
Frauds scammed US citizens claiming e-commerce accounts were compromised: CBI probe
The entire operation was carried out from an illegal call centre in Pune, with a team of trained callers, CBI officials said. The fraudsters allegedly impersonated customer care executives of the two US firms and informed them that their accounts and social security numbers had been compromised and needed remedial action.
Once they had the attention of their potential victims, the fraudsters would allegedly attempt to hustle them by saying their compromised accounts were being used to conduct illegal activities, such as procuring narcotics and psychotropic substances, officials said.
'Once the US citizens fall prey to the scammers' modus operandi, the fraud callers would lure them with an offer to help them avoid legal action, including arrest by US law enforcement agencies, in lieu of service charges in US dollars, ranging from $500 to $3,000,' said a CBI official, requesting anonymity.
The victims were then allegedly asked to withdraw money from their bank accounts and purchase gift vouchers. Subsequently, they were asked to share the gift voucher number along with their personal identification number, so that the amount could be redeemed by the scammers. 'In the case of such a payment exceeding $3,000, the victims were asked to buy Bitcoins and subsequently transfer them to the Bitcoin wallets of the scammers,' the official said. Bitcoin is a virtual currency that isn't legal tender in India.
The syndicate allegedly generated illegal earnings of around ₹3-4 crore per month this way, officials said. The proceeds of crime were then allegedly laundered via mule accounts, cryptocurrency and hawala routes.
The syndicate's operatives allegedly also posed as officials of US government agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service and Citizenship & Immigration Services, along with Indian diplomatic officials at times, to defraud their victims.
CBI raids
The CBI busted the cybercrime racket after conducting searches last week at seven premises belonging to individuals from the syndicate, which operated from Mumbai and Pune. The agency seized unaccounted cash worth around ₹11.2 lakh from two of the accused persons, around 150 grams of narcotic substances, cryptocurrency worth ₹6.94 lakh, and arrested four people allegedly linked to the syndicate.
The agency also booked unidentified public and private sector bank officials who allegedly facilitated the opening and operation of fake bank accounts using forged Know Your Customer (KYC) documents, officials said. The operation also involved the alleged illegal acquisition of contact leads through vendors who operated on encrypted instant messaging platforms, officials added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Inclusion of TRF in report under 1267 Committee a boost for India's counter-terror campaign: officials
India's global campaign against cross-border terrorism received a boost with the inclusion of The Resistance Front (TRF) in the recent report of a counter-terror committee of the United Nations Security Council, officials in New Delhi said on Wednesday (30 July 2025). India has described the TRF as a front of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and accused it of carrying out the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians and injured dozens more on April 22. The Monitoring Team of the 1267 Sanctions Committee, which chronicles global terror groups for international punitive actions, published its report on July 24. India had sent a technical team to the UN to convey its position on cross-border terrorism, after Operation Sindoor was conducted between May 7 to 10. The technical team had reached out to the members of the UNSC and briefed officials of the 1267 Sanctions Committee's Monitoring Team. Earlier, India's campaign found support from the United States, with the U.S. State Department including TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) on July 17. In its report, the Team noted that the TRF had taken responsibility for the attack in Pahalgam, saying, 'On 22 April, five terrorists attacked a tourist spot in Pahalgam, in Jammu and Kashmir. Twenty-six civilians were killed. The attack was claimed that same day by The Resistance Front (TRF), who in parallel published a photograph of the attack site. The claim of responsibility was repeated the following day. On 26 April, however, TRF retracted their claim. There was no further communication from TRF, and no other group claimed responsibility.' Following the publication of the Team's report, officials here noted that the mention of Pakistan-based TRF in a UN document has brought global spotlight to a group that India considers to be the latest addition to the list of Pakistan-based terror outfits like the LeT, Jaish-e-Mohammed and others. Under Operation Sindoor, Indian armed forces struck locations inside Pakistan that were known to host terror-training facilities. The team further noted that there was high regional tension that could be exploited by terror groups. 'One Member State said the attack could not have happened without Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT, QDe.118) support, and that there was a relationship between LeT and TRF. Another Member State said that the attack was carried out by TRF, who was synonymous with LeT. One Member State rejected these views and said LeT was defunct,' the MT's report said, referring to divergent exchange between Indian and Pakistani officials on the TRF following the attack in Pahalgam, in which a Nepali citizen was among those killed. India's international campaign on the role of the TRF in the Pahalgam attack has been part of its overall campaign that also included sending multi-party teams to various countries in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor. The TRF also featured in the speech by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, who spoke on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha on July 29 and mentioned the U.S. action against the TRF. '...I would particularly like to mention two or three other developments. One, the American designation of TRF. On the 17th of July, the Department of State designated the TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation, and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. Now, this sir, comes in the wake of extradition of Tahawwur Rana, who was involved in the 26/11 attack,' said Mr. Jaishankar speaking in the Lok Sabha.


