Cries of a nation overwhelmed
Poet Robert Frost in Mending Walls said that good fences make good neighbours.
South Africa keeps finding itself in situations where it has to keep defending its borders.
Today, its citizens are at a point where they must justify the desire for South Africa's provisions to be adequate without leaving its people scrambling, while also providing for its undocumented neighbours.
We are living with ghosts who work and have access to state provisions, but we don't even really know who they are.
This is the case raised by movements such as March and March and Operation Dudula.
While many of us may differ with them on how to restore a semblance of order, many may agree that their cause is long overdue.
ALSO READ: Foreign national arrested for mass Umlazi murder
When Tom London went on social media to lament the state of Helen Joseph Hospital, many rallied in support of his move to a private hospital. Funds were raised, and he was moved to Morningside Hospital for private care.
London complained that doctors treated patients as cockroaches. We agreed that some reform was needed.
The celebration of staff at state facilities as seen across social media platforms, of the work and initiatives by Operation Dudula and March and March reiterates, staff did in fact feel overwhelmed.
The nurses are accused of taking long breaks but they've worked as slaves throughout the day.
This is because they are stretched – they are servicing far greater numbers. While we may be angry, the people on the front lines are stretched. They are the voices that also lend a whisper of their exhaustion to movements that say, abahambe (let them go).
This is no phenomenon, this is the voice of the real people.
ALSO READ: 22 arrested after illegal workers and weapons found in Roodepoort factory raid
The people of Lesotho are notorious for illegal mining, our neighbours from Mozambique are synonymous with vehicle theft.
The Zimbabweans are considered as petty thieves and Nigerians are known as traffickers of drugs and humans.
This in no way vindicates South Africans as perpetrators of crime, but we have moved from a national to an international crisis because we are unable to attribute these crimes to known people. How, when most are undocumented?
Swaziland has now taken five US convicts in, with 150 more expected. The spill over, South Africa.
Do our neighbours and their leaders really respect South Africa?
The people are clearly tired and have become the voice the government lacks. Now, the question remains: would good fences not have made good neighbours?
NOW READ: 'We are not xenophobic': No justification to favour foreign academics over South Africans, says ANC MP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
8 minutes ago
- IOL News
Parks Tau faces scrutiny over IDC board appointments
Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau says he will reply to specific questions from MPs at the meeting of the portfolio committee in connection with the appointment of the Industrial Development Corporation board members. Image: GCIS Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau is resisting calls for clarity regarding the appointment of the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) board members. He informed DA MP Toby Chance and EFF MP Sinawo Thambo that he would address their specific questions during the upcoming Portfolio Committee meeting on Trade, Industry and Competition. He stated that he had been invited to brief the portfolio committee on the appointment of the IDC board on July 22, but the meeting was postponed. 'Upon the rescheduling of the meeting, specific questions will be directly responded to during the meeting or after if there is still a need,' he said in his standard response. Chance on Thursday accused Tau of being evasive and deviating from his usual detailed responses. 'He has provided no information at all; ministers are obligated to respond in writing to written questions, which is unsatisfactory,' said Chance. 'We normally get detailed responses from him. This time, he seems very evasive in not providing answers,' he added. Last month, the Cabinet announced a new eight-member board for the IDC, which included ANC-aligned members such as former ministers Sydney Mufamadi and Ayanda Dlodlo, and former KwaZulu-Natal premier and now Higher Education Deputy Minister Nomusa Dube-Ncube. The Cabinet had also appointed Sam Bhembe, who is reportedly involved in a court battle with the finance institution over a R70 million debt. The IDC board appointments happened at a time when there was a public outcry over the appointment of chairpersons for the boards of Sector and Education Training Authorities, which have since been cancelled. At the time, Thambo requested an urgent committee meeting, and committee chairperson Mzwandile Masina wrote to Tau indicating it was prudent that they receive a briefing on the process followed in the IDC board appointments. Thambo also sent questions to Tau, wanting to know the process followed and the measures his department implemented to safeguard the IDC from undue political influence, among other things. He had expressed concern about a pattern of compromised appointments that was a direct consequence of politically motivated deployments. 'The IDC must not be reduced to a retirement destination for politically connected individuals,' read Thambo's letter to Tau. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
IOL News
38 minutes ago
- IOL News
Time for liberation movements to rebuild trust, rethink strategy
