Why Business Isn't Ranking on Google
'Why can't I find it?' — even though you've done everything you were told to do for SEO?
You've used the right keywords, written blogs, posted on social media, maybe even hired someone for SEO… but still, your business doesn't show up at the top of Google Maps.
If this sounds like you, you're not alone.
Many small business owners in Varanasi and across India go through the same struggle.
And the real reason usually boils down to this:
A Google Business Profile (earlier known as Google My Business) is what shows up when someone searches for local businesses on Google or Google Maps.
For example, when you type 'cafes near me' or 'plumber in Varanasi,' you'll see a map with business names, reviews, photos, and details — that's powered by the Google Business Profile.
So even if your website is SEO-optimized, your business won't rank high on Google Maps unless your GBP is set up properly, verified, and consistently active.
When users search on Google Maps, they're usually looking for fast and nearby options. Google knows this and prioritizes businesses that are:
TrustworthyRelevant to the user's searchPopular (based on reviews)
Active and consistently updated
That's where Nikhil Consulting, a trusted GMB SEO provider in Varanasi, comes in — to help businesses like yours build strong, optimized profiles that Google trusts.
If you haven't verified your business through Google (via postcard, phone, or email), it won't appear in search results.
What to Do:
Log into your Google Business Profile and follow the steps to verify it. It's free and takes just a few minutes.
Does your GBP include: Correct Name, Address, Phone (NAP)?
Business hours?
A website link?
Category and services offered?
Photos and a business description?
If not, Google may assume your business is inactive.
What to Do:
Fill out every section of your profile. A complete profile improves your chances of ranking.
Google trusts businesses that customers trust. Reviews show Google that your business is legitimate and loved.
What to Do:
Ask satisfied customers to leave reviews weekly. Even 1–2 reviews a week make a big difference. Always respond to reviews, even just to say 'Thank you!'
Think of your GBP like a mini social media page. You can share offers, updates, photos, and news.
What to Do:
Post regularly — even once a week. Share a photo, a tip, or a special offer. Google rewards activity.
If your business name, address, or phone number (NAP) is written differently on directories, websites, or Facebook — Google may get confused.
What to Do:
Keep your NAP consistent everywhere online. This builds trust and improves your ranking.But I Already Do SEO — Isn't That Enough?
SEO helps your website rank on Google.
But your Google Business Profile helps your physical business location show up on the map.
You need both — and that's where Nikhil Consulting bridges the gap between SEO and local visibility.
We specialize in offering trusted, Google My Business services in Varanasi — including profile optimization, reviews strategy, post planning, and Google Maps SEO to generate real leads.What You Can Do Today (5 Quick Wins)
Start improving your local visibility right now: Search for your business on Google Maps and claim it. Add full details — business hours, photos, services, and website. Ask 2–3 happy clients for reviews. Reply to all existing reviews. Post one update this week — a photo, event, or short message.
Keep doing this, and within a few weeks, you'll notice a real improvement in your map rankings — no big budget required.
Want to see how an optimized profile looks? Check out this example
Or view how we've helped others through our live GMB SEO consulting profile
I'm Nikhil Singh, founder of Nikhil Consulting, a trusted provider of Google My Business services and local SEO solutions in Varanasi. With 5+ years of experience, I help small businesses, startups, and service providers increase their visibility on Google Maps through verified GMB setup, profile optimization, lead generation, and complete GMB SEO support.
Whether you run a salon, real estate agency, coaching center, or any local business, I offer affordable Google My Business services in Varanasi with pricing customized to your needs.
