
Police boss plans to take back Johannesburg
Speaking at a meet-and-greet session held at the Indaba Hotel in Fourways on July 15, the commissioner said her leadership would be grounded in action, discipline, and meaningful collaboration. 'As the captain of the ship, I will lead.' She outlined a six-pronged mission that prioritises integrated policing, stronger partnerships, and social impact.
At the core of her mission is a deep belief that: 'Criminals are very few among us,' and that united communities have the power to shift the tide on crime.
She said her first pillar is partnership and collaboration, not only with SAPS and Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department (JMPD), but also with private security, government departments, and the Community Policing Forum (CPF) structures on the ground. 'The crime is happening in the community, which is why we must work with the community.'
Also read: Douglasdale CPF calls for school shoe donations
The second pillar is police visibility and crime reduction. Acknowledging limited personnel, Kubheka called for better resource co-ordination and intelligence-led operations.
Kubheka highlighted the role of crime prevention wardens as a key force multiplier in overcoming police shortages.
Thirdly, she committed to educating officers on the six pillars of the integrated crime and violence prevention strategy, with special emphasis on early intervention among the youth, victim support, and public participation. 'We must plant the seed now to see change in the next generation.'
Other mission points include: tackling hijacked buildings, a known breeding ground for crime, and strengthening the mental health and professional development of officers, especially the incoming recruits.
Also read: Massive rush of enrolments for SAPS training programme
The other focus is on discipline and anti-corruption, which Kubheka sees as essential to rebuilding trust. 'We can't have law enforcement if we are not disciplined and addressing the corruption. Corruption is affecting the discipline. We are losing a lot of members. We are saying we are [dedicated to] the organisation, but we've got a lot of members who are going out the back door because they cannot continue to work with us. They are compromising us.
'Let us remember that effective discipline helps build community trust and maintain the integrity of law enforcement.'
While acknowledging the challenges, Kubheka also pointed to recent success stories, particularly in tackling violent and organised crime. 'We have recorded commendable successes through multidisciplinary operations. These include Operation Shanela 2, Valamgodi, and various high-density operations.'
Also read: SAPS reunites nearly 18 000 missing persons with families in 5 years
Most notably, she highlighted progress in several kidnapping cases, including the breakthrough in the murder case of 11-year-old Jayden-Lee Meek from Fleurhof. 'In June, we managed to solve about six kidnapping cases and reunited victims with their families. We confiscated firearms, drugs, and made arrests in drunk-driving cases.
'Colleagues, we have seen the crime picture improve for the quarter. I am very proud.'
Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration! Have a story idea? We'd love to hear from you – join our WhatsApp group and share your thoughts!
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa's Police Corruption Inquiry: Will This One Deliver?
President Cyril Ramaphosa has announced a new judicial commission to investigate deep-rooted dysfunction within the police. Will this inquiry finally uncover the truth and lead to meaningful change? Image: GCIS When President Cyril Ramaphosa announced yet another judicial commission this time to investigate deep-rooted dysfunction within the police the question wasn't whether the truth would emerge. It was whether anything would change. We've been here before. The Zondo Commission laid bare the full extent of state capture, naming names, exposing networks, and recommending sweeping reforms. Yet years later, South Africans are still asking: How far have we come in implementing those recommendations? Why are so many still waiting for justice, restitution, or real reform? Now, following bombshell revelations by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi who courageously exposed rot, political interference, and operational decay at SAPS's heart we're again placing hope in a judicial commission. But hard questions demand answers. Will this be another toothless inquiry, destined to produce a glossy report and little else? Will Mkhwanazi be supported or scapegoated? Will the public be engaged or merely placated? Most importantly: What will make this commission succeed where so many have failed? Judicial commissions have become our default crisis response. From ethics violations to public trust deficits, policymakers reflexively turn to them as proof of action. Yet government shelves already groan under dust covered reports that achieved little beyond symbolism. The issue isn't whether we need judicial commissions, whether we'll finally design ones built to deliver results rather than rhetoric. The first fatal flaw plaguing most commissions is what I call the accountability paradox: they're granted impressive investigative powers but no enforcement muscle. They excel at exposing problems less so at fixing them. Truly effective commissions transcend "fact-finding" missions to wield binding powers that compel reform. South Africa's own Judicial Service Commission, established in 1994, exemplifies this approach. Beyond overseeing judicial appointments, it enforces ethical conduct through transparent processes public