Deutsche Bank's Fund Arm Cuts Limits on Defense Assets
(Bloomberg) -- Deutsche Bank AG's investment unit is removing restrictions that had prevented a number of its funds from holding defense assets, according to its chief executive officer.
The move, made possible by a recent adjustment in Germany's investment guidelines, has the potential to free up 'hundreds of billions' of euros across the country's asset management industry for defense allocations, DWS Group CEO Stefan Hoops said in an interview on Wednesday.
It's part of a wider reset across Europe's investment industry, as fund managers from Scandinavia to France look for ways to support an industry whose geopolitical significance has soared in the face of war and souring ties with the US. The pivot has also helped boost investment returns, with defense assets such as Germany's Rheinmetall AG having more than doubled in value this year alone.
Industry rules for funds marketing themselves as ESG (environmental, social and governance) used to largely exclude arms manufacturers, but 'that has now changed,' Hoops said. That's also due to the defense sector's financial performance, he said.
Several industry standard setters for the German asset management industry late last year agreed to change a rule known as ESG Target Market Concept, DWS said in a separate statement to Bloomberg News on Wednesday. Developed in 2021, 'when there were no standards for sustainable products in the EU,' the rule excluded many defense investment from ESG funds.
The decision to change the guidelines applies across Germany, enabling the country's asset managers to open ESG funds to defense investments.
DWS is now in the process of adjusting the documentation of funds applying its DWS Basic Exclusions filter, according to the statement. The change, which will go into effect by May 21, will scrap a threshold that had prevented funds from holding companies that got more than 10% of their revenue from defense activities. It will also free funds to add shares of companies linked to nuclear weapons, DWS said.
The adjustments mean that 34 members of the MSCI World Index — accounting for 2.26% of its weight — will be added to the universe of investable firms for DWS funds previously subject to defense restrictions, according to the statement. The asset manager's Controversial Weapons policy, which excludes cluster munition and other arms, continues to apply, it said.
'The Target Market Concept has to change for the industry, then the prospectuses have to change, and then we can make the changes,' Hoops said in the interview, explaining how the changes take effect.
DWS isn't planning to put all the money that's unlocked by these adjustments into defense, Hoops said. 'But if the question is, what quantum of funds can then all of the sudden start investing, those are hundreds of billions of notional that can then start investing in defense.'
'There will definitely be a catch-up,' Hoops said. 'There's no question about that.'
(Corrects preposition in seventh paragraph to 'by' from 'on'.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
First Published: 24 Apr 2025, 01:19 PM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
Vijay Kedia portfolio stock Sudarshan Chemicals jumps 11% to hit record high; up 66% from 52-week low
Shares of Sudarshan Chemical Industries surged nearly 11 percent on June 9 to hit a fresh 52-week high of ₹ 1,298 amid robust trading volumes. The sharp rally came despite a recent delay in the company's audited financial results, highlighting strong investor confidence, partly driven by the stock's connection to ace investor Vijay Kedia. Sudarshan Chemicals has seen a remarkable uptrend in recent months. From its 52-week low of ₹ 779.95 touched in June 2024, the stock has now gained over 66 percent. In just the first week of June 2025 alone, it has advanced 9.4 percent, continuing a four-month winning streak. In May, the stock had jumped more than 15 percent, following gains of 3.5 percent in April and 14.5 percent in March. Prior to this rally, it had witnessed a brief correction, falling 13.4 percent in February and 12.6 percent in January. Over the past year, the chemical stock has delivered a return of 48 percent, far outperforming broader market indices. As per the March 2025 quarter shareholding data, Vijay Kedia held a 1.27 percent stake in Sudarshan Chemical Industries. Though slightly down from 1.44 percent in the December 2024 quarter, his continued presence in the stock reinforces investor confidence. Kedia, known for his high-conviction bets in small and midcap companies, has been associated with Sudarshan Chemicals for several quarters. Late last month, Sudarshan Chemicals announced a delay in submitting its audited financial results for FY25. The delay is linked to the complexities following its acquisition of the global pigment business of Germany's Heubach Group. The deal, finalized in March 2025, added around 60 subsidiaries and 17 manufacturing sites to Sudarshan's global footprint. According to the company, several factors contributed to the delay. Firstly, some German entities involved in the deal were under insolvency proceedings, which made it difficult to obtain financial and regulatory records on time. Secondly, the post-acquisition integration process was extensive, involving aligning financial systems, accounting standards, and audit processes across multiple geographies. Lastly, the business combination accounting itself proved complex, as the acquisition included both asset and share purchases across multiple legal structures. Sudarshan Chemicals has formally requested an extension from stock exchanges to submit its results, which are now expected after completion of these consolidation activities. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Auto companies 'in full panic' over rare-earths bottleneck
