Congress members split over US attack on Iran
The following are statements from key legislators:
Senate armed services committee chair Roger Wicker, a Mississippi Republican, applauded the operation but cautioned that the US now faced 'very serious choices ahead'.
Senate foreign relations committee chair Jim Risch, Republican of Idaho, said, 'This war is Israel's war, not our war, but Israel is one of our strongest allies and is disarming Iran for the good of the world.' Risch added, 'This is not the start of a forever war. There will not be American boots on the ground in Iran.'
'This is not constitutional,' conservative Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky said on social media. He was referring to the power of Congress to declare war on foreign countries.
US House of Representatives speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican of Louisiana, said, 'The president gave Iran's leader every opportunity to make a deal, but Iran refused to commit to a nuclear disarmament agreement.
'The president's decisive action prevents the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism, which chants 'Death to America,' from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet.'
Senate majority leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, said, 'I stand with President Trump.'
Democratic Representative Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, a daughter of Palestinian immigrants: 'President Trump sending US troops to bomb Iran without the consent of Congress is a blatant violation of our constitution. The American people do not want another forever war. We have seen where decades of endless war in the Middle East gets us — all based on the lie of 'weapons of mass destruction.''
Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia said the US public 'is overwhelmingly opposed to the US waging war on Iran' and said Trump displayed 'horrible judgment'.
Max Rose, a former Democratic member of Congress who now is a senior adviser to the progressive veterans' group 'VoteVets', said, 'Trump's decision to launch direct strikes against Iran without congressional authorisation is illegal.' Rose added, 'This conflict is his and the Republicans who have abrogated all their responsibilities.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Complicity, Silence, Historical Amnesia: Universities and the Genocide in Gaza
British-Cypriot coach Louis Allan, 33, sits atop an olive tree on a main road in Nicosia on May 7, 2025, as he continues a week-long silent sit-in and hunger strike in support of Palestinians in Gaza and calling for an end to the war between Israel and Hamas. University of Pretoria Staff For Palestine (UPS4Palestine) As an academic collective from the University of Pretoria, we offer the following reflections on the unfolding genocide of Palestinians in Gaza as a contribution to a growing number of South African academic voices against the genocide. The increased horrors faced by the Palestinian people in Gaza since October 7, 2023, and especially from March 2025, with the enforcement of a total siege and blockade of all humanitarian aid (barring the trickle that Israel permits), are on an unimaginable scale. It has been confirmed that Israel has directly killed more than 58,000 Palestinians in Gaza since October 2023, more than 17,000 of them children, and has carried out daily 'aid' massacres of Palestinians who are waiting for food and water at distribution points since instituting a total aid blockade in March 2025. With thousands of bodies still buried under the rubble, and many more dying of hunger and preventable diseases, due to the destruction of hospitals and worsening living conditions, some have estimated the real death toll in Gaza to be far higher. According to the United Nations, the illegal and immoral weaponization of food has led to the death of at least 70 Palestinian children from malnutrition. Further, in the West Bank, Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians since October 7, 2023. It has also ramped up the incarceration of Palestinians, with more than 10,000 detained in its torture dungeons by April 2025. Furthermore, the ongoing attacks on Palestinian children have resulted in about 3,000 children having amputations as a result of traumatic force injuries, burns, and infection. This has resulted in thousands of children with a new disability facing uncertain futures. Starving and quarantined within a desolate strip of land, denied basic human rights and continually brutalised by the Israeli Defence Force, the plight of Palestinians in Gaza is a stain on the human conscience, especially the leading Western nations and leaders of the world, who have sacrificed international law and human rights in favour of their imperialist interests in West Asia, as represented by Israel. Effectively, the genocide in Gaza reveals the persistence of the global division of humanity produced and maintained by centuries of European colonialism. It is a genocide transmitted in real time, watched by millions of outraged people around the world and by complicit leaders, journalists, academics, and religious figures, especially in the West and in the Arab world. The Palestinian genocide that has been unfolding for the last 20 months has shown up the fallacy of the international rule of law - permitting Israel the right to carry out this genocide in the full glare of world attention; and also turning a blind eye to Israeli occupation, violent settler colonialism and the denial of Palestinian human rights and sovereignty since Israel's official establishment in 1948. The increasing evidence of the genocide in Gaza, which includes scholasticide, has not sufficiently galvanised many institutions, such as universities, including many in South Africa. While a few South African universities have taken a brave stand, such as the University of Fort Hare and Nelson Mandela University, and thereby risked not only public opprobrium from sectors