Goblin doll Labubu's evil twin contaminating Australian supply, authorities warn
Via its Facebook account, Fair Trading warned consumers that Lafufu – the nickname given to Labubu counterfeits, which look like a worse-off version of the furry elf doll – have infiltrated the Australian market of Labubus.
'Labubu toys are all the rage right now – but beware, some online sellers are tricking shoppers with counterfeit Lafufu [fake Labubu] products or not delivering at all,' the warning read.
It told collectors to look out for the Lafufus' disfigured ears spread far apart from each other, and to count the number of its teeth (if there are more or fewer than nine fangs), which it also said may be 'poorly shaped'.
Labubu, a helpful elf-like monster, was created in 2015 by a Belgium-based artist from Hong Kong, Kasing Lung. Labubu was one of several monsters illustrated by Lung for three children's books based on Nordic folklore.
Loading
While the original Labubu is already off-putting to many, its evil twin can be told apart by its frequently mangled features. Some Lafufus' heads can be removed from their furry bear suits, others' faces are completely upside-down. Some Lafufus are even more sought after than the originals they are mocking.
Part of the Labubu hype derives from their packaging in 'blind boxes', meaning buyers can't see which Labubu they get before they buy them. The rarity of some colours and special editions keeps customers buying more, but also makes it harder to detect when one is fake before taking it home.
Fair Trading advised collectors to limit their purchases to legitimate businesses and to beware of overseas websites offering Labubus at 'suspiciously low prices'. It added that scam stores could be reported on the Fair Trading website.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
‘Virus': Sad claim at anti-Semitism hearing
An inquiry into anti-Semitism across Australia has been told the 'terrible virus' is spreading across the country. Last July the Federal Government appointed Australia's first Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism (ASECA), following a rise in apparent anti-Semitic attacks. Jillian Segal AO told a hearing at NSW parliament on Friday a spate of anti-Semitic acts in NSW over the past summer have contributed to 'anxiety and unease' in the Jewish community. 'Anti-Semitism is such a terrible virus that eats away at our fundamental Australian values,' she said. Anti Semitic attacks are on the rise across the country, a parliamentary hearing has been told. NewsWire / Simon Bullard. Credit: News Corp Australia Strike Force Pearl was formed following a spate of alleged anti-Semitic attacks across NSW. NewsWire Credit: NewsWire Since her appointment to the envoy nearly 12 months ago, Ms Segal told the parliamentary hearing she has met with many political and civil leaders across the country. Anti-Semitic acts that Ms Segal referenced included the caravan full of explosives found in Dural, NSW in January which appeared to target the Jewish community. 'The Dural caravan contained explosives and it deliberately targeted the Jewish community and created a sense of vulnerability among the Jewish community,' she said. Ms Segal said the assertion that the Dural caravan was 'merely a harmless hoax' and 'did not in fact terrorise the Jewish community' was false. 'Whether or not the caravan was ultimately intended to be used in a terror attack, it had the effect of causing a great deal of fear and anxiety in the Jewish community, which was already on edge following the succession of arson and graffiti attacks, as well as the terror attack on the Adass Israel synagogue in Melbourne,' she said. Ms Segal was asked about the impacts of a violent pro-Palestinian rally at the Sydney Opera House, on October 9, 2023, following Hamas attacks, and if those events 'set the tone for everything that has happened following that incident.' 'I think it was a terrible incident that did indicate to people who were underlying anti-Semitic that they could continue behaving that way,' she said. 'Anti-Semitism is a hatred and behaving that way in that community is shaped by leadership. 'Leadership is incredibly important and leader's condemning certain attitudes and behaviours sets the tone. Jillian Segal AO has spoken at a parliamentary hearing. . Supplied Credit: Supplied 'I don't think everything that has happened has been a result of that … but it was an opportunity for it to be stamped out.' Ms Segal said Jewish Australians should not have to live in fear. 'No Jewish person should be told it's not safe to visit the opera house, or to visit a NSW hospital. Or worry about the safety of their children at a Jewish school,' she said. Rising anti-Semitism is being seen 'everywhere', Ms Segal said, which requires a range of approaches. 'We need a whole host of responses not only individual leadership but we need legislation, condemnation and education,' she said. 