Phone: +91-8527665635
Email: nikhilsinghlucky@gmail.com
Office: 2nd Floor, Sanskrit University Road, Lahurabir Rd, Opp. Sagar Food Corner, Jagatganj, Shivala, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221002
Business Hours: Monday to Saturday | 10:00 AM – 8:00 PM
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Entrepreneur
6 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Microsoft Planning Return-to-Office Mandate: Report
Microsoft employees at its headquarters in Redmond, Washington, may soon be mandated back to the office, according to new reports. Microsoft is planning to implement a stricter return-to-office mandate as soon as next year, sources told Business Insider. Since the pandemic, Microsoft has had a flexible work arrangement, allowing remote work as much as half of the time. According to the BI report, Microsoft is considering increasing the requirement for in-person work for employees based in its Redmond, Washington, headquarters to at least three days a week starting in January. Microsoft is still working out the details of the plan and intends to announce it in September, the sources said. A Microsoft spokesperson told BI that the company was considering revising its flexible work schedule, but had yet to finalize any changes. Related: Microsoft Just Became the Second Company in History to Achieve a $4 Trillion Valuation — Here's How A return-to-office mandate could impact tens of thousands of Microsoft employees. As of June 30, Microsoft employed 228,000 workers, with 125,000 located in the U.S. If Microsoft implements a stricter return-to-office policy, it would join a slew of other companies that have tightened the limits on remote work recently — or eliminated it altogether. In 2025, both AT&T and Sweetgreen revised their stances on remote work, with AT&T asking U.S. staff to work all five days from the office while Sweetgreen mandated four days. Both companies previously required staff to work in person three days a week. Meanwhile, Amazon announced a sweeping return-to-office mandate in September, requiring employees to work from the office five days a week starting in January instead of adhering to a hybrid schedule. Though the move met with pushback from staff — and inspired 500 employees to sign a letter in protest — Amazon persisted with the move. Related: Amazon Tells Thousands of Employees to Relocate or Resign According to a study conducted last year by Bamboo HR, return-to-office mandates were often layoffs in disguise, designed to pare down a workforce without conducting official job cuts. About a quarter of C-Suite executives surveyed wanted to inspire "voluntary turnover" with stricter return-to-office policies. Mass Layoffs Despite Stellar Earnings Microsoft recently conducted mass layoffs, eliminating 9,000 roles in July, or nearly 4% of its workforce. Two months earlier, in May, Microsoft laid off over 6,000 employees, or 3% of its workforce. At the same time, Microsoft has reported stellar earnings, greater than analyst expectations. Last month, Microsoft announced that for the quarter ending June 30, revenue was up 18% from the previous year, reaching $76.4 billion, while net income was $27.2 billion, a 24% increase. Related: Microsoft's CEO Says the Company's Mass Layoffs, Despite Financial Success, Are 'Weighing Heavily on Me' in an Internal Memo Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella explained the job cuts in a memo to staff released on Microsoft's corporate blog last month. Nadella acknowledged the discrepancy between Microsoft's "thriving" financials and his decision to still lay off staff. "This is the enigma of success in an industry that has no franchise value," Nadella wrote, without explaining further. Microsoft stock is up over 24% year-to-date at the time of writing.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google denies AI search features are killing website traffic
Numerous studies indicate that the shift to AI search features and the use of AI chatbots are killing traffic to publishers' sites. But Google on Wednesday denied that's the case, at least in aggregate. Instead, the search giant says that total organic click volume from its search engine to websites has been 'relatively stable' year-over-year and that average click quality has slightly increased. 'This data is in contrast to third-party reports that inaccurately suggest dramatic declines in aggregate traffic — often based on flawed methodologies, isolated examples, or traffic changes that occurred prior to the roll out of AI features in Search,' writes Google VP and Head of Search, Liz Reid, in a new blog post. Though Google hasn't shared any specific data to back up its conclusions, even if we assume Google's claims to be true, this doesn't necessarily mean that AI isn't having an impact. Even Google has to admit this, as Reid acknowledges that 'user trends are shifting traffic to different sites, resulting in decreased traffic to some sites and increased traffic to others.' That word 'some' is doing heavy lifting here, as Google doesn't share data about how many sites are gaining or losing. And while chatbots like ChatGPT have certainly seen traffic increase in recent months, that doesn't mean online publishers aren't suffering. Google has been revamping its search engine for years to answer more questions directly on the search results page, and now does so with AI through its 'AI Overviews' that appear at the top of search results. Google also allows users to interact with an AI chatbot for some queries. Yet Google denies that this is significantly reshaping the search landscape. Rather, it points to users shifting their attention to other sites to start their queries. Reid explains, 'People are increasingly seeking out and clicking on sites with forums, videos, podcasts, and posts where they can hear authentic voices and first-hand perspectives.' Reading between the lines, it seems like isn't necessarily people's first stop on the web these days. But that's something we've known for some time. Back in 2022, a Google exec even said that social sites like TikTok and Instagram were eating into Google's core products, like Search and Maps. 'In our studies, something like almost 40% of young people, when they're looking for a place for lunch, they don't go to Google Maps or Search,' said Google SVP Prabhakar Raghavan, who ran the company's Knowledge and Information organization at the time (he is now its Chief Technologist). 