logo
Wild salmon are on the brink of disappearing from Irish waters

Wild salmon are on the brink of disappearing from Irish waters

Irish Times28-06-2025
It's difficult to grasp two truths when only one is in plain sight. Take a walk down the chilled section of any supermarket and you'll spot rows upon rows of Atlantic salmon for sale. Whether it's fresh, poached, smoked over peat or skinless, canned, in pots flavoured with lemon and herbs, or ready-made sushi rolls wrapped in rice, farmed salmon might not be cheap, but it's abundant, in high demand (Irish production has risen by 51 per cent in the past few years) and everywhere.
The other reality, underwater and hidden from our view, couldn't be more different. In the past five decades,
wild salmon numbers in Irish waters have dropped by 90 per cent
– and that's from an already low level in the 1970s. They are now on the brink of disappearing.
Earlier this month, scientists from Nasco, an international body set up in 1984 to protect these iconic fish, met in Cardiff. Known for their cautious, measured tone, the boffins' latest warning is anything but:
wild Atlantic salmon are in crisis
, and only 'urgent and transformative' action can save them.
Wild salmon are born in freshwater, travel to the sea, and then return to their birthplace to spawn, making them a clear sign of how well we're managing to coexist with other life. They need cold, clean and free-flowing waters, but right now we're offering rivers and oceans that are too warm, polluted, exploited or physically altered, making life impossible for these fish. On top of that, many rivers are blocked by man-made structures like weirs, culverts and dams, preventing salmon from completing their journey.
READ MORE
Nasco scientists say that
salmon farming is a significant threat
. Along Ireland's west coast – from Donegal to Mayo to Cork – tens of thousands of salmon are raised in circular open-net cages that float just offshore. For sea lice, the crustaceans about the length of a small button that feed on salmon, these pens are like a giant seafood banquet. The lice attach themselves to the fish using their clawed limbs, then crawl across their skin, feeding on them and eventually eating through to the muscle and fat before releasing eggs into the surrounding waters. Without treatment, an infested farmed salmon won't survive long.
For young wild salmon leaving their home river for the first time, the journey to sea is full of danger. A female adult salmon lays thousands of eggs, but only a few will survive to become adults. As the young salmon swim by the salmon farms along the coast out into the Atlantic, they can pick up sea lice. These parasites can cause serious harm; scientists say it only takes a few lice to kill a young wild salmon.
However, some experts sharply disagree over how much blame sea lice from fish farms deserve for the decline in young wild salmon. This debate really matters because, by law, every fish farm must have an aquaculture licence to operate. The rules are clear: if the science raises any reasonable question that sea lice from a farm could cause serious damage to wild salmon, then granting a licence becomes very difficult for the authorities to justify.
'Unless a salmon conservation programme is initiated, Ireland could be looking at a situation where we will have little or no salmon left in the wild,' according to Declan Cooke of Inland Fisheries Ireland
Scientists can use a simple method to determine how sea lice affect wild salmon. They take two groups of young salmon; one group is given a special chemical treatment to protect them from lice; the other is left untreated. Both groups are then released into the same river, go to sea and face the same conditions. A year later, researchers count how many fish from each group return. If more of the treated salmon come back than the untreated ones, it shows that sea lice have a serious impact.
Between 2001 and 2009, scientists from the
Marine Institute
carried out this 'paired release' research at eight sites in Ireland. Their conclusions, published in 2013: while sea lice cause a 'significant' number of deaths among young wild salmon, the overall impact is 'minor and irregular'. This paper has been used to support the granting of fish farm licences as evidence that sea lice from farms aren't a significant threat to wild salmon survival.
[
Wild salmon are an Irish icon. Now they're almost gone
Opens in new window
]
Not everyone agrees. Scientists from Canada, Norway and the UK raised serious concerns about the paper and, last month, researchers from
Inland Fisheries Ireland
published a new study looking at 18 years' worth of data from paired released experiments. They found that, on average, an 18 per cent drop in survival among young salmon that weren't treated for lice, and the more lice on the farms, the greater the losses. Their conclusion is clear: sea lice from salmon farms pose a real threat to wild salmon.
Why does this matter? Because 12 rivers along Ireland's west coast flow into legally protected areas where salmon farms operate. If scientists are now saying that these farms are killing young wild salmon due to sea lice infestations, then the law leaves little room for inaction. Authorities are obliged to act to move the farms to new locations, revoke their licences or find a way to ensure that there are no lice on the farmed salmon during the critical time when the young wild salmon are heading out to sea.
There is no single solution that will save Ireland's wild salmon. If emissions remain high, our waters will continue to heat up. But not everything is hopeless – there are things in our immediate control. We can remove our barriers, free our waters from pollution and, if the science shows it will help wild stocks survive, change how or where salmon farms operate.
Holding on to the reality of wild salmon in our waterways is one we should cling to – for future generations if nothing else.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Child with additional needs loses legal challenge over year-long delay getting school transport
Child with additional needs loses legal challenge over year-long delay getting school transport

