logo
Why left populism failed

Why left populism failed

Photo byTen years ago this summer, as Jeremy Corbyn scraped onto the ballot in the Labour Party leadership election, the hopes of the European left centred on Greece, where a radical left government was seeking to restructure the country's debt and roll back brutal austerity that had seen suicide, unemployment and home repossessions rocket. As negotiations reached an impasse, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras announced that he would put the Eurozone's offer to a referendum. The rallies for the No (or 'Oxi') campaign, which he addressed, were the biggest public gatherings in Greece since the fall of the colonels in 1974.
I was in Athens to witness the campaign, and when the result came through on 5 July – an overwhelming 61 per cent rejection – I saw the city's streets erupt in celebration. Less than two weeks later, Tsipras had signed up to the bailout package, pushing it through the Greek parliament with the help of his former opponents. Riot police were sent in to break up the same crowds who had cheered him on. Tear gas flew outside the parliament building, and police rode through the fleeing crowd on motor bikes, swiping indiscriminately with batons. Unlike the years of the mass anti-austerity movement that had led to Syriza's rise, the protests now were going through the motions. Police fielded routine petrol bombs near Exarchia. Gatherings in Syntagma Square felt like an angry wake.
There were no easy options for the government. Defying the demands of 'the Troika' – the European Commission, European Central Bank and the IMF – would have meant a sudden return to the Drachma. Economic and humanitarian crisis would have been the result whichever way Tsipras turned. But the abrupt betrayal of both the election and the referendum set the Greek and European left back years. Tsipras won snap elections in September 2015, but did so at the head of a different party. Syriza lost many of its activists and almost half of its large central committee. Its youth wing voted to dissolve itself.
Ten years on, the basic lesson of the Greek Oxi referendum is that new left parties – however populist and radical – can and do 'Pasokify' themselves. Whether you are Zarah Sultana or Zack Polanski, it is worth paying attention to the fate of Syriza – which, despite the British left's current momentum, could well be theirs.
Pasok, Greece's social democratic party, had dominated Greek politics for decades. It signed the first bailout package in 2010, implementing harsh austerity and privatisation measures. By the January 2015 elections, it had lost 90 per cent of its voters and came in seventh place. Pasokification was the fate of the French Socialist Party, the Dutch Labour Party, and to a lesser extent the German Social Democrats. If current polling holds, Starmer's Labour is next.
Syriza was the original new left alternative to a failing centre-left. In 2019, having implemented the third bailout package, it lost two thirds of its voters and left office. When Tsipras stood down as leader in 2023, the party elected Stefanos Kasselakis, an American former banker and shipping investor who had once supported the centre-right New Democracy. Kasselakis was later removed and split to form his own party, leaving Syriza once again behind Pasok in the Greek parliament. Syriza's once mighty youth support has evaporated, and it is now polling in sixth place.
The Oxi vote was the high watermark of the immediate revolt against austerity in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. The response of the European establishment was a fork in the road. Faced with mass opposition to austerity and the neoliberal economic consensus, it ploughed on. In backrooms, figures like the IMF's Christine Lagarde freely admitted that austerity measures would not work, and would instead deepen Greece's recession. But allowing Syriza to pursue a different path, backed by a popular mandate, would have been politically ruinous for governments which had asked their own populations to swallow cuts and wage depression.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Rather than give the radical left an opportunity, the European institutions stamped on Greece. Europe's centre-left and centre-right preferred a strategy of accommodation to a rising tide of nationalist and anti-migrant politics. Now, the new far right are in or near power in all but a couple of the EU's founding member states. Nigel Farage is odds on to be our next prime minister.
