Only Four Days Left To Cash In On Deufol's (HMSE:DE10) Dividend
Regular readers will know that we love our dividends at Simply Wall St, which is why it's exciting to see Deufol SE (HMSE:DE10) is about to trade ex-dividend in the next 4 days. The ex-dividend date is commonly two business days before the record date, which is the cut-off date for shareholders to be present on the company's books to be eligible for a dividend payment. It is important to be aware of the ex-dividend date because any trade on the stock needs to have been settled on or before the record date. Accordingly, Deufol investors that purchase the stock on or after the 27th of June will not receive the dividend, which will be paid on the 1st of July.
The company's next dividend payment will be €0.30 per share, and in the last 12 months, the company paid a total of €0.30 per share. Based on the last year's worth of payments, Deufol has a trailing yield of 5.2% on the current stock price of €5.75. If you buy this business for its dividend, you should have an idea of whether Deufol's dividend is reliable and sustainable. So we need to check whether the dividend payments are covered, and if earnings are growing.
This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality.
Dividends are typically paid out of company income, so if a company pays out more than it earned, its dividend is usually at a higher risk of being cut. Deufol paid out more than half (65%) of its earnings last year, which is a regular payout ratio for most companies. Yet cash flows are even more important than profits for assessing a dividend, so we need to see if the company generated enough cash to pay its distribution. The good news is it paid out just 24% of its free cash flow in the last year.
It's positive to see that Deufol's dividend is covered by both profits and cash flow, since this is generally a sign that the dividend is sustainable, and a lower payout ratio usually suggests a greater margin of safety before the dividend gets cut.
See our latest analysis for Deufol
Click here to see how much of its profit Deufol paid out over the last 12 months.
Businesses with strong growth prospects usually make the best dividend payers, because it's easier to grow dividends when earnings per share are improving. If business enters a downturn and the dividend is cut, the company could see its value fall precipitously. This is why it's a relief to see Deufol earnings per share are up 6.0% per annum over the last five years. Decent historical earnings per share growth suggests Deufol has been effectively growing value for shareholders. However, it's now paying out more than half its earnings as dividends. Therefore it's unlikely that the company will be able to reinvest heavily in its business, which could presage slower growth in the future.
Another key way to measure a company's dividend prospects is by measuring its historical rate of dividend growth. Deufol's dividend payments are broadly unchanged compared to where they were seven years ago.
Is Deufol worth buying for its dividend? Earnings per share growth has been modest and Deufol paid out over half of its profits and less than half of its free cash flow, although both payout ratios are within normal limits. While it does have some good things going for it, we're a bit ambivalent and it would take more to convince us of Deufol's dividend merits.
On that note, you'll want to research what risks Deufol is facing. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Deufol you should know about.
A common investing mistake is buying the first interesting stock you see. Here you can find a full list of high-yield dividend stocks.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investors in Magna International (TSE:MG) have unfortunately lost 23% over the last three years
As an investor its worth striving to ensure your overall portfolio beats the market average. But in any portfolio, there are likely to be some stocks that fall short of that benchmark. We regret to report that long term Magna International Inc. (TSE:MG) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 32% in three years, versus a market return of about 46%. With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. Magna International saw its EPS decline at a compound rate of 1.2% per year, over the last three years. This reduction in EPS is slower than the 12% annual reduction in the share price. So it's likely that the EPS decline has disappointed the market, leaving investors hesitant to buy. The less favorable sentiment is reflected in its current P/E ratio of 9.14. The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image). We know that Magna International has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? Check if analysts think Magna International will grow revenue in the future. As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for Magna International the TSR over the last 3 years was -23%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence! While the broader market gained around 22% in the last year, Magna International shareholders lost 7.2% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 0.6%, each year, over five years. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. Importantly, we haven't analysed Magna International's dividend history. This free visual report on its dividends is a must-read if you're thinking of buying. If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Canadian exchanges. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Vita Life Sciences Set for a 12.72% Revenue Growth While Tackling Operational Challenges By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$2.42 · 0.1% Overvalued Vossloh rides a €500 billion wave to boost growth and earnings in the next decade By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €78.41 · 0.1% Overvalued Intuitive Surgical Will Transform Healthcare with 12% Revenue Growth By Unike – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $325.55 · 0.6% Undervalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With 66% ownership of the shares, FS Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSBW) is heavily dominated by institutional owners
Institutions' substantial holdings in FS Bancorp implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company Insider ownership in FS Bancorp is 11% This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. To get a sense of who is truly in control of FS Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSBW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 66% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of FS Bancorp. See our latest analysis for FS Bancorp Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. We can see that FS Bancorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at FS Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in FS Bancorp. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.8% and 6.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Joseph Adams directly holds 2.0% of the total shares outstanding. We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of FS Bancorp, Inc.. Insiders have a US$32m stake in this US$290m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over FS Bancorp. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand FS Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Vita Life Sciences Set for a 12.72% Revenue Growth While Tackling Operational Challenges By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$2.42 · 0.1% Overvalued Vossloh rides a €500 billion wave to boost growth and earnings in the next decade By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €78.41 · 0.1% Overvalued Intuitive Surgical Will Transform Healthcare with 12% Revenue Growth By Unike – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $325.55 · 0.6% Undervalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Where Will Newsmax Stock Be in 3 Years?
