logo
Calls grow for urgent action to address job losses

Calls grow for urgent action to address job losses

eNCA4 days ago
Seven months after President Cyril Ramaphosa stood before the nation in his State of the Nation Address and declared that South Africa's 'most urgent task is to grow the economy, create jobs, and reduce poverty,' the country is now in the grip of a deepening employment crisis.
On Saturday, Statistics South Africa confirmed that 140,000 jobs were lost between April and June, equating to an average of 46,000 jobs lost each month. The news has prompted growing public frustration and political concern, especially given the silence from the President, his party the ANC, and the Democratic Alliance (DA), the second-largest party in the new Government of National Unity (GNU).
'Business as Usual Is Failing' DA Slams Lack of Urgency
Speaking on All Angles, Michael Bagraim, the DA's spokesperson for Employment and Labour, did not mince his words.
'The government is repeating the same failed strategies. For over a decade, I've called for reforms in the labour space. Removing red tape, deregulating, and easing the burden on small businesses. But we're still stuck in an outdated model,' said Bagraim.
He highlighted the quarter's job losses as part of a broader, cyclical trend, particularly in tourism-dependent provinces like the Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal, where seasonal employment typically shrinks.
'That said, seasonal factors don't excuse policy paralysis. There's no innovation, no urgency. While the DA is trying to push reforms from within the GNU, the ANC seems unwilling to abandon approaches that clearly aren't working.'
Silence from the Top
Despite the scale of the economic blow, there has been no official response from President Ramaphosa nearly 48 hours after the data was released.
'Perhaps he's silent out of embarrassment,' said Bagraim. 'He challenged his ministers two years ago to explain what's blocking job creation in their departments. Yet only DA ministers are doing so.'
Bagraim pointed to successes by DA-appointed ministers, including Dean Macpherson, whose department reportedly created 20,000 new jobs, and Dr Leon Schreiber at Home Affairs, who has implemented policy changes aimed at employment growth.
Signs of Reform But Are They Enough?
Bagraim expressed cautious optimism about discussions underway within NEDLAC (the National Economic Development and Labour Council), which he described as the "engine room" for new labour legislation.
'There's serious talk about freeing small businesses from the heavy burdens of existing labour laws, something we've been advocating for over a decade. You can't govern a spaza shop by the same laws as a supermarket giant.'
He also mentioned that the Western Cape, under DA leadership, has managed to reduce its unemployment rate to roughly half the national average, citing deregulation and policy innovation.
GNU Holding, but Under Pressure
When pressed about what's really happening behind the scenes in the GNU, Bagraim insisted the partnership is functional and producing results, albeit slowly.
'There's progress. GNU is working in principle. Some ANC ministers are starting to listen. The unemployment crisis is too big for political posturing. This is about national survival, not party politics.'
He warned, however, that failure to act decisively could lead to social unrest.
'We've seen what unemployment can do, look at the Arab Spring. South Africans want solutions, not speeches.'
Turning the Tide
Despite the grim numbers, Bagraim ended on a hopeful note, calling for unity, urgency, and less politics.
'Unemployment is not a political issue, it's a humanitarian one. Let's stop blaming and start fixing. The green shoots are there, but we need to water them.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National Dialogue has big gaps in it
National Dialogue has big gaps in it