Frank Eckard, CEO of a German magnet maker, has been fielding a flood of calls in recent weeks. Exasperated automakers and parts suppliers have been desperate to find alternative sources of magnets, which are in short supply due to Chinese export curbs. Some told Eckard their factories could be idled by mid-July without backup magnet supplies. "The whole car industry is in full panic," said Eckard, CEO of Magnosphere, based in Troisdorf, Germany. "They are willing to pay any price." Car executives have once again been driven into their war rooms, concerned that China's tight export controls on rare-earth magnets - crucially needed to make cars - could cripple production. U.S. President Donald Trump said Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to let rare earths minerals and magnets flow to the United States. A U.S. trade team is scheduled to meet Chinese counterparts for talks in London on Monday. The industry worries that the rare-earths situation could cascade into the third massive supply chain shock in five years. A semiconductor shortage wiped away millions of cars from automakers' production plans, from roughly 2021 to 2023. Before that, the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 shut factories for weeks. Those crises prompted the industry to fortify supply chain strategies. Executives have prioritized backup supplies for key components and reexamined the use of just-in-time inventories, which save money but can leave them without stockpiles when a crisis unfurls. Judging from Eckard's inbound calls, though, "nobody has learned from the past," he said. This time, as the rare-earths bottleneck tightens, the industry has few good options, given the extent to which China dominates the market. The fate of automakers' assembly lines has been left to a small team of Chinese bureaucrats as it reviews hundreds of applications for export permits. Several European auto-supplier plants have already shut down, with more outages coming, said the region's auto supplier association, CLEPA. "Sooner or later, this will confront everyone," said CLEPA Secretary-General Benjamin Krieger. Cars today use rare-earths-based motors in dozens of components - side mirrors, stereo speakers, oil pumps, windshield wipers, and sensors for fuel leakage and braking sensors. China controls up to 70% of global rare-earths mining, 85% of refining capacity and about 90% of rare-earths metal alloy and magnet production, consultancy AlixPartners said. The average electric vehicle uses about .5 kg (just over 1 pound) of rare earths elements, and a fossil-fuel car uses just half that, according to the International Energy Agency. China has clamped down before, including in a 2010 dispute with Japan, during which it curbed rare-earths exports. Japan had to find alternative suppliers, and by 2018, China accounted for only 58% of its rare earth imports. "China has had a rare-earth card to play whenever they wanted to," said Mark Smith, CEO of mining company NioCorp, which is developing a rare-earth project in Nebraska scheduled to start production within three years. Across the industry, automakers have been trying to wean off China for rare-earth magnets, or even develop magnets that do not need those elements. But most efforts are years away from the scale needed. "It's really about identifying ... and finding alternative solutions" outside China, Joseph Palmieri, head of supply chain management at supplier Aptiv, said at a conference in Detroit last week. Automakers including General Motors and BMW and major suppliers such as ZF and BorgWarner are working on motors with low-to-zero rare-earth content, but few have managed to scale production enough to cut costs. The EU has launched initiatives including the Critical Raw Materials Act to boost European rare-earth sources. But it has not moved fast enough, said Noah Barkin, a senior advisor at Rhodium Group, a China-focused U.S. think tank. Even players that have developed marketable products struggle to compete with Chinese producers on price. David Bender, co-head of German metal specialist Heraeus' magnet recycling business, said it is only operating at 1% capacity and will have to close next year if sales do not increase. Minneapolis-based Niron has developed rare-earth free magnets and has raised more than $250 million from investors including GM, Stellantis and auto supplier Magna. "We've seen a step change in interest from investors and customers" since China's export controls took effect, CEO Jonathan Rowntree said. It is planning a $1 billion plant scheduled to start production in 2029. England-based Warwick Acoustics has developed rare-earth-free speakers expected to appear in a luxury car later this year. CEO Mike Grant said the company has been in talks with another dozen automakers, although the speakers are not expected to be available in mainstream models for about five years. As auto companies scout longer-term solutions, they are left scrambling to avert imminent factory shutdowns. Automakers must figure out which of their suppliers - and smaller ones a few links up the supply chain - need export permits. Mercedes-Benz, for example, is talking to suppliers about building rare-earth stockpiles. Analysts said the constraints could force automakers to make cars without certain parts and park them until they become available, as GM and others did during the semiconductor crisis. Automakers' reliance on China does not end with rare earth elements. A 2024 European Commission report said China controls more than 50% of global supply of 19 key raw materials, including manganese, graphite and aluminum. Andy Leyland, co-founder of supply chain specialist SC Insights, said any of those elements could be used as leverage by China. "This just is a warning shot," he said.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Musk versus Trump: A case of mutually assured destruction
