Antisemitism envoy denies involvement in major donation by husband's company to rightwing group Advance
Guardian Australia first reported in February that Henroth Investments Pty Ltd had donated $50,000 to Advance in 2023-24, according to Australian Electoral Commission annual donation disclosure figures. One of that company's directors, according to corporate records, is John Roth – Segal's husband.
Advance received more than $15.6m in the 2023-24 financial year, according to the AEC figures. The Henroth donation was the equal second-largest donation to Advance last year, one of five donors to give $50,000 to the group.
Advance campaigned vigorously against the Labor government and the Greens at the May election, with a major focus on criticising their responses to antisemitism and immigration issues as well as questioning renewable energy, net zero, and Indigenous welcome to country ceremonies. Advance frequently derided Anthony Albanese, who appointed Segal to her position, as making Australia 'weak, woke and broke', and accused him of 'letting foreign criminals back into your communities, and staying silent over increasingly violent protests'.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The Henroth donation resurfaced after a report from independent news site the Klaxon over the weekend after Segal's delivery of 49 recommendations to the government to address antisemitism. Corporate records show John Roth and his brother, Stanley, listed since 1975 as directors of the company set up by their father, Henry.
Segal's name is not listed in any official capacity for the company.
In a brief two-line response to questions, Segal distanced herself from the Henroth donation.
'No one would tolerate or accept my husband dictating my politics, and I certainly won't dictate his. I have had no involvement in his donation, nor will I,' she said in a statement.
Segal's office did not respond to questions about whether she held any interest in Henroth Investments, nor whether she was aware of the donation made to Advance. Segal's office also did not respond to questions about whether Segal had comment about the actions or campaign efforts of Advance, or whether she had any concerns about the potential impacts on social cohesion of Advance's campaign material.
Advance has counted former Liberal prime minister Tony Abbott as a board member and Coalition senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price as a spokesperson. It led the no campaign in the Indigenous voice referendum and ran controversial and ultimately unsuccessful campaigns in various political elections focusing on crime and immigration issues.
Albanese in 2024 accused Advance of being 'very partisan' and spreading 'a whole lot of misinformation' during the Dunkley byelection; its controversial referendum campaign drew criticisms of racism and misinformation from opponents and some Liberal MPs.
Following the May election, which saw the Coalition reduced to a historically low parliamentary caucus, several senior Liberal sources questioned the impact of Advance Australia, with some warning it 'undermined' and cost the Liberals votes.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Advance's recent campaign activity includes calls to reverse clean energy policies, 'drop welcome to country' and 'stop mass immigration'.
Last week, the group posted a screenshot of a job ad for a 'Palestinian settlement and community development worker' in Sydney, asking 'why do we have to pay for this, exactly?'
Other recent posts have also raised issues related to Palestine. 'Who would've thought bringing hundreds of people from Gaza would be a risk to security,' Advance posted on X on Friday. Last week, the group also posted: 'If you chant 'globalise the intifada' on the street, you should be deported. End of story.'
In April 2024, posting about pro-Palestine protests on Anzac Day, Advance posted on X: 'If you hate our country, why don't you go live in 'Palestine'?'
In March, Advance posted on X that Greens politicians 'should take their keffiyehs and mardi gras marches to the streets of Gaza … then we'd see how quick they want to go back to hugging trees'.
