No printers and desktop PCs, Starbucks Korea tells customers
Starbucks's announcement comes as the growing trend of those studying and working at cafes - cagongjok - becomes a subject of intense debate in Korean society.
Since the pandemic, as the trend towards working from home escalates, many have started using the term cagonjok in not-so-friendly terms, showing irritation at those who use the seats for hours after only buying one drink.Some users in Korea on social media have said cagonjok are also freeloading electricity."If you can't afford an office space and Starbucks is silly enough to let you run your office there for the price of their less-than-mediocre sugary caffeine beverage, go for it," said one user on Reddit.
'Bad manners'
Koreans on social media have been reacting to the announcement from Starbucks."Good job," said one Korean user on social media. "Now that Starbucks has started, other cafes should follow suit".Another said that people working from cafes made him stop going to Starbucks, and that the announcement is a "measure against those who've crossed the line with their bad manners"."It feels like there are way too many people without common sense these days," the user wrote.
A spokesperson for Starbucks said: "Starbucks Korea has updated its policy so all customers can have a pleasant and accessible store experience. "While laptops and smaller personal devices are welcome, customers are asked to refrain from bringing desktop computers, printers, or other bulky items that may limit seating and impact the shared space".
"Starbucks remains committed to being a welcoming third place for coffee and connection, and where community thrives in every cup, every conversation, and every visit", Starbucks concluded, though its mild-mannered response hides the derision many feel for those seen to be hogging seats at cafes.
Starbucks's in South Korea move echoes sentiment in cafes across the world, including in England where some coffee shops have introduced policies aimed at stopping remote workers from "hogging" tables and limiting turnover.
Additional reporting by Hosu Lee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 minutes ago
- Reuters
China's fight against price wars is an uphill battle
HONG KONG, August 13 (Reuters) - Overcapacity has made its way into China's domestic market, with price wars leading to collapsing profitability and accelerating deflation. The government has responded by launching a so-called 'anti-involution' program to combat deflationary price wars. It's had some early wins, but this could be a lengthy battle. The Chinese internet slang for 'involution' originally referred to competitive pressures faced by young Chinese in education and the workplace. Since early 2024, however, the word has come to describe supposedly excessive, unsustainable competition among Chinese firms, where more resources are being invested without increasing higher returns. The Chinese government began to highlight the economic dangers of involution as early as June 2024, opens new tab in the face of declining corporate margins and profitability across diverse sectors such as electric vehicles, solar panels, lithium batteries, steel, cement and food delivery. Critiques of "excessive" competition grew much louder in the first half of 2025 as several price wars escalated. In particular, EV leader BYD( opens new tab started sharply cutting prices, and food delivery giant Meituan ( opens new tab and new ecommerce platform opens new tab began offering discounts and subsidies. Increased competition in China also appears to be amplifying deflationary pressures. While China's Producer Price Index (PPI) has been in negative territory for much of the last three years, hopes of escaping this morass were ignited in mid-2024 as domestic demand appeared to be recovering. However, that optimism was doused this year as price wars intensified, with PPI falling by 3.6% year-on-year in the most recent report. China's government, recognising that industrial overcapacity is a potential danger to the domestic economy, launched a multi-pronged anti-involution campaign in July. The program seeks to channel investment funds to advanced manufacturing, control production in highly competitive industries like steel, oversee pricing and subsidies in EVs and food delivery, and continue phasing out obsolete industrial capacity. It's early days, but some nascent impacts are visible. Carmakers' average price discount declined in July, and Meituan, and Alibaba ( opens new tab recently agreed to end aggressive discounting in food delivery and promote "fair competition". Industry consolidation has accelerated as well. Polysilicon manufacturers are discussing the creation of a $7 billion fund to acquire and shut down almost one-third of their production capacity and restructure part of the loss-making sector. Additionally, the country's largest coal miner, China Shenhua Energy ( opens new tab , stated its intention to acquire various assets from the subsidiaries of its controlling shareholder to improve operational efficiency. China's anti-involution program faces myriad hurdles, however. For one, most of the targets of the anti-involution program are in the private sector, which means they will be making voluntary pledges to maintain pricing discipline and thus could revert to aggressive tactics in the face of market pressure. Importantly, Beijing's previous supply-side structural reforms from 2015-17 reduced excess capacity among state-owned firms, over which Beijing, by definition, had much more control. Moreover, many of China's local governments are highly indebted and may prioritise short-term revenue generation over long-term reform, potentially offering subsidies to firms to attract investment even in industries targeted by the anti-involution campaign. Innovation in emerging technologies could also be a casualty if deterring overlapping investments hinders experimentation with different approaches. And tighter oversight on pricing and capacity could dampen private capital's investment enthusiasm overall. Finally, one of the biggest risks to the implementation of the program is the possibility of job losses as industries consolidate and become more inefficient. While China's youth unemployment rate has declined recently, it remains high and could increase over the next few months as over 12 million new university graduates join the workforce. And the private sector – the target of the anti-involution program – generates the vast majority of China's incremental employment. China's anti-involution efforts have had some success, but this will likely not be a short fight. First, to truly absorb excess capacity in various industries, Beijing will almost certainly have to stimulate domestic consumption more aggressively than it has in the past. Sentiment among Chinese consumers remains quite low, implying that the monetary and fiscal stimuli undertaken by China's government over the past year have had only a limited impact. The government could also consider more innovative, hitherto untested policies. For example, it could mandate superior product quality to weed out players who compete purely on cost to encourage industry consolidation. However, defining 'low quality' and enforcing standards would be challenging, and this strategy may be less effective in services industries. Another way to reduce the incentives for extreme competition would be encouraging collaboration between firms through technology sharing and mutual equity holdings. And the increased availability of patient long-term capital could obviate the need for companies to ramp up production and revenues rapidly. The anti-involution program marks a new phase of China's pursuit of high-quality development. Enforcing pricing discipline and market stability in furiously competitive industries will be no easy task. That means an updated playbook may be needed. (The views expressed here are those of Manishi Raychaudhuri, the founder and CEO of Emmer Capital Partners Ltd, and the former Head of Asia-Pacific Equity Research at BNP Paribas Securities). Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI,, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
