Where Will Newsmax Stock Be in 3 Years?
Newsmax's stock plummeted from its post-IPO highs.
Unresolved lawsuits, rising costs, and clashes over carriage fees could curb its growth.
It could struggle to outperform the S&P 500 and higher-growth media stocks.
10 stocks we like better than Newsmax ›
Newsmax (NYSE: NMAX) executed one of a wildest IPOs of 2025. The conservative media company went public at $10 on March 31, but it closed at $83.51 on its first day and nearly tripled to a record closing price of $233 per share the next day. That rally was driven by the company's association with President Donald Trump, its limited supply (it only offered 6% of its shares in its IPO), and the same meme stock dynamics that lifted other Trump-related stocks.
At its peak, Newsmax's market cap swelled to $29 billion, or 170 times the $171 million in revenue it generated in 2024. But today, Newsmax's stock trades at about $13 with a market cap of $1.7 billion, which still isn't a bargain at 10 times last year's sales.
Newsmax's meme stock valuations were clearly unsustainable, and its steep losses, messy legal battles, and ongoing dilution indicated it wasn't a great long-term investment. But can it stabilize its business over the next three years?
Newsmax was founded in 1998. It was originally an online and print media company before it launched its linear TV platform, Newsmax TV, for satellite and cable networks in 2014. Over the following decade, Newsmax flourished as a conservative alternative to mainstream media networks like Fox News.
Its growth accelerated under the first and second Trump administrations, but it was also criticized for disseminating conspiracy theories regarding the 2020 elections, the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, and COVID-19 vaccines. Newsmax's controversial claims about the 2020 elections sparked defamation lawsuits from the voting system suppliers Smartmatic and Dominion. Newsmax agreed to pay a $40 million settlement to Smartmatic last year, but it hasn't reached a settlement with Dominion.
Its payments to Smartmatic -- along with the costs of expanding its infrastructure to support its higher viewership rates up to the election -- caused its net loss to widen significantly in 2024. Newsmax's higher viewership rates boosted its advertising, cable licensing, and subscription revenues in 2024, but its higher expenses offset those gains.
Metric
2022
2023
2024
Revenue
$135 million
$135 million
$171 million
Net loss
($20 million)
($42 million)
($72 million)
Data source: Newsmax.
Newsmax claims to reach 40 million people through its cable, satellite, and digital channels. According to Nielsen's data from April, Newsmax tied Fox News among 35 to 64-year-old viewers, while 3.7 million viewers only watched Newsmax and never watched Fox News.
In the first quarter of 2025, Newsmax's revenue rose 12% year over year to $45 million as it narrowed its net loss from $51 million to $17 million. But its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) -- which excludes its easy comparisons to the Smartmatic settlement -- still dropped from $4.4 million to negative $1.2 million.
Newsmax hasn't provided any guidance for the rest of the year, and Wall Street's top analysts aren't actively covering the stock or setting any longer-term growth targets yet. This makes Newsmax a tough stock to value, but its near-term catalysts and challenges are obvious. Its catalysts include its ongoing coverage of the Trump administration's latest actions, the 2026 midterm elections, and higher ad spending from conservative donors and PACs.
It could also pull more viewers from Fox News, especially if Trump continues to promote Newsmax and more conservative viewers shun Fox as a "mainstream" media network. The ongoing expansion of Newsmax's digital media platform and its Newsmax+ subscription service could lock in more of its users and widen its moat against Fox and other competitors.
Newsmax's biggest challenges include its legal battle with Dominion, which could result in another massive settlement, and its potential carriage disputes with pay TV providers. Newsmax was previously free-to-air, but it's now demanding carriage fees to carry its channel. DIRECTV temporarily dropped Newsmax in 2023 over those fees, and it could run into similar conflicts with Comcast, Verizon, and Charter in the future.
Dilution is another major near-term problem for the stock. In a recent SEC filing, Newsmax said it would let some of its earlier investors sell up to 121 million shares on the open market -- compared to its 89.7 million outstanding shares on the market today.
Lastly, there are persistent rumors that Newsmax, which is still majority-owned by its founder Christopher Ruddy, could merge with another conservative-leaning media company. Some potential candidates would be Trump Media, which owns Truth Social, or the conservative streaming media platform Rumble.
From 2021 to 2024, Fox's revenue grew at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of just 3%. Assuming Newsmax grows at a faster CAGR of 5% from 2024 to 2027 -- and still trades at 7 times its trailing sales at the beginning of 2028 -- its stock price could rise 16% over the next three years. That's a decent gain, but it could still underperform other media stocks as well as the S&P 500, which has delivered an average annual return of 10% since its inception.
