
Supreme Court seeks issues for consideration in review of 2022 PMLA ruling, final hearing on August 6-7
The Supreme Court on Wednesday (May 7, 2025) gave petitioners seeking a review of a nearly three-year-old top court judgment, which confirmed amendments to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 (PMLA) giving extensive powers of arrest, summon and raid to the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), liberty to propose issues in consultation with the Centre's top law officers, who raised objections.
Also read: Supreme Court reconstitutes three-judge Bench to hear on ED's powers
Appearing before a three-judge Bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre, said the review must be limited to only two aspects of the July 27, 2022, judgment.
Mr. Mehta said the Supreme Court itself had, while issuing formal notice to the Centre on August 25, 2022, in the review, restricted the ambit of the review to the dual aspects of depriving accused a copy of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) and transferral of the burden of proof of innocence onto shoulders of the accused instead of the prosecution. He said the Justice Kant Bench should limit the review to only these two issues. The Centre had also filed an affidavit the very next day confirming this arrangement. The petitioners had not objected to the affidavit.
However, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, for the petitioners including Karti Chidambaram, informed the Bench that a coordinate Bench of the court headed by Justice AS Oka has, in the meanwhile, pronounced a judgment that ECIR copies must be shared with the accused.
Also read: SC ruling paves way for ED to attach assets, conduct raids prior to predicate offence: Ex ED chief
The July 2022 verdict giving the ED unbridled powers under the PMLA had been delivered by a three-judge Bench headed by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar (now retired).
Mr. Sibal said the review, in the light of Justice Oka's conflicting judgment must go to a Constitution Bench for an authoritative pronouncement.
Justice Kant remarked that Mr. Sibal's submissions suggested a complete recall of the 2022 judgment. The Bench asked him to instead to broadly suggest issues in consultation with Mr. Mehta and Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju and place it before the court first for its consideration.
The court fixed the case for firming up the issues on July 16 at 2 p.m. It then scheduled the case for final hearing of arguments on August 6, and if necessary, on August 7.
The review petitioners have alleged that the top court's 2022 judgment deprived an accused person basic rights, which include even a copy of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR). The core amendments to which the judgment gave its stamp of approval had virtually transferred the burden of proof of innocence onto the shoulders of the accused instead of the prosecution.
The 545-page judgment, authored by Justice (now retired) A.M. Khanwilkar, had upheld the PMLA's controversial 'twin conditions' for bail.
These conditions provided that a PMLA-designated trial court was required to give bail only if the accused could prove his innocence against money laundering charges. On the slim chance the accused did get bail, he had to establish that he was 'not likely to commit any offence while on bail'.
For an undertrial, who is under incarceration and with whom the ED has not shared the Enforcement Case Information Report, to prove that he is not guilty, to say the least, may prove to be a herculean if not an impossible task, the review petitions had argued.
The 2022 verdict was based on an elaborate challenge raised against the amendments introduced to the 2002 Act by way of a Finance Act in 2019.