Liberation movement leaders at the summit hosted by the African National Congress on July 25-27 in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng. Image: ANC/X Dr. Reneva Fourie Many South Africans failed to appreciate the relevance of the Liberation Movements Summit, held in Johannesburg from 25 to 28 July. In an era marked by widespread public disappointment and growing criticism, the very premise of such a gathering appeared, they argued, outdated if not entirely obsolete. Movements such as South Africa's ANC, Mozambique's FRELIMO, Namibia's SWAPO, Angola's MPLA and others are not conventional political parties. Their legitimacy was not conferred solely through elections. It was earned through generations of collective resistance, sacrifice and clarity of purpose in the face of colonialism and apartheid. They were forged in the trenches of anti-colonial struggle and shaped by the convictions of those who believed in dignity, equality and justice. However, in the years since the dawn of democracy, these once-powerful connections to the people have frayed. The post-liberation period has, for many citizens, become associated less with freedom and opportunity, and more with corruption, inequality and governance failures. In the wake of immense sacrifice and hard-won liberation, the urgent and deeply complex question confronting Southern Africa's former liberation movements is whether they have eroded their moral authority through complacency, self-enrichment and detachment from the aspirations of the people. The Liberation Movement Summit sought to confront these realities directly. It did not offer a platform for nostalgic celebration but one for critical reflection and collaborative renewal. Its central assertion was that historical legitimacy cannot excuse present failures. Rather, it is only through meaningful action, grounded in principle and delivered with urgency, that these movements can continue to play a relevant role in shaping their societies. The summit occurred within an increasingly unstable global environment. The declining coherence of the neoliberal project, further unravelling through the ongoing genocide in Gaza, the war in Ukraine and destabilisation across West Asia, has disrupted many of the ideological assumptions that underpinned global governance for the past three decades. Added to this is the rise of narrow nationalism, a retreat into bilateralism and the erosion of respect for international law, particularly by powerful Western states. This evolving landscape has profound implications for the continent. African states face increased vulnerability to external manipulation, regime-change agendas and exploitative economic arrangements. The summit, therefore, was necessary to provide a space for shared analysis, introspection and strategic coordination to enhance sovereignty and to assert a united voice in shaping a more just and inclusive global order. However, it was not only external pressures that required attention. Internally, liberation movements face complex democratic terrains that demand new forms of engagement. Factors such as declining electoral support, shifting generational political identities, and the enduring impact of structural inequality, poverty, unemployment and insecurity required thoughtful responses. The situation in Sudan was referenced as a painful example of how internal contradictions, if unresolved, can be exploited by external actors and descend into devastating conflict. It served as a reminder that liberation is not a singular event, but an ongoing process that requires vigilance, renewal and integrity. The summit's focus on democratic sustainability, effective governance, economic transformation and international solidarity was not incidental. It signalled a clear understanding that liberation must be understood as a living project. One of the central issues raised was the growing gap between political rhetoric and implementation. Widespread dissatisfaction does not stem from a lack of vision. It stems from the failure to translate that vision into material change. Inadequate socio-economic development, deteriorating public services, and perceptions of systemic corruption have undermined the legitimacy of former liberation parties. Where liberation once promised dignity, many now experience marginalisation. Discontent is particularly acute among young people and women. These are not marginal constituencies. They were at the centre of liberation struggles and remain central to any democratic renewal. Yet they are often excluded from decision-making spaces. The summit emphasised that genuine empowerment must move beyond rhetoric. It requires shifts in institutional culture, the opening up of leadership opportunities and policy frameworks that respond to the realities and capabilities of young people and women. The summit also reaffirmed the enduring relevance of international solidarity. While formal colonialism has ended, other forms of domination persist through financial dependence, extractive corporate practices and systemic inequality in global institutions. Collective resistance remains necessary. Regional cooperation is essential not only for economic development but for protecting sovereignty and pursuing peace on the continent's terms. By revisiting the principle of Pan-Africanism and anchoring itself within a broader vision of progressive internationalism, the summit resisted the idea that liberation movements are simply relics of a past era. It positioned them as political institutions still capable of shaping the future, provided they act with courage, humility and commitment to the people they claim to serve. In this sense, the summit was not a retreat into history. It was an attempt to reframe the liberation narrative to meet current realities. It outlined a multidimensional approach, encompassing accountability in governance, inclusivity in political participation, innovation in economic policy, and coherence in international engagement. The chosen theme, 'Defending the liberation gains, advancing integrated socio-economic development, strengthening solidarity for a better Africa', was both affirmation and provocation. It affirmed the commitments that guided the anti-colonial struggle, while insisting that the defence of those gains cannot rely on slogans. It must be evidenced in action. The political renewal required is not superficial. It cannot be achieved through new slogans or minor adjustments. It requires deep institutional reform, alignment with democratic values and a reconnection to the needs and aspirations of the people. If this does not occur, these movements risk losing not only electoral support but also their historical legitimacy. Even so, the summit offered a timely opportunity to regroup and recommit. It provided a forum to rethink strategy, rebuild trust and begin crafting a credible future. If these movements can confront their shortcomings with honesty, implement their commitments with discipline and listen to their people with sincerity, they may yet remain relevant in the evolving story of African freedom. * Dr Reneva Fourie is a policy analyst specialising in governance, development and security. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
