
Can new Africa Energy Bank power a continent while protecting the planet?
The long-planned 'Africa Energy Bank' that is expected to take off soon was announced last June as a joint initiative by the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) and the African Petroleum Producers' Organization (APPO) – a group of 18 oil-exporting nations.
The bank aims to lift growth by boosting Africa's energy supply. Its founders consider it a lifeline in a continent rich with natural resources, but where millions of people still lack access to electricity.
However, climate activists have questioned the logic of doubling down on fossil fuels.
In addition, oil and gas projects built today have a high probability of becoming unusable 'stranded assets', leading to costly debt on countries' balance sheets in the future as the world transitions to low-carbon alternatives.
To provide for the material power needs of Africans while also protecting the planet, experts say a balance is needed.
Caught between a rock and a hard place
Under the 2015 Paris Agreement, hundreds of countries pledged to hold global temperatures to below 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels. Since then, governments and companies – including in Africa – have faced increased pressure to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels.
The World Bank stopped financing oil and gas extraction in 2019. In 2022, Shell suspended marine exploration activity off the coast of South Africa after a High Court ordered it to pause work due to successful legal challenges from environmental campaigners.
At the time, Happy Khambule, a senior campaigner for Greenpeace Africa, said, 'We must do everything we can to undo the destructive colonial legacy of extractivism, until we live in a world where people and the planet come before the profits of toxic fossil fuel companies.'
For his part, Omar Farouk Ibrahim, secretary-general of APPO, has said there is a 'need to strike the right balance between the imperatives of climate change mitigation and the need to avoid social upheaval that could result from difficult economic and financial conditions in Africa'.
Indeed, Africa's energy needs are immense.
The number of sub-Saharan Africans without access to electricity has risen in recent years. As population growth outpaced new energy supply in 2023, 600 million people (43 percent of the continent) were left in the dark, according to the International Energy Agency.
While estimates vary, electricity supply would need to increase fivefold to support large-scale industrial activity and help lift the majority of Africans – one-third of whom live on less than $1.90 a day – out of poverty.
On a per capita basis, Africa has the lowest level of modern energy usage in the world. At an economy-wide level, it also lags behind. Globally, manufacturing makes up 42.2 percent of total power consumption. In Africa, it's just 16.8 percent.
APPO head Ibrahim says the Africa Energy Bank is the result of Western countries' 'abandon[ing] hydrocarbons' so that 'the leaders of the continent have no choice but to look within to raise the required funds to sustain and grow the [energy] industry'.
The Africa Energy Bank will be headquartered in Abuja, Nigeria's capital.
On February 11, Nigeria's Minister of State for Petroleum Resources Heineken Lokpobiri told reporters that 'the building is ready, and we are only putting finishing touches to it, by the end of this quarter [end of March], this bank will take off.'
Countries involved in the Africa Energy Bank include Nigeria, Angola and Libya, among others. Planned projects are expected to range from offshore oil exploration to new gas-fired power plants.
Each country has pledged $83m and to raise a total amount of $1.5bn. That will be complemented by $14bn from the Afreximbank, a trade credit organisation.
Over the next five years, Lokpobiri said that the Africa Energy Bank is hoping to secure $120bn in assets. Additional funding will likely come from sovereign wealth funds, commodity traders and international banks interested in acquiring equity.
Africa's context is 'different'
Many African leaders recognise the need for rapid industrial development and balk at restrictions from Western financial backers, whose rules increasingly bar them from traditional energy projects.
Arkebe Oqubay, a former adviser to Ethiopia's Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, insists that 'Africa's context is totally different from elsewhere because its economic resources have not been fully developed. At the same time, it's made a minimal contribution to climate change.'
Africa is responsible for just 4 percent of global carbon emissions and even less on a historical basis. It also suffers disproportionately from the effects of extreme weather events.
'The moral imperative to cut emissions is not as present in Africa,' said Oqubay.
He told Al Jazeera that, '[these] are countries at a development stage where you cannot suddenly move into the green transition … You cannot just say funding is cut and they cannot commit to oil and gas'.
The African Energy Chamber, an advocacy group, has also argued that Africa has a 'sovereign right' to develop its natural resources, which, according to the group, includes 125 billion barrels of oil and 620 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
'Until [renewable energy] funding becomes more readily available, African countries are entitled to expand their oil and gas capabilities … and the international community does not have the right to say we cannot do this,' said Oqubay.
'But to be clear, fossil fuels are not the future,' he said.
'Huge' renewable energy potential
Africa's energy shortages are a 'development constraint', said Fadhel Kaboub, an associate professor of economics at Denison University in the United States. Africa's subdued power sector limits the production of fertiliser, steel and cement – hallmarks of economic development.
The continent's inability to industrialise has exacerbated global growth divergence.