Advance's largest declared donor last year was the Cormack foundation, best known as a multimillion-dollar investment vehicle for the Liberal party and one of the party's biggest single donors, which pledged $500,000 to the conservative campaign group.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
A new mural in France shows the Statue of Liberty covering her eyes in a swipe at Trump
As statements go, it's a big one. A towering mural in France of the Statue of Liberty covering her eyes is racking up millions of views online with its swipe at U.S. President Donald Trump 's immigration and deportation policies. Amsterdam-based street artist Judith de Leeuw described her giant work in the northern French town of Roubaix, which has a large immigrant community, as 'a quiet reminder of what freedom should be.' She said 'freedom feels out of reach' for migrants and 'those pushed to the margins, silenced, or unseen.' 'I painted her covering her eyes because the weight of the world has become too heavy to witness. What was once a shining symbol of liberty now carries the sorrow of lost meaning,' de Leeuw wrote in a July 4 post on Facebook, when Americans were celebrating Independence Day. Her depiction of the Statue of Liberty, a gift from the French people in the late 1800s, has inspired some sharp criticism. Rep. Tim Burchett, a Republican lawmaker from Tennessee, wrote in an angry post on X that the work 'disgusts me.' He said he had an uncle who fought and died in France, where U.S. forces saw combat in both World War I and World War II. In an interview with The Associated Press, de Leeuw was unapologetic. 'I'm not offended to be hated by the Donald Trump movement. I am not sorry. This is the right thing to do," she said. The town stood by the work, with its deputy mayor in charge of cultural affairs, Frédéric Lefebvre, telling broadcaster France 3 that 'it's a very strong and powerful political message.' Since returning to the White House amid anti-immigration sentiment, Trump has launched an unprecedented campaign that has pushed the limits of executive power and clashed with federal judges trying to restrain him. People from various countries have been deported to remote and unrelated places like South Sudan and the small African nation of Eswatini. Immigration is one of Trump's strongest issues in public polling in the U.S. The mural in Roubaix is part of an urban street culture festival backed by the town. Roubaix is one of the poorest towns in France. It was economically devastated by the collapse since the 1970s of its once-flourishing textile industry that used to attract migrant workers from elsewhere in Europe, north Africa and beyond. ___ Associated Press journalists Ahmad Seir in Amsterdam and John Leicester in Paris contributed.
BreakingNews.ie
25 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
French mural shows Statue of Liberty covering her eyes in swipe at Trump
A towering mural in France of the Statue of Liberty covering her eyes is racking up millions of views online with its swipe at US president Donald Trump's immigration and deportation policies. Amsterdam-based street artist Judith de Leeuw described her giant work in the northern French town of Roubaix, which has a large immigrant community, as 'a quiet reminder of what freedom should be'. Advertisement She said 'freedom feels out of reach' for migrants and 'those pushed to the margins, silenced, or unseen'. 'I painted her covering her eyes because the weight of the world has become too heavy to witness. What was once a shining symbol of liberty now carries the sorrow of lost meaning,' Ms de Leeuw wrote in a July 4 post on Facebook, when Americans were celebrating Independence Day. A mural by Dutch artist Judith de Leeuw (/Sylvain Plazy/AP) Her depiction of the Statue of Liberty, a gift from the French people in the late 1800s, has inspired some sharp criticism. Tim Burchett, a Republican politician from Tennessee, wrote in an angry post on X that the work 'disgusts me'. Advertisement He said he had an uncle who fought and died in France, where US forces saw combat in both World Wars. In an interview with The Associated Press, Ms de Leeuw was unapologetic. 'I'm not offended to be hated by the Donald Trump movement. I am not sorry. This is the right thing to do,' she said. The town stood by the work, with its deputy mayor in charge of cultural affairs, Frederic Lefebvre, telling broadcaster France 3 that 'it's a very strong and powerful political message'. Advertisement Since returning to the White House amid anti-immigration sentiment, Mr Trump has launched an unprecedented campaign that has pushed the limits of executive power and clashed with federal judges trying to restrain him. People from various countries have been deported to remote and unrelated places like South Sudan and the small African nation of Eswatini. Immigration is one of Mr Trump's strongest issues in public polling in the US. The mural in Roubaix is part of an urban street culture festival backed by the town. Advertisement Roubaix is one of the poorest towns in France. It was economically devastated by the collapse since the 1970s of its once-flourishing textile industry that used to attract migrant workers from elsewhere in Europe, north Africa and beyond.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Qantas blunder ruins couple's overseas holiday - weeks after the airline was rocked by a massive cyber attack affecting six million customers
