Charming two-bedroom apartment on the English Riviera sells for 73,000 times its guide price
The two-bedroom apartment in Paignton, Devon - aptly named Sea Breeze - was listed for just £1 when it went up for auction in July.
The run-down apartment, only a minute from the town's famous seafront, attracted a lot of attention with the initial price less than the cost of an ice cream cone.
The lot attracted ninety bids from 15 separate bidders over the two days it was up for auction at South Wales based Paul Fosh Auctions.
The 'fixer-upper', in need of significant work, eventually sold for £73,000 after the intense bidding war.
Sea Breeze looks like a building site on the inside and is unfurnished as it has recently been refurbished and is in the final stages of second fix.
It could be transformed into a dream home by the beach if the new owner is able to complete the finishing touches.
Sean Roper of Paul Fosh Auctions said that once the apartment has been fully refurbished, it could fetch up to £35,000 a year in rent.
The run-down apartment, only a minute from the town's famous seafront, attracted a lot of attention with the initial price less than the cost of an ice cream cone
Mr Roper said: 'The property has been recently refurbished and is at final stages of second fix.
'The kitchen is already supplied and in the property.
'It requires skimming and painting before being ready to enjoy or let out or sell on the open market.
'This a great opportunity for an investor which won't break the bank in terms of expenditure to complete the refurbishment of the apartment.'
'As serviced accommodation or as a holiday let, a well-furnished to a high standard apartment the Paignton property could well generate a rent of around £35,000 per annum on a short stay basis.
'If a long term let is considered with the property refurbished to a similar high standard it is going to command a monthly rental in the region of £900- £1,000 p.m.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Watchdog names the best and worst UK broadband and phone network providers
Ofcom 's latest report on customer complaints for January to March reveals TalkTalk as the leading source of grievances for broadband and landline services. O2, Three, and iD Mobile were identified as the most complained-about mobile providers, while Virgin Media received the highest number of complaints for pay-TV. Conversely, Plusnet generated the fewest complaints among broadband providers, and EE, Sky Mobile, Tesco Mobile, and Vodafone were the least problematic mobile networks. The regulator publishes these quarterly figures to provide transparency on consumer experiences, assist customers in choosing providers, and encourage service improvements. While overall complaint numbers have stabilised, Ofcom urges providers to enhance customer service, with TalkTalk and Virgin Media O2 acknowledging the need for further improvements.
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Bitcoin: James Howells gives up on retrieving hard drive from Newport landfill site
It has lasted 12 years, involving a High Court and Court of Appeal hearing, and a very public row between a computer engineer and a council - but could the Newport tip Bitcoin saga finally be coming to an end? James Howells, from Newport, who claimed his ex-girlfriend mistakenly threw away a hard drive containing 8,000 bitcoins in 2013, has given up on retrieving the wallet, worth £620m, but has been hit with a £117,000 legal bill from his fight. Instead of buying the site to retrieve it, he has now launched his own cryptocurrency - Ceiniog Coin - to try and regain some of his this year, Newport council said it plans to close the site in the 2025-26 financial year, prompting Mr Howells to offer to buy it to retrieve the wallet. But the authority said he owes them just under £117,000 after his attempts to buy the landfill went to court. "We will not be spending any more of our officers' time on this issue until that payment is made," the council told BBC News. It was a move Mr Howells described as "financial coercion", to which the council refused to respond. Mr Howells has spent significant time and energy trying to access the site and recover the cryptocurrency, once describing it as his "9 to 5". But in January, Newport council asked a High Court judge to strike out Mr Howells' legal action to access the landfill or get £495m in Keyser KC said there were no "reasonable grounds" for bringing the claim and "no realistic prospect" of succeeding at a full led Mr Howells to represent himself at the Court of Appeal in London, using artificial intelligence to support his case, but this was rejected. Earlier this year, the council announced that the landfill site is set to close, after which Mr Howells said he intended to buy it."In July, I made a multi-million pound offer to Newport City Council. I followed up with the council's legal team and the leader of the council," Mr Howells said. He said he did not receive a reply or an acknowledgement from the council regarding his offer. A spokesperson for the council said that Mr Howells "currently owes the council just short of £117,000 in legal costs, costs which we occurred defending his claim for £500m submitted last year". It added that the council has a duty to the taxpayer to recover this money and to ensure that council resources are "used efficiently, and that officers time is not taken up unnecessarily"."As such, the council has responded to Mr Howells' correspondence, reiterating that he is required to pay us these costs, and that we will not be spending any more of our officers' time on this issue until that payment is made," it added. The council said it had not received any payment from Mr Howells and would not be commenting further. Responding to the council's comments, Mr Howells said it was "effectively holding the landfill sale process in an attempt to force a payment", something he described as "financial coercion"."If they don't wish to sell the site, they should say so clearly. But this tactic of using unrelated debts to shut down a lawful offer - one that's in the public interest - raises serious questions, not just legally but morally," he to BBC News on Thursday, he said he remained "open to a proper discussion" with council leaders until 17:00 BST on Friday, "after which I no longer care what they do, and will move forward with a tokenisation proposal regardless". The council said it would not be commenting further. What is Bitcoin? Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency, a virtual or digital currency that has no physical can be split into smaller units, with a satoshi being the smallest monetary are named after bitcoin's inventor Satoshi Nakamoto - believed to be a pseudonym – who wrote a key document about the currency in investing in the product around this time, like Mr Howells, were part of a "very small" crypto community known as Cypherpunks, said Billy Bambrough, author of the CryptoCodex was not the first cryptocurrency to be invented, but it did gain considerable attention with early adherents being "very quickly enamoured with it", Mr Bambrough began to rise in about 2016 and 2017, and again in 2020 during the Covid pandemic when "stock markets, cryptocurrencies and meme coins went up hugely". But Mr Howells is not giving up on utilising on his Bitcoin fortune. He now intends to "tokenise" the full value of the wallet assets into a new Bitcoin-based smart token called Ceiniog Coin (INI), which he intends to launch later this year. Mr Howells will use his Bitcoin wallet value as a "store-of-value or 'vault'" providing backing for the new token. Josh Riddict, a cryptocurrency expert, said there are many coins in crypto ecosystems that have "value derived from some kind of asset backing or vault". "Since James' wallet is publicly known and the blockchain is there for all to see, its easy evidence that these 8,000 coins do indeed exist. The need to readily access them to 'prove' their existence simply isn't required."Ultimately the market will decide how valuable they deem this new coin offering to be," he added.
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on gambling: a public reckoning with the dark side of this highly profitable industry is overdue
No one should be surprised that the highly profitable UK gambling industry is intensifying its lobbying efforts, with a view to avoiding both higher taxation and stricter regulation of its activities, including advertising. Establishing a presence, and a voice, in parliament is what the leaders of growing business sectors do, and have done at least since the 18th century, when the brewing interest began to shift from a loose grouping of MPs with family links to breweries, into a national campaign. In the five years since Michael Dugher, a former Labour MP and shadow culture secretary, became chief executive of the Betting and Gaming Council, the £11.5bn-a-year industry has seen off a Tory white paper that threatened to curb its advertising, and resisted pressure for the higher taxation that many expected last year. Now, with Rachel Reeves reviewing gambling taxes in advance of the autumn budget, and amid growing calls for ministers to be more active in addressing gambling harms, including addiction, the organisation and its supporters are making fresh efforts to influence MPs in their favour. This week, Gordon Brown threw his weight behind demands for higher taxes to be levied on an 'undertaxed' sector, and for the money to be used to meet the roughly £3bn cost of ditching rules that restrict some benefits to a family's first two children. This is the case also made by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) thinktank, and both it and the former prime minister are right to stress the urgency of child poverty-reducing measures. The linkage between highly profitable gambling businesses, some of which are based offshore, and grim levels of deprivation, is powerful in part because high street gambling premises, including adult gaming centres packed with slot machines, are concentrated in poor areas. But calls for change are not confined to the political left. The cross-party, pro-market Social Market Foundation also thinks the industry should make a bigger contribution. Like the IPPR, it pinpoints the remote gaming duty levied on online casinos, with an identical recommendation that this should jump from 21% to 50%. Currently, this tax accounts for £1.2bn of the £3.6bn in gambling duties overall (including the national lottery), and the thinktanks are right that targeting this form of gambling would be far more beneficial than the harmonisation of rates that has also been discussed. Just as alcohol, spirits and beer are taxed differently, sports betting and gambling should continue to be recognised as distinct activities. Simplifying the tax system, which is a motive for harmonisation, cannot be regarded as the most important thing, when gambling affects so many lives in troubling ways. Taxes aside, the campaign being led by Labour's Andy Burnham in Manchester, and Dawn Butler in London, for councils to have more say over the opening of new gambling premises, is overdue but no less welcome for that. Ministers should change the law so that local politicians have more power over planning in this highly sensitive area. Used as they are to betting shops on high streets, and football shirts emblazoned with gambling sponsors' logos, many voters are probably unaware that regulation in the UK is strikingly lax, compared with other countries. That is all the more reason for politicians to turn down lobbyists' invitations, and focus instead on the need for a public reckoning with this highly profitable industry's harms.
