Harehills children's questions inspire Leeds exhibition about poo
Mr Gann added: "The children were much more curious than we thought. "People might feel uncomfortable asking some of these questions, but they're not silly questions."I was really pleased the children felt increasingly free to throw out big questions and that curiosity is what we're looking to in our audience and what we hope that exhibitions like this reward."It's not just us telling them what to think. It's them asking questions and searching for answers."
The exhibition also features a 12th Century Medieval poo, a proctogram chair -designed for inspecting the rectum - and Victorian constipation cures.It was curated with children from Harehills Primary School, one of nine local schools the Thackray works in partnership with.Other questions the children posed included: 'Why is a fart colourless?', "How do you get constipated?" and "why is poo brown?"Mr Gann said the "why is poo so smelly?" question inspired his favourite item in the exhibition.He said: "Skatole, which is the chemical component that makes poo smell, is obviously a nasty smell when you get it in poo, but in a different amount it's actually very pleasant."It's in a lot of flowers and perfumes. So because we have collections that touch on that we can display some things that smell of poo but smell good."One of the objects on display is the anointing oil that's used at the Royal Coronation, which is full of those floral ingredients, which all have skatole as a chemical compound in them."So we get to ask: does this smell of poo, does it make the King smell of poo?"
He added another recurring theme among the children was "Why is poo disgusting?", something the team had to ask historians to look into."We talked to a couple of different historians about this, about how it's not necessarily disgusting in every culture, how you're not born naturally finding it disgusting."That's kind of a learned thing that we do socially, because obviously it carries a lot of disease. So you learn that that's probably not a thing you want to put in your mouth."'POO!' runs at the Thackray Museum of Medicine from 26 July to 4 January 2026.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
New research suggests women in midlife can benefit from ‘gym bro' supplement
Until recently, creatine supplements was almost exclusively used by athletes and bodybuilders looking to enhance performance and pack on muscle mass. But now there is a surprising rapidly growing market for it: middle aged women. While Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson still puts in his protein shake to 'put on size,' Ivanka Trump revealed earlier this year she takes a dose with her morning smoothie. From fitness influencers on TikTok to health experts, the chalky powder is now being touted for a range of benefits for women. So, what exactly is creatine and does the science back up the hype? 'Creatine is a natural compound that comes from three amino acids – arginine, glycine, and methionine,' Dr. Rupa Parmar, a physician and Director at Midland Health, tells The Independent. 'It's stored mainly in our muscles to help produce energy.' While small amounts come from foods like red meat and fish, our bodies also make about a gram each day. Most women don't get the recommended three to five grams per day from food, Rupar said, and supplementation may help. 'Women naturally have much lower creatine stores than men and usually eat less of it in their diet, so they may actually benefit more from taking creatine to boost their levels,' he added. Creatine's rise as a go-to supplement can be traced to 1992 when British sprinter Linford Christie and hurdler Sally Gunnell, both vocal about its use, won gold at the Barcelona Olympics. Glossy fitness magazines began branding it a 'breakthrough'; a 1998 article in Fortune magazine called the compound 'nature's steroid'; a Los Angeles Times headline blared, 'Power powder.' While much of its early reputation focused on muscle-building and workout recovery, research suggests creatine's benefits may extend beyond the gym. Creatine has been linked to improved memory, brain health, depression treatment and increased energy. 'It can even support brain health, with studies suggesting the substance helps to improve cognitive function and provide some protection as we age,' Rupar said. A preliminary study by the University of Kansas Medical Center on people with Alzheimer's found that creatine supplements may improve memory and executive function. Creatine may also offer benefits tied to hormonal fluctuations. 'Creatine can help ease fatigue during your period by supporting stable energy levels,' Rupar continued, 'especially when you're feeling more tired.' Oestrogen and progesterone, hormones that regulate the menstrual cycle, influence how the body produces and uses creatine, he explained. 'During the menstrual cycle, creatine levels can change, and supplements may help keep energy and muscle function more stable, especially when oestrogen is low,' Rupar said. For women approaching or going through menopause, creatine appears especially promising as it may help counteract declines in muscle mass, strength, and bone density, particularly when combined with resistance training. One 12-month study found that creatine reduced the loss of bone mineral density in 47 postmenopausal women. For all its potential upsides, creatine isn't without drawbacks. One of the most common complaints is bloating: because it saturates the muscles, it may cause water retention, which sometimes leads to a bloated feeling and a few extra pounds on the scale from water weight. Still, studies have repeatedly shown creatine to be safe for most healthy adults when taken at recommended doses. Experts advise consulting a healthcare provider before starting, especially for those with kidney conditions or who are on medication.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Doctors warn millions of people will be diagnosed with stomach cancer because of common infection
A common bacteria responsible for almost half of stomach cancer cases in the UK could kill millions in the coming years, top scientists have warned. Called Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), infection with the bug is now estimated to cause 76 per cent of stomach cancers worldwide. Experts warn that many people infected with the bacteria—which infests the lining of the stomach and causes damage to tissue that can lead to cancer—show no obvious symptoms beyond relatively common ailments like indigestion, bloating or nausea. The team is now calling for increased screening for the bacteria, which can be detected in blood and breath test or via a stool sample in a bid save lives. Scientists from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)—part of the World Health Organisation —warned if nothing was done nearly 12million people across the globe born between 2008 and 2017 will develop stomach cancer due to H. pylori. This, they said, represented just over three quarters of all cases of the cancer. H. pylori is thought to be spread from person to person via contaminated food and water as well caring for those who become ill. Studies have previously found 40 per cent of Britons are infected with H. pylori, but