interviews, inclusive representation that helped rebuild trust in our post-apartheid judiciary. Contrast this with advisory only commissions, which quickly become political footballs: praised by supporters, dismissed by opponents, and ultimately relegated to ceremonial irrelevance. Political independence isn't a luxury it's an existential requirement. Across the globe, commissioners have been dismissed or marginalized when their findings threatened powerful interests. South Africa cannot afford this pattern. Genuine independence demands three non-negotiables: Fixed tenure with narrow removal criteria. Commissioners should face dismissal only for serious misconduct or incapacity, requiring supermajority votes or judicial review never political convenience. Secure, dedicated funding. Like courts themselves, commissions must be shielded from budgetary manipulation. Multi-year funding commitments prevent political retaliation through fiscal strangulation. Balanced, credible composition. Legal insiders alone cannot carry reform's burden. The most effective commissions blend judges, attorneys, scholars, and informed public voices in carefully calibrated proportions that reflect society's diversity while maintaining professional credibility. Too many commissions operate behind coverings of secrecy, undermining the very trust they aim to rebuild. In our digital age, opacity isn't just outdated, it's counterproductive to reform goals. Successful commissions embrace radical transparency through: Open hearings where confidentiality permits, inviting public observation Real-time publication of commission activities, findings, and rationales Accessible communication that translates legal complexity into public understanding Proactive engagement with communities, not just legal elites This transparency doesn't compromise integrity, strengthens legitimacy by demonstrating accountability in action. Even visionary recommendations prove worthless without robust follow-through. Reform graveyards overflow with brilliant ideas that never escaped paper. To avoid this fate, effective commissions must: Establish statutory timelines. Vague recommendations enable indefinite delay. Specific deadlines and milestones create pressure for action while enabling progress measurement. Maintain post-report oversight. Commissions shouldn't dissolve upon publication; they should retain monitoring authority to track implementation and publicly highlight foot-dragging. Secure early stakeholder buy-in. Judges, court administrators, civil society, and affected communities should participate from inception, building implementation coalitions rather than resistance movements. Include resource allocation plans. Proposals without funding mechanisms remain wishful thinking. Successful commissions provide detailed cost analyses and financing strategies as integral recommendation components. Judicial commissions don't operate in political vacuums. Effective reform requires understanding of the political ecosystem, not surrendering to it. Strategic considerations include: Cross-party leadership. Single-party commissions face inevitable credibility challenges. Bipartisan endorsement creates broader political investment in success. Thoughtful pacing. While comprehensive reform may be ideal, incremental progress often proves more sustainable than revolutionary proposals triggering massive political backlash. Coalition building. Courts serve everyone. Successful commissions cultivate support extending beyond traditional legal circles to include business groups, civil rights organizations, and other stakeholders invested in judicial effectiveness. Evidence shows that transformative judicial commissions share critical characteristics distinguishing them from failed counterparts: They possess clear mandates with measurable objectives rather than aspirational vagueness. They maintain operational independence through structural protections, not ceremonial declarations. They embrace transparency as a strategy, not liability. They design enforcement mechanisms from the outset rather than hoping for voluntary compliance. Most crucially, they understand that judicial reform ultimately concerns public trust. In an era of declining institutional confidence, commissions that enhance rather than undermine faith in courts serve democracy's fundamental needs. South Africa doesn't lack judicial reform ideas. What's missing is the resolve to implement what experience teaches works. Lieutenant General Mkhwanazi's revelations present both crisis and opportunity. His courage in exposing institutional decay deserves support, not scapegoating. The commission investigating his allegations must be structured for success, not designed for bureaucratic theater. This moment demands more than good intentions. It requires structural clarity, political courage, and unwavering commitment to transparency and public interest. The blueprint for commission success exists, drawn from both our own experience and the best international practices. The only remaining question is whether we possess wisdom and the will to follow it. The stakes couldn't be higher. Public trust in our institutions hangs in the balance. We can continue the cycle of well-intentioned commissions producing impressive reports that gather dust, or we can finally build one designed to deliver the accountability and reform our democracy desperately democracy. Nyaniso Qwesha

IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Trust in police at all time low
