Gov. Evers discusses childcare funding in CF stop
Patten told Gov. Tony Evers about the challenges facing rural childcare centers like her business during a sit-down conversation Monday in Chippewa Falls. Patten said she was 'scared and nervous' about what could happen without permanent Child Care Counts state aid.
'I appreciate his time and energy he's putting into the childcare field, and hopefully he'll be able to make some changes,' Patten said.
The governor's 2025-27 budget proposal would invest more than $500 million to lower child care costs, support the industry, invest in employer-sponsored child care, and make the successful Child Care Counts Program permanent, a press release from his office reads. The proposal 'makes meaningful investments in Wisconsin's child care industry to help lower the cost of childcare for working families, ensure child care providers can recruit and retain dedicated workers, and make child care more accessible by filling available slots and preventing further child care closures,' the statement reads.
Evers noted there are fewer childcare centers today than pre-pandemic.
'The state has to step up and do something financially,' Evers said. 'If we don't, the industry itself might dissipate. The thought of thousands of children not having access to childcare — (their parents) just won't go to work.'
Evers, a Democrat, is optimistic that the Republican-controlled state Assembly and Senate will work on childcare funding with him this session.
'I feel good. Is it going to be easy? No,' Evers said. 'If we don't, our economy will absolutely struggle. It's not just important for our kids; it's important for our economy.'
Jeff Pertl, secretary of the Department of Children and Families, joined Evers in the roundtable discussion with childcare center providers.
'It's a difficult business to run, and it's not going to make you rich,' he said.
Pertl noted that parents with two children in childcare are likely spending 70% of their earnings between housing and childcare.
'You need a system that supports work,' Pertl said.
State Sen. Jeff Smith, D-town of Brunswick, said he has visited numerous struggling childcare centers, including one in Menomonie earlier in the day. He noted that workers are not 'babysitters.'
'No one has called their staff anything but educators,' Smith said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
American Eagle ‘almost paralyzed by body positivity' before it launched ‘sultry' Sydney Sweeney ads
American Eagle Outfitters has made a bold, divisive bet on its 'sultry' Sydney Sweeney ads — but only after its commitment to the 'body positivity' movement started to falter, experts told The Post. A decade ago, the mall-based chain's 20-year-old lingerie brand Aerie famously took off as millennials shunned Victoria's Secret and its leggy, angel-winged supermodels in favor of Aerie's ads featuring ordinary women and diverse body types. But recently, American Eagle's flagging sales show that 'inclusive fashion' has its limits — especially after the election of President Trump, experts say. Advertisement 7 Sydney Sweeney's provocative ad for American Eagle Outfitters has created a firestorm that's even drawn in President Trump. American Eagle 7 Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle was ratcheting up the provocative ads before the Sweeney campaign. American Eagle 'They were almost paralyzed by their body positivity movement and were cautious about coming across too sexy,' according to retail analyst Gabriella Santaniello, who heads up A-Line Partners. Advertisement In recent months, the retailer has been pivoting to more provocative looks — even before the Sweeney campaign rocked the internet late last month, Santaniello said. String bikinis and 'cheeky bottoms' that expose more of women's butts, for example, were previously only available on American Eagle's website, but started cropping up in its stores earlier this year, she noted. Susan Scafidi, director of the Fashion Law Institute, has likewise noticed 'edgier' looks and 'more sultry styling. 'This means featuring fewer boxy t-shirts and more cropped camisoles,' she said. 7 American Eagle has been edgier in its marketing even before the Sydney Sweeney campaign, experts told The Post. American Eagle Advertisement What's more — unlike competitors including Abercrombie & Fitch, Hollister, and the Gap — some pages on American Eagle's website have lately shown models going braless under various tops — and they aren't always subtle about it. 'All of the teen retailers shy away from the nipple,' Santaniello said. 'That's why it's so odd that they're going for it.' 7 Most teen retailers avoid the nipple look, according retail analyst Gabriella Santaniello. American Eagle Then, in late July, came the Sweeney spots. In one video, the 'White Lotus' and 'Euphoria' star tinkers under the hood of a vintage Mustang GT350 before slamming it shut, wiping her hands on the butt of her jeans — and peeling off in a cloud of burning rubber. Advertisement Days later, President Trump gushed that the ads were 'hot' and 'fantastic' after he learned Sweeney was a registered Republican. The company's shares surged 23% on Trump's comment, drawing comparisons to meme stocks. 7 American Eagle has been among the leading voices among retailers on body positivity messaging. Getty Images for Aerie 'They had to do something different,' said Hitha Herzog, a fashion management professor at Parsons School of Design. 'We have a conservative president in office and we are seeing conversations that skew away from body positivity, inclusion and diversity. 