An Australian businessman and his wife suffered a nightmare end to their US holiday courtesy of a bizarre and infuriating Qantas blunder. Craig Badings and his wife Margo had booked a long-haul flight leaving Los Angeles on Tuesday and were due to arrive back in Sydney on Thursday. They never made the flight because Qantas told them it had been it had been cancelled. The only problem was, according to Mr Badings, it hadn't been at all. Mr Badings said the flight took off when it was supposed to, just as they were making their way back from the airport after turning around due to the cancellation message. The principal at public relations firm SenateSHJ said he and his wife were instead stranded in LA. 'The best Qantas can offer us is a flight on Friday via Dallas to Sydney arriving Sunday morning - three days later than scheduled,' Mr Badings said. The initial test and email the couple got from Qantas told them that their flight - QF12 - had been 'delayed' and would be instead be leaving on Thursday. They were later told Qantas had failed to book them seats on the Thursday flight, resulting in the offer of leaving on Friday. After much back-and-forth with the airline the couple were eventually booked on a replacement flight a little earlier on Thursday morning. 'It's all been a bit of a debacle,' Mr Badings told Daily Mail Australia. 'Even a few hours before the flight, when our travel agent was dealing with Qantas, they didn't alert him that the flight was still going ahead as scheduled. 'I'm not sure whether this was related to the (recent) cyber incident, poor planning on Qantas' part, or just poor communications and a genuine mix up.' Mr Badings said the booking for their rescheduled flight on the 17th had disappeared from his Qantas app, meaning at one stage they weren't on any flights at all. 'Ten hours of calls to Qantas US (no help at all), the 24-7 Qantas number and we were finally booked via Dallas to Sydney on the 19th, arriving on Sunday the 20th. They said we couldn't get on the flight on the 17th,' he said. 'Then, when Australia woke up, we called our agent again and a few hours later we were informed we are indeed on the 10am flight (on the 17th).' With 30 years' experience advising major corporations and senior executives about communication and brand reputation, Mr Badings had some advice for the embattled national carrier. 'The message to Qantas would simply be over-communication in these situations,' he said. 'Not knowing and being able to get hold of someone when you are thousands of kilometres from home isn't great. And then keep us informed along the way.' Mr Badings urged fellow Qantas passengers to learn from his lesson and double check that cancellation texts and emails are valid. 'The message to others would be to call Qantas immediately and if in any doubt, go to the airport and speak to them in person,' he said. 'If we had done that, we would have been on the flight.' A Qantas spokesperson confirmed the mix-up was the result of an 'administrative error'. 'We sincerely apologise to Mr and Mrs Badings and understand how frustrating this experience would have been,' they said. 'The SMS sent to Mr Badings was a result of an administrative error and we are investigating how this occurred to ensure it doesn't happen again. 'The error is not related to the recent cyber incident. 'We have contacted Mr and Mrs Badings and rebooked them on the first available direct flight from Los Angeles to Sydney.' The couple will be compensated for any additional travel costs. The blunder comes after the airline fell victim to a cyber attack on June 30. Qantas was granted an interim injunction in the NSW Supreme Court on Thursday to stop the compromised data of customers being accessed or released following the hack. The records of 5.7million Qantas customers were impacted when a third-party system used by an offshore call centre was hacked. The names, email addresses and frequent flyer details of four million customers were exposed. The remaining 1.7 million customers had more data taken, including their dates of birth, phone numbers, personal or business addresses, gender and meal preferences, prompting an apology from Qantas boss Vanessa Hudson. The airline has confirmed there was no evidence of any personal data being released, and no credit card or passport details or personal financial information had been accessed. 'In an effort to further protect affected customers, the airline has today obtained an interim injunction in the NSW Supreme Court to prevent the stolen data from being accessed, viewed, released, used, transmitted or published by anyone, including by any third parties,' a Qantas statement said on Thursday. 'We want to do all we can to protect our customers' personal information and believe this was an important next course of action.'
