Sarwar dodges question on potential welfare reform revolt
But on Wednesday, Mr Sarwar refused to say if he supported the reforms or the rebellion against them.
When asked if he supports the Scottish MPs seeking to block the Bill at a live taping of the Holyrood Sources podcast in Edinburgh, the Scottish Labour leader said: 'My position has been quite consistent on the welfare reforms, which is I support the principle of reform.
'We have to look at the structural challenges that exist in our welfare system, even with the changes currently being proposed.'
Mr Sarwar said there were 'many positives' in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, but added that there were 'still conversations to be had' about potential changes.
Pushed again on whether he supports the rebellion, Mr Sarwar said: 'Conversations are ongoing, as you would expect.
'People are legitimately voicing their concerns, having those conversations.'
Pressed again on his view on the potential revolt, Mr Sarwar added: 'We have to support the principle of reform.
'What those reforms look like has to be balanced and has to be fair.'
Mr Sarwar stressed that he believed the best way out of poverty was through work, but said those who cannot work should be supported.
The most controversial part of the plans will see the eligibility of the personal independence payment (Pip) in England and Wales be reduced in a bid to save £5 billion.
Earlier on Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner suggested that ministers were considering potential concessions to Labour MPs to stave off a rebellion.
'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable,' she said in an interview with ITV's Peston programme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
12 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Starmer seeking to quell revolt over welfare reform plan
Downing Street insiders said talks were taking place with Labour MPs about the legislation after 126 of them publicly backed a move to block the legislation. The first vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to take place on Tuesday and a concerted effort has been launched by ministers to win round potential rebels. A No 10 source said: 'The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back. 'It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this.' The source insisted the reforms were 'underpinned by… Labour values'. They said: 'Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the Bill and the changes it will bring, we want to start delivering this together on Tuesday.' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and the Government were 'ongoing' as six more Labour MPs added their names to the rebel amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. The reasoned amendment argues that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards. North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names. The new names take the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the amendment, tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, to 126. The plans restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. 'To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country. 'It's not very grown-up.' They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.' The Daily Telegraph reported that potential concessions being considered include a commitment to speed up payment of support to help people back into work and offering assurances that reviews of policies in this area will be published. Meanwhile, The Times reported some MPs opposed to the plans had blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and suggested the time had come for 'regime change' in Downing Street. Asked about attacks on Mr McSweeney, trade minister Douglas Alexander said: 'I'm much less interested in the gossip about SW1 than whether this legislation works on the streets, in the towns, in the communities right across the country.' He said it was 'for the Prime Minister to make his judgments' about who works in Downing Street but the fact is that team delivered us an historic victory only last July, against expectations'. Mr Alexander said: 'The task of government is hard, there are always going to be people with strong opinions on all sides of an issue like welfare reform.'
The National
13 minutes ago
- The National
Holyrood passes legislation to abolish SQA exams body
The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) is set to be scrapped and replaced by a new body called Qualifications Scotland. The Education (Scotland) Bill was passed by 69 votes to 47 late on Wednesday evening, following two days of debate. As well as abolishing the SQA, the bill also sets out plans for a new chief inspector of education, who will be tasked with inspecting nurseries, schools and colleges across Scotland. READ MORE: 100 charities challenge Ian Murray and Scottish Labour to oppose UK welfare cuts The bill states that Qualification Scotland will have to give equal weighting to both British Sign Language (BSL) and the Gaelic language. It also outlines that the new body must consider the needs of pupils who use BSL or learn in BSL. The new body is expected to be up and running in the autumn, after this year's exam results are released. It comes almost five years after the 2020 exams scandal, where marks for more than 124,000 pupils were downgraded after exams had to be scrapped as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. Speaking as the legislation was passed, Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said the bill would "fundamentally create a new and a different type of organisation which works with the teaching profession differently". Jenny Gilruth And speaking after the vote, Gilruth said: 'The successful passage of this legislation shows this Government is serious about implementing the changes needed to drive improvement across Scotland's education and skills system. "The creation of a new national qualifications body is about building the right conditions for reform to flourish; the new body will ensure that knowledge and experience of pupils and teachers are at the heart of our national qualifications offering." Gilruth added that the new chief inspector would have "greater independence and the power to set the frequency and focus of inspections". READ MORE: SNP MPs join Labour rebellion in bid to kill off benefit cuts 'Throughout this process, I have been determined to work with other parties on this vital legislation. I am also grateful to teaching unions and other organisations across civic Scotland who contributed to its development," she continued. 'Taken together our major programme of education and skills reform will bring about the changes needed to meet the needs of future generations of young people." The bill was backed by the Scottish Greens, who said that the new body "will put the voices of teachers and students at its heart". The party's education spokesperson, Ross Greer, who has previously campaigned for an overhaul of the exams body, said he was pleased MSPs had voted for "this fresh start in Scottish education". Ross Greer He said: "Senior leadership at the SQA was given the opportunity to change over many years, but refused to do so. "Replacing the organisation with one legally required to listen to teachers and students will end this constant cycle of scandals. "Now we can begin rebuilding the trust which was so completely destroyed over the last decade and put the focus back on supporting students." But he added that such reform needed to be followed up with "urgent work" to reduce teachers' workload and an overhaul of the "Victorian-era" end of term exams system towards a model of ongoing assessment. Greer also hit out at Scottish Labour, who voted down the bill on the basis it did not go far enough. "Labour's vote to protect the scandal-plagued and unaccountable SQA is bizarre," he said. 'How can anyone look at the mistakes of recent years and think it can continue? We need real change for students and teachers, which this bill will deliver." READ MORE: UK nations unite against Labour's 'inadequate' devolution approach Both Labour and the Tories voted down the bill on Wednesday. Pam Duncan-Glancy, Scottish Labour's education spokesperson, said: 'We needed a qualifications system fit for the future, one that respects the efforts of learners, supports the judgment of teachers, and earns the trust of employers and universities. 'We needed a curriculum that is broad and inclusive, we needed an inspectorate that can challenge where necessary but also celebrate excellence. But on reform this is a job unfinished.' Meanwhile, Scottish Tory education spokesperson Miles Briggs said the new body was "little more than a rebrand of the SQA". 'The SQA needed an overhaul, not a cosmetic makeover, and the changes proposed fall way short of what is required to ensure the organisation can operate effectively and is properly accountable," he added.