this is thought to be on the decrease. The vast majority of these patients—between eight-to-nine out of 10—will show no symptoms meaning they have no idea they are infected. H. pylori can rarely cause the development of painful stomach ulcers which is usually when most patients learn they are infected. While the IARC scientists said the majority of the predicted 12million stomach cancer cases linked to the bug will be in Asia, 2million will develop in the Americas and 1.2million in Europe. Data from British charity Cancer Research UK (CRUK) suggests 41 per cent of the UK's 6,500 annual stomach cancer cases are caused by H. pylori, about 2,700 cases a year. Studies suggest being infected with the bacteria increases the risk of developing stomach cancer six-fold, although appropriate treatment like antibiotics, dramatically reduces this. Writing in the journal Nature Medicine, the IARC scientists called for greater investment in population testing for H. pylori to find those silently infected with the bacteria and offer them treatment. In the study itself, the team examined current rates of stomach cancer in 185 countries in 2022 and used that to project the number of cases in the coming years. They also found 75 per cent of stomach cancer cases could be prevented globally by the introduction of screening programmes. Dr Jin Young Park, an author of the study and leader of the gastric cancer prevention team at IARC, said: 'It is essential that health authorities make gastric cancer prevention a priority and accelerate efforts to control it by planning pilot and feasibility projects, including H. pylori screen-and-treat programmes.' But CRUK said Britons should not be too concerned about potential infection with H. pylori as it was not a particularly common bug in the UK. Instead, the charity's health information manager Dr Rachel Orritt said the public needed to beware of more preventable lifestyle factors that increase stomach cancer risk. 'Although this is an important issue worldwide, in the UK other preventable factors cause more cancer cases,' she said. 'Ways to reduce your cancer risk include stopping smoking, keeping a healthy weight, cutting down on alcohol and eating a healthy, balanced diet.' The charity estimates that just over half (54 per cent) of all stomach cancers are preventable. CRUK also noted that stomach cancer cases in the population have fallen by more than quarter over the last decade and are projected to fall further. The main symptoms of stomach cancer include heartburn or acid reflux, having problems swallowing, feeling or being sick, indigestion and burping and feeling full very quickly when eating. These symptoms are common and usually caused by other conditions but patients who have had them for over three weeks should contact their GP for advice, Other symptoms include loss of appetite or losing weight without trying, stomach pain, a lump feeling at the top of the stomach and feeling very tired. About 18 Britons and 83 Americans are diagnosed with stomach cancer each day. The disease kills just over 4,200 patients in the UK each year, with the death toll rising to nearly 11,000 in the US. Only about one in six patients with stomach cancer (17 per cent) are expected to still be alive 10 years after their diagnosis. About one in 92 men and one in 170 women in the UK are estimated to develop stomach cancer in their lifetime.
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
London's low-traffic zones ‘cut deaths and injuries by more than a third'
Low-traffic neighbourhoodscut road injuries and deaths by more than a third within their boundaries with no apparent negative safety effect on nearby roads, a study has shown. Based on comparisons of more than a decade of road casualty statistics between 113 London LTNs and other roads that did not have them, the report's authors found that LTNs were associated with a 35% reduction in all injuries, rising to 37% for deaths and serious injuries. In absolute terms, the study concluded, this meant that creating the LTNs prevented more than 600 road injuries that would have otherwise taken place, including 100 involving death or serious injury. On boundary roads, those just outside the LTNs, there was no observable change in the number of casualties. LTNs aim to make smaller residential streets more friendly for walking, wheeling and cycling by using filters to stop through-traffic by motor vehicles. While they have been used in various forms in the UK for decades and are ubiquitous in many European cities, an expansion in their use from 2020 led to pushback from some politicians and parts of the media. A common criticism has been that LTNs simply displace traffic to boundary roads, which become more dangerous. However, studies have found a negligible impact on traffic levels and the new paper, published in Injury Prevention, a spin-off from the British Medical Journal, indicates this is the same for deaths and injuries. Of the 113 LTNs studied, 27 were subsequently taken out. According to analysis by the authors, from Westminster University and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, if the LTNs had not been removed there would have been 116 fewer injuries overall, 16 of which involved death or serious injuries. Across the LTNs as a whole, the authors said, an estimated 613 injuries were prevented, including 100 deaths or serious injuries. The study involved analysing road casualties from 2012 to 2024 on all so-called road links – a sections of road between two junctions – in London, some of which became part of or a boundary to an LTN, while others did not were treated as a control group. This allowed the authors to observe changes within LTNs and also compare them with changes on other road links, to take account of separate, longer-term changes in injury rates, including lower traffic levels during Covid. One phenomenon that was apparent between schemes was that the safety benefits of being within an LTN in outer London seemed notably less than those in inner London. Some outer London schemes have been shown as less successful in reducing overall traffic. Even with such caveats, the results across a relatively large-scale study give supporters of LTNs the ability to argue that they provably prevent injuries and deaths, as has also been shown to be the case for 20mph speed limits in Wales. Although modal filters, the technical name for LTNs, have been repeatedly shown to be effective when implemented properly, negative media coverage of the wave of schemes introduced from 2020 prompted a political backlash, with Rishi Sunak's government pledging to clamp down on LTNs. Sunak's government even commissioned a report on LTNs in the apparent hope it would conclude they did not work. When the report found instead they were mainly popular and effective, it was initially buried. Dr Jamie Furlong from Westminster University's Active Travel Academy, who led the new study, said its findings should reassure policymakers about the schemes. He said: 'LTNs have led to considerable reductions in road traffic injuries inside their boundaries for all road users – from pedestrians and cyclists to drivers. At the same time, concerns about nearby main roads becoming more dangerous aren't supported by the evidence.'