of South African society but also much-needed funding, other universities blithely carry on 'with business as usual'. Debates in some institutions invariably devolve into spurious and disingenuous comparisons with atrocities in other parts of the world – the by-now common 'whataboutism' – to even more fallacious arguments about a complex situation, two-sidedism, 'not our problem', and the 'hand-wringing, what can we do' argument. The global solidarity we garnered in our struggle against apartheid is a long-distant memory for some. For others who were quite comfortable with apartheid, the international cultural, academic, sports, and economic boycott against apartheid South Africa was an outrage. For such South Africans, a similar outrage should not be perpetrated against Israel, a historical ally of the apartheid government. The inaction and 'apolitical neutrality' of historically white universities, which were bastions and intellectual playgrounds of apartheid, is particularly shameful and is indicative of the superficiality of transformation in these institutions as well as the lack of a genuine commitment to the pursuit of justice. While university leaders spout empty rhetoric about transformation, the pursuit of justice, and responsiveness to local and global issues, their inaction is more telling of their complicity. Erasure through violence and destruction of both tangible and intangible traces of place and belonging, and denial of sovereignty and personhood are core elements of settler colonialism, whether in the Americas, Australia, Africa, or Palestine. These core elements are inextricably linked to race and ethnicity. Thus, as early as 1917, the discourse of erasure and denial of sovereignty and personhood is already clearly evident in the Balfour Declaration, which not only favoured 'the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people', but also posited the Palestinians as the 'other' in contradistinction to the Jewish people. Historian Avi Shlaim argues that the genocide in Gaza is a 'direct result of the Balfour Declaration'. It set in motion the colonisation of historic Palestine and the systemic erasure of native Palestinians. Whereas Jews constituted only 10% of the population and owned a meagre two per cent of the land by 1917, the so-called British Mandate facilitated the mass invasion of mainly European Jews into Palestine and the displacement of Palestinians. This freed up land for Jewish settlements in historic Palestine to create the state of Israel. This process of colonisation continues to this day, and explains why Britain, despite mass support from its citizens for the national liberation of Palestine, has provided unconditional support to Israel in the commission of the genocide in Gaza since October 2023. Defined by racism, oppression, and brutal violence, the Zionist project in Israel has consistently and continually sought to erase the Palestinian presence in its onward march to 'Greater Israel'. This march to 'Greater Israel' has gathered a violent pace in the past 20 months. Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, Palestinian and foreign aid workers, predominantly Palestinian journalists, medical personnel, teachers, and academics, children, and the old are all cannon fodder to the Israeli march to 'Greater Israel'. The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide as 'any of the following acts with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group' by any means of the following actions: Killing members of the group Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and Forcibly transferring children of one group to another. Israeli actions in Gaza constitute a textbook case of genocide, according to Holocaust scholar, Raz Segal. Yet, like in the case of the genocides of the Harara, Herero, and the San, Western political elites, corporate media, and academics refute and deny the evidence. In the case of Gaza, the denial is particularly startling as the evidence is transmitted daily on social media platforms and independent media. The complicity of the so-called 'democratic free' world of the West is monstrously on display.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Sleeping While the Lies Were Written – A Call to Stand with South Africa
Ngomane Nicholas | Published 2 hours ago While South Africans rested under our night sky, a distorted narrative about our nation was quietly taking shape in Washington. The Trump administration, through the US State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labour, released a report that paints South Africa in the most troubling and inaccurate terms. This so-called assessment, claiming to be the result of 'engagements with stakeholders' in South Africa, alleges a severe deterioration of human rights in the past year. It brands our Expropriation Act as 'substantially worrying,' accuses the Economic Freedom Fighters of encouraging farm attacks, and concludes that Afrikaners are being targeted as an ethnic minority. These claims are not only misleading — they are outright falsehoods. The report leans on selective anecdotes, ignores verified data, and omits the context of our constitutional democracy. It overlooks that land reform policies are grounded in law, subject to judicial review, and aimed at correcting historic injustices. It repeats discredited myths about 'white genocide,' despite numerous independent investigations debunking such claims. This narrative is not about protecting human rights — it is a political weapon designed to undermine South Africa's sovereignty. The most dangerous aspect of this report is its arrogance. Too often, foreign officials arrive on our soil convinced they have diagnosed our problems before speaking to the people who live here. By the time they check into their hotels, they have already designed solutions that disregard local realities. The following day, they begin recruiting allies to impose their vision. This is not partnership — it is