In 2015, the Greek left was fighting from within the Euro and at the European periphery. It had the strongest organised left on the continent and a recent history of military dictatorship. In all these senses, it could not have been further from the post-Corbyn British left. But in the sense that it is the only example of the new post-crash left leading a government, the lessons it offers are invaluable.
One of the founding promises of Syriza was that it represented a new kind of politics. When it came to power in January 2015, many of its newly elected MPs had never been near parliament before. The party was young, dynamic and above all rooted in the mass movements that had brought it to power. Even when Tsipras wrote to Angela Merkel offering concessions, many activists on the campaign trail that summer earnestly believed that their leaders would not act against the wishes of party members, let alone against the overwhelming mandate of a referendum. Some knew government ministers personally.
But as Corbynism demonstrated, 'a new kind of politics' is just a slogan – even if its supporters took it as an oath. Had the Syriza government been accountable to its members and activists, it would not have been possible to capitulate to the Troika in the summer of 2015. But Syriza had taken over the institutions of the state, and those institutions had a logic of their own. As soon as it won power, the party's internal democracy barely functioned.
Having had its institutions crushed by Thatcherism, the British left has many weaknesses for which it shouldn't blame itself. Its persistent lack of internal democracy is not one of them. Corbynism transformed our politics, but behind the crowds and the aesthetic edge, it was conventional. Faced with a hostile parliamentary party, the project ended up in a bunker, relying on standard party management methods. Labour members were not permitted to set policy, and no major democratic reform of the party took place. Instead of allowing Momentum to emerge as a messy, independent project, the leadership backed moves to shut down its local groups and democratic structures. The culture of the new Labour left was, above all, loyalist.
Corbynism had little organisational legacy. But when the cost of living crisis hit in 2022, and the UK was gripped by its biggest wave of strikes since the 1980s, the left had an opportunity to rebuild politically. It failed to do so. One problem was that the most prominent vehicle for the left, Enough is Enough, amassed a huge email list, held some big rallies, and then, rather than build local groups and democratic structures, vanished. Where healthy left organisations are built from the bottom up, today's left has a habit of relying on celebrities and hollow online hype. We teach people to be spectators and cheerleaders.
We are trained by mainstream political analysis to counterpose effectiveness and democracy, and to associate relentless professionalisation with electoral success. If you are part of an establishment for whom politics is essentially an elite sport, this is reasonable. Had Blair or Starmer allowed party members a say over party policy or candidate selection, they would not have been able to enact their strategies of choice. The radical left cannot win this way. When Tsipras signed the third bailout package, he escaped the messiness of running an anti-establishment party and his popularity initially rose. But the character of the project was irretrievable.
The social conditions that swept Syriza to power and which almost put Jeremy Corbyn in Downing Street in 2017 are, if anything, even sharper now. The resurgence of the British left – perhaps as an electoral alliance between a new left party and a Zack Polanski-led Green Party – could come soon, and with a force few commentators expect. In 2027, Jean-Luc Mélenchon could win the French presidency. The first wave of the new European left was up against a failing centre; now, it must fight toe-to-toe with the far right. To succeed, it must learn not only how to win elections, but how to keep its soul intact.
[See also: Inside the factions of the new left]
Related
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jeremy Corbyn and Gary Lineker join Mo Salah in condemnation of Uefa tribute to ‘Palestinian Pele'
Jeremy Corbyn and Gary Lineker join Mo Salah in condemnation of Uefa tribute to ‘Palestinian Pele'