The Citizen

timean hour ago

  • The Citizen

National Dialogue has big gaps in it

A properly managed national dialogue, which could be an inclusive participatory exercise for all groups, would be beneficial. With so many top leaders and prominent South Africans boycotting the National Dialogue, it risks losing credibility if it continues in its current form, says an expert. He added that President Cyril Ramaphosa should listen to the dissatisfied leaders and review the process. Mbeki's vision: Civil society at the helm Political economy analyst Daniel Silke said instead of forging ahead, President Cyril Ramaphosa should review or reconstitute it to bring everybody on board. He said at the core of it all was widespread dissatisfaction with President Cyril Ramaphosa's leadership – both within and outside of the ANC. Former president Thabo Mbeki, who first floated the idea of a National Dialogue, indicated during a special congress of the SA Communist Party in December last year that he expected Ramaphosa would merely announce the process, while civil society would occupy the front seat 'for the first time'. Mbeki said the process would be different to the Convention for a Democratic South Africa, which was initiated and dominated by political parties and the elite. ALSO READ: Mazibuko reaffirms that the National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans Foundations and key players boycott National Dialogue The multi-stakeholder two-day national convention, which kicked off the National Dialogue, commenced on Friday in Pretoria, despite a stay away by six legacy foundations belonging to prominent anti-apartheid stalwarts, along with the FW de Klerk Foundation. The foundations, which cited rushing and centralising of the process by Ramaphosa, demanded that it should be led by civil society or citizens themselves. They were later joined by the Kgalema Motlanthe Foundation, which pulled out but cited that its mandate had nothing to do with pursuing political projects. Motlanthe was quoted by the Sunday Times as saying: 'We work in accordance with the deed of trust and the foundation's work.' Among other boycotters were the DA and Freedom Front Plus. Non-participation by these parties meant most whites have no voice in a dialogue on their country's future. Several other parties were not at the event. ALSO READ: Still no confirmation on cost of controversial National Dialogue Ramaphosa unshaken by absentees At the gathering, Ramaphosa seemed unperturbed by the senior leaders' absence, emphasising the significance of his role in the process, saying he has to be 'allowed to be the president'. This was seen as a broadside against Mbeki, whom some accused of trying to outshine Ramaphosa. Silke, said the credibility of dialogue is bound to be undermined since it was being boycotted by to crucial players in the political setup. 'This is a botched attempt at something that could have been beneficial to SA,' Silke said. ALSO READ: The credibility of the National Dialogue is at stake Dialogue perceived as ANC-controlled A properly managed national dialogue, which could be a 'listening exercise' for the government and an inclusive participatory exercise for all groups, would be beneficial. But the process had clearly been seen as an attempt by the ANC to steer the discourse. Silke added: 'What is astonishing is that ANC-linked organisations are increasingly frustrated with the style of leadership of Ramaphosa and the way his ANC is steering South Africa. 'It seems the ANC cannot rely on the veterans any more to provide it with support. It seems it's free for all on all sides of the ANC in terms of self-criticism and very publicly so.' Political analyst Dr George Tsibani backed the view that Mbeki should give Ramaphosa a chance as president to lead the process. READ NEXT: National Dialogue: Concerns about financial transparency and hotel bookings for delegates

City says debt relief working, critics warn of looming crisis
City says debt relief working, critics warn of looming crisis

