CSTO Foreign Ministers Meet in Kyrgyzstan
On June 30, foreign ministers from the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) member states met in Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan. The routine meeting comes amid Kyrgyzstan's chairmanship of the CSTO, and follows recent gatherings of the CSTO security council heads in June and defense ministers in May. With one member on the way out, and Russia's continued war in Ukraine, the organization's role and heft remain open questions.
Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov and Foreign Minister Jeenbek Kulubayev welcomed the foreign ministers of Belarus (Maxim Ryzhenkov), Kazakhstan (Murat Nurtleu), Russia (Sergey Lavrov), and Tajikistan (Mukhriddin Sirojiddin), as well as CSTO Secretary General Imangali Tasmagambetov.
Absent was Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan.
The CSTO formally launched in 2002, evolving out of the post-Soviet Collective Security Treaty (CST) which had been formed in 1992. The alliance counts among its members Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Russia – the latter widely viewed as leading the organization by dint of its massive size and overwhelming influence. Uzbekistan had been party to the CST but declined to extend its association in 1999, a decision also made by Georgia and Azerbaijan. Tashkent did join the CSTO in 2006, but withdrew in 2012.
Armenian authorities last year made clear their dissatisfaction with the CSTO, a break rooted in the organization's inaction in regard to the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. In February 2024, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said the country would freeze its membership.
In June 2024, Pashinyan denounced the CSTO once again for failing to come to Armenia's aid. 'We will leave,' Pashinyan said during a parliament session. 'We will decide when to leave. We won't come back, there is no other way.'
Those comments came amid Armenia's not-so-subtle distancing from the CSTO, a trend that has only solidified. Armenia skipped the November 2023 CSTO summit in Minsk, Belarus, did not show up for a CSTO joint military exercise in Russia in August 2024, and also skipped the November 2024 CSTO summit in Astana, Kazakhstan.
In December 2024, Pashinyan remarked, 'We have fulfilled all our allied obligations [to the CSTO] accurately, both morally, politically, and legally, but the allied obligations towards us have not been fulfilled.' He continued, 'In a difficult moment, they left us alone, they abandoned us, and yes, there are opinions that we were betrayed, and I have no argument to assure them otherwise.' The break had passed the 'point of no return,' he said.
Despite these comments, and Armenia's persistent absence from CSTO engagements, Russian authorities appear at times somewhat deluded. In December, Lavrov told journalists, 'We hear these rumors that the prime minister of Armenia spoke and discussed many things on this topic in the parliament. We do not impose anything on anyone. We are convinced that making the most of [CSTO] membership is in the interests of Armenia's security.'
Russia may be catching on, finally. Following the recent foreign ministers meeting in Kyrgyzstan, Lavrov remarked, 'We still consider Armenia the full-fledged member of this organization but, undoubtedly, a full-fledged membership implies participation and observance of all obligations under the CSTO charter documents. Including paying membership fees, by the way.'
In early June, TASS reported that Armenia had not paid its membership fees for 2024. Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan, speaking in parliament, said that 'Armenia has not paid the membership fee to the CSTO due to the suspension of its membership in this organization.' Mirzoyan added, as reported by TASS, 'Yerevan is assessing all the risks of the decision to withdraw from the CSTO.'
For now, Armenia's flag remains on banners for CSTO meetings.
After the recent gathering of foreign ministers, a CSTO readout noted that the states 'adopted statements on issues related to international information security, countering radicalization leading to terrorism and extremism, the situation in the Middle East, as well as the establishment of the U.N. Regional Center for Sustainable Development Goals for Central Asia and Afghanistan.' The also discussed closer cooperation between the CSTO, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) – the full constellation of Russian-dominated multilateral organizations.
Although specific dates have not been announced, as chair Kyrgyzstan will host the annual leaders summit later this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
4 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
'Trump Route' in Armenia-Azerbaijan deal could reshape Eurasian trade
From left, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, U.S. President Donald Trump and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan at a signing ceremony for a peace agreement in Washington on Aug. 8. © Reuters TAKAYUKI TANAKA August 12, 2025 01:22 JST TOKYO -- The planned transport route included in the peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia has the potential to bring big changes to transportation on the Eurasian continent, benefiting U.S. economic interests while also serving as a check on Iran.