News18
23 minutes ago
- News18
Bengal: 2 Bangladeshis held for residing in India with fake documents
Kolkata, Jul 30 (PTI) Two Bangladeshi nationals, including a woman from Kolkata, and another person from South 24 Parganas district of West Bengal, were arrested for residing in India allegedly using fake documents, an official said on Wednesday. A 28-year-old woman was arrested from the city's Golf Green area by officers of the Park Street Police Station in connection with a forgery case, he said. The other person was arrested from Canning in South 24 Parganas district for living in India for nearly 15-16 years allegedly using fake identity, the official said. 'We have seized several Bangladeshi passports issued in her name… and several Indian identification documents, including Aadhaar cards, voter IDs and ration cards," he said. view comments First Published: July 31, 2025, 00:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Land-for-jobs case: Supreme Court refuses to defer Lalu Prasad's trial
The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to entertain a plea filed by RJD president Lalu Prasad seeking deferment of trial court proceedings in the land-for-jobs case against him. Lalu moved the SC seeking directions to the trial court to adjourn proceedings till the Delhi High Court concludes hearing his petition to quash the case. Refusing to put brakes on the proceedings in the lower court, a division bench comprising Justices MM Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh clarified that the trial court's framing of charges in the case would not render Lalu's quashing petition in the HC infructuous. "We are not passing any order. Taking note of the apprehension, we say framing of charges will not make the pending petition before the HC infructuous," the bench said. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Operations Management CXO Others Data Science Degree MBA Data Analytics Technology Management Public Policy Digital Marketing healthcare Product Management Design Thinking PGDM Cybersecurity Finance Artificial Intelligence Leadership MCA Project Management Healthcare others Data Science Skills you'll gain: Quality Management & Lean Six Sigma Analytical Tools Supply Chain Management & Strategies Service Operations Management Duration: 10 Months IIM Lucknow IIML Executive Programme in Strategic Operations Management & Supply Chain Analytics Starts on Jan 27, 2024 Get Details Lalu had moved an application in the top court seeking deferment of trial court proceedings in the land-for-jobs case at least till after August 12, when the Delhi HC is slated to hear his plea seeking quashing of the case. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 most beautiful women in the world Undo Earlier this month, the apex court had refused to entertain a plea filed by Lalu to stay trial court proceedings in the land-for-jobs case in which he, his kin and other accused stand chargesheeted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) over corruption and conspiracy. Lalu had moved the SC challenging a May 29 order of the Delhi High Court refusing to stay the trial court proceedings. Refusing to put brakes on the trial, a division bench comprising Justices MM Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh on July 18 had said it would ask the Delhi HC to decide Lalu's plea that seeks quashing of the CBI case. The apex court then asked the high court to decide Lalu's plea expeditiously. Live Events ET had reported earlier this month that Lalu had moved an application in the trial court seeking to summon old records of the land-for-jobs case investigated by the CBI. The CBI has already concluded its arguments on framing of charges against Lalu, his kin and other co-accused.