The National
13 minutes ago
- The National
100 charities challenge Scottish Labour MPs to oppose UK welfare cuts
Charities including The Poverty Alliance, Carers Scotland, and Glasgow Disability Alliance have written a joint letter to Scottish Secretary Ian Murray, and all of Scotland's MPs, urging them to vote against the planned welfare cuts. The Labour Government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill aims to cut back disability benefit payments by around £5 billion per year. The SNP have made clear that their MPs will be opposing the changes. In the letter, the charities highlight that an estimated 400,000 people will be pushed into poverty if the changes to Personal Independence Payments (Pip) and Universal Credit go ahead. READ MORE: Scottish Enterprise to keep funding Israel-linked arms firms, Kate Forbes says They also warned MPs that the proposed cuts will mean 'destitution and misery' for many sick and disabled people, along with others in their households, including children and unpaid carers. 'This is a question about the kind of society we want to be,' the letter reads. 'Scotland is a country that believes in justice and compassion, and people want our governments to make decisions which align with those values. 'We urge ministers to drop these proposals. We urge Scottish MPs to vote against these cuts, sending a strong, positive message to disabled people and carers in Scotland that this Government will build a country free from poverty, not one that forces people into deeper poverty and destitution.' MPs are expected to get their first chance to vote on the cuts in the Commons on July 1. However, more than 130 Labour MPs' signatures have appeared on a reasoned amendment explaining why they cannot support the Labour Government's proposals to slash welfare spending. If passed, which it could with support from opposition parties, the amendment would block the bill from progressing to its second reading when it returns to the Commons and would hand Keir Starmer his first major defeat of his time as Prime Minister. The amendment notes that the UK Government's 'own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of [the bill], including 50,000 children'. Peter Kelly, chief executive of The Poverty Alliance, said the UK Government's plans to press ahead with the bill would mean more disabled people living in poverty, relying on food banks, and being pushed into destitution. He said: 'People are desperate for the UK Government to deliver a just and compassionate society – but these proposals will deliver the opposite. 'If enacted, these cuts will mean more disabled people living in poverty, relying on foodbanks, and pushed into destitution. That's not the change people voted for at the last general election.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has supported the UK Government's plans to cut welfare despite unease among his group. At the time of writing, 11 Scottish Labour MPs had signed the rebel amendment. Starmer said on Wednesday morning: 'We're pressing on with a vote on this because we need to bring about reform.' (Image: PA) Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner clarified that a vote would be going ahead, despite reports that the UK Government was planning to delay it due to the scale of the rebellion. Fiona Collie of Carers Scotland said an estimated 50,000 unpaid carers across the UK stand to lose carers' benefits as a direct result of the changes. She said: 'We need a government that will reduce the poverty that unpaid carers face. If these cuts go ahead, even more of them will be pushed into crisis – leaving people struggling to afford food, heating, and other essentials. 'We estimate that around 150,000 unpaid carers across the UK stands to lose carers' benefits as a direct result of these changes. That's completely wrong - and any MP who votes to inflict that kind of deliberate harm on people in their constituency will have to justify themselves to electors.' In a survey last year, 71% of Glasgow Disability Alliance members said they didn't have enough money to manage the cost of their needs, 68% couldn't afford utilities, and 58% couldn't manage the costs of food and essential groceries. Tressa Burke of the Glasgow Disability Alliance added that the cuts will undermine disabled people's human rights and leave them facing even greater inequality and discrimination. She said: 'It is shameful to try to balance the nation's books on the backs of disabled people. We have around 6000 members who have already suffered the worst impacts of the cost-of-living crisis, and more than a decade of austerity and social security cuts. 'These plans will cause untold harm to many disabled people and push them into destitution. It will undermine their human rights and leave them facing even greater inequality and discrimination. 'If MPs in Scotland support these heartless cuts, it will be a bleak day indeed. They will absolutely not get people into work, and will act as a reason to fall out of work too, where PIP has been topping up low-paid work.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are determined to create a welfare system – backed by dedicated employment support we are investing in now – that will help people into work and out of poverty in all parts of the country. 'We will never compromise on protecting people who need our support, and our reforms will mean the social security system will always be there for those who will never be able to work. 'We are working with devolved administrations to ensure their views are at the heart of what we do, which is why we held Green Paper consultation events in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.' Scottish Labour has been approached for comment.