Japan Today
a day ago
- Japan Today
Commercial fishing in vast Pacific nature area halted after judge blocks a Trump order
President Donald Trump participates in a trilateral signing ceremony with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev in the State Dining Room of the White House, Friday, Aug. 8, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) By JENNIFER SINCO KELLEHER and AUDREY McAVOY Commercial fishing that recently resumed in a vast protected area of the Pacific Ocean must halt once again, after a judge in Hawaii sided with environmentalists challenging a Trump administration rollback of federal ocean protections. The remote Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument is home to turtles, marine mammals and seabirds, which environmental groups say will get snagged by longline fishing, an industrial method involving baited hooks from lines 60 miles (about 100 kilometers) or longer. President Donald Trump's executive order to allow this and other types of commercial fishing in part of the monument changed regulations without providing a process for public comment and rulemaking and stripped core protections from the monument, the groups argued in a lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Micah W. J. Smith granted a motion by the environmentalists on Friday. The ruling means boats catching fish for sale will need to immediately cease fishing in waters between 50 and 200 nautical miles (93 kilometers to 370 kilometers) around Johnston Atoll, Jarvis Island and Wake Island, said Earthjustice, an environmental law organization representing the plaintiffs. U.S. Justice Department attorneys representing the government did not immediately return an email message seeking comment on Saturday. Trump has said the U.S. should be 'the world's dominant seafood leader,' and on the same day of his April executive order, he issued another one seeking to boost commercial fishing by peeling back regulations and opening up harvesting in previously protected areas. President George W. Bush created the marine monument in 2009. It consists of about 500,000 square miles (1.3 million square kilometers) in the remote central Pacific Ocean southwest of Hawaii. President Barack Obama expanded it in 2014. Soon after Trump's executive order, the National Marine Fisheries Service sent a letter to fishing permit holders giving them the green light to fish commercially in the monument's boundaries, Earthjustice's lawsuit says. Fishing resumed within days, the group said. Government attorneys say the fisheries service's letter merely notified commercial fishers of a change that had already taken place through Trump's authority to remove the prohibition on commercial fishing in certain areas. Earthjustice challenged that letter, and by granting the motion in their favor, the federal judge found the government had chosen not to defend its letter on the merits and forfeited that argument. Smith also ruled against the government's other defenses, that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the letter and that the court lacked jurisdiction over the matter. David Henkin, an Earthjustice attorney, said Smith's ruling requires the government to go through a process to determine what kind of fishing, and under what conditions, can happen in monument waters in a way that wouldn't destroy the area. Members of Hawaii's longline fishing industry say they have made numerous gear adjustments and changes over the years, such as circle hooks, to avoid that. The lawsuit says allowing commercial fishing in the monument expansion would also harm the 'cultural, spiritual, religious, subsistence, educational, recreational, and aesthetic interests' of a group of Native Hawaiian plaintiffs who are connected genealogically to the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
The Mainichi
2 days ago
- The Mainichi
Armenians and Azerbaijanis greet US-brokered peace deal with hope but also caution
YEREVAN, Armenia (AP) -- Residents and politicians in Armenia and Azerbaijan responded Saturday with cautious hope -- and skepticism in some cases -- after their leaders signed a U.S.-brokered agreement at the White House aimed at ending decades of hostilities. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed the agreement on Friday in the presence of U.S. President Donald Trump, who stood between the leaders as they shook hands -- a gesture Trump reinforced by clasping their hands together. While the agreement does not constitute a formal peace treaty, it represents a significant diplomatic step toward normalization of relations. The two countries remain technically at war, and the deal does not resolve the longstanding dispute over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh. It does, however, reflect the shifting power dynamics following Azerbaijan's 2023 military victory, which forced the withdrawal of Armenian forces and ethnic Armenians from the region. Among the agreement's provisions is the creation of a new transit corridor, dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity," highlighting a changing geopolitical landscape amid declining Russian influence in the South Caucasus. Nagorno-Karabakh has been at the heart of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict since the Soviet Union's collapse. Although internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, the mountainous region was controlled for decades by ethnic Armenian forces backed by Armenia. Two wars -- in the early 1990s and again in 2020 -- left tens of thousands dead and displaced. In 2023, Azerbaijan regained control of most of the territory in a swift offensive. Hopeful for peace and a weaker Moscow Ali Karimli, head of the opposition People's Front of Azerbaijan Party, wrote on Facebook that the signing of the agreement "has undoubtedly brought Azerbaijan and Armenia significantly closer to peace," and noted that it delivered "another blow ... to Russia's influence in the South Caucasus," while deepening ties with the U.S. Arif Hajili, chairman of Azerbaijani opposition party Musavat, said he believed that "the most positive aspect of the initialing in Washington was the absence of Russia from the process." He said lasting stability in the region hinges on the continual dwindling of Russian power, which "depends on the outcome of the Russian--Ukrainian war." Hajili also warned of lingering challenges, including Armenia's economic dependence on Russia and some 2 million Azerbaijanis living in Russia. "Russia will continue to use these factors as levers of pressure," he said. Hope on the streets of Azerbaijan's capital "We have been waiting for a long time for this agreement to be signed," a resident of Baku, Gunduz Aliyev, told The Associated Press. "We did not trust our neighbor, Armenia. That's why a strong state was needed to act as a guarantor. Russia couldn't do it, but the United States succeeded." "The U.S. is taking full responsibility for security. This will bring peace and stability," said another, Ali Mammadov. "Borders will open soon, and normal relations with Armenia will be established." Abulfat Jafarov, also in Baku, expressed gratitude to all three leaders involved. "Peace is always a good thing," he said. "We welcome every step taken towards progress." More divided views in the Armenian capital Some people in Yerevan were unsure of the meaning of the agreement. "I feel uncertain because much still needs clarification. There are unclear aspects, and although the prime minister of Armenia made some statements from the U.S., more details are needed," Edvard Avoyan said. But entrepreneur Hrach Ghasumyan could see economic benefits. "If gas and oil pipelines pass through Armenia and railway routes are opened, it would be beneficial for the country," he said. "Until now, all major routes have passed through Georgia, leaving Armenia sidelined and economically limited." Others were skeptical that peace could be achieved, and expressed discontent with the terms of the agreement. "That declaration is unlikely to bring real peace to the region, and we are well aware of Azerbaijan's stance," Ruzanna Ghazaryan said. "This initial agreement offers us nothing; the concessions are entirely one-sided."