Relationship status: It's complicated. The simmering feud between US President Donald Trump and tech titan Elon Musk went public last week, sending Tesla's stock tumbling (before rebounding), calling his government contracts into question and leaving Trump possibly in a more commanding position over the world's richest man. But really, who knows what to make of this always-odd pairing between two erratic men? Late last Thursday, Musk signalled that he was open to a détente. Reports of a Friday phone call surfaced, which were dismissed by Trump. Where this goes and how it ends is anyone's guess, but what's clear is that the political friendship that saw two of the world's most powerful men attached at the hip at the beginning of Trump's presidency has now become an unstable mess. Also Read: X factor: The rise and fall of Elon Musk as a political figure This, of course, is no way to run a country. The day-long brawl starkly revealed what had always been plainly obvious: This relationship is transactional and has always smelt of corruption, with Musk's $270 million campaign contribution seeming to buy him a powerful foothold in the US government, including billions in contracts and access to data and the inner workings of federal agencies. It was only last week that Trump gifted Musk with a golden key to the White House, saying his 'service to America has been without comparison in modern history" and commemorating his final day as a special government employee. But that send-off couldn't paper over the increasing cracks in the friendship. Musk had become a political liability to Trump, even as the president became a business liability to the world's richest man. The union has cost Musk billions, damaging his brand and leading him to suggest he was done with politics. 'I think I've done enough," Musk said in a Bloomberg interview last month when asked about his political spending on Trump and the Republican cause. The billionaire, who operates the Building America's Future PAC, had vowed to spend $100 million on midterm polls, though that's now in doubt. And in ceding such power to Musk, Trump marred the first 100 days of his presidency with erratic cuts, mistakes and walk-backs that led to infighting among staff and cabinet members who couldn't control Musk. His Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was largely a failure, with costs likely outweighing savings, federal spending continuing to rise and the Trump administration now undoing some of DOGE's firings of government workers. In the days after his official tenure wrapped up, Musk then proved just how uncontrollable he was, training his fire on Trump's massive reconciliation bill, calling it an 'abomination." 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," Musk threatened on X last Tuesday. Also Read: Electric debacle: Tesla's troubles started before Musk wore the MAGA cap But the feud has the potential to be as damaging to both men as their unlikely friendship proved to be. At stake for Trump is the kind of muscle, megaphone and money that only Musk can bring, given his status among the powerful techno-right bros who fuelled Trump's campaign and the Republican party more broadly. Most of Trump's political alliances have had a sell-by date, but his relationship with Musk has been like no other. For Trump, Musk was a force multiplier, magnifying his stature and bringing other billionaires, tech bros and regular bros along with him. But in challenging Trump, and particularly by bringing up his alleged connection to the late Jeffrey Epstein [a convicted paedophile who faced charges of running a vast child sex trafficking ring], Musk tests his power over MAGA and puts himself—and his companies—at risk of cancelled contracts and potentially even federal government investigations. Trump holds tremendous power over Musk's vast wealth. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" This was scorched earth, revealing Trump's strong hand and Musk's big weakness. Also Read: Trump's presidency has only seen federal spending rise so far Ultimately, MAGA belongs to Trump. As for the massive bill, it will still likely pass in some form, though Musk has now put a spotlight on the worst parts of it—it adds $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade and is hardly MAGA. Meanwhile, some Democrats have suggested that Musk is a potential free agent and should be courted and brought into their fold. But that would be a mistake. An alliance with Musk is akin to having a tiger by its tail in a very small and crowded tent. There are no good choices and the only certainty is chaos. ©Bloomberg The author is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.