Before you buy stock in Newsmax, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Newsmax wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Leo Sun has positions in Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool recommends Comcast and Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Where Will Newsmax Stock Be in 3 Years? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oklahoma City (OK) Mayor David Holt Elected New President of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, Policy Agenda Adopted for the Year Ahead, as Annual Meeting Concludes
San Diego (CA) Mayor Todd Gloria and Lincoln (NE) Mayor Leirion Gaylor Baird Elected First and Second Vice Presidents TAMPA, Fla., June 22, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Today, the U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) voted to elect a new leadership team and approved a slate of policy resolutions that will serve as the official platform of the organization and guide its advocacy agenda for the year ahead. The business meeting marked the close of USCM's 93rd Annual Meeting, which convened more than 170 mayors from across the country in Tampa, Florida. Oklahoma City (OK) Mayor David Holt was elected by his fellow mayors to serve as the next President of the U.S. Conference of Mayors. He will serve a one-year term. "There is no more important place in human existence than the city, and there is no higher office than the Mayor," said President Holt. "The Conference of Mayors sits at the epicenter of America's future. If that future is to be as bright or brighter than the past, it will be because of the work that happens right here." "This Conference is fortunate to lean on the leadership of Mayor Holt in this time of opportunity and need for America's cities," said Tom Cochran, USCM CEO and Executive Director. "He champions the value of local leadership, and he embraces the power this Conference has to unite so many voices to improve the lives of the people of America's cities. I know his colleagues are grateful to have him steering the ship." In addition to elevating Mayor Holt to USCM president, mayors elected San Diego (CA) Mayor Todd Gloria as First Vice President and Lincoln (NE) Mayor Leirion Gaylor Baird as Second Vice President. The Conference also named new Trustees and Advisory Board Members. New USCM Trustees are as follows: Scranton (PA) Mayor Paige Cognetti Albuquerque (NM) Mayor Tim Keller Columbia (SC) Mayor Daniel Rickenmann These mayors, in addition to the current elected top leaders and past presidents, make up the USCM Executive Committee. New USCM Advisory Board Members are as follows: Redmond (WA) Mayor Angela Birney Carmel (IN) Mayor Sue Finkam Chicago (IL) Mayor Brandon Johnson Tucson (AZ) Mayor Regina Romero Mount Vernon (NY) Mayor Shawyn Patterson-Howard A major component of today's meeting was also the consideration and adoption of policy resolutions. Throughout the Annual Meeting, the standing committees of the Conference met to propose and advance resolutions on a wide range of priorities for American mayors. Of particular emphasis today, the full Conference adopted a policy that calls for recalibrating federal immigration enforcement, protecting local control in public safety and with federal resources, preserving economic growth, and continuing to improve cities' affordability and quality of life. Other policies were adopted on issues including energy, housing, the environment, transportation, and the economy. The resolutions adopted today now make up the official policy of the U.S. Conference of Mayors and can be found here. Next year's Annual Meeting will be in Long Beach, California. About the United States Conference of Mayors – The U.S. Conference of Mayors is the official nonpartisan organization of cities with populations of 30,000 or more. There are more than 1,400 such cities in the country today, and each city is represented in the Conference by its chief elected official, the mayor. Follow our work on X, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, and Medium. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE U.S. Conference of Mayors Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
Wall Street Is Steadily Investing In Energy As An Inflation Hedge
CULVER CITY, CA (Photo by) At the end of last week, fund managers had built up the largest net long position in crude oil futures in nine months, according to data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It is serving as a necessary inflation hedge given a growing conflict in the Middle East, and declining drilling at home. The biggest risk to equity returns remains inflation and funds need to protect themselves. Inflation also risks prolonging the current period of high rates, which is already taking its toll on several asset classes, including housing. Oil and energy equities broadly are increasingly appealing as a result of these dynamics. Funds flow into energy is expected to continue and the recent involvement of the U.S. in Iran will only accelerate this move. In the latest Bank of America fund manager survey, energy and materials still remained unloved, with managers net underweight. This is even after the recent increase, as allocations were near record lows just earlier this year. Yield and an inverse correlation to bonds has been another benefit of the trade. The yield on XLE, the energy sector ETF, is also almost three times that of the broader market, providing income that closer tracks inflation. It has also been performing as a hedge when bonds, the historical hedge in the 60/40 portfolio, have been failing. Periods of increased inflation expectations, as seen with the initial tariff announcements, now see both bonds and equities dropping in parallel. This is because inflation would force rates to remain high right as the U.S. refinances a sizable chunk of government debt this summer. The already large deficit means that higher rates become a self-fulfilling problem as more and more of future bond raises goes towards paying interest, which investors demand a higher rate for, creating a growing deficit spiral in an inflationary environment. The above strategy has played out in actual returns. US equities are up only slightly this year, a little over 1%, while emerging markets and commodities have outperformed, with gold up over 25%, oil up over 5%, silver up over 20%, emerging markets up over 10%, and bonds returning a little less than 1%. Several other dynamics make continued energy outperformance, and increased fund exposure likely, and these are outside of the increasing conflict in the middle east. The first is that escalating equipment costs, due to a combination of climbing labour costs and changing supply chains, benefits incumbent energy names. The second is that power demand shows no signs of slowing down with natural gas being the winner in AI data centers that require both scale and reliability. This is also during a period that the US wants to continue to grow natural gas exports, creating multiple demand levers at a time when storage availability remains flat. That creates an asymmetry where prices can spike to the upside. The third is that oil rigs have dropped by 9% in the U.S. as producers pulled back capital amidst economic uncertainty. This reduces the chance that supply will overwhelm demand and helps alleviate some of the downside risks to the trade. While energy investing always has a risk, an allocation as a hedge, especially given the broader macro tailwinds, is increasingly appealing for funds. This continues to show up in recent funds flow and is expected to only increase this coming week with both energy equities and oil prices likely to spike on the news of U.S. strikes.
Wall Street Journal
18 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Standards Slip at Fort Bragg
'On Display at D.C.'s Parade: Tanks, Drones and the Military's Identity Crisis' (Review, June 14) cites President Trump's speech at Fort Bragg in which he used a group of soldiers as stage props in a piece of political theater. The authors refer to it as 'a breach of traditional decorum.' I believe it is an egregious violation of U.S. military standards of conduct. Our armed forces have sedulously separated themselves from partisan politics—and soldiers on duty, in uniform, booing or cheering remarks in a blatantly political speech are acting in contravention to those standards. One might note that politicians don't campaign on military installations; nor should they. That a politician would use soldiers in this way is profoundly disrespectful to the Constitution and to the troops who are sworn to defend it. It appears that refresher training in standards of conduct would be in order at Fort Bragg. Moreover, someone might inform the president of what type of speech or behavior is appropriate for uniformed military audiences.