Australia's Treasury Wine Estates posts more than 15% rise in annual profit
Aug 13 (Reuters) - Australia's Treasury Wine Estates ( opens new tab reported a 15.5% rise in annual underlying profit on Wednesday, reflecting strong performance in its luxury portfolio, particularly Penfolds. The country's biggest wine producer posted underlying net profit after tax of A$470.6 million ($307.21 million) for the year ended June 30, which was higher than the A$407.5 million a year ago but missed Visible Alpha's estimate of A$472.1 million. The results underscore the growth in Treasury Wine's luxury wine portfolio, which now generates around 55% of revenues, as well as the successful re-establishment of Penfolds and other products in China after Beijing lifted punitive tariffs. The winemaker's annual sales revenue climbed more than 7% to A$2.94 billion. It announced a final dividend of 20 Australian cents per share, higher than 19 Australian cents apiece declared last year. Treasury Wine also announced a buyback of up to A$200 million, which is to be completed progressively through fiscal 2026. ($1 = 1.5319 Australian dollars)
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
FTA: UK firms chase $38bn India contracts but challenges loom
A standout feature of the India-UK free trade agreement signed last month was the Narendra Modi government's decision to open India's vast government procurement market to UK suppliers. This typically includes a range of things the government buys - from goods and services to contracts for public works such as roads. Some 40,000 high-value tenders worth £38bn from federal ministries will now be open to bidding for UK businesses in strategic sectors like transport, green energy and infrastructure - areas which have thus far been heavily protected from foreign access is unprecedented, trade experts is "far greater" than what India had offered in its earlier agreement with the United Arab Emirates and "sets a new benchmark", Ajay Srivastava of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), a Delhi-based think-tank, told the the agreement, UK firms bidding for Indian government contracts in specified areas will be treated almost on par with Indian suppliers and also have real-time access to information on forthcoming public tenders and procurement goods from the UK made with just 20% domestic input can now be supplied to the Indian government, allowing UK companies the flexibility to source up to 80% of the parts or raw material from other countries and still qualify for procurement preference in minimum contract value at which these firms can bid for government projects has also been sharply reduced as a result of which "UK companies can now bid on a wide range of lower-value projects - such as rural roads, solar equipment for schools, or IT systems for government offices - that were previously out of reach", said Mr Srivastava. But for British companies, realising this opportunity on the ground will be easier said than done, several experts told the UK suppliers are eligible to participate as Class-II local suppliers, Indian companies will continue to get preferential treatment as Class-I suppliers, says Dr Arpita Mukherjee, a trade expert with the Indian Council for Research on International Economic pricing plays a key role in winning contracts, and "UK companies tend to have higher prices" compared with Indian companies, which will be a major challenge for them, she adds.A more significant deterrent will be delayed payments and difficult contract enforcement, which are "major legacy issues when it comes to public procurement in India", says Srijan Shukla of the Observer Research Foundation says a study on procurement by India's central public sector enterprises from 2017 to 2020 found that pending payments to suppliers were often more than the total average procurement in a year."This will impact UK players trying to enter India's public procurement markets, especially when it comes to public contracts that have long-time horizons and are subject to regulatory and political uncertainties," Mr Shukla told the dues have been a major irritant for India's small businesses too, leading to short-term liquidity issues that often "force them out of these procurement markets and reallocate that business to the big players", according to Mr of this is reflected in India's poor ranking - 163 out of 190 - on contract enforcement in the World Bank's Doing Business report, the latest round of which was in things have improved since these rankings were published - with one-stop-shop portals like Government e-Marketplace, the Central Public Procurement Portal or the recently launched online dispute resolution portal bringing more transparency to the public tendering process - payment discipline by government entities continues to remain a challenge, says Mr to Ms Mukherjee, the India-UK trade agreement emphasises transparency in procurement but omits issues like pending dues, contract enforcement and adds the deal excludes the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement's dispute settlement provisions for four years after the CETA takes effect - these provisions usually define how disputes are resolved."Doing business in India is an acquired skill. Over time, companies from the UK will have to learn the way to work around complexities regarding the art of winning public tenders and navigating though complex regulations," Mr Shukla says. Despite the niggling issues, allowing foreign players entry into India's government procurement market marks a far-reaching policy shows the Indian government's intentions to open up a space that has long been reserved for local small and medium enterprises, and could be reflective of the concessions Delhi is willing to give foreign players in future trade agreements like the one being negotiated with the US, according to is late to including deep government procurement clauses in trade deals, making its current efforts a catch-up game, says Mr is also a sign, he says, of the Indian government's "confidence that its own firms can compete with global firms both externally and at home". The hope is that more foreign players will force more accountability from the Indian government and "help standardise" its tendering and public procurement process - marked by payment delays and poor contract enforcement - to global standards. Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook.
