Drax Group First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: UK£0.61 (vs UK£0.88 in 1H 2024)
Key Financial Results
Revenue: UK£2.65b (down 16% from 1H 2024).
Net income: UK£220.8m (down 35% from 1H 2024).
Profit margin: 8.3% (down from 11% in 1H 2024). The decrease in margin was driven by lower revenue.
EPS: UK£0.61 (down from UK£0.88 in 1H 2024).
Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period
Drax Group Earnings Insights
Looking ahead, revenue is expected to decline by 6.6% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, while revenues in the Renewable Energy industry in Europe are expected to grow by 6.1%.
Performance of the market in the United Kingdom.
The company's share price is broadly unchanged from a week ago.
Risk Analysis
You still need to take note of risks, for example - Drax Group has 4 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Manchester United ‘Open to Offers' for £70million Star
Man United Open to Hojlund Offers Amid Sesko Talks Manchester United's active pursuit of RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko, as reported by Sky Sports News, suggests that the club's recruitment strategy under Ruben Amorim may be evolving faster than anticipated. Talks remain ongoing between United and Leipzig regarding the valuation of Sesko, a player with high potential who is viewed as an ideal fit for Amorim's fluid attacking system. According to Sky Sports News' Vik Varange, Amar Mehta and Dharmesh Sheth, 'Manchester United's pursuit of RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko could have ramifications for Rasmus Hojlund's future.' This line alone indicates more than just a transfer rumour, it hints at real structural considerations happening behind the scenes at Carrington. United's openness to considering offers for Rasmus Hojlund, who only arrived from Atalanta in 2023 for approximately £70 million, marks a significant turn. The club is said to be willing to listen to 'suitable offers provided it was right for the club and the player.' Hojlund's Fight to Stay To his credit, Hojlund has not shied away from the challenge. He has featured from the start in both of Manchester United's pre-season tour games in the United States and publicly declared his desire to remain and fight for his place under Amorim. His mindset reflects maturity and belief in his potential, but as ever in elite football, intent must meet opportunity. Photo IMAGO The reality is that a new striker arriving could further reduce Hojlund's minutes. Though a straight replacement scenario appears unlikely, the looming presence of Sesko complicates matters. Leipzig, in return, are reported to have suggested a loan move for Hojlund as part of the negotiations. Amorim's Tactical Demands If Ruben Amorim intends to implement a high-pressing, versatile forward line, then the addition of Sesko makes tactical sense. His profile as a mobile and direct frontman fits neatly with Amorim's system, which often demands physical presence combined with technical flexibility. That said, Hojlund's profile isn't drastically different. What might tip the scales is Sesko's development curve and possibly greater upside. Amorim may simply see him as a more suitable long-term option, or even a complement, to add depth in a system that uses multiple forward options. What the Deal Could Mean Financially With UEFA's Financial Fair Play regulations looming large over Manchester United's transfer planning, selling or loaning out Hojlund could provide crucial breathing room. While a loan to Leipzig would help facilitate Sesko's arrival, a full sale of Hojlund could recoup funds for other reinforcements. Still, as reported, 'a scenario where Sesko joins and Hojlund stays cannot be ruled out.' That points to a willingness by the club to explore competition within the squad, rather than pushing a player out the door prematurely. Our View – EPL Index Analysis As a Manchester United supporter, this news leaves a mixed feeling. On one hand, it's exciting to see the club active and deliberate in trying to upgrade the squad, especially under a forward-thinking manager like Ruben Amorim. Sesko is a top talent and would be a smart addition in terms of age, profile and system fit. But letting go of Rasmus Hojlund, even temporarily, feels premature. He's just 22, has only had one full season at Old Trafford and has shown flashes of real promise. It's not every day a striker takes on that pressure at such a young age and still manages ten Premier League goals in a struggling side. Rather than viewing Sesko as Hojlund's replacement, it would be far more logical to see them as co-existing in a system that rotates or plays with two up front. With the number of matches United play across four competitions, depth up top is not a luxury, it's a necessity. There's also the psychological aspect. What does it say to a player if, one year after a £70 million transfer, the club is already willing to listen to offers? It's crucial that Amorim and the board show that young players are given time to develop at Old Trafford, not shuffled out at the first sign of competition. Hojlund deserves a proper chance. The best-case scenario? Sesko joins, Hojlund stays and both push each other to become even better.