Irish Times

time14 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Child with additional needs loses legal challenge over year-long delay getting school transport

A primary school child with additional needs living in Dublin has lost a High Court challenge over delays of up to a year in providing him with a transport service to school. While the delays were frustrating for the boy and his family, there was nothing to suggest any conscious or deliberate flouting of rights, Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger said. A 'proactive and reactive' approach was adopted by the Minister for Education, despite practical challenges posed by unsuccessful transport escort recruitment processes and delays due to legal obligations including procurement rules and Garda vetting requirements. The delay was due to 'genuine difficulties' that the relevant personnel are actively seeking to address and suitable alternative supports – a school transport grant and home tuition grant – were offered as a temporary measure. READ MORE While refusing to declare the Minister had not complied with her statutory obligation to provide a school transport service for a child with disabilities or other special educational needs, the judge said the delay in securing services cannot be 'unlimited'. If a transport service is not in place by September, as expected, the child can reapply to the court, she said. In her judgment published on Monday, the judge noted school transport is administered by a Department of Education non-statutory scheme. The child lives with his family in Dublin and had difficulties with previous school placements. After his parents accepted a July 2024 offer of a place, they sent a completed school transport application form on July 13th, 2024 to a special education needs officer but it was not provided to the relevant section of the Department of Education until September 4th. The form referred to the child's anxiety causing 'meltdowns and outbursts when triggered' and said an escort would be required to prevent danger to the driver. On September 25th, Bus Éireann advised the department a driver service was required, which the department sanctioned a week later. A procurement process, required under European law, involved the route being put to tender five times before a successful bidder was appointed on March 3rd. The child's mother was sanctioned for a home tuition grant that was ultimately not availed of as she said sourcing a suitable tutor would take considerable time. She was paying for private dyslexia reading lessons since the previous October. On March 3rd, a transport service was put in place and the school was responsible for employing the escort. One was hired on April 2nd and, after Garda vetting, began employment on May 6th. The transport service involved the boy and two other children with additional needs being transported by a driver and accompanied by the escort in a saloon car. On May 12th, the school principal informed the department the other two children had become dysregulated during the journey, partly due to limited space in the car, and expressed concern the school would lose the escort. She said the boy could not attend school until a new escort was recruited. The escort resigned two days later, the judge noted. The department then sanctioned an individualised transport service for the boy, available from May 25th, subject to getting an escort. That proved difficult, and a temporary arrangement was made to have a post-primary escort who, after Garda vetting, was available for two weeks in July. The department's reasonable expectation was that an escort would be in place for the new school year commencing in September, the judge said. As there is no 'firm arrangement' in place, the issues raised in the proceedings are not moot or pointless, and the application can be renewed if the service is not available, she said.

Are school holidays too long? A mother of two and school principal debate
Are school holidays too long? A mother of two and school principal debate

Irish Times

time18 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Are school holidays too long? A mother of two and school principal debate