The Independent

timea few seconds ago

  • The Independent

Jeremy Corbyn and Gary Lineker join Mo Salah in condemnation of Uefa tribute to ‘Palestinian Pele'

Gary Lineker and Jeremy Corbyn have joined footballer Mohamed Salah in condemning Uefa's tribute to the late Suleiman Al-Obeid, known as the 'Palestinian Pele'. Al-Obeid, 41, was killed when Israeli forces targeted civilians waiting for humanitarian aid in the Gaza Strip on Wednesday, according to the Palestine Football Association (PFA). In a post paying tribute to the footballer on social media platform X, Uefa said: 'Farewell to Suleiman al-Obeid, the 'Palestinian Pele'. A talent who gave hope to countless children, even in the darkest of times'. Liverpool player Mohamed Salah, called out the governing body for failing to reference the circumstances of his death, saying: 'Can you tell us how he died, where, and why?' Now, Gary Lineker, former England footballer and TV presenter, has taken to Instagram to share an article about the backlash to Uefa's post, writing: 'We can't hear you Uefa'. Jeremy Corbyn has also backed Salah's comments on X, saying: 'Well said Mo!'. Salah's social media post has so far been viewed by 73.4 million users. The Liverpool forward, 33, who has more than 19 million X followers, previously called for the massacres in the conflict to stop and for aid to be allowed into Gaza. In a video posted on Instagram in October 2023, he wrote: "It is not always easy to speak in times like this. There has been too much violence and too much heartbreak and brutality. "The escalations in the recent weeks is unbearable to witness. All lives are sacred and must be protected. The massacres need to stop. Families are being torn apart." The PFA said that Al-Obeid, who was married with two sons and three daughters, made 24 appearances for the national team, scoring twice. He was nicknamed the "Palestinian Pele", the PFA said. At least 38 Palestinians were killed overnight on Tuesday and into Wednesday while seeking aid from United Nations convoys and sites run by an Israeli-backed American contractor, according to local health officials. The Israeli military said it had fired warning shots when crowds approached its forces, but that it was not aware of any casualties. Nasser Hospital, which received the bodies, said another four people were killed in the Teina area, on a route leading to a site in southern Gaza run by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American contractor. The Al-Awda Hospital said it received the bodies of six people killed near a GHF site in central Gaza. Another 12 people were killed in Israeli airstrikes, according to the two hospitals. GHF said there were no violent incidents at or near its sites. The military says it tries to avoid harming civilians and blames their deaths on Hamas because its militants are entrenched in heavily populated areas. The United Nations has said that more than 1,300 people have been killed near aid distribution sites and aid convoys in Gaza since the launch of the US and Israel-backed aid distribution system, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.

Frankly, those most harmed by Nicola Sturgeon's gender policies are in for more injustice
Frankly, those most harmed by Nicola Sturgeon's gender policies are in for more injustice

Scotsman

time31 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Frankly, those most harmed by Nicola Sturgeon's gender policies are in for more injustice