From 2014 to 2024, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in sub-Saharan Africa dropped by more than 10 percent (from $1,936 to $1,700). Over the same period, global GDP per capita rose by 15 percent.
'To climb the development ladder, the continent needs more energy,' Kaboub said. 'But the best way forward isn't to double down on fossil fuels. And boosting oil and gas exports as an end, in itself, is what Afrexim is pushing for.'
Instead, he believes that Africa should leverage its remaining fossil fuel infrastructure to build out its 'huge' renewable energy potential. Africa is endowed with solar, wind and geothermal resources, as well as the critical minerals needed for green technologies.
According to the International Renewable Energy Agency, Africa's potential to generate renewable energy from existing technologies, accounting for current costs, is 1,000 times greater than the projected demand for electricity in 2040.
'Of course, there are constraints to realising Africa's renewable energy capacity. But cost is not one of them,' said Kaboub, referring to reports which state that most new wind and solar projects are cheaper to run than their fossil fuel counterparts.
Instead, he contends that 'debt is the pressure point not to change tack'.
Almost 60 percent of countries in sub-Saharan Africa are in debt distress, according to the World Bank. 'For oil producers on the continent, economic activity mainly consists of exporting fossil fuels to stay on top of debt repayments,' said Kaboub.
He suggested that, by providing oil and gas for other countries' industrial processes, African governments are engaged in 'economic entrapment'.
'Industrial growth requires economies of scale [cost savings derived from high levels of production],' said Kaboub. 'Africa needs regional development plans where national resources are complemented and built out across countries … it doesn't need more siloed oil and gas projects.'
In his view, development banks are failing to present a long-term economic vision for the continent. 'And the green industrial revolution, where renewable energies power domestic manufacturing, could be that strategy,' he said.
'Or we can continue to focus on raw material export activity and stay stuck in the resource trap.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Qatar Tribune
15 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Clash between European Union and China over green technology escalates
Agencies Brussels As the world races toward a low-carbon future, the geopolitical undercurrents of climate action are becoming increasingly turbulent. Nowhere is this more evident than in the escalating tensions between the European Union and China, where green technology has become both a symbol of cooperation and a flashpoint of conflict. The recent Financial Times article, 'EU and China stand-off over climate action before Xi and von der Leyen meet,' captures this friction, highlighting how the EU's anti-subsidy probe into Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) has provoked a sharp rebuke from Beijing. But beneath the surface of trade disputes lies a deeper story, one that reveals the strategic ambitions of Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to dominate the global green economy while resisting external scrutiny. The EU's investigation into Chinese EV subsidies is not merely a bureaucratic exercise; it is a direct challenge to China's state-led industrial model. For years, Beijing has poured vast subsidies into its clean tech sector, enabling Chinese firms to flood global markets with low-cost solar panels, batteries, and EVs. While this has accelerated the global green transition, it has also raised alarms in Brussels and Washington about unfair competition and strategic dependency. Xi Jinping's government has responded with characteristic defiance. Framing the EU's actions as protectionist and politically motivated, Beijing has warned of retaliatory measures, signalling that it views climate-linked trade disputes as part of a broader Western effort to contain China's rise. This narrative fits neatly into the CCP's domestic messaging, which portrays China as a victim of Western double standards while asserting its right to industrial self-determination. Under Xi, China's green industrial policy is not just about environmental stewardship; it is a pillar of national strategy. The CCP has identified clean technology as a domain where China can leapfrog traditional powers and assert global leadership. This ambition is backed by a sprawling network of state-owned enterprises, subsidies, and regulatory protections that have enabled Chinese firms to dominate key segments of the green supply chain. Rare earths, solar panels, and EV batteries are not just commodities; they are instruments of geopolitical leverage. The EU's dependence on Chinese inputs for its green transition places it in a precarious position. Brussels faces a dilemma: how to enforce fair competition without jeopardizing its own climate goals. Xi's government is acutely aware of this dependency and has not hesitated to exploit it, using export controls and diplomatic pressure to remind Europe of the costs of confrontation. While China has made impressive strides in renewable energy deployment, its climate governance remains tightly controlled by the CCP. Xi's top-down approach to environmental policy, often described as 'authoritarian environmentalism,' prioritizes state control over market mechanisms or civil society engagement. This model allows for rapid mobilization of resources but lacks transparency, accountability, and public participation. Critics argue that this approach enables greenwashing and data manipulation, undermining global trust in China's climate commitments. Moreover, the CCP's suppression of environmental NGOs and independent researchers has stifled domestic scrutiny, making it difficult to assess the true environmental impact of China's industrial policies. In this context, the EU's push for fair competition and regulatory transparency is not just an economic issue; it is a challenge to the CCP's governance model. The EU's decision to launch an anti-subsidy probe marks a turning point in its relationship with China. For years, Brussels pursued a policy of engagement, hoping that economic