Lululemon sues Costco for selling 'dupes'
The suit, filed on June 27 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, claims that Costco has unlawfully sold "knockoff" versions of Lululemon's SCUBA® hoodies, DEFINE® jackets, and ABC pants, which bear a striking resemblance to the athleisure giant's original designs.
Lululemon argues that Costco's products create confusion among consumers, who may mistakenly believe they are purchasing authentic Lululemon items. The company claims that Costco's actions are part of a broader strategy to confuse customers into thinking these 'dupes' are legitimate. 'One of the purposes of selling 'dupes' is to confuse consumers at the point-of-sale and/or observers post-sale,' the complaint states.
The lawsuit highlights instances where Costco's products are nearly identical to Lululemon's designs, with the company pointing to a New York Times article that noted how Costco's items 'looked almost identical' to Lululemon's. Additionally, Lululemon claims that Costco used the name "Tidewater Teal" for one of its products, a color trademarked by the brand since 2019, further evidence of deliberate imitation.
The complaint also mentions specific items allegedly copied by Costco, including Danskin hoodies, Jockey yoga jackets, and Kirkland performance pants. Lululemon asserts that Costco's actions have caused significant damage to its reputation and business, and it is seeking monetary damages as well as an injunction to stop the retailer from selling the infringing products.
In response, Lululemon emphasized its commitment to defending its intellectual property, stating, 'As an innovation-led company that invests significantly in research, development, and design, we take the responsibility of protecting our rights seriously.'
Costco has not yet commented on the lawsuit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Australia lifts foreign student cap to 295,000 and prioritises Southeast Asia
SYDNEY: Australia will raise its cap on foreign students by 9% to 295,000 next year and prioritise applicants from Southeast Asia, the government said on Monday. Limits on places were announced last year as a way to rein in record migration that had contributed to a surge in housing prices, with 270,000 places made available for 2025. An additional 25,000 places were being granted in 2026 as the policy was successfully bringing down 'out of control' international student numbers, the government said. 'This is about making sure international education grows in a way that supports students, universities and the national interest,' Education Minister Jason Clare said in a statement. Australia granted nearly 600,000 student visas in the 2023 financial year, as international students returned to the country in record numbers following COVID-19. Australia's largest cohorts of students come from China and India. As well as introducing the cap on numbers, the government also more than doubled the visa fee for foreign students in 2024 and pledged to close loopholes in rules that allowed them to continuously extend their stay. The government's measures to curb migration were 'bearing fruit' and allowed for a modest increase in the cap in 2026, International Education Assistant Minister Julian Hill said. 'The numbers were growing out of control,' Hill told national broadcaster ABC. 'The government has taken tough decisions over the last 12 months, not always loved by the sector, to get the numbers down and get them to a more sustainable footing.' Roughly two-thirds of places will be allocated to universities and one-third to the vocational skills training sector. Larger, public universities would need to demonstrate domestic and international students had 'access to safe and secure housing' and recruit more students from Southeast Asia to increase their individual allocations, the government said. It was important 'for Australia's future soft power that we continue to bring the best and brightest from our (Southeast Asian) neighbours to have a bit of Australia with them for the rest of their life', Hill said. Relations with Southeast Asia have been a focus of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's Labor government as it looks to reduce Australia's economic dependence on China. Universities Australia welcomed the 'sensible' increase in places. 'Universities have called for growth in this critically important sector, and the government has honoured this,' CEO Luke Sheehy said. Australia has one of the highest shares of international students globally. The sector contributed more than A$51 billion ($33.05 billion) to the economy in 2024, the country's top services export.
