ECI Ropes In Panchayat's ‘Banrakas' To Promote Bihar Electoral Roll Revision Amid Row
The poll body is roping actors like Pankaj Tripathi and even using memes to encourage new registrations amid the political and legal storm over the decision.
The Election Commission is leaving no stone unturned to to raise awareness about the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll in Bihar ahead of the upcoming Assembly elections.
The poll body is roping actors like Pankaj Tripathi and even using memes to encourage new registrations amid the political and legal storm over the decision.
On Monday, the poll body shared an image of actors Durgesh Kumar and Sunita Rajwa, portraying their characters 'Banarakas" and 'Kranti Devi", respectively from the famous web series 'Panchayat", raising awareness about the enumeration.
In the image, both the characters are seen standing and asking, ' Banrakas aur Kranti Devi ne toh apna prapatra bhar diya, kya aapne bhara? (Banrakas and Kranti Devi have filled their nomination forms, have you?)"
बनराकस और क्रांति देवी ने भरा अपना गणना प्रपत्र, क्या आपने भरा? #SIR2025 #BiharElection #Election2025 pic.twitter.com/jUVzSaAhkc — Election Commission of India (@ECISVEEP) July 7, 2025
Earlier, the poll body issued a video clip featuring actor Pankaj Tripathi to raise awareness about the SIR drive.
In the video clip, Bollywood actor Tripathi can be seen saying, 'We can't stop people from thinking, but yes, we can definitely try to change your minds."
Sharing the video clip on Sunday, Press Information Bureau (PIB) Patna wrote on X, 'To vote, you need to fill out the form. Bihar Special Intensive Revision, 2025. Now, attach just any 1 of the 11 documents. Fill out the enumeration form to get included in the voter list. Scan the QR code and fill out the form online."
Meanwhile, the SIR is being implemented smoothly at the ground level with the active cooperation of the electors, the ECI said.
The EC added that all voters are directly made aware through more than 77,000 BLOs and 4 Lakh volunteers as well as 1.5 lakh BLAs appointed by all political parties.
'In accordance with Article 326, the orders of SIR dated 24 June 2025 clearly enable all eligible electors to be included while excluding ineligible electors after verification by the concerned ERO," the EC said.
'The initial phase of SIR, during which Enumeration forms were to be printed and distributed, is almost complete with the forms having been made available to all the electors who were available," read a statement from the poll panel.
ECI also reiterated that SIR is being conducted as per the SIR instructions dated June 24, 2025, and there is no change in the instructions. As per instructions, draft electoral rolls that will be issued on 1 August 2025 will contain the names of persons whose enumeration forms are received.
The Election Commission's decision to initiate a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral roll in the run-up to the assembly elections later this year has triggered major political controversy.
While the commission maintains that the revision is intended to enhance transparency and remove ineligible entries from the voter list, opposition parties have raised concerns, claiming that the move may lead to the exclusion of legitimate voters.
As the matter heads to the Supreme Court, the standoff between the poll body and opposition parties continues to escalate.
Amidst legal challenges, the ECI has indicated that the SIR of electoral rolls is on track and any extension of deadline is not being considered at this stage. 'More than 1/5th of enumeration forms have come back within two days. At this rate, we might complete the exercise before time, so extension of deadline is not a question at the moment," a top ECI official told CNN-News18.
The ECI, however, has given a concession of a few weeks for submitting supporting documents. Voters can submit documents at the claims and objection stage. This would give voters time till August to procure the documents. 'After publication of draft electoral rolls, if any document is deficient, EROs can obtain such documents from the electors whose names appear in the draft electoral rolls, during scrutiny in the claims and objection period," EC said.
