Confronting county leader on claims about unclaimed funds for Browns: I-Team
Monday, the I-Team questioned the county executive.
State lawmakers may help the Browns build a dome in Brook Park with $600 million from the Unclaimed Funds Account. The Browns would pay back that money.
Watch: Residents called 911 for hours about crowds filling streets — where was Cleveland police?
Chris Ronayne believes giving that money to the Browns would be unfair to taxpayers. But, the I-Team discovered state lawmakers have often raided that fund for big money to balance the budget.
And, while the Browns would pay back that money from unclaimed funds, state lawmakers have not paid back money taken out of the same account. Sometimes, hundreds of millions of dollars at once.
We asked Ronayne questions about lawmakers not paying the money back, yet he's opposed to money from the same fund for the Browns which would be paid back.
He kept resorting to telling citizens to check and see if they have any money in the account and talking about how the Browns plan for a dome would hurt downtown Cleveland.
Chris Ronayne also said, 'We have said, over and over, again, this proposal by the Cleveland Browns is, too, risky.'
The I-Team also found, back in 2018, Cuyahoga County leaders took $7 million out of a local unclaimed funds account. So, we asked if county leaders ever paid that back. Ronayne reminded us, that happened before he took office.
'You'd have to look further,' he said. 'You'd have to look back on what prior administrations did.'Last week, Browns Chief Operating Officer Dave Jenkins said, 'I think we've been pretty clear since the outset that it's going to take a public-private partnership to enable this project.'
The Browns argue they'd put more than a billion dollars into the dome, and, again, pay back any state funds.
State leaders are kicking around three plans to help the Browns with public money. That includes using unclaimed funds. Senate leaders promise, even if the Browns get unclaimed funds, when you go on-line to apply for your money, you'll also get yours.
'I think the State of Ohio has to find a different solution than unclaimed funds,' Ronayne added.
When we asked state officials about lawmakers repaying the unclaimed funds, we received this response from a spokesperson with the Office of Budget and Management:
Any payment from a state fund, including the General Revenue Fund, to Unclaimed Funds would require an authorizing appropriation from the General Assembly. Such appropriations have generally not occurred. For example, the budget bills mentioned (last week) that directed transfers from Unclaimed Funds to the state GRF (general fund) did not include appropriations from the GRF (general fund) to make payments back to Unclaimed Funds.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
13 hours ago
- New York Times
Harvard Will Share Employee Forms With Federal Government
Harvard University will share thousands of employment eligibility verification forms with the federal government, its human resources office said Tuesday, after the Trump administration asked this month to review the records. The university's response to the Department of Homeland Security's so-called notice of inspection comes as Harvard negotiates with the White House about a possible settlement to its monthslong clash over research funding and academic independence. The government's request was broad — it asked for the I-9 forms for all Harvard employees, as well as anyone else employed by the university over the previous year — but not altogether unusual. Federal officials have long had, and used, the authority to scrutinize the records, and the Trump administration has routinely harnessed that power in recent months. The form asks people to attest to their citizenship or immigration status and includes a section for employers to review and verify the claims using various documents. In its notice to Harvard, Homeland Security Investigations told the university it intended to use the records 'to assess your compliance with the federal laws and regulations applicable to employment eligibility verification.' Violations related to I-9 forms can be handled as civil or criminal matters. Harvard's human resources office said Tuesday that it was not 'at this time' giving the government access to forms completed by people who were in jobs 'only open to students' as it weighed whether an educational privacy law protected those documents. Otherwise, the university said, it 'intends to comply with federal law and accordingly will provide the requested records.' Harvard, though, suggested it was surprised by the scale of the request, noting that 'the government does not ordinarily ask an employer to disclose all of its employees' Form I-9s and their supporting materials.' The Homeland Security Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The government served the notice, as well as several subpoenas, on July 8. The subpoenas were sprawling, with demands that included payroll records, years of disciplinary files and any videos Harvard had of international students protesting on campus since 2020. In its initial public statement about the demands, Harvard, without referencing the notice of inspection, described the subpoenas as 'unwarranted.' 'The administration's ongoing retaliatory actions come as Harvard continues to defend itself and its students, faculty, and staff against harmful government overreach aimed at dictating whom private universities can admit and hire, and what they can teach,' the university said then.
