take much for them to be not OK,' Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree, told CNBC. 'So many Americans are a job loss, income reduction or medical emergency away from real financial trouble.' Wait And See Looking to the rest of the year in retail, consumers seem poised to deliver toward the top end of the NRF's core retail projections between $5.42 trillion and $5.48 trillion, a 2.7% to 3.7% uptick. Strong summer sales, early back-to-school demand and moderating inflation in key categories are providing tailwinds. Yet, retailers must navigate an increasingly complex consumer landscape, as Americans face mounting economic pressures, including slowing wage growth and rising credit card debt. The yet-to-be-realized impact of tariffs on inflation remains a wildcard. To keep sales robust, retailers will need to pull strategic levers – maintaining affordable prices, utilizing more targeted and personalized promotions and elevating the customer experience – to stay ahead of the uncertainties and sustain momentum. See Also:


UPI
3 hours ago
- UPI
Britain, Germany, France threat Iran sanctions over nuclear talks
Britain, Germany and France signalled in a letter to the United Nations that they were prepared to implement so-called 'snapback' sanctions against Iran if it failed to return to nuclear talks. File Photo by Vahid Reza Alaie/Fars News Agency | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- Britain, Germany and France told U.N. officials that snapback sanctions are on the table if Iran does not sit down to negotiate over its nuclear weaponry. The letter delivered to United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, signed by the three foreign ministers, indicated the E3 was prepared to enforce severe sanctions if Iran did not agree to limit it's nuclear program and gave Iranian officials until the end of the month. "We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," read a letter in part signed by Britain's David Lammy, Jean-Noel Barrot of France and Germany's Johann Wadephul. The sixth round of American-Iranian negotiations were abandoned in June after a joint U.S.-Israeli attack on known parts of Iran's nuclear facilities. The 12-day conflict escalated regional tension amid Israel's war in Gaza and spiked oil prices. The "snapback" guardrail built into Iran's 2015 nuclear deal, officially titled the "Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action," was set to trigger if an instance arose in which Iran committed an act of "significant non-performance." Signed by Tehran with Britain, France, Germany, Russia, China, the European Union and United States it removed sanctions and curbed Iran's nuclear program. Initially the United States left the JCPOA in 2018 during U.S. President Donald Trump's first term in the White House. Iran, however, has periodically violated parts of the agreement for years and the snapback mechanism threatened more than once by Europe and the E3 as far back as 2019 nearly four years after the deal was inked. In addition to limiting Iranian nuclear activities, it thawed U.S. sanctions against Tehran that hampered its economy for years. On Wednesday, Germany's Wadephul said Iran "must never acquire a nuclear weapon" and reiterated that the E3 had "every right" to resort to snapback. "Iran has the opportunity to return to diplomacy and resume full cooperation with the IAEA," he wrote in an X post a little before 11 a.m. local time. "The ball is now in Iran's court," Germany added.