'They go to TikTok or Instagram,' he noted. Google has also long been worried that had become people's first stop for online shopping searches, and had become the first stop for researching topics of interest. Over many years, the company has tried to come up with compelling features for both consumers and retailers that would attract more users to Google Shopping. These efforts have included universal shopping carts, local inventory checks, deal finders, shopping from product images on websites, and more. It even made its Shopping listings free for merchants in 2020. Meanwhile, as users complained that Google Search quality was declining, the search giant was seeing so much demand for Reddit that it finally added a 'Reddit' filter to allow users to narrow down results on relevant search queries. (Now that filter simply reads, 'forums.') So perhaps there's some truth in Google's denials — it's not AI that's entirely responsible for killing search. Search was already dying. Google's new blog post also attempts to move the goal posts a bit about what it means for websites receiving Google's clicks. Now, instead of counting clicks, it wants publishers to think about click quality. The company says average click quality has increased, and Google is sending 'slightly more quality clicks' to websites than a year ago. (Google explains that a quality click is one where users don't quickly click back — they stay and read.) How much of an increase, though, Google doesn't say. The company only points out that when people click through on an AI response to the source, they're more likely to dive deeper, so those clicks are more valuable. What's more, Google paints AI as an opportunity for web publishers to gain increased exposure, saying that '…with AI Overviews, people are seeing more links on the page than before,' as Reid writes. 'More queries and more links mean more opportunities for websites to surface and get clicked.' But AI, while a growing referral source, isn't yet making up the difference in terms of clicks, reports have shown. One recent study from Similarweb indicates that the number of news searches on the web resulting in zero clicks to news websites has grown from 56% (when Google launched AI Overviews in May 2024) to 69% as of May 2025. Google appears to knows this is a trend, too, as it recently launched a product for publishers that helps them monetize their dwindling traffic in other ways that don't rely only on advertising, like micropayments or newsletter sign-ups. The fact that Google is pushing this 'AI is not the end of search traffic!' PR now only makes the situation seem more dire. It's as if Google wants publishers to believe not what their own eyes — and graphs and charts — tell them, but instead take comfort in the fact that Google still sends 'billions of clicks to websites' every day, just as the post claims.
Engadget
37 minutes ago
- Engadget
Google: Actually, AI in Search is driving more queries and higher quality clicks
Last month, a Pew Research Center report shed light on Google's AI Overviews' effect on web publishing. In short, the analysis painted an abysmal outlook for anyone relying on web traffic. But on Wednesday, Google Search head Liz Reid penned a blog post that puts quite a different spin on things. The Google VP claims traffic from search to websites is "relatively stable" and that click quality has increased. Reid's framing boils down to everything is peachy, and AI is making things better — even for websites! She wrote that Google Search's total organic click volume to websites has been "relatively" stable year-over-year. Reid also claimed Google sends more "quality clicks" (visitors who don't quickly bounce) to websites than a year ago. The company says people are also happier with the search experience. The company didn't share any numbers — the post has no data whatsoever — to support its claims. Google's explanation for the rosy outlook? "With AI Overviews, people are searching more and asking new questions that are often longer and more complex," Reid wrote. "In addition, with AI Overviews, people are seeing more links on the page than before. More queries and more links mean more opportunities for websites to surface and get clicked." Reid does highlight a shifting landscape. She says user trends are resulting in lower traffic for some sites and increased traffic for others. Of course, the Google Search head didn't call out any specific websites. But she claims forums, videos, podcasts and posts with "authentic voices and first-hand perspectives" are thriving. Reid added that content like "an in-depth review, an original post, a unique perspective, or a thoughtful first-person analysis" does well. A Google AI Overview for the query (Google / Engadget) The Google VP said people seeking simple Q&A types of searches are leaning more on AI. "For some questions where people are looking for a quick answer, like 'when is the next full moon,' people may be satisfied with the initial AI Overviews response and not click further," Reid wrote. "This has also been true for other answer features we've added, like the Knowledge Graph or sports scores. But for many other types of questions, people continue to click through, as they want to dig deeper into a topic, explore further or make a purchase. This is why we see click quality increasing — an AI response might provide the lay of the land, but people click to dive deeper and learn more, and when they do, these clicks are more valuable." It's quite the contrast from the Pew report. It found that visitors who saw an AI summary clicked a traditional search result in eight percent of all visits. Those without an AI summary? They clicked on a traditional result in 15 percent of their visits. As for those source links in AI summaries? Pew found that only one percent of people clicked on those. Users were also more likely to end their browsing after visiting a page with an AI summary. That aligned with comments Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince made in June. He said search traffic referrals keep plummeting. "The future of the web is going to be more and more like AI, and that means that people are going to be reading the summaries of your content, not the original content," he said. Prince said that a decade ago, Google sent a publisher one visitor for every two pages it crawled. Early this year, it dropped to one visitor for every six pages. He said that, in June, it was down to one for every 18. I can't tell you who to believe. But here's what the ultimate source had to say: Straight from the source! (Google / Engadget)