Eater
16 hours ago
- Eater
D.C. Council Signs Off on a Tipped-Wage ‘Compromise'
The city's nearly decade-long debate on how to pay tipped restaurant workers came to a head around dinnertime on Monday, July 28, when the D.C. Council narrowly voted (7-5) for a new 'compromise' amendment to keep the tipped wage in place, for now, without stripping Initiative 82 entirely. For Jonathan Nelms, the owner of D.C.'s first Georgian restaurant Supra, 'I-82 has been the biggest contributing factor to our going from being a profitable restaurant to losing money last year.' But proponents of the hotly contested issue say Monday night's move essentially waters down the D.C. voter-approved ballot initiative that was designed to bring the base wage for tipped workers up to the level of the minimum wage by 2027. The newly passed amendment partially repeals Initiative 82, a contentious law in effect since 2023 that would have eventually eliminated the city's 'tipped minimum' wage and would require employers to make up for the rest. If I-82 went on as planned, the tipped minimum wage would have gone up from $10 to $12 on July 1. The D.C. Council paused that increase during an emergency vote in early June. Under the newly passed amendment co-sponsored by councilmembers Christina Henderson and Charles Allen, the current base wage for tipped workers will stay put at $10 until July 2026. After that, it will slowly tick up every two years as a percentage of the regular minimum wage until it reaches 75 percent of the full minimum wage by 2034. There were a number of last-minute amendments on the overall 2026 budget bill, but the partial repeal of pay equity for restaurant workers sparked a chaotic uproar inside the Wilson Building. Those in support of keeping I-82 in its original form swiftly disrupted proceedings with a shouting match, causing Council chair Phil Mendelson to call upon D.C. Protective Services police force to clear protestors from the building and lock down the chambers. Smaller restaurants did not embrace 1-82, and owners came out of the woodwork in full force for a marathon testimony hearing in June that lasted well over eight hours. Eric Heidenberger, whose hospitality group runs of Shaw's Tavern, 801, Prost DC, Madhatter, the Bottom Line, and Vagabond, says I-82 has 'made it near impossible for a small, independent operator to make ends meet,' noting a few of his locations have experienced a 30-percent decline in customer foot traffic since I-82's implementation. American standby Brookland's Finest closed after a decade this spring, in part, due to payroll challenges Initiative 82 presents. Brookland's Finest 'The decline in sales, coupled with a doubled increase in labor costs, has put a significant strain on the viability of our D.C. operations,' he says. If I-82 stayed as is, he anticipated having to close half of his D.C. portfolio. 'Plenty of businesses, both longtime and newly opened, tell me the math just doesn't work, and others say they're simply not going to open up any more restaurants here,' said Allen, ahead of the Monday night vote. 'This [amendment] is a step that we can take that provides several years of stability.' The new law will also require D.C. Council to stay on top of economic trends that affect the restaurant industry, including employment and wages, by conducting a bi-annual study. The polarizing topic has been a hot-potato agenda item for the D.C. Council for three months now. In early May, Mayor Muriel Bowser announced her 2026 budget proposal would include language to repeal I-82, which won by a 74-percent landslide at the D.C. polls in 2022. Supporters believe the measure would reduce restaurants' wage violations and boost pay. Opponents like Restaurant Association Metropolitan Washington argue it hurts independent operators, slashes pay for some servers, and spikes labor costs. Several D.C. restaurants like Sticky Rice, Haikan, and Brookland's Finest cited the existing measure, among other financial hurdles, as part of the cause for their recent closures. Way back in 2018, I-77 – a similar voter-approved ballot initiative that would gradually eliminate the tipped wage – was struck down by D.C. Council. While RAMW still favors a 'full repeal' of I-82, its newly amended language that slows down wage hikes is 'a win for the industry' that addresses the 'need to bring greater balance to a policy that has contributed to record closures and job losses … and provides operators with more clarity and a stronger foundation to plan for the future.' RAMW embarked on a campaign to roll back I-82 in recent months, releasing results from a recent poll of 400 D.C. voters who say Initiative 82 has hurt (46 percent) rather than helped (9 percent) the independent restaurant industry in D.C. 