How women have been impacted by Musk-led federal layoffs
But women and people of color are among those most affected by cuts to certain agencies, according to a new analysis from the National Women's Law Center (NWLC). The layoffs and buyouts have shaken the government employee base, which has more built-in protections and benefits than many positions in the private sector.
'The elimination of all these federal jobs passes these female workers into a market that does discriminate on the basis of sex,' said Jacqueline Simon, policy director for the American Federation of Government Employees, a union that represents over 750,000 federal workers.
On his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order terminating any federal programs related to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) — a sweeping and vague mandate that put even marginally related initiatives on the chopping block. Coupled with that was Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which had unprecedented and far-reaching authority to dictate agency reductions and closures.
Women made up the majority of workers in departments — including Veterans Affairs, Education, Health and Human Services, Treasury, and Housing and Urban Development — targeted for these larger-scale layoffs. Women also make up the majority of employees at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Voice of America, which are among other agencies that have been or are expected to be gutted or shuttered altogether.
This has pulled out the 'explicit' career ladders on which women federal employees could rely, according to Simon.
'You can't find yourself in a situation that says, 'You're doing really great work, but sorry, we don't have room for any promotions,'' Simon said. 'Promotions were sort of built in — it was and is a positive attribute of federal employment for any group that experiences discrimination when it comes to career advancement.'
Media organizations and watchdog groups don't have exact numbers on the roughly 280,000 federal employees who have been impacted in some way by the second Trump-era cuts and buyouts. Current data does not suggest that women have been disproportionately or specifically targeted for mass terminations.
But an overt lack of transparency means experts cannot meaningfully dissect the cuts and buyouts. The White House recently removed current and historic diversity data from public government websites, further obscuring the effects of mass layoffs. Numbers like those in the NWLC report are so far the closest to approximating the populations that have been most affected by Musk's reduction efforts.
However, the series of layoffs illuminates the diversity in the federal government's 2.3 million workers, 47 percent of whom were women as of September 2024. While the stereotype of an older White man in government might be true for leadership and supervisory positions, she said the report shows how many women and people of color have found a path to the middle class through stable government jobs, which carried predictable schedules, raises and union representation. They are also supposed to be protected from arbitrary firings.
'The federal government creates such great opportunities and has such quality jobs that we don't always see in the private industry,' said Sarah Javaid, the report's author. 'It is a huge attraction to people, and it is far more diverse than we initially thought. It's so clear why people come to these jobs.'
'All those things are rare in the private sector, and now they're being obliterated,' said Liz Morris, co-director of the Center for WorkLife Law.
The California-based advocacy organization focuses on gender and racial equity, and opened a hotline for laid-off workers in April to help connect them with legal help. Morris said that before this year's layoffs, they had never received so many calls from federal workers.
Outside of layoffs, she said caregivers and pregnant workers have endured the deepest impact from the changes to federal employee standards, including orders earlier this year to return to work in-person and a lack of reasonable accommodations. Attempts to address these concerns can go unanswered when human resources departments within these same agencies have also been gutted, Morris added.
'People who are expecting a baby … a time when a stable income is absolutely critical — people are being terminated, having their termination reversed by a court order, then they're being terminated again — all the while they have a baby on the way,' she said. She added that other factors like economic strain, losing health insurance or job searching while pregnant compound the fear many workers feel right now.
She said she has even heard from employees who have returned from parental leave only to be fired and asked to pay back the leave they just took.
'In the past, the federal government was an excellent employer,' Morris said. 'Any employer can make missteps, but generally, federal employees could count on civil service protections… That security has been shattered.'
The post How women have been impacted by Musk-led federal layoffs appeared first on The 19th.
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
US applications for jobless benefits rise last week, but layoffs remain historically low
WASHINGTON (AP) — More Americans filed for unemployment benefits last week, but U.S. layoffs remain in the same historically healthy range of the past few years. Applications for unemployment benefits for the week ending Aug. 16 rose by 11,000 to 235,000, the Labor Department reported Thursday. That's slightly more than the 229,000 new applications that economists had forecast. Weekly applications for jobless benefits are seen as a proxy for layoffs and have mostly settled in a historically healthy range between 200,000 and 250,000 since the U.S. began to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic more than three years ago. While layoffs remain low by historical comparisons, there has been noticeable deterioration in the labor market this year and mounting evidence that people are having difficulty finding jobs. U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs in July, well short of the 115,000 analysts forecast. Worse, revisions to the May and June figures shaved 258,000 jobs off previous estimates and the unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2% from 4.1%. That report sent financial markets spiraling, spurring President Donald Trump to fire Erika McEntarfer, the head of Bureau of Labor Statistics, which tallies the monthly employment numbers. The BLS does not contribute to the weekly unemployment benefits report except to calculate the annual seasonal adjustments. The BLS reported earlier this week that the unemployment rate in Washington, D.C. eclipsed 6% in July, the third straight month that it was the highest in the U.S. The rising D.C. jobless rate is a reflection of the mass layoffs of federal workers by Trump's Department of Government Efficiency earlier this year. An overall decline in international tourism — a main driver of D.C.'s income — is also expected to have an impact on the climbing unemployment rate in the District. Neighboring states of Maryland and Virginia, where many federal employees reside, also saw an uptick in unemployment rates in July. Since the beginning of Trump's second term, federal workers across government agencies have been either laid off or asked to voluntarily resign, spurring lawsuits from labor unions and advocacy groups. Another recent report on the U.S. labor market showed that employers posted 7.4 million job vacancies in June, down from 7.7 million in May. The number of people quitting their jobs — a sign of confidence in finding a better job — fell in June to the lowest level since December. Some major companies have announced job cuts this year, including Procter & Gamble, Dow, CNN, Starbucks, Southwest Airlines, Microsoft, Google and Facebook parent company Meta. Intel and The Walt Disney Co. also recently announced staff reductions. Many economists contend that Trump's erratic rollout of tariffs against U.S. trading partners has created uncertainty for employers, who have grown reluctant to expand their payrolls. The Labor Department's report Thursday showed that the four-week average of claims, which softens some of the week-to-week swings, rose by 4,500 to 226,500. The total number of Americans collecting unemployment benefits for the previous week of Aug. 9 jumped by 30,000 to 1.97 million, the most since November 6, 2021.