Newsmax's stock plummeted from its post-IPO highs. Unresolved lawsuits, rising costs, and clashes over carriage fees could curb its growth. It could struggle to outperform the S&P 500 and higher-growth media stocks. 10 stocks we like better than Newsmax › Newsmax (NYSE: NMAX) executed one of a wildest IPOs of 2025. The conservative media company went public at $10 on March 31, but it closed at $83.51 on its first day and nearly tripled to a record closing price of $233 per share the next day. That rally was driven by the company's association with President Donald Trump, its limited supply (it only offered 6% of its shares in its IPO), and the same meme stock dynamics that lifted other Trump-related stocks. At its peak, Newsmax's market cap swelled to $29 billion, or 170 times the $171 million in revenue it generated in 2024. But today, Newsmax's stock trades at about $13 with a market cap of $1.7 billion, which still isn't a bargain at 10 times last year's sales. Newsmax's meme stock valuations were clearly unsustainable, and its steep losses, messy legal battles, and ongoing dilution indicated it wasn't a great long-term investment. But can it stabilize its business over the next three years? Newsmax was founded in 1998. It was originally an online and print media company before it launched its linear TV platform, Newsmax TV, for satellite and cable networks in 2014. Over the following decade, Newsmax flourished as a conservative alternative to mainstream media networks like Fox News. Its growth accelerated under the first and second Trump administrations, but it was also criticized for disseminating conspiracy theories regarding the 2020 elections, the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, and COVID-19 vaccines. Newsmax's controversial claims about the 2020 elections sparked defamation lawsuits from the voting system suppliers Smartmatic and Dominion. Newsmax agreed to pay a $40 million settlement to Smartmatic last year, but it hasn't reached a settlement with Dominion. Its payments to Smartmatic -- along with the costs of expanding its infrastructure to support its higher viewership rates up to the election -- caused its net loss to widen significantly in 2024. Newsmax's higher viewership rates boosted its advertising, cable licensing, and subscription revenues in 2024, but its higher expenses offset those gains. Metric 2022 2023 2024 Revenue $135 million $135 million $171 million Net loss ($20 million) ($42 million) ($72 million) Data source: Newsmax. Newsmax claims to reach 40 million people through its cable, satellite, and digital channels. According to Nielsen's data from April, Newsmax tied Fox News among 35 to 64-year-old viewers, while 3.7 million viewers only watched Newsmax and never watched Fox News. In the first quarter of 2025, Newsmax's revenue rose 12% year over year to $45 million as it narrowed its net loss from $51 million to $17 million. But its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) -- which excludes its easy comparisons to the Smartmatic settlement -- still dropped from $4.4 million to negative $1.2 million. Newsmax hasn't provided any guidance for the rest of the year, and Wall Street's top analysts aren't actively covering the stock or setting any longer-term growth targets yet. This makes Newsmax a tough stock to value, but its near-term catalysts and challenges are obvious. Its catalysts include its ongoing coverage of the Trump administration's latest actions, the 2026 midterm elections, and higher ad spending from conservative donors and PACs. It could also pull more viewers from Fox News, especially if Trump continues to promote Newsmax and more conservative viewers shun Fox as a "mainstream" media network. The ongoing expansion of Newsmax's digital media platform and its Newsmax+ subscription service could lock in more of its users and widen its moat against Fox and other competitors. Newsmax's biggest challenges include its legal battle with Dominion, which could result in another massive settlement, and its potential carriage disputes with pay TV providers. Newsmax was previously free-to-air, but it's now demanding carriage fees to carry its channel. DIRECTV temporarily dropped Newsmax in 2023 over those fees, and it could run into similar conflicts with Comcast, Verizon, and Charter in the future. Dilution is another major near-term problem for the stock. In a recent SEC filing, Newsmax said it would let some of its earlier investors sell up to 121 million shares on the open market -- compared to its 89.7 million outstanding shares on the market today. Lastly, there are persistent rumors that Newsmax, which is still majority-owned by its founder Christopher Ruddy, could merge with another conservative-leaning media company. Some potential candidates would be Trump Media, which owns Truth Social, or the conservative streaming media platform Rumble. From 2021 to 2024, Fox's revenue grew at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of just 3%. Assuming Newsmax grows at a faster CAGR of 5% from 2024 to 2027 -- and still trades at 7 times its trailing sales at the beginning of 2028 -- its stock price could rise 16% over the next three years. That's a decent gain, but it could still underperform other media stocks as well as the S&P 500, which has delivered an average annual return of 10% since its inception. Before you buy stock in Newsmax, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Newsmax wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Leo Sun has positions in Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool recommends Comcast and Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Where Will Newsmax Stock Be in 3 Years? was originally published by The Motley Fool