PA Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... In the third Harry Potter book, The Prisoner of Azkaban, JK Rowling introduces readers to the foul 'Dementors', prison guards of the wizarding world. Dark, billowing, hooded figures, if they get too close you'll relive your worst moments; any happiness vanishes. At worst, they suck out your soul, leaving you husk-like, robbed of life's wonders. Asked how he escaped them, wrongly-convicted wizard Sirius Black recounts that, because he knew he was innocent – not a happy thought he could be robbed of –they couldn't destroy him entirely. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As someone pursued by demented forces unleashed by former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon's doomed gender-identity project, in the darkest moments of that experience – the journey to writer, rather than the poet I was six years ago has been a rough one - I've long dwelt on Rowling's prescient metaphor. Surviving the horror, the depression, of public denouncement based on false premises is a profoundly life-altering experience. Alas, in 'the gender wars' there isn't a simple spell to repel the damaging forces. Given this, reading Sturgeon's extract from hotly-anticipated (for varying reasons) memoir, Frankly, published this weekend, was always going to be difficult. I'll leave detailed reviews to literary critics who've read the full book. Unlike gender-dementors, I feel it important to read and understand a book before wishing to burn it or its author. Correction: I'd do neither even in situations of profound disagreement. But from extracts published, I fear those most harmed by Sturgeon's gender policies are in for more injustice. Whatever her troubles, Sturgeon still fails to understand the role she's played here. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Chief 'feminist to her fingertips,' she presided over a very Scottish version of a global battle that's seen women hounded, abused, often destroyed financially. In Australia, entrepreneur Sall Grover awaits finding out if she'll lose everything due to a man demanding access to her woman-only online app. He's already successfully sued her for his exclusion in an ongoing, contested, legal challenge. Also, as reported this week by Reduxx magazine, this movement has led to an unnamed European country offering asylum to Isabella Cêpa, a Brazilian feminist who faces up to 25 years in prison for 'misgendering' a male politician wishing to be female. Writing my last paragraph in Brazil would risk a woman getting the same treatment. So you'll excuse my struggle to empathise with Sturgeon's 'dystopian' feeling of being a high-profile woman at the centre of a police investigation into alleged criminality in the party she led, while her husband was Chief Executive. Her role, both as FM and supposedly still-sitting MSP comes with a handsome salary, afforded to roles of profound importance, and necessary media scrutiny. Of course that can put you in a 'bad state mentally.' Unlike for Sturgeon, however, for non-public women such as 'Lara' (not her real name) interviewed for my book Hounded, there's no escape from forces that threaten to dement them. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lara related to me her ex-husband's sexual abuse, as well as suicide threats if she didn't call him a literal woman. A wealthy man, who she tried to support initially, caused her, and her children's lives, to be turned upside-down. Lara specifically raised the horror of hearing her own First Minister prioritise her abusive partner's desires over the needs of the women of Scotland, in the most difficult interview I've ever conducted. Lara lost most of the couple's friends, who, despite the abuse, justified his behaviour as his journey was 'difficult'. As feminist writer Victoria Smith has long highlighted, the entire 'gender wars' has been characterised by the deeply misogynist narrative of 'divisive, complaining women, making everything so polarised, even risking making you feel bad!' versus 'the joyful, charming bullies who ask for nothing but your adoration!' On adoration: someone recently asked when I started to question if I'd made the wrong decision in voting Yes to Scottish independence. It was circa November 2014 when Sturgeon played the Hydro, with a stadium full of acolytes but no real policy plan. I watched closely since as the vibrant cultural discussions about our future morphed into the banality of propping up SNP pet projects. 'Oor Nicola's' false reputation as a feminist rose, while my hopes that Scotland's leading literary lights had the stones to question their government, one of the naïve notions that led me to support independence in the first place, were decimated. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What too, of other Sturgeon-era policy manias causing dementors to circle someone? As Fraser Hudghton, Director of the Free Speech Union in Scotland joked following reading about Sturgeon's 'terrible experience', he looks forward to working with her to help those reported to Police Scotland for 'speech crimes' under the SNP's 2021 Hate Crime Act. Sturgeon also again doubles down on her genderism by saying that sexuality in general is 'not binary'. For the lesbians and gay men also harmed by her obsession with allowing men to call themselves lesbians, and pushing an ideology that says gay men should be attracted to some females, it really is. Sturgeon should know this. The Supreme Court confirmed in April that thousands of taxpayers money has been spaffed on her project to end women's and LGB rights in Scotland, only to be defeated by the tenacity of For Women Scotland, a trio with a thimble of the wealth and resources of their opponents.

The man behind Scotland and Corsica's enduring link
The man behind Scotland and Corsica's enduring link