paternalism. It reduces our people to subjects of external judgment rather than citizens capable of defining their destiny. This is not the first time Africa has been subjected to such treatment. History is filled with examples of outsiders painting the continent as broken to justify interference. Nelson Mandela warned that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of others; the inverse is also true — when our sovereignty is undermined, the freedom of all who value self-determination is at risk. Today, the tactics have shifted from open colonialism to narrative warfare, but the aim is the same: to weaken, divide, and control. It is no coincidence that this report comes at a time when the South African government is seeking to grow revenue and resources in a competitive global economy. The subtext is clear—apply pressure through negative international perception, create economic vulnerability, and force political concessions. Tariffs, trade restrictions, and selective sanctions often follow such campaigns. This is not about human rights; it is about leverage. South Africans cannot allow this narrative to go unchallenged. We must respond by writing, speaking, researching, and sharing our truths. Our universities, journalists, artists, and community leaders must actively dismantle the myths being exported about our nation. My research, The Invisible Faith in Democracy: Ekaslam, has shown how foreign perceptions often strip township communities of their agency, treating them as evidence for pre-written stories rather than as living, complex societies. This report is a textbook example of that practice. To those abroad who care about fairness: understand that South Africa is a vibrant, plural democracy with a fiercely independent judiciary, active civil society, and a free press. Our path is not perfect — no democracy's is — but it is ours to walk. Do not mistake the noise of politics for the collapse of a nation. To those within our borders: let us unite in defending our sovereignty, for this moment calls for solidarity beyond party lines. The architects of this report, along with the local voices who contributed to it, should bear the weight of shame for misrepresenting the country we have built together. South Africa is not defined by the distortions of foreign actors. It is defined by the resilience of its people, the strength of its Constitution, and the unwavering belief that freedom, once won, must be guarded fiercely. The world must know we will not bow. We will rise—together. Ngomane, PhD Candidate | University of the WitwatersrandTheatre Practitioner | Researcher | Dramaturge
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
BRICS+ Series: Iran's Aquaculture Ambitions And The Opening for BRICS Development Finance
Iranian fishermen work at the Caspian sea beach near Anzali Port, northern Iran, on March 27, 2017. Image: Xinhua At the heart of this transformation is a push for self-sufficiency in aquaculture and marine biotechnology. The newly greenlit projects span a diverse range of priorities, from introducing novel aquatic species to expanding offshore cage farming capacity, a capital-intensive but high-impact strategy for food security and export potential. Despite the scientific momentum, Iran faces a familiar challenge, a severe funding shortfall. The total projected cost of the active programmes exceeds 1.23 trillion rials (approximately $2.46 million), yet only a quarter of this has been secured. Among the initiatives, aquaculture alone requires 725 billion rials, while genetic conservation and wild fisheries management need 270 billion rials, and advanced processing technologies account for another 10 billion rials. These figures may appear modest by global standards, but they carry outsized implications for regional food systems, climate resilience, and technology localisation, all areas where BRICS and the New Development Bank (NDB) are actively expanding their investment mandates. An Entry Point for NDB to Fund Food Security Innovation This funding gap provides an ideal entry point for BRICS+ strategic investment. The NDB, established to finance infrastructure and sustainable development in member countries, has recently widened its scope to include agriculture, health, and food systems, sectors that align perfectly with Iran's fisheries transformation goals. With Iran officially joining BRICS in 2024, the timing is pivotal. The country's fisheries sector, with its long coastline and underutilised marine resources, holds untapped potential not just for domestic food security but for export-led growth to Asia and Africa — markets that BRICS states are increasingly prioritising. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Iran's internal institutions have recognised the urgency of financial coordination. During a recent session of the Strategic Council for Fishery Research, a cross-institutional body formed in March 2023 — officials outlined the need for co-investment mechanisms between state-owned enterprises, banking institutions, and research bodies. Citing Article 4 of the national budget law, the council has called for 60% of public R&D funds to be directed toward fisheries and marine technology. From Research Proposals to Regional Blue Economy Pipelines What remains missing is multilateral, concessional capital that can fast-track these developments, protect ecosystems, and build regional supply chains. Here, the NDB could play a catalytic role by co-financing technology transfers, supporting infrastructure for offshore cage farming, and enabling capacity-building across Iran's fisheries research ecosystem. There's precedent for this kind of BRICS support. The NDB has already funded water management systems in Brazil, agricultural resilience projects in South Africa, and digital supply chains in India. Expanding into sustainable aquaculture is not a departure, it's an evolution of the bank's mandate in the face of global food security pressures and the climate crisis.
