ABS and Saronic Technologies to explore autonomous maritime tech
The two entities signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to collaborate on projects aimed at enhancing technical requirements for autonomous surface vessels (ASVs) and classification services for Saronic's autonomous capabilities.
Saronic co-founder and CEO Dino Mavrookas added: 'We are excited to work with ABS, a recognised authority in maritime safety and innovation standards.
'Through this agreement, we look forward to collaborating with ABS to contribute our experience and expertise to inform the advancement of industry standards for this emerging class of vessels, while ensuring our technology and platforms meet a high bar for safety, reliability, and efficiency.'
ABS is known for providing technical support for innovative autonomous and remote-controlled technologies within the maritime and offshore sectors.
ABS chairman and CEO Christopher J. Wiernicki said: 'Advancing autonomous technologies and uncrewed systems unlocks safer, more efficient operations across the maritime sector.
'We are delighted to work together with Saronic to foster innovation in this space, supporting cutting-edge solutions to redefine what's possible for maritime operations worldwide.'
Furthermore, ABS has also recently created a simulation tool for controlling thermal runaway incidents in lithium-ion battery fires, an essential aspect of safety.
Developed in collaboration with Texas A&M University, this tool delivers precise simulations at the individual battery cell scale.
Additionally, in June, ABS granted an Approval in Principle (AIP) to Hyundai Heavy Industries and Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering for their floating module design powered by small modular reactors (SMRs).
This design aims to generate electricity for both offshore and coastal areas, providing energy for harbour services and land-based populations.
"ABS and Saronic Technologies to explore autonomous maritime tech" was originally created and published by Ship Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Motormouth: What's that noise?
Q: I have a two-decade-old Toyota Corolla that has been making a random noise when braking that sounds/feels like the anti-locking brake system kicking in but on dry surfaces. I had a brake shop check the brakes and they couldn't find anything wrong. J.B., Chicago A: I have a hunch that the problem is the ABS (anti-lock brake system) controller. Let's hope not because they ain't cheap. Q: I got a check engine light on my 2016 Ford Edge for my catalytic converter. It only has 65,000 miles on it. I tried a fuel additive, followed directions and the check engine light went off after a couple of days but went back on three days later. Should I try it again? My mechanic quoted $1,700 for a new catalytic converter. T.M., Elmhurst, Illinois A: The EPA catalytic converter warranty covers emission control components for a minimum of 5 to 8 years or 80,000 to 100,000 miles. Too bad; you missed it. I wouldn't continue to use an additive. Your car won't pass the emissions inspection if there is a stored trouble code due to a bad cat. Bite the bullet. Your mechanic's price is typical. Q: There used to be an order form in the back of your owner's manual to send for a car-specific service manual. I believe the company was Helm. Are service manuals still available? A: Service manuals are available – online. Helm is still a reliable source: M.M., Palos Park, Illinois Q: Thank you for your Motormouth columns! They are informative and entertaining -- the best combination. Recently, you corresponded with a reader about the Fisker Ocean, which had solar panels on top, presumably to help keep its batteries charged. Powering a car with solar panels is extremely difficult technically. This is because sunlight is not concentrated enough to provide a significant fraction of the power needed. Another example is the Lightyear 0, which is also no longer in production. Its solar panels were supposed to produce enough power to add 70 kilometers of range per day in the summer. This might be enough to support short commutes or shopping. We may never get to the point where a normal-sized car can power itself entirely with sunlight. A.M., Colorado Springs, Colorado A: Probably not, but I recall a 1987 competition that led to the Sunraycer, a solar-powered car created by a team that included GM, Hughes Aircraft and AeroVironment to build a very light-weight and ultra-low-wind-resistance vehicle. The car weighed in at 580 pounds - a lot lighter than either the Fisker or Lightyear vehicles. It used 8,800 solar cells that reportedly could generate about 1,500 watts under full sun. That's typical wattage for an air fryer. The Sunraycer experiment led GM to build the Impact electric car. (I always thought it was a bad name for an automobile.) It didn't go far in the market. Q: I purchased a 2009 Volvo C70 convertible in August 2008 and have driven it 35,100 miles. We spend almost 6 months a year in Arizona. My Volvo dealership recommended replacing the timing belt, tensioner and idler pulley in addition to the serpentine belt. Since the repair work would be very costly, my question is this: Regardless of the low mileage, do I need to make this repair investment? R.S., Oak Brook, Illinois A: Do you have proof of the car's service history? If that stuff has been replaced recently, you're probably OK. If not, don't let your investment turn into a boat anchor. Get the work done. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
ABS and Saronic Technologies to explore autonomous maritime tech