'American Eagle has always been good about knowing where the conversations are going,' Herzog added. Traffic to American Eagle's US website soared following the campaign's rollout on July 23, rising more than 60% on July 28 compared to the same day last year, according to data and insights company Consumer Edge. Meanwhile, however, left-wing critics seized upon the campaign's tagline 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans'. In one clip, Sweeney explains that genes 'often determin[e] traits like hair color, personality and even eye color,' before declaring, 'My jeans are blue.' 7 The Sydney Sweeney American Eagle campaign includes scenes of the star looking under a hood of Mustang. American Eagle An ensuing fracas claimed the ads were promoting Nazi ideology, calling for boycotts of the 48-year-old company. According to a survey this week by Axios and Generation Lab, 39% of young women and 42% of Democrats said the ads made them less likely to buy American Eagle jeans. Advertisement In the week of Aug. 3, foot traffic at American Eagle stores dropped 8.9% on top of a 3.9% decline the previous week — far steeper than drops at rival chains including Abercrombie and the Gap, according to Pass_by. 'When a brand sees momentum stall so sharply, it often reflects a reputational or cultural factor,' said James Ewen, vice president of marketing for Pass_by. 7 Aerie won market share from Victoria Secret's teen brand, Pink. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement American Eagle posted its only message about the ad so far on Aug. 1 on its Instagram account. 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story. We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone,' the company said.
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump tax law could trigger about $500B in Medicare cuts over decade without fix: CBO
Recent analysis from the Congressional Budget Office estimated that Medicare spending would see steep cuts over roughly the next decade absent congressional action, following passage of President Trump's major tax law last month. The nonpartisan budget scorekeeper crunched the numbers of potential across-the-board cuts that federal programs could see under the Statutory Pay‑As‑You‑Go Act of 2010 as a result of the enactment of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' — which it estimates could cost trillions of dollars over the next 10 years. The 2010 law, enacted under the Obama administration, seeks to require Congress to ensure new legislation is budget-neutral and can be enforced with the threat of automatic cuts, also known as 'sequestration,' to counter excess costs. But Congress has often enacted legislation over the years to avoid those cuts under both Republican and Democratic administrations. CBO noted in a June letter that sequestration has never been triggered under the law since its enactment in 2010. However, in its analysis, conducted at the request of Democrats, CBO estimated the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) would be required to issue a 'sequestration order not more than 14 days after the end of the current session of Congress' to cut fiscal 2026 spending by $415 billion, if Congress does not act. The office estimated that reductions in Medicare spending would be limited to about $45 billion for fiscal year 2026 under the 2010 law, leaving '$370 billion to be sequestered from the federal budget's remaining direct spending accounts in that year.' CBO also noted that the law exempts large accounts that fund programs like Social Security, while further estimating that the OMB would 'have roughly $120 billion in budgetary resources available for cancellation in 2026 — less than the remaining amount that would be required to be sequestered.' CBO's analysis included a closer breakdown of how Medicare spending would fare under such circumstances. 'The 4 percent maximum reduction in Medicare spending would continue to apply to sequestration orders for years after 2026,' it said. 'If OMB ordered a sequestration of $415 billion for each year through 2029 and $339 billion each year from 2030 through 2034, the ordered reductions in Medicare spending would increase to $76 billion in 2034 and would total $491 billion over the 2027–2034 period.' When factoring in fiscal 2026, the estimated spending reductions in store for Medicare would total more than $500 billion. 'After accounting for the reduction in Medicare spending, the required reduction in spending for other programs would exceed the estimated amount of resources available to those programs in each year over the 2027–2034 period,' CBO said. It added that, if the OMB 'sequestered all of the funding for those programs, the total amounts would be less than the reductions required by' the 2010 law. The Hill has reached out to OMB for comment. The CBO has estimated Trump's major tax package will add nearly $3.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over roughly the next decade, not factoring in macroeconomic and debt-service effects. However, Republicans have largely downplayed the cost of the tax cuts and argue the overall plan will help boost the economy.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Liberty University faces second lawsuit accusing it of mishandling sexual assault cases