The Citizen

time3 hours ago

  • The Citizen

City says debt relief working, critics warn of looming crisis

The metro has defended its controversial debt relief programme, maintaining that consumer debt has declined. This comes after criticism from opposition parties who claim it encourages non-payment and threatens the metro's financial health. Opposition claimed that despite the debt relief programme, residents' outstanding debt increased by more than R700-million in the previous financial year. The Freedom Front Plus said it was particularly concerned about a 600% increase in new defaults within the 31-60-day payment period. However, metro spokesperson Lindela Mashigo argued that consumer debt has been decreasing since the launch of the incentive in May. 'Between February and March, the debtors' book fell by 13.56%, with a further drop from R26.6-billion to R25.8-billion over the next two months,' Mashigo said. He said these figures prove the initiative is working, allowing residents to settle arrears and keep their accounts in good standing. 'The plan offers ratepayers a 70% discount on outstanding municipal bills if they pay the balance in full, and was introduced to address a historic R30-billion debtor's ledger.' Mashigo dismissed claims of a 600% spike in new defaults as 'factually incorrect'. 'Nevertheless, the city remains committed to addressing all arrear accounts, particularly those that are 30 days and more in arrears.' He said intensified credit control measures are being implemented to reduce the debtors' book and to improve the overall payment levels. 'These measures include stricter enforcement of credit control policies, targeted customer engagement, and proactive monitoring of payment patterns to prevent accounts from falling into longer-term arrears.' Mashigo stressed that the metro maintains a structured payment arrangement with Eskom, honoured in full and on time. 'We have never defaulted on our commitments to Eskom and disciplined financial management has kept essential services running.' Despite the metro's reassurances, opposition parties remain unconvinced. Freedom Front Plus Councillor Mark Surgeon warned that outstanding debt climbed by more than R700-million in the past financial year, even with the debt relief scheme in place. He accused the ANC-led coalition of using the policy as a quick political fix rather than a long-term financial strategy. 'The FF Plus has always maintained that general debt write-offs foster a culture of non-payment,' said Surgeon. Surgeon also cited a R2.28-billion increase in the city's own debt in 2024/25 and a 43% rise in what it owes Eskom, warning of looming fiscal collapse. He said underspending on projects further erodes public trust, calling the budget a 'political wish list' rather than a binding service delivery plan. Surgeon argued that without structural reforms, the debt crisis will only deepen, worsening service delivery and public confidence in municipal governance. The DA shared similar concerns. Former MMC for Finance Jacqui Uys said the policy benefits residents who can pay but choose not to, while doing little for struggling households or for restoring payment discipline. 'The processes followed by the coalition do not ensure the inclusion of defaulting ratepayers back into the payment net,' she said. Uys said the DA had proposed alternative repayment models to help those who want to pay but cannot, but these were rejected. 'The debtors' book might even be closer to R28-billion,' said DA caucus leader in Tshwane Cilliers Brink. Brink said it is clear that there hasn't been an uptake by residents of the incentive scheme of the city. 'The DA warned that the scheme is inadequate, but the bigger problem is that credit control is not happening.' He said other measures, such as rolling out smart meters to indigent residents, are also not happening. 'Instead of collecting what is already due to the city, the ANC coalition has sought to introduce a new tax, the so-called city cleansing levy. Now that the High Court has set the levy aside, it means that there is about R500-million shortfall on top of the R850-million shortfall from the financial year ending in June,' said Brink. Mashigo insists that the metro's approach, combined with stronger credit control and targeted revenue collection campaigns, will stabilise its finances and support long-term service delivery. He said the underspending experienced in the 2024/25 financial year can largely be attributed to delays in project implementation, procurement processes, and the finalisation of contractor appointments. 'In some cases, unforeseen technical challenges and compliance requirements also contributed to slower capital expenditure. While underspending may temporarily affect the pace of certain service delivery projects, the city is actively working to fast-track delayed initiatives and reallocate resources where possible to ensure service delivery targets are met.' He said the city has instituted a 'war room' initiative led by the mayor. 'In this forum, service delivery departments are required to report regularly on the progress of their respective capital programmes and others.' According to Mashigo, the political leadership provides oversight, ensuring accountability and alignment with strategic priorities. 'Importantly, this process operates in conjunction with the statutory oversight functions of the Section 79 Committees and the city's council, which continues to hold the administration accountable for sound budget planning, disciplined execution, and prudent financial management. This layered oversight structure mitigates the risk of undue political interference.' Mashigo said the metro has adopted an approved service delivery budgetary implementation plan that outlines clear performance targets for each department. 'This plan is supported by a funding plan aimed at ensuring financial viability, achieving strategic financial objectives, and strengthening the city's liquidity position. By enhancing revenue collection and optimising expenditure, the city can sustainably deliver essential services to communities, thereby restoring public trust and reinforcing confidence in its financial stability.' He denied that the debt relief programme has fostered a culture of non-payment, saying on the contrary, it has provided much-needed financial reprieve to residents across the city, enabling them to settle arrears and remain in good standing. Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.

Pull the plug and start dialogue over
Pull the plug and start dialogue over

The Citizen

time3 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Pull the plug and start dialogue over

It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. While the National Dialogue saga seems destined to generate little more than more hot air – as if we don't have enough already from our verbose politicians – it does provide some fascinating material for pondering our parlous political situation. First, the foundations associated with the elders of recent South African history – those who negotiated the way towards ending apartheid – have pulled out of the process. What the National Dialogue should've been One of the prominent critics of the dialogue process is former president Thabo Mbeki. He was the man who set in motion this idea of a national dialogue, and, in his own words, it should have been civil society in the driving seat, not President Cyril Ramaphosa and the ANC. That would seem, at first glance, to be noble and wise, as befitting Mbeki's status as an elder statesman. However, what if Mbeki realised that his own legacy – despite the collapse which followed after he left office – was going to be less than shining? Even ignoring the Aids debacle, where an estimated 250 000 people died while he dithered about antiretroviral medications, Mbeki is regarded by many critics as having moved the country onto a neocolonial, capitalist-friendly course, failing to deal with critical issues like land restitution. Perhaps he needs the dialogue to rebuild his legacy into one of 'the man who saved South Africa'. Yet, whatever his motive may be, Mbeki is correct – and so are the others who withdrew – that this dialogue should not be steered by Ramaphosa and the ANC. People, not political parties, should air their views on the future. That is why it is concerning that organisations like the DA and Freedom Front Plus, which represent many in the white community, have also chosen to stay away. It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. READ NEXT: Mazibuko reaffirms that the National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store