Location :
Patna, India, India
First Published:
July 07, 2025, 19:19 IST
News elections ECI Ropes In Panchayat's 'Banrakas' To Promote Bihar Electoral Roll Revision Amid Row
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
BJP's counter to Rahul Gandhi's ‘Vote Chori' charge - ‘Sonia Gandhi was on electoral rolls before Indian citizenship'
The Bharatiya Janata Party launched a counterattack on the Congress party on Wednesday by claiming that the former Congress chief Sonia Gandhi had been illegally, though briefly, added to the voter list 45 years ago, before she was an Indian citizen. Former Union Minister Anurag Thakur claimed Gandhi—born Sonia Maino in Italy in 1946 — was added to the list from 1980 to 1982, a year before she became an Indian citizen, NDTV reported. The allegation comes amid 'vote chori' charges by Rahul Gandhi, accusing the Election Commission of India of colluding with the BJP Thakur's allegations were first shared by BJP IT Cell chief Amit Malviya, who had posted on X hours earlier. Sharing a 'photocopy of what appeared to be an extract from electoral rolls of 1980, indicating Sonia Gandhi was a voter when she did not yet acquire the citizenship of Bharat'. "If this isn't blatant electoral malpractice, what is?" Malviya claimed Gandhi, who married Rajiv Gandhi in 1968, had been added to the voter list while the Gandhi family lived at the official residence of then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. In response, Congress leader Tariq Anwar told NDTV that Sonia Gandhi had not asked for her name to be included in the voter roll. Anwar said that it was the poll body officials of the time who did so. "See... the Election Commission is responsible. Sonia Gandhi did not say 'my name should be included in the voter registration list'. In the end it was the Election Commission that included her...," he said. Anwar said, Gandhi never made a request to be added to the voter list. The BJP also alleged Congress defeated Bhimrao Ambedkar, regarded as the father of the Indian Constitution, in the 1952 general election through electoral fraud. If we start from 1952, Congress and CPI together defeated Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar, a constitution maker and a saint-like leader, in the election. Congress laid the foundation of electoral corruption in the very first election of 1952," BJP MP Anurag Thakur said at a press conference held in the party's headquarters here. "Check the records: 74,333 votes were rejected, while Ambedkar ji lost by just 14,561 votes. Congress ensured that a constitution maker, a Dalit leader, was eliminated in the very first election. Imagine, the one who created the constitution was defeated by the Congress family through electoral fraud," he added. Sonia Gandhi did not say 'my name should be included in the voter registration list'. The BJP MP alleged that Rahul Gandhi and his family had a history of questioning the Election Commission when they lost elections. "This family and party have had a tradition from the beginning that if you lose an election, you raise questions about the Election Commission, the voters, or the functioning of the Election Commission. Indira Gandhi had said, Voters are a bunch of fools. When Rajiv Gandhi lost the election, he blamed the ballot paper. Rahul Gandhi's father used to say, conduct elections with voting machines, and Rahul Gandhi says, conduct elections with ballot papers," he said.
Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
Union Minister Anurag Thakur Turns Tables On Opposition In 'Vote Chori' War With ‘Fake Voter' Data
The BJP has turned the 'vote chori' debate into an all-out political slugfest, directly targeting Congress over alleged fake voters in Opposition strongholds. In a fiery press conference, BJP leader Anurag Thakur accused Sonia Gandhi of being on the voter list before becoming an Indian citizen and presented a detailed dossier exposing voter list anomalies in seats held by Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi, Abhishek Banerjee, Akhilesh Yadav, Dimple Yadav, and MK Stalin. From duplicate entries to mass voter additions, the BJP claims a 'ghuspaithiya vote bank' fuels Opposition victories. The party says its proposed SIR system will clean voter rolls and expose decades of electoral malpractice. Rahul Gandhi has yet to respond to the BJP's fresh offensive.#bjp #congress #votechori #rahulgandhi #soniagandhi #anuragthakur #abhishekbanerjee #akhileshyadav #mkstalin #tmc #sp #dmk #indiapolitics #evmcontroversy #fakevoters #parliament #breakingnews #trending #trendingnow #toi #bharat #toibharat #indianews Read More
Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bihar SIR process is ‘voter-friendly, not exclusionary': SC says ECI now allowing 11 documents as identity proof
The Supreme Court Wednesday said that the Election Commission of India (ECI) permitting to present 11 documents as proof of identity for the latest Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voters list in Bihar, compared to only seven documents for the summary revision carried out in the state in 2003, showed that the process is 'in fact voter-friendly.' A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said this while hearing petitions challenging the SIR process. 'They are expanding the number of documents of identity… We understand your exclusionary argument may be with regard to Aadhaar, but the expansion of number of documents from what was followed in a summary revision to an intensive revision is, in fact, voter-friendly and not voter-exclusionary. It gives you more options,' Justice Bagchi said. 'See, it was seven items (in 2003). And now there are 11 items from which you can identify yourself as a citizen,' the judge added. The court said this as Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, contended that the process was exclusionary. Singhvi, however, continued to insist that it was. On Monday, the Supreme Court expressed dissatisfaction with the norm of prospective voters merely having to furnish a declaration that they are citizens for inclusion in the list, while holding that the ECI can decide to include a citizen in the voter list or exclude a non-citizen from it. The top court said self-declaration of citizenship may lead to legal complications. The remarks were in response to Singhvi's argument that it was not within the remit of the ECI to decide on citizenship.