A former Liberty University employee says she was terminated in part for cooperating with a federal investigation of the school's handling of sexual assault, according to recently filed court documents. In her suit against the private Christian university, Erika Woolfolk stated she was paid less, required to work more, and the subject of a hostile work environment while employed in the university's office of Equity and Compliance and Title IX. Woolfolk's work involved investigating cases of sexual violence on campus, of which she alleged her bosses would improperly predetermine their outcomes, according to her lawsuit. She claimed in the filing that she shared that information and more about the university's 'systemic violations of federal law' with the U.S. Department of Education. She also claims she was fired for it. She is now the second former Liberty University employee who has alleged in lawsuits that they reported the university's improper and unethical investigations into sexual assault and were later terminated. Most recently, Peter Brake sued the university along similar grounds and his firing was cited in Woolfolk's filing. Both suits also name as a defendant Ashley Reich, a former top administrator at the university who oversaw the Title IX office. In a statement to USA TODAY, Liberty University declined to respond to all the allegations but disagreed with Woolfolk's claims. It stated that her termination did not have to do with her race or her interactions with the federal government. Instead, her firing was tied to "legitimate business reasons" related to Title IX investigations. USA TODAY reached out to Reich for comment but received no response prior to publication. The Biden-era Education Department in 2024 found that the university had created a culture where students and others were afraid to report sexual violence. The university was penalized $16 million as a result. It also remains on federal monitoring through April 2026. Liberty has previously said it believed it was treated unfairly by the Biden administration, while agreeing 'there were numerous deficiencies that existed in the past' with its compliance with the Clery Act. That regulation includes requirements for how universities respond to and report sexual assault and other crimes on their campuses. More: Liberty to pay Jerry Falwell Jr. $15 million settlement after high-profile sex scandal The government's final report found that college administrators overlooked and failed to track repeat cases of sexual violence on campus, and that it failed to warn students of potential danger. It laid out how university officials tried to cover their tracks by seeking technology staff to delete hard drives. Liberty, based in Lynchburg, Virginia, is among the nation's largest and most prominent Christian universities. The school is also hugely popular among Republican politicians. Jerry Falwell, a televangelist and conservative figure, started the school in 1971. The university has grown thanks to online students – about 124,000 combined in the 2023-24 academic year, according to the school – and it took nearly $880 million in federal financial aid for its students in the 2022-2023 academic year, according to the Department of Education. What did Woolfolk allege? In her lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Virginia, Woolfolk stated she earned undergraduate and master's degrees at the school and had been working there since 2014. She initially produced content for the Liberty Flames Sports Network, before transferring to the Office of Equity and Compliance/Title IX in 2018. In that office, she was the only Black employee and faced a hostile work environment, the suit states. She alleged she was paid less than her more inexperienced peers and was asked to work longer hours on more arduous tasks. She said she was denied promotions and accommodations, like remote work, while Reich routinely stayed home, according to the lawsuit. She also described facing racial comments from her colleagues, like one who stereotyped 'Blacks as either 'black-black' or 'white-black'' with more positive connotations for the latter, according to the lawsuit. The suit also included screenshots from Microsoft Teams chats where her peers joked about naming a coworker's new dog after Confederate generals. Woolfolk's suit also states that Reich regularly influenced the findings of Title IX cases, either directly or through another employee. In another instance, Woolfolk learned details of a confidential case were improperly shared throughout the office, which 'posed significant risks of prejudice to complainants and respondents.' That was because members of her team would sometimes have to serve as neutral deciders in cases other than their own. In 2022, Woolfolk spoke to Education Department investigators. Her suit states she told them about numerous violations of Title IX, which included 'systematic efforts to minimize and downplay sexual assault reports; and predetermined case outcomes before investigations were completed.' She also alleged that Reich was aware of her actions. By June 2024, Woolfolk said she had filed an internal complaint against Reich related to workplace discrimination and retaliation for cooperating with the federal government. She was assigned to work virtually, but was fired days later. The suit stated that the university fired her for unspecified compliance issues. She was terminated on the same day as two other investigators, including Peter Brake, who had also raised complaints about Reich. Reich now works at the Education Department where she'll be recused from matters involving the school. In a statement to USA TODAY, a department official praised her nearly two decades of working in higher education, policy development and government affairs, and said that she'll help advance President Donald Trump's agenda but didn't offer more details about her is seeking legal fees and an unspecified amount of Quintana is an investigative reporter at USA TODAY. He can be reached at cquintana@ or via Signal at 202-308-9021. He is on X at @CQuintanaDC