New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump admin plans first ‘Golden Dome' test of space-based missile defense system: report
Pentagon officials are aiming to test President Trump's space-based Golden Dome missile defense system to safeguard the US in the fourth quarter of 2028, according to a report. That timeframe lines up with Trump's ambitious goal to 'have it done in three years' and comes amid pitches from defense contractors to score coveted contracts to develop the cutting-edge system. 'They want a win to point to in November [2028],' a defense official told CNN. 'And DoD [Department of Defense] wants to avoid anything they perceive will slow them down.' Advertisement The test, which will be conducted by the Missile Defense Agency, is expected to be called FTI-X, which stands for 'Flight Test Integrated,' in a nod to how it will assess the Golden Dome's vast array of sensors and weapons systems, according to the report. Development of the state-of-the-art missile defense system is expected to cost about $175 billion, according to Trump, who tapped Gen. Michael Guetlein, vice chair of operations at the Space Force, to oversee the ambitious project in May. 4 President Trump wants the US to develop a state-of-the-art missile defense system to protect the homeland from advanced attacks. Getty Images Advertisement 4 The Golden Dome system is intended to safeguard the colossal continental US. AP Congress has already allocated $25 billion in funding for the Golden Dome in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Trump signed into law last month. Military officials have explored space-based missile defense technologies for decades, including during Ronald Reagan's Star Wars program, also known as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Space-based missile defense technology can be advantageous because it can help thwart an enemy missile much earlier in its trajectory than other technologies that the US currently has in its arsenal. Advertisement It can also reduce geographical barriers and catch certain types of enemy missiles at a stage when they are slower and easier to intercept. However, there are many drawbacks. The US would need to make significant technological advances to develop that system, which is likely to be very costly and could entice other countries to weaponize space. 4 Skeptics have raised questions about whether the Golden Dome can be completed on time and within the budget President Trump laid out. Getty Images The defense official called it a 'hard problem, and technically very risky,' CNN reported. Advertisement 'The possible number of satellites needed to achieve a probability of engagement success is going to be very high, given the time and area needed to cover the continental United States,' the defense official said. Plans for the test in 2028 are expected to be 'phase one' of the project. A deluge of defense contractors and other private companies have been jockeying for contracts to help develop the massive defense system. Precise details of how the Golden Dome system will function are not fully known. Trump has taken inspiration from Israel's feted Iron Dome system, which helps defend populated areas from short-range attacks. Trump's plans would encompass much more sophisticated missiles, such as ballistic and hypersonic missiles, that may potentially be fired off from much more distant locations than what Iron Dome defends against. 'Once fully constructed, the Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world,' Trump teased in May. 4 Precise details about how the Golden Dome system will function are not clear. Getty Images Guetlein has admitted that the Pentagon faces enormous challenges in successfully completing the project. Advertisement 'I think the real technical challenge will be building of the space-based interceptor,' Guetlein said at a summit last month. 'That technology exists, I believe. I believe we have proven every element of the physics, that we can make it work.' 'What we have not proven is, first, can I do it economically, and then second, can I do it at scale? Can I build enough satellites to get after the threat? Can I expand the industrial base fast enough to build those satellites?' The initiative comes amid advancements in the American space industry, with tycoons such as Elon Musk working to bring down the costs of launching satellites. The Defense Department didn't reply to a request for comment Sunday.
Politico
16 minutes ago
- Politico
Canada's trade minister confident that countries will come to a deal
Trump imposed heightened tariffs on Canada on Thursday. The levies only apply to goods not covered by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement that Trump negotiated in his first term, meaning much of Canada's economy is insulated. Still, Canada's steel and aluminum industries are feeling the heat, with the White House working to revitalize American production capacity. 'We understand and respect totally the President's view in terms of the national security interest,' LeBlanc said. 'In fact, we share it, and what we've said to our American counterparts is, how can we structure the right agreement, where we can both continue to supply one another in a reliable, cost-effective way that preserves jobs essential to the American economy, but the same thing is true, obviously in Canada as well.' Another wrinkle: Trump last week suggested on his social media platform that Carney's pledge to recognize Palestinian statehood could imperil talks, making it 'very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them.' But LeBlanc, who left Washington on Friday after spending much of the week in town meeting with senior White House officials, remains positive. He cites the connective tissue underpinning the two countries' economies as a key reason for hope. 'One description which I thought was very apt: we don't sell things to each other as much as we build things together,' he told Brennan. 'And that's why it's difficult in this relationship when so much is integrated, but we remain very optimistic.'