'We need to make sure it doesn't in any way send the message that it is acceptable.' Deputy Commissioner David Hudson NSW Police Force told the hearing 33 per cent of reports of hate crimes to his team have been of an anti-Semitic nature. NSW Police have received a total of 1,121 reports of anti-Semitic acts so far in 2025, the inquiry was told. 'This type of behaviour and offending is not going away,' Mr Hudson said. Strike force Pearl formed to investigate anti-Semitic acts, has seen 14 incidents which were on the 'higher end of the spectrum' of offending, Mr Hudson said, which included attacks and firebombing of Jewish centres and synagogues. 'We certainly believe they were anti-Semitic in nature … the Jewish community was targeted, they were putting lives in danger and ultimately I don't think we would consider it anything but anti-Semitic in nature,' he said. Those 14 attacks were allegedly conducted by criminal networks, Mr Hudson said, with one 'individual of interest' seen as a catalyst for those incidents, who had allegedly made social media posts that were anti-Semitic in nature.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Rude customers? Retail review gives us one star, at best
The SDA (Shoppies') Union surveyed 4600 Australian workers in 2023 and found that 76 per cent received regular verbal abuse from customers and one in eight had suffered physical violence. These figures had doubled in two years. The Australian Retail Association found that more than 92 per cent of staff experienced verbal or physical assaults at work. One in 10 of their customer-facing faces had been spat on. Women are most often the targets. In 2024, ANROWS (Australia's National Research Organisation for Women), in its 'Just Another Day in Retail' report, found that 38 per cent of sexual harassment in shops is from customers (the rest is from co-workers). As the Herald's investigation into the Merivale hospitality empire this week shows, the idea that 'the customer is always right' can take a dark turn in certain industries. Rudeness from customers, which used to risk nothing more than being 'fired' by the retailer, has been unlawful in NSW for exactly two years. Since the Minns government's Crimes Legislation Amendment was enacted in mid-2023, 136 individuals have been charged, 64 convicted and 25 jailed for aggression against retail staff. The world – by which I mean not Washington, Gaza or Ukraine but your neighbourhood mall – is demonstrably on a more aggressive trajectory. The big and small pictures seem related. Feeling impotent about climate change or the Middle East, you shout at the poor person in the call centre (who is probably living in a country prone to climate-related unrest and geopolitical violence). Where is it headed? I'm not sure if the old-fashioned lessons of civil society work. I was brought up under middle-class Protestant rules: if a hot temper is your daily nemesis, first you exercise self-discipline and fume silently. Need to escalate? Swear under your breath. Still doesn't work? Take it out on (1) inanimate objects, (2) yourself, or (3) some vigorous activity like sport or gardening. What you absolutely mustn't do is boil over at a complete stranger or a service worker, because their opinion of you matters more than anyone else's. Loading This social order is, from the evidence, a thing of the past. I don't think nostalgia is the answer. My friend J says we ought to blame the warning signs themselves. J, a customer who remains right after all these years, thinks the zero-tolerance signs just lower expectations about customer service. 'They're saying, 'We know we're going to be incompetent, so please go easy on us.'' According to J, the 'team' should be focusing on lifting its game, not on reporting you for showing your frustration. There's probably a grain of truth in this, but shoving the blame back across the table only works in general if you have the world's strongest military behind you, and even then it only works for a day or two. If the other is seen simply as the opposite party in a deal, then you're always going to lose. Both of you. What zero-tolerance signs, Lickert scales and most of tech-mediated transactions seem to miss is that the other side of your activity shares 99.9 per cent of their DNA with you. When going into that shop is, for many, the only face-to-face human contact they have all day, when work and trade and even leisure have dehumanised them into economic units, they just forget that the person on the other side of the counter is a person. Many of us are prone to that amnesia, and realise we're getting worse. But sometimes you get a wake-up call – from a human, not a talking clock. The other night I had to phone a service provider. I'd been dreading it and putting it off. But he – his name was Joselito – answered the phone quickly. His English, or mine, was heavily accented. As I explained my problem, I could hear his children screaming in the background. Our call dropped out. I was frustrated at having to start again with a different operator, but I got an immediate callback. It was Joselito! Then he fixed my problem, all while his kids were still making a racket. I tried to imagine where he lived, how old his kids were, what his home workspace looked like. At the end, he asked if I would complete an online survey. 'Are you kidding?' I said. 'I want to get you a promotion.' He paused. 'Just the survey is fine.' The Lickert scale wasn't enough, but the survey left me room to write a short love letter. It probably meant nothing and only got read by an AI, and all I was doing was writing a message in a bottle. But customer relations are so rarely like that, it's worth making a record of them when they are.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Rude customers? Retail review gives us one star, at best
