
Trump threatens 200% tariff on Champagne and wine from Europe
Advertisement
The 27-nation bloc explained that it would react to America's steel and aluminum tariffs in two waves: First, with tariffs as high as 50 percent on US products, including Harley-Davidson motorcycles and Kentucky bourbon, which will take effect on April 1; and second, a series of measures in mid-April that would target farm products and industrial goods that are important to Republican districts.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
European leaders have made it clear that they would prefer not to enact those measures, and would like to come to an agreement with Trump instead.
'Tariffs are taxes,' Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, the bloc's executive arm, said in a statement on Wednesday. But with little progress toward a deal, EU leaders decided to hit back in politically sensitive product categories, hoping to inflict enough pain to drive Americans to the negotiation table.
European officials had anticipated that Washington might react, and some vowed on Thursday not to cave under that pressure.
'We will not give in to threats,' Laurent Saint-Martin, France's foreign trade minister, said in a post on the social platform X. Trump 'is escalating the trade war he chose to unleash,' he added.
The European Commission, which most directly drives trade policy for the economies in the bloc, did not have an immediate comment on Trump's post.
Advertisement
But Olof Gill, a spokesperson for the commission, said Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic had reached out to his American counterparts after the EU's announcements Wednesday. Calls were 'being prepared,' he said.
This is not the first time the spirits and alcohol industry has been caught in a trans-Atlantic trade war. Less extreme tariffs were placed on liquor and other alcohol during Trump's first term, and the industry's recovery from that hit has been long and grueling.
Back then, the president threatened Champagne with tariffs, but did not follow through.
While it is not clear how much it mattered in that case, Bernard Arnault, France's richest man and head of the LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton luxury empire, is a longtime friend of Trump's. He attended the president's recent inauguration.
Arnault's company is home to brands including Dom Pérignon, Krug, and Veuve Cliquot.
This time around, a range of alcohol industry executives have been lobbying in Washington, Brussels, and other European capitals to be spared — and have expressed alarm that they are once again caught in the crossfire.
Ulrich Adam, director general of the trade group spiritsEurope, called Trump's tariff threat on European alcohol a 'shocker.' The group aims 'to get spirits out of the middle of these unrelated disputes,' he added.
There seems to be little hope of an immediate reprieve. Trump stressed that the tariffs 'will be great for the wine and Champagne businesses in the U.S.'
Champagne, technically, is produced only in a specific region in France. About 16 percent of its total exports go to the United States, based on industry data from 2023, making America the largest importer of the sparkling wine.
Advertisement
This is the second time this week that Trump has threatened to rapidly escalate a trade war against a close ally.
On Tuesday, Trump threatened to double the tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum after the province of Ontario responded to his previous tariffs by putting a surcharge on electricity it exported to the United States.
Within hours, Ontario had suspended its surcharge, and Trump also walked back his threats. On Wednesday, he proceeded to tax Canadian steel and aluminum at the same 25 percent rate as other countries.
Governments have varied their responses to Trump's tariff threats.
China, the European Union, and Canada have quickly answered Trump's tariffs with levies of their own, encouraged by their domestic political constituencies to fight back or emboldened by leverage based on the size of their economies.
But governments in Australia, Brazil, Britain, Japan, and Mexico have chosen not to retaliate, at least for now, as they seek a deal with Trump.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick warned other countries in an interview on Bloomberg TV on Thursday against retaliating against the United States.
'If you make him unhappy, he responds unhappy,' Lutnick said.
Lutnick said that some countries, like Britain and Mexico, had thoughtfully examined how they do business with the United States. But for countries that respond with further tariffs, 'the president's going to deal with them with strength and with power,' he threatened.
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Baby Bunting Group Full Year 2025 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations
Baby Bunting Group (ASX:BBN) Full Year 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: AU$521.9m (up 6.3% from FY 2024). Net income: AU$9.54m (up 91% from FY 2024). Profit margin: 1.8% (up from 1.0% in FY 2024). The increase in margin was driven by higher revenue. EPS: AU$0.071 (up from AU$0.037 in FY 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Baby Bunting Group EPS Misses Expectations Revenue was in line with analyst estimates. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 22%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 8.5% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 5.6% growth forecast for the Specialty Retail industry in Australia. Performance of the Australian Specialty Retail industry. The company's shares are up 53% from a week ago. Balance Sheet Analysis While earnings are important, another area to consider is the balance sheet. See our latest analysis on Baby Bunting Group's balance sheet health. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge blocks FTC probe into progressive media watchdog
A federal judge temporarily blocked the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) investigation into Media Matters for America on Friday, arguing the agency is likely in violation of the progressive media watchdog's free speech rights. U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan, an appointee of former President Biden, ordered a preliminary injunction against the investigation, which was opened in May. 'It should alarm all Americans when the Government retaliates against individuals or organizations for engaging in constitutionally protected public debate. And that alarm should ring even louder when the Government retaliates against those engaged in newsgathering and reporting,' Sooknanan said in the 48-page ruling. 'This case presents a straightforward First Amendment violation.' The FTC opened the probe into Media Matters in late May over whether the progressive media group improperly coordinated with advertisers. The anti-trust agency demanded correspondence between Media Matters and advertisers, along with its communications with watchdog groups. In response, Media Matters sued the FTC in June to block the agency's probe, contending the investigation is an example of unlawful retaliation. Media Matters president Angelo Carusone said in a statement Friday that the court's ruling shows the 'importance of fighting over folding, which far too many are doing when confronted with intimidation from the Trump administration.' Carusone said the case is not 'just about the campaign to punish and silence Media Matters, however. It is a critical test for whether the courts will allow any administration – from any political party – to bully media and non-profit organizations through illegal abuses of power. We will continue to stand up and fight for the First Amendment rights that protect every American.' Media Matters was sued by tech billionaire Elon Musk and social media platform X in 2023, arguing that the progressive media watchdog colluded with advertisers as part of an effort to pull advertising dollars from X.


San Francisco Chronicle
13 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
In letter to Putin, US first lady asks him to consider the children in push to end war in Ukraine
WASHINGTON (AP) — Melania Trump took the unique step of crafting a letter that calls for peace in Ukraine, having her husband President Donald Trump hand-deliver it to Russian President Vladimir Putin during their Friday meeting in Alaska. The letter did not specifically name Ukraine, which Putin's forces invaded in 2022, but beseeched him to think of children and 'an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology.' Nor did the American first lady discuss the fighting other than to say to Putin that he could 'singlehandedly restore' the 'melodic laughter' of children who have been caught in the conflict. 'In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone — you serve humanity itself,' she wrote on White House stationery. The first lady said that Putin could help these children with the stroke of a pen. Putin's invasion of Ukraine has resulted in Russia taking Ukrainian children out of their country so that they can be raised as Russian. The Associated Press documented the grabbing of Ukrainian children in 2022, after which the International Criminal Court said it had issued an arrest warrant for Putin for war crimes, accusing him of personal responsibility for the abductions of children from Ukraine.