integration would encourage political convergence. That illusion has faded. The green tech standoff reflects a broader strategic awakening in Europe, where concerns about dependency, coercion, and systemic rivalry are reshaping policy. Yet Europe's position remains constrained by its reliance on Chinese supply chains. The EU's climate ambitions are entangled with its economic vulnerabilities. This interdependence complicates efforts to decouple or diversify, especially in the short term. Xi Jinping understands this dynamic and is likely to use it as a bargaining chip in upcoming negotiations with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Xi's leadership style is defined by calculated brinkmanship, pushing boundaries while avoiding outright rupture. In the climate domain, this means presenting China as an indispensable partner while resisting external pressure for reform. The CCP's strategy is to shape global norms from within, leveraging its market size and technological prowess to dilute Western influence. However, this approach carries risks. If China is perceived as weaponizing green trade or undermining fair competition, it could trigger a backlash that accelerates efforts to diversify supply chains and tighten trade rules. Already, the U.S. and EU are exploring new alliances and regulatory frameworks to counter China's dominance. Xi's challenge is to maintain China's centrality in the green economy without provoking a coalition of resistance. The upcoming meeting between Xi and von der Leyen will be more than a diplomatic formality; it will be a test of whether two interdependent yet adversarial powers can find common ground in the face of mounting tensions. For Xi Jinping and the CCP, the stakes are high. Their vision of green leadership is inseparable from their broader quest for global influence and domestic legitimacy. But if that vision relies on coercion, opacity, and strategic dependency, it may ultimately undermine the very cooperation needed to address the climate crisis. The EU, for its part, must navigate a delicate balance—asserting its values and interests without derailing the green transition. In this high-stakes standoff, the path forward will require not just diplomacy, but a rethinking of how power, policy, and the planet intersect.


Qatar Tribune
15 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
1,200 POWs to be exchanged with Russia, says Zelensky
DPA Moscow Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Sunday confirmed a previously discussed prisoner-of-war (POW) exchange with Russia, which had already mentioned the swap. Zelensky, in a post on Telegram, said a list of 1,200 names was being worked on. Russian negotiators had mentioned that figure during direct talks with their Ukrainian counterparts in Istanbul on July 23, while the Ukrainians did not release a number then. Following a meeting with Ukrainian lead negotiator Rustem Umerov, Zelensky said that the exchange would include civilians as well as soldiers. He added that preparations for another meeting with the Russian side were proceeding, without mentioning a date. At the end of July, Zelensky said that a total of 5,857 people had been returned to Ukraine from Russian captivity since the full-scale Russian invasion in February 2022. An additional 555 people had been freed apart from the exchanges, he reported on X. The two sides released prisoners most recently in July, concluding a phased exchange agreed in Istanbul at the end of June of 1,200 on each side. The total number of prisoners on both sides remains unknown and is constantly changing. There have also been repeated exchanges. The unconditional and comprehensive ceasefire called for by Ukraine at the Istanbul talks is not in sight. Moscow has instead offered brief truces for both sides to collect their fallen andinjured along the frontline. Among Russian preconditions for a comprehensive ceasefire is that Western arms deliveries to Ukraine must be halted.


Qatar Tribune
15 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Russia, China begin joint military drills in Sea of Japan
Agencies Moscow China and Russia have begun joint naval drills in the Sea of Japan as they seek to reinforce their partnership and counterbalance what they see as a United States-led global order. The Chinese and Russian governments have deepened their ties in recent years, with China providing an economic lifeline to Russia in the face of Western sanctions over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. The Joint Sea-2025 exercises began in waters near the Russian port of Vladivostok and will last for three days, China's Ministry of National Defence said in a statement on Sunday. The two sides will hold 'submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat'. Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, are participating in the exercises, alongside Russian ships, the ministry said. After the drills, the two countries will conduct naval patrols in 'relevant waters of the Pacific'. China and Russia have carried out annual drills for several years, with the 'Joint Sea' exercises beginning in 2012. Last year's drills were held along China's southern coast. With this year's drills in the Sea of Japan, in its annual report last month, Japan's Ministry of Defence warned that China's growing military cooperation with Russia poses serious security concerns. 'The exercise is defensive in nature and is not directed against other countries,' the Russian Navy Pacific Fleet said earlier this week, according to a report by the US Naval Institute's online news and analysis portal. On Friday, the Chinese Defence Ministry said this year's exercises were aimed at 'further deepening the comprehensive strategic partnership' of the two countries. China has never denounced Russia's more than three-year war nor called for it to withdraw its troops, and many of Ukraine's allies, including the US, believe that Beijing has provided support to Moscow. European leaders asked China last month to use its influence to pressure Russia to end the war, now in its fourth year, but there was no sign that Beijing would do so. China, however, insists it is a neutral party, regularly calling for an end to the fighting while also accusing Western countries of prolonging the conflict by arming Ukraine.