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

The man behind Scotland and Corsica's enduring link

In general, this belief is phony, but it has some truth in Corsica, in part due to a shared sense of minority nationhood but principally because of James Boswell. Many will know Boswell only for his biography of Samuel Johnson but during an earlier period he was nicknamed 'Corsica Boswell' around London because of his love for the island. James Boswell It was expressed in An Account of Corsica, a history of the island inspired by his stay there and centred on his admiring portrait of the 18th-century nationalist leader Pasquale Paoli. Paoli was famous throughout Europe in his time and is still revered in his own land, where he is commonly referred to as the Father of the Nation and has a status akin to that of Wallace or Bruce. At the age of 25, Boswell made his acquaintance when he deviated from the standard grand tour young noblemen were expected to undertake. Before reaching Italy, the real goal of such journeys, he managed to make the acquaintance of Voltaire and Rousseau. The latter advised him to visit Corsica, the centre of European attention at the time because of its nationalist struggle against its overlord, Genoa. READ MORE: Trust selling Highland clan's land for £6.8m under investigation Boswell set sail from Livorno for Corsica. The journey across the island to meet Paoli was perilous both because of the threat of bandits and the precariousness of roads over the mountainous terrain. But Boswell was young and healthy, and also wealthy enough to be able to hire guards and porters. Corsica had endured centuries of foreign domination. It had been Papal territory but the Pope granted it to Pisa, who later ceded it to Genoa. The Genoese were oppressive rulers and in 1735, after decades of turbulence, Corsica declared independence. Paoli's father was a prominent figure among the rebels but the movement suffered various setbacks, causing the Paoli family to seek refuge in Naples. However, the movement grew in strength and a constitution was drawn up. In 1754 Paoli was invited to return in a leadership role and set about establishing the institutions of a state. In the commune of Corte, he founded a university that still bears his name; reformed criminal law; created a navy and established a currency. Corsica was an independent state between 1755 and 1768. The Corsican cause received international attention. Voltaire issued an enigmatic statement, still blazoned on placards at bus stops on the island, that 'Europe is Corsica'. In his tract The Social Contract, Rousseau wrote that 'the valour and constancy with which this brave people has been able to recover and defend its liberty would make it well worthwhile for some wise man to teach it how to preserve it.' Paoli was that man, and Boswell was keen to make his acquaintance. In 1765 he spent a month in Corsica and it had a deep impact. However, as with Johnson, Boswell got off to an unpromising start. Paoli feared this strange young foreigner was a spy but he was eventually reassured. Boswell explained that he was on his travels and, having been in Rome, he had come 'from seeing the ruins of one brave and free people to see the rise of another'. He reports that Paoli received the compliment graciously but observed that Corsica's 'situation and the modern political system' made it unthinkable that the island could never be 'a great conquering nation', although he was convinced 'it may be a very happy country'. Boswell won Paoli over with his candour, charm and intelligence. The two men formed a deep and lasting friendship, including on Boswell's side the element of deferential near-worship which was part of his character. The two met on a daily basis and, as he would do with Johnson, Boswell made notes of what was said, sometimes during the conversation, sometimes afterwards. These formed the basis of his work An Account of Corsica, The Journal of a Tour to That Island; and Memoirs of Pascal Paoli, published in London in 1768. It is not a relaxing read, with the earlier part an unremittingly serious historical study of Corsican history from classical times, including long quotations in ancient Greek and Latin. READ MORE: The tax haven firms given cash by the Scottish Government revealed But it bursts into life with the closing autobiographical Journal where Boswell records his travels. These sections are written with the verve, wit and vigour which mark his later Life of Johnson. The work was immediately translated and was an international success. However, independent Corsica's enemies now included France, which had been called on to support Genoa but which eventually, and permanently, succeeded Genoa as ruler of the island. One independence supporter was Carlo Bonaparte, father of Napoleon. What if Napoleon had been born in an independent Corsica and had never been French, and thus could never have become Emperor of France? But that is a question for dreamers, not historians. Boswell immersed himself in Corsican ways, and even acquired Corsican dress. Other topics included the oppression Corsica had endured, crime and punishment, the nature of God, and the possibility of intelligence in animals. There were also lighter moments, although mainly with servants and the military, not Paoli himself: 'They asked me a thousand questions about my country, all of which I cheerfully answered as well as I could.' The period of independence was brought to close when Corsican forces were routed at the Battle of Porto Novu in 1769. Paoli was forced into exile in London. There, he renewed his acquaintance with Boswell who in turn introduced him to the leading figures in the worlds of literature and politics – including the king, who awarded him a pension, as well as Johnson and Pitt the Elder. Boswell also accompanied Paoli on a visit to Scotland but there is no account of that tour. Paoli made a brief return to Corsica in 1790 when the chaos following the French revolution made Corsican independence seem again possible. But three years later he was accused of treason and had to flee back to London, where he died in 1807. There is still a bust of him in Westminster Abbey. He was buried in St Pancras churchyard but his body was returned to Corsica in 1889 and interred in Morosaglia, where he was born. This tiny village is at the top of a mountain and its inaccessibility has acted as a deterrent to all but the most ardent admirers. The house has been transformed into a chapel-cum-museum, which celebrates Boswell alongside Paoli. Boswell is credited as being responsible for the creation and diffusion of the 'Paoli myth' in Europe. Boswell remains a well known figure in Corsica and, thanks to him Scotland's history and status now is of interest to Corsicans.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store