The Human Sciences Research Council's (HSRC) revealed that only 22% of the citizens trust the police. Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers ONLY 22% of citizens trust the police, representing the lowest level of trust in 27 years, according to the Human Sciences Research Council's (HSRC). Their study released this week, days after KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi lifted the lid on the alleged malfeasance in SAPS, which also implicates Police Minister Senzo Mchunu who has since been placed on special leave. Mkhwanazi also implicated senior SAPS officials in corruption during his recent media briefing, claiming police have failed to act on evidence tying firearms to high-profile killings, including those of prominent South African artists. He accused Mchunu of sabotaging critical crime-fighting efforts by ordering the disbandment of the Political Killings Task Team, a unit established in 2018. Mkhwanazi alleged that Mchunu, in collaboration with Deputy Commissioner General Shadrack Sibiya, withdrew 121 case dockets from the team, leaving them untouched at SAPS headquarters in Pretoria, despite five being ready for arrests. He also claimed that Mchunu was in constant communication with criminal syndicates, naming a businessman, Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala, and an associate, Mr Brown Mogotsi (also referred to as Mahodi or Maki in various statements), as key players funding Mchunu's political activities. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Sibiya, like Mchunu was placed on special leave Tuesday as Mkhwanazi's allegations now form part of a judicial commission of inquiry to be headed by acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga. The HSRC survey also found that well-publicised instances of police abuse or failure can also seem to reduce public confidence, while perceptions of police corruption also had a strong, negative effect on police confidence. Mkhwanazi's allegations represent another decisive moment for policing in South Africa, the outcome of which will have a significant bearing on the project to rebuild public trust, said the HSRC. "Not once during this 27-year interval did more than half the adult public say that they trusted the police. This suggests that the issue of police legitimacy is by no means a new one. "Over the 1998 to 2010 period, the average level of trust in the police was relatively static. It ranged between 39% and 42% in all but a few years. This was followed by a sharp decline between 2011 and 2013, following the Marikana massacre of August 2012. However, confidence had almost returned to the 2011 level by the time of the 2015 survey round. The 2016 to 2020 period was characterised by modest fluctuation between 31% and 35%. The hard COVID-19 lockdown experience, which including instances of police brutality in enforcing lockdown regulations, did not appear to have had an aggregate effect on confidence levels based on the 2020 survey results." In 2021 public trust in the police dipped to a low of 27%, and the HSRC attributes this to the July 2021 social unrest. "This was followed by a further 5 percentage point decline to 22% in 2022, with the 2023 and 2024/25 confidence levels almost unchanged, which may reflect increasing rates for certain crimes. The 2022, 2023 and 2024/25 figures are the lowest recorded in 27 years." Experts said it was deeply concerning that the public's trust in police continues to decline. Independent crime and policing consultant, Dr Johna Burger, said the declining levels of trust and confidence in the SAPS over the last two decades were predictable, adding that the National Development Plan of 2012, Parliament's Detective Dialogue Report of September 2012 and the 2018 report by the Panel of Experts on how to strengthen and improve the SAPS are some of the reasons for this decline as none of the recommendations were implemented. 'The SAPS has, over the years, and in many instances, abused its own appointment and promotion policies, enabling them to appoint persons into senior positions for which they were not suitably qualified. The recent highly publicised appointment of a female brigadier from outside the police in Crime Intelligence is a good example." Cape Times


Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
SA scholar Jonny Steinberg calls for cautious approach to Mkhwanazi's allegations
CAPE TOWN - South African writer and scholar Jonny Steinberg believes KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi tried to send President Cyril Ramaphosa a threatening message when he made allegations against Police Minister Senzo Mchunu. Mkhwanazi held a media briefing recently to allege that parts of the South African Police Service (SAPS) have been captured by criminal syndicates. Steinberg, who is an acclaimed writer on South Africa's democratic history and politics, has questioned the timing of the press conference and Mkhwanazi's choice to wear military garb while surrounded by officials carrying automatic weapons. He also questioned why the general chose not to use another platform to bring his allegations against Mchunu. "You know this is a police officer, not a soldier, and yet he chose to dress in fatigues and to be surrounded by pretty ominous-looking men carrying automatic weapons and to use such language as saying he's prepared to die, he's ready for combat." Steinberg believes Ramaphosa was being sent a message. "For seven years, Ramaphosa has sat on his hands and done nothing about the crises within the police. He finally moved and tried to do something and this is a response. It's saying beware, I am armed." Steinberg said Mkhwanazi's motives should be questioned and called for a cautious approach to the theatrics surrounding the allegations the general has made. ALSO READ: SAPS corruption claims: Investigators gathering evidence at police headquarters