'No one is 100-percent happy here. We want workers to be able to have the annual wage growth and restaurants to be able to have more manageable labor costs, and we think that this strikes the balance,' says Ward 2 councilmember Brooke Pinto, who voted 'yes' on the amendment. Fair Price Fair Wage, an advocacy coalition that includes local restaurant workers' union Unite Here, is furious over I-82's partial repeal. 'How many times do D.C. voters have to approve this before it actually happens?' said One Fair Wage president Saru Jayaraman, in a statement on Monday. 'This isn't just a rollback of wages — it's a rollback of democracy. Councilmembers sided with a corporate lobby that spreads lies and bankrolls influence.' Advocates are now fielding options like ballot referenda to recall efforts and voter education campaigns to reinstate I-82 in full. Ward 4 Councilmember Janeese Lewis George agrees that overturning the will of the voters was not the way to go and says not all restaurant failures can be fully attributed to I-82. 'It is not our job to remove all risk from the restaurant industry,' she says. Other U.S. cities like Chicago are also dealing with impacts of the hotly debated ordinance, and Massachusetts voters recently rejected a tip credit elimination and minimum wage hike law. Jonathan Nelms, owner of Georgian restaurant Supra and longtime D.C. resident, spoke out at the June hearing about the motives behind enforcing I-82. 'Why did the government feel the need to get involved in private enterprise? I don't think you did. I think an out-of-state organization came in and ran these campaigns for deceiving initiatives that have fooled D.C. voters twice,' he says. 'They all failed to understand that we as restaurant owners have to pay the difference, the tip makeup.' D.C. chef Rock Harper, who runs fried chicken joint Queen's Mother, echoed that sentiment as a small business owner who's far from a Stephen Starr. 'I wish I was a part of this 'millionaire class.' I live in a little joint across the bridge. I've worked almost 30 years to try to get my business up and this [I-82] thing is hurting us and not working the way it was intended,' he says. He reveals he lost $40,000 in December, and I-82 was one big factor as to why. The early years of I-82 has also impacted Better Hospitality Group, which runs Boardwalk Bar & Arcade, Easy Company, and Takoda. 'Our longest-standing team members have left the D.C. hospitality market and our current team members are struggling to get by due to decreased tips and the limited number of shifts we have available,' says CEO Ryan Seelbach. 'We're reaching the point of the $35 hamburger. It's not sustainable.' — Andrew Kline, Partner vertias He says I-82 has left owners like himself with three options: decrease staffing levels, on top of raising menu prices or adding service fees to guest checks; or close. Veritas Law co-founder Andrew Kline, who represents many of RAMW's members, also broke down the pitfalls of I-82 during the June hearing. 'You can't triple front-of-house wages without having a replacement source of revenue,' he says. 'The numbers are astronomical. I mean, we're reaching the point of the $35 hamburger. It's not sustainable.' Northern Virginia-based data firm MarginEdge, which represents about 600 small restaurant owners in D.C., tracked a nearly 16-percent average spike in D.C. menu prices from May 2023 (soon after I-82 went into effect) to July 2025. (While MarginEdge can't directly attribute these increases to I-82, it notes that 'prices have risen significantly over that same period.') 'The reality is, there's not a playbook,' says MarginEdge CEO Bo Davis, who also runs local sushi chain Wasabi. 'Prices on menus are going to have to be higher in D.C. than other markets. It's challenging for people to swallow.' The budget will now go to Bowser, and the bill will be sent to President Donald Trump for submission to Congress for final approval. Eater DC All your essential food and restaurant intel delivered to you Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Boston Globe
16 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Harvard provides Trump administration with thousands of employee records under subpoena
'Federal regulations entitle the government to access a U.S. employer's Form I-9 documents and supporting materials,' the email said. The university is one of Massachusetts' largest employers, with Advertisement Harvard is not handing over I-9 records — verification forms that all US employees and employers are required to complete for people hired by a company — for students who were hired for roles that are only open to students, citing a review of a federal privacy law, the university said in its Tuesday email. The subpoena seeking employment documents is separate A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment. This is a developing story and will be updated. Aidan Ryan can be reached at