The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Live updates: Texas barrels toward new district maps; White House details EU trade deal
The Texas House gave its seal of approval to new congressional district maps, and the state Senate takes up the effort on Thursday. President Trump is pushing for the new lines to give Republicans a boost of five seats in Congress. California's effort to counter Texas redistricting is full steam ahead, with both legislature chambers debating the issue Thursday. The California Supreme Court on Wednesday handed state Democrats a win, rejecting a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plan to redistrict California's congressional map. The Trump administration on Thursday morning rolled out details of its trade deal with the European Union, setting its exports tariff at 15 percent. The EU has agreed to eliminate all tariffs on industrial goods imported from the U.S. and to widen preferential market access to U.S. seafood and agricultural products. At the White House, Trump will sign executive orders at 3 p.m.


The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Putin has a Melania Trump problem, and the DC media is too slanted to see it
Of all the people in the White House not to end up on the wrong side of, outside of President Trump, I would put Melania Trump at the top of the list. Very private and not at all liking politics (although far too classy to constantly whine about it, unlike a certain former first lady), Melania Trump has taken a very low profile. But that doesn't mean she is uninvolved. Too bad for Vladimir Putin that he didn't get the memo. Now the Russian president is paying the price. In fact, Trump himself revealed the first lady is not buying Putin's soft-soap routine. USA Today reported that when the president told Melania about Putin's desire for peace, she quickly noted that Russia had just bombed another city, killing more civilians. In response, Russia's ham-handed propaganda machine went on the attack, peddling nasty gossip and calling her a 'danger to Russia.' But the first lady was not about to engage. To all appearances, she had a far more shrewd and effective response in mind. Her letter to Putin was a clear shot at the Russians. In the letter, she essentially says that Putin and the Russians abducted Ukrainian children, and she wants them released. Melania did not call Putin a war criminal, but that conclusion is just a step away. Has Putin figured out his attack dogs blundered? There is evidence to suggest just that. Putin compounded the Russian propaganda mistake with an even more serious blunder, possibly to make up for insulting the first lady. At the Anchorage summit — which was a success for Trump, since he didn't give anything away and forced Putin to confer on a U.S. Air Force Base on American soil — Putin was an obsequious as he could be. But in doing so he went a step too far, agreeing with Trump that he would not have invaded Ukraine if Trump had been president. For over three years Putin has claimed to the Russian people and the world that he is in a civilizational fight and battling Nazis in Ukraine. And that is a lie. Putin's invasion was opportunistic. He started the war because he thought he would win easily. Of course, it's one thing for a national leader to lie (happens all the time), and another thing to admit it — and make your loyalists look like fools. Even more problematic for Putin are his inner circle and the security state that surrounds him. Tied to Putin, his sheepish sycophancy to Trump is a humiliation for them as well. Instead of a proud, patriotic Russia fighting for its survival, Putin has portrayed himself and Russia as supplicants to Trump. Pretty humiliating, if you ask me. Putin is the main power in Russia, but he is not a dictator in the style of Kim Jong Un. There are other power centers in the country, and his personal control still relies on the support of Russia's security state. Expect Putin to pivot to a more aggressive posture in order to regain some semblance of pride and control — which will undermine his position with Trump. Of course, these complexities are utterly beyond the understanding and interest of a Western media that is obsessed with loathing Trump — and by proxy anyone associated with him, including the first lady. Instead of recognizing the subtle and substantive moves of Melania Trump, the progressive left immediately sought to demean her letter. Salon's pages snarked like an overqualified freshman English teacher. Others claimed it was an AI paste-up job. But even if the letter wasn't everyone's cup of tea or not quite the Gettysburg Address, that's beside the point. The significant revelation is that Putin and his thugs may well have created an implacable foe in the White House who cannot be displaced. Too focused on their mission to throw mud at anything and everything Trump, the establishment media and leftist echo chamber are unwilling (or unable) to amplify Putin's humiliation and fuel discontent within Russia. It all makes their support for Ukraine ring hollow, to say the least. When push comes to shove, there is no principle that supersedes hatred for Trump. Time will tell on this latest burst of diplomacy. It is more likely than not that Putin is in too deep to offer any compromise that could be remotely acceptable. His own propaganda and ultra-nationalist allies may well have put him in a box he cannot get out of. Not that this circumstance should surprise anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of Russian history. There is a reason Russian autocrats almost never survive losing a war. This war will most likely not end until Putin is removed from power and a new Russian leadership can start over, blaming the dead man for all of the mistakes — another classic Russian trope. If and when that happens, Melania Trump will deserve some credit.