Niamh O'Reilly: How can a parent continue to work when their primary-aged children are out of school for two months of the year? Ireland's children enjoy almost two months off primary school and three months off secondary school during the summer. But how can a parent continue to work when their primary-aged child/children, who need supervision, are out of school for two months of the year? Even for my five-year-old, this is a simple mathematical equation to solve. The answer is to provide supports such as subsidised summer camps or structured summer programmes within school settings or even paid parental leave which must be taken during the summer holiday period. READ MORE The present solution offered to working parents in Ireland is lacking any real sense. We have a series of messy, just-muddle-through-and-get-on-with-it-style lifelines that are often expensive, unequal or unpredictable. Show me a working parent in Ireland during the summer break who has not had to call in every favour in the book and hope they have an understanding workplace to boot? I can't help feeling the powers that be have forgotten basic mathematics as they seem unable to solve this unbalanced equation for working families. Taking annual leave will only get you so far. That's assuming you haven't used most of your leave for midterm breaks, Easter holidays, parent teacher meetings, school plays or random days off throughout the year. You could also take unpaid parental leave, but with many families already stretched financially this is not a solution. Summer camps are the other go-to, even if the best ones need to be booked by February, cost a small fortune and don't come within an ass's roar of covering a full working day. If you're lucky, you might have secured a childminder to help or have grandparents or family to step in. That's a lot of 'ifs' and it takes just one small 'if' to be knocked out of place and the whole deck of cards will fall, generally on top of an exhausted mum. Asked recently about consideration of any change to the length of school holidays, Minister for Education Helen McEntee said schools were 'very active' throughout the year and they offered people a chance to 'take a break' . It's definitely a break for the children and teachers, just not so much for the working parents. I'm not a total curmudgeon either. Children need a proper break to switch off and be children again. Teachers also put in a serious shift. School is full-on; between homework and after-school activities, most young children are scheduled to the hilt. The summer break isn't really the problem. Shortening it even by a couple of weeks would still leave a huge gap for parents. The elephant in the room is that, unlike my 1980s/1990s childhood when almost everyone, including me, had a stay-at-home parent, today that's not the case. However, neither the length of the holidays nor level of parental support has been adjusted to reflect modern life. Like most working parents, I dream of being able to take the whole summer off and enjoy it with my young children. At eight and five, they are in that blissful stage when their innocence and enthusiasm for life are at an all-time high. It's like a wonder-drug. If I could bottle it and sell it then I'd probably have enough money to be able to make that summer dream a reality. For now, I'd settle for even a few modest supports that don't have me run ragged with guilt and exhaustion. What would also help is not to be told to stop complaining about how long the summer holidays are and just enjoy them while my children are still young. I'll be sure to remember that the next time I've got a work deadline, no summer camps lined up and no village or magic pot of money to call on. Niamh O'Reilly is a journalist and mother of two living in Wicklow Simon Lewis: No. Children aren't designed for non-stop schooling. They need breaks Are school holidays too long? If you ask most parents then they'll reply with an emphatic 'yes' and if you ask most teachers then they'll disagree. As a teacher, I know this argument won't win me many fans, but it might give pause for thought about what we want schools to be. Let's start with some facts. In Irish primary schools, the summer break runs for about seven-and-a-half weeks. This summer, more than half of Irish schools are running summer provision. These are intensive, small-group programmes for children with additional needs or from disadvantaged backgrounds, staffed by teachers and SNAs. Alongside that, most teachers spend two to three weeks on continuing professional development (CPD) during summer, but unless you're living with a teacher then you're unlikely to hear much about that. However, this debate isn't really about teachers. In my view, it's about children and maybe a bit about childcare. Children aren't designed for non-stop schooling. They need breaks. They need time to rest, play and sometimes get bored. More school does not automatically mean better outcomes. Overloading their calendar may help parents in terms of childcare, but primary school isn't about childcare. Irish primary pupils spend a minimum of 910 hours a year in school, well above the average of 805 hours in countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In terms of holidays, our summer sits squarely in the middle, with Germany and the UK on six weeks and Italy on 12 weeks. Our seven-and-a-half weeks doesn't seem excessive. Virtually all countries still have a long summer break. It can't be without merit. The bigger issue here isn't education. It's childcare. More specifically, it's the lack of structured, affordable wraparound care. In the absence of a proper government-funded national strategy, people understandably turn to schools to fill the gap. For example, in the last year, I've been asked to talk about why schools should be responsible for everything from toxic masculinity to smartphone bans and everything in between. Teaching is an intense profession. It's six hours of live performance, decision-making, emotional labour and crowd management. I often compare it to being a doctor, but instead of seeing your patients one at a time you have 25 of them in the room, all with different needs, and you're expected to diagnose, treat and manage them simultaneously all day long. If teaching really were the cushy number some imagine then why are we in the middle of a recruitment and retention crisis? Schools are struggling to fill posts. Burnout is rampant. With so much time off and early finishes you'd think the issue would be too many applicants. However, all that said, we could restructure the school year. We could have a shorter summer, with more frequent breaks during the year, and that's a fair discussion. However, if we do shorten the summer then who runs Summer Provision? If we cut CPD time, when do teachers upskill? These aren't rhetorical questions, they're trade-offs. If we want schools to become year-round childcare hubs then we need to say so and fund them properly. If we want them to remain focused on education, we must stop treating holidays as a perk and start seeing them as part of a sustainable system not unlike the long summer break granted to those in other professions such as third-level lecturers, which rarely draws public outrage. None of this is about teachers asking for sympathy. It's about creating a sustainable, child-centred education system that serves the country well and about the Government providing a properly funded childcare system that meets the needs of working parents. We can then let schools be schools and childcare be childcare. Simon Lewis is principal of Carlow Educate Together primary school

Not wild about Trinity College
Not wild about Trinity College

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

Not wild about Trinity College

Sir, – For visitors to Dublin, the Trinity College main entrance is the front door of the city. For years the elegant facade was complemented by a beautifully maintained lawn. Now the space has been given over to wilding in a city centre with more than enough derelict sites. Surely, Trinity could find additional space for wilding elsewhere within its large campus and restore our city-centre oasis of calm. For my part I'm all for wilding, but not in my front yard. – Yours, etc, READ MORE KEVIN DEVINE, Dublin 5.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store