Business Recorder
7 days ago
- Business Recorder
India's garment and jewellery sectors fear for US orders after tariff shock
NEW DELHI/MUMBAI: India's apparel and jewellery exporters are bracing for a drop in orders fromtheir biggest market and could cut jobs after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on Indian imports starting on Friday, industry executives said. Several garment exporters, who had hoped for a bilateral trade deal and were preparing for a rise in orders from U.S. retailers such as Walmart and Costco, have now halted expansion plans as they await the outcome of negotiations, they said. Key garment exporters including Welspun Living, Gokaldas Exports, Indo Count and Trident, make 40%-70% of their sales in the United States. Higher tariffs could shift orders to Vietnam, which now has lower U.S. duties of 20%. The United States is India's largest market for garment and jewellery, with nearly $22 billion in exports in 2024. India has a 5.8% share in the U.S. garment market, behind China, Vietnam and Bangladesh. 'We were getting ready for expansion, expecting 10%-15% tariffs under the U.S. deal,' said Gautam Nair, director at Matrix Design and Industries Pvt Ltd, a subsidiary of India's largest garment exporter Gokaldas Exports. India, UK trade deal signals Modi's priorities as New Delhi eyes EU, US pacts Gokaldas U.S. clients include GAP, Walmart and JCPenney. 'Trump's tariff announcement has come as a shock, and if implemented, the 25% duty will severely impact exports,' Nair said, adding that India's apparel sector already faces higher costs than leading competitors Bangladesh and Vietnam. 'Immense pressure' In Tirupur, a textile hub in southern Indian concerns are mounting, with exporters pinning their hopes on a bilateral trade deal to put a quick end to the uncertainty. The two countries are still holding talks in a bid to reach a deal. 'If U.S. business declines, factories will start poaching each other's customers,' said Naveen Michael John, executive director at Cotton Blossom India, which supplies Walmart and Bass Pro Shops. India's gems and jewellery sector, also heavily reliant on U.S. buyers, is already under pressure. Exports of cut and polished diamonds sank to their lowest in nearly two decades in the 2024/25 fiscal year due to weak U.S. and Chinese demand. The U.S. accounts for nearly one-third of India's $28.5 billion in annual gems and jewellery exports. 'A blanket tariff of this magnitude will inflate costs, delay shipments, distort pricing, and place immense pressure on every part of the value chain - from lower level worker to large manufacturers,' said Kirit Bhansali, chair of the Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC). Looking ahead to the U.S. holiday season, exporters are urging the government to find a way to restore stability before September, giving them time to ramp up seasonal production. 'Without a trade deal, exports won't recover,' said one jewellery exporter in Surat, India's diamond-polishing hub. 'We'll be forced to cut production and jobs.'
Express Tribune
30-06-2025
- Express Tribune
Lululemon sues Costco for selling 'dupes'
Lululemon has filed a lawsuit against Costco Wholesale Corporation, accusing the retailer of selling unauthorized replicas of its popular apparel, alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition. The suit, filed on June 27 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, claims that Costco has unlawfully sold "knockoff" versions of Lululemon's SCUBA® hoodies, DEFINE® jackets, and ABC pants, which bear a striking resemblance to the athleisure giant's original designs. Lululemon argues that Costco's products create confusion among consumers, who may mistakenly believe they are purchasing authentic Lululemon items. The company claims that Costco's actions are part of a broader strategy to confuse customers into thinking these 'dupes' are legitimate. 'One of the purposes of selling 'dupes' is to confuse consumers at the point-of-sale and/or observers post-sale,' the complaint states. The lawsuit highlights instances where Costco's products are nearly identical to Lululemon's designs, with the company pointing to a New York Times article that noted how Costco's items 'looked almost identical' to Lululemon's. Additionally, Lululemon claims that Costco used the name "Tidewater Teal" for one of its products, a color trademarked by the brand since 2019, further evidence of deliberate imitation. The complaint also mentions specific items allegedly copied by Costco, including Danskin hoodies, Jockey yoga jackets, and Kirkland performance pants. Lululemon asserts that Costco's actions have caused significant damage to its reputation and business, and it is seeking monetary damages as well as an injunction to stop the retailer from selling the infringing products. In response, Lululemon emphasized its commitment to defending its intellectual property, stating, 'As an innovation-led company that invests significantly in research, development, and design, we take the responsibility of protecting our rights seriously.' Costco has not yet commented on the lawsuit.