IOL News
38 minutes ago
- IOL News
Operation Dudula under fire for campaign to ban foreign children from public schools in 2026
Operation Dudula vows to block undocumented foreign children from public schools, prioritising South African children first, citing constitutional resource limits. Legal foreign children will only be admitted after all locals are enrolled. Image: Tumi Pakkies/Independent Newspapers Operation Dudula's organisational leader, Zandile Dabula, has announced that the organisation will launch a campaign at the end of December 2025, continuing into the first week of January 2026, aimed at preventing foreign children, particularly those without legal documentation, from enrolling in public schools in South Africa. But Equal Education (EE) and the Equal Education Law Centre (EELC) are pushing back calling the proposed campaign a violation of South Africa's Constitution and a precedent setting High Court ruling. The issue of foreign nationals in South Africa, particularly undocumented migrants, has been contentious and ongoing, sparking public debates, protests, and policy discussions for years. Concerns over access to limited resources such as housing, healthcare, and education have fueled tensions between local communities and foreign nationals. According to Dabula, members of Operation Dudula will be stationed at schools to enforce the policy. 'No foreign child will be attending school in a public school,' she said. 'They can rather take them to private schools, we don't care, but public schools are going to be reserved for South African children only.' When asked whether the campaign targets all foreign children or only those without legal documentation, Dabula said, 'I'm talking about illegal foreigners who will definitely not be accepted, but those who claim to be legal. We have Home Affairs, bogus Home Affairs, and we've seen a lot of them. You also know about these bogus Home Affairs.' She emphasised that all foreign nationals would need to be thoroughly vetted, including the legal status of their parents. 'They must be checked, thoroughly checked, because how did they come to this country? Are their parents documented?' Speaking to IOL News, Equal Education (EE) and the Equal Education Law Centre (EELC) sharply criticised Operation Dudula's campaign as unlawful, unconstitutional, and deeply harmful to children. 'South Africa has a long history of dispossession, unequal resources for our communities, and unequal laws. Thirty years since the dawn of democracy, we remember this history because many of those living in South Africa still look forward to service delivery that gives our families access to basic resources such as health, education, and adequate housing. The poor access to these resources can mostly be attributed to poor government planning, corruption, wasteful expenditure, and poor political will.' 'Children should never be collateral damage of the failures of those in power.' EE and EELC highlighted the protections guaranteed to all children, saying: 'The Constitution of South Africa, in Section 29(1)(a) and Section 9, gives everyone an equal right to basic education and prohibits discrimination against any child in accessing this right. No child may be excluded from attending a public school, regardless of their documentation status or nationality. This was confirmed in the Department of Basic Education Circular 1 of 2020, a response to the judgment of the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court in Centre for Child Law & Others v Minister of Basic Education and Others ,which restated the obligation of Provincial Education Departments and schools to admit all learners, and undocumented learners in particular.' EE and EELC said denying any learner access to school perpetuates inequality and undermines democratic values. Denying children access to their right to education can be very traumatising. 'Any interference with the enjoyment of the right to equal education will constitute a grave constitutional violation and is condemned by Equal Education and the Equal Education Law Centre in the strongest terms. ''All learners in South Africa are entitled to an education, and we must make sure that this right is protected and upheld to build the equitable society envisioned by our democracy.' Further condemning the campaign, Section27 said: 'Operation Dudula's campaign is unlawful and unconstitutional. Children must be protected, and all state departments and individuals have a constitutional obligation to act in the best interests of children.' Section27 referenced Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (Phakamisa judgment), in which the court confirmed that all children, regardless of immigration status, are entitled to education under Section 29(1)(a) of the Constitution. 'Our courts have held that all children, despite their immigration status, are entitled to basic education,' Section27 said. 'The court in the Phakamisa judgment interrogated the constitutionality of a circular by the Eastern Cape Department of Basic Education, which provided that undocumented learners would not be enrolled at schools. The High Court found that such a circular infringed learners' rights and was not in the best interests of the child.' The South African Schools Act (SASA), as amended by the Basic Education Law Amendment Act 32 of 2024, now codifies this legal protection. Section 5(1A) of SASA mandates that undocumented learners must be allowed admission into schools and may provide an affidavit containing the learner's details. In addition, Section 3(7) of SASA outlines legal consequences for those who interfere with schooling: 'If any person unlawfully or intentionally disrupts or hinders educational activities, they are guilty of an offence and liable, on conviction, to a fine or imprisonment for up to 12 months, or both.' 'Operation Dudula's campaign to prevent undocumented learners from being enrolled at schools or entering school grounds is intentional, and the disruption of school activities is an infringement of the right to basic education in terms of Section 29(1)(a) of the Constitution and the South African Schools Act,' said Section27. [email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News