The SDA (Shoppies') Union surveyed 4600 Australian workers in 2023 and found that 76 per cent received regular verbal abuse from customers and one in eight had suffered physical violence. These figures had doubled in two years. The Australian Retail Association found that more than 92 per cent of staff experienced verbal or physical assaults at work. One in 10 of their customer-facing faces had been spat on. Women are most often the targets. In 2024, ANROWS (Australia's National Research Organisation for Women), in its 'Just Another Day in Retail' report, found that 38 per cent of sexual harassment in shops is from customers (the rest is from co-workers). As the Herald's investigation into the Merivale hospitality empire this week shows, the idea that 'the customer is always right' can take a dark turn in certain industries. Rudeness from customers, which used to risk nothing more than being 'fired' by the retailer, has been unlawful in NSW for exactly two years. Since the Minns government's Crimes Legislation Amendment was enacted in mid-2023, 136 individuals have been charged, 64 convicted and 25 jailed for aggression against retail staff. The world – by which I mean not Washington, Gaza or Ukraine but your neighbourhood mall – is demonstrably on a more aggressive trajectory. The big and small pictures seem related. Feeling impotent about climate change or the Middle East, you shout at the poor person in the call centre (who is probably living in a country prone to climate-related unrest and geopolitical violence). Where is it headed? I'm not sure if the old-fashioned lessons of civil society work. I was brought up under middle-class Protestant rules: if a hot temper is your daily nemesis, first you exercise self-discipline and fume silently. Need to escalate? Swear under your breath. Still doesn't work? Take it out on (1) inanimate objects, (2) yourself, or (3) some vigorous activity like sport or gardening. What you absolutely mustn't do is boil over at a complete stranger or a service worker, because their opinion of you matters more than anyone else's. Loading This social order is, from the evidence, a thing of the past. I don't think nostalgia is the answer. My friend J says we ought to blame the warning signs themselves. J, a customer who remains right after all these years, thinks the zero-tolerance signs just lower expectations about customer service. 'They're saying, 'We know we're going to be incompetent, so please go easy on us.'' According to J, the 'team' should be focusing on lifting its game, not on reporting you for showing your frustration. There's probably a grain of truth in this, but shoving the blame back across the table only works in general if you have the world's strongest military behind you, and even then it only works for a day or two. If the other is seen simply as the opposite party in a deal, then you're always going to lose. Both of you. What zero-tolerance signs, Lickert scales and most of tech-mediated transactions seem to miss is that the other side of your activity shares 99.9 per cent of their DNA with you. When going into that shop is, for many, the only face-to-face human contact they have all day, when work and trade and even leisure have dehumanised them into economic units, they just forget that the person on the other side of the counter is a person. Many of us are prone to that amnesia, and realise we're getting worse. But sometimes you get a wake-up call – from a human, not a talking clock. The other night I had to phone a service provider. I'd been dreading it and putting it off. But he – his name was Joselito – answered the phone quickly. His English, or mine, was heavily accented. As I explained my problem, I could hear his children screaming in the background. Our call dropped out. I was frustrated at having to start again with a different operator, but I got an immediate callback. It was Joselito! Then he fixed my problem, all while his kids were still making a racket. I tried to imagine where he lived, how old his kids were, what his home workspace looked like. At the end, he asked if I would complete an online survey. 'Are you kidding?' I said. 'I want to get you a promotion.' He paused. 'Just the survey is fine.' The Lickert scale wasn't enough, but the survey left me room to write a short love letter. It probably meant nothing and only got read by an AI, and all I was doing was writing a message in a bottle. But customer relations are so rarely like that, it's worth making a record of them when they are.