Over 240 petitions were filed against the amendments which the challengers claimed to violate personal liberty, procedures of law and the constitutional mandate. The petitioners had claimed that the 'process itself was the punishment' under the PMLA.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
OBC quota deadlock dominates politics in West Bengal; new list an appeasement move, says BJP
The deadlock over the Other Backward Classes (OBC) reservation continues to dominate politics in West Bengal with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leadership accusing the State government of 'appeasement politics' on Wednesday, a day after Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said that'backwardness'wasthe only benchmark to decide OBC categories. Addressing the State Assembly while tabling the annual report of the West Bengal Commission for Backward Classes for the financial year 2024-25,the Chief Minister had said on Tuesday that a commission set up by the government is holding a survey on 50 new subsections for inclusion in the category. The Calcutta High Court in May 2024 had struck down the OBC reservation awarded to 77 categories, highlighting a complete lack of legislative policy within the 2012 scheme to classify any group as OBC. The matter is pending before the Supreme Court. On March 19, 2025, the State government told the Supreme Court that it would complete the fresh OBC survey within three months. Since the fresh list of OBC reservation is not available, the admission to colleges in the State has not started almost a month after results of Higher Secondary Examinations have been declared. The State government on Tuesday also tabled in the Assembly an interim report on the new OBC list for reservations. 'One-sided benefits' Reacting to the developments, Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari took to social media and said, 'If this reservation list is not prepared with the intention of providing 'one-sided benefits' exclusively to Muslims, by deliberately depriving Hindus and other communities, then the sun rises in the west.' Meanwhile, State Education Minister Bratya Basu has assured that there will be no disruption in the academic calender due to the OBC reservation list.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Quota sub-categorisation ensures marginalised get their share: CJI B R Gavai
NEW DELHI: Nearly a year after penning the seven-judge Supreme Court bench's majority view favouring sub-categorisation of Scheduled Caste quota, India's second Dalit CJI B R Gavai has said the ruling ensured that the most backward among Dalits got a fair share in public employment and admissions to govt educational institutions. Speaking at the Oxford Union on 'From Representation to Realisation: Embodying the Constitution's Promise' on Tuesday night, CJI Gavai stepped into the rare zone of a judge explaining his judgment in public. The seven-judge bench judgment, authored by Justice Gavai, had on Aug 1 last year permitted states to sub-categorise castes within SC communities based on socio-economic backwardness and the degree of under-representation in govt jobs to ensure that the larger pie of 15% quota went to the most backward. The court had asked govts to devise suitable criteria to bar the 'creamy layer' among the SCs from availing reservation. The logic behind the court's suggestion for keeping out the 'creamy layer' was that the children of civil servants and others from among the SCs, who had moved up on the socio-economic ladder and received good education, were not deserving of quotas. In his speech, CJI Gavai said the apex court's decision to uphold the principle of sub-classification within quotas for SCs "was not to question the relevance or success of reservations, but to ensure that the most marginalised within marginalised groups receive their fair share". He said many decades ago, millions of citizens of India were called untouchables, but the country had marched ahead and "here we are today, where a person belonging to those very (untouchable) people is speaking openly, as the holder of the highest office in the judiciary of the country". "This is what the Constitution of India did. It told the people of India that they belong, that they can speak for themselves, and that they have an equal place in every sphere of society and power," he said, adding that it was possible because the prime architect of the Constitution, Dr B R Ambedkar, made inclusivity and equality the bedrock of constitutional values and guarantees.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
5,500 Annapurna Bhawans to have fair price shops, common service centres
Lucknow: Around 5,500 upcoming 'Annapurna Bhawans' will be a blend of fair price shops and common service centres (CSC) provisioning essential govt and non-govt services to citizens in rural and urban centres of Uttar Pradesh. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The key feature will be the hallmark of these centres which would be constructed across all districts – the state govt plans to set up at least 75 Annapurna Bhawans in each district. The development comes a week after the cabinet gave its nod to step up the construction of Annapurna Bhawan by utilizing funds and sources other than Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MNREGS). These centres may now be set up using MP/MLA Local Area Development Fund, tourism development fund, Bundelkhand Vikas Nidhi or any other govt-approved scheme. The feature comes as an add-on after the successful implementation of PM Gareeb Kalyan Anna Yojana, Centre's flagship scheme that was put in place at the peak of coronavirus pandemic. The state govt has already set up around 3,500 Annapurna Bhawans. "Another 2,000 are in the pipeline," food and civil supplies minister Satish Sharma told TOI. Currently, there are around 80,000 fair price shops in the state. Sharma said that selected shops would be shifted to Annapurna Bhawan free of cost. "The objective of the scheme is to improve the accessibility of fair price shops and ensure their transparent operation," he said. In a communique to all divisional commissioners, principal secretary, food and civil supplies, Ranveer Prasad said that each Annapurna Bhawan would be constructed over an area of around 484 sq feet. The shop will comprise two sections – one for the fair price shop, the other for CSC. These centres will also have a 96 sq ft verandah, which would serve as a waiting area. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now These centres may also be constructed in clusters in the urban areas after due approval from the district magistrates. The district administration will choose the working agency – gram panchayat in rural and development authority in urban areas.