The American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) and Saronic Technologies have announced a partnership to advance autonomous technologies for maritime applications. The two entities signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to collaborate on projects aimed at enhancing technical requirements for autonomous surface vessels (ASVs) and classification services for Saronic's autonomous capabilities. Saronic co-founder and CEO Dino Mavrookas added: 'We are excited to work with ABS, a recognised authority in maritime safety and innovation standards. 'Through this agreement, we look forward to collaborating with ABS to contribute our experience and expertise to inform the advancement of industry standards for this emerging class of vessels, while ensuring our technology and platforms meet a high bar for safety, reliability, and efficiency.' ABS is known for providing technical support for innovative autonomous and remote-controlled technologies within the maritime and offshore sectors. ABS chairman and CEO Christopher J. Wiernicki said: 'Advancing autonomous technologies and uncrewed systems unlocks safer, more efficient operations across the maritime sector. 'We are delighted to work together with Saronic to foster innovation in this space, supporting cutting-edge solutions to redefine what's possible for maritime operations worldwide.' Furthermore, ABS has also recently created a simulation tool for controlling thermal runaway incidents in lithium-ion battery fires, an essential aspect of safety. Developed in collaboration with Texas A&M University, this tool delivers precise simulations at the individual battery cell scale. Additionally, in June, ABS granted an Approval in Principle (AIP) to Hyundai Heavy Industries and Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering for their floating module design powered by small modular reactors (SMRs). This design aims to generate electricity for both offshore and coastal areas, providing energy for harbour services and land-based populations. "ABS and Saronic Technologies to explore autonomous maritime tech" was originally created and published by Ship Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Court should reject HPE-Juniper merger: Former DOJ antitrust deputy
A Justice Department shake-up that led last month to the departure of the antitrust division's second in command arose over a DOJ decision to bend to lobbyists in the department's review of Hewlett Packard Enterprise's (HPE) acquisition of rival Juniper Networks ( according to Roger Alford, the fired official. The division's former antitrust deputy, Alford accused DOJ officials Chad Mizelle, chief of staff to Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Stanley Woodward, an associate attorney general nominee, of allowing lobbyists to prevail over the rule of law in the review that green-lighted the deal. Alford's critique came during an address on Monday at the Tech Policy Institute Aspen Forum. "It is my opinion that in the HPE/Juniper merger scandal, Chad Mizelle and Stanley Woodward perverted justice and acted inconsistent with the rule of law," Alford said. "I hope the court blocks the HPE/Juniper merger. If you knew what I knew, you would hope so too." The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Alford, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, was one of two of the Justice Department's most senior officials shown the door last month. He also served in the antitrust division during President Trump's first term. Before his departure from the second administration, he was principal deputy to President Trump's hand-picked antitrust chief, Gail Slater. The other official, William Rinner, a deputy assistant attorney general, headed up merger enforcement. Rinner also served in Trump's first administration. The Wall Street Journal reported that the two had been working on the department's challenge to the acquisition before a settlement was reached with HPE's politically connected lawyers, who lacked antitrust expertise. Alford said the HPE-Juniper review exemplified a broader, ongoing battle within the Republican Party over the future of the second Trump administration. "I am not talking about the well-known ideological battle between traditional conservatives and Trump supporters. I am talking about the battle between genuine MAGA reformers and MAGA-In-Name-Only lobbyists," Alford said. "It's a fight over whether Americans will have equal justice under law, or whether preferential access to our justice system is for sale to the wealthy and well-connected." The former deputy went on to question whether the US under the balance of President Trump's second term would be governed by the rule of law or the rule of lobbyists. He said the agency could correct course if it takes action to carry out the Trump administration's original mission to enforce the competition rules. "For the words 'equal justice under law' to be more than just a phrase etched in marble, it must be practiced by those privileged to enforce it," he said. "I am speaking out now because it is still early days in this Administration and I think correcting the problems at the DOJ is still possible, either by political will or judicial decree." Alford praised his former boss, Slater, and department colleagues, including Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who Alford said he believes remain true to President Trump's core message instructing that antitrust enforcement is not for sale and should deliver tangible "common sense populism"-oriented results for millions of Americans. During a panel discussion at George Washington Law School in May, Alford emphasized that the administration's focus was on mergers expected to drive up prices on goods and services that impact everyday Americans, like housing, education, healthcare, and everyday goods and services. Merger challenges like the one against HPE — filed roughly a week after Trump took office — appeared to signal the administration's plans to vigorously pursue competition concerns. Further underscoring its offensive approach, the administration pushed ahead with antitrust prosecutions targeting the biggest names in tech, including Google (GOOG), Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), and Meta (META). The Justice Department sued Hewlett-Packard in January, alleging that the $14 billion tie-up to combine the nation's second- and third-largest providers of enterprise wireless networking would substantially lessen market competition. Five months later, in June, the department announced it had settled with HPE and would allow the deal to go forward by requiring HPE to divest its global "Instant On" WLAN business to a DOJ-approved buyer, plus ensure it would license key software assets to rivals. Alford called on California Federal District Judge P. Casey Pitt to closely scrutinize the events that led to the merger settlement between the DOJ and HPE-Juniper court proceedings under the 1974 Tunney Act. The act requires companies seeking approval of merger settlements to disclose their settlement-related communications with the executive branch. Democratic lawmakers also asked Judge Pitt to hold a hearing to review the settlement. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
