How Insularity Defined the Last Stages of Biden's Career
For months, as I worked on a book about the 2024 presidential election, I made multiple requests for an interview with Mr. Biden. One of my co-authors had sat down with President-elect Donald J. Trump, and we felt it was critical to talk to Mr. Biden. But the former president's aides said he was working on a memoir, and that would conflict with my book.
Yet when I reached Mr. Biden on his cellphone in late March, he answered and agreed to talk. He broke his silence on his successor to criticize the early weeks of Mr. Trump's second term. 'I don't see anything he's done that's been productive,' the former president said.
When I asked if he had any regrets about dropping out of the presidential race, Mr. Biden said, in a detached tone, 'No, not now. I don't spend a lot of time on regrets.' Then he hung up because he was boarding an Amtrak train.
My brief conversation with Mr. Biden prompted a cascade of concern among his top aides. One screamed at me for calling the former president directly. Others texted furiously, trying to figure out how I had obtained Mr. Biden's phone number.
Mr. Biden had seemed open to continuing the conversation, but my subsequent calls went straight to voice mail. His automated greeting simply said, 'Joe.'
Two days later, that greeting was replaced by a message from Verizon Wireless: 'The number you dialed has been changed, disconnected or is no longer in service.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republican US Senator Grassley clashes with Trump over nominations
By Nate Raymond (Reuters) -U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley said on Wednesday he was "offended" and "disappointed" by President Donald Trump's social media posts targeting him for refusing to end a custom that allows Democratic senators to effectively veto new nominees to serve as judges and prosecutors in their states. At the start of a Senate Judiciary hearing on four of Trump's judicial nominees, Grassley, an Iowa Republican, took issue with the president's call late Tuesday on his social media platform Truth Social for an end to the so-called "blue slip" process in the Republican-led Senate. Senators by custom must return blue slips, named for the color of the form, in order for any district court or U.S. attorney nominees from their states to advance and receive a hearing before the committee. Trump in a post on Tuesday called on Grassley to have the "COURAGE" to end "hoax" and "scam" blue slips, which he said are allowing Senate Democrats to "have an ironclad stoppage of Great Republican Candidates" to serve as judges and U.S. attorneys. Trump then early Wednesday reposted messages from Truth Social users focused on the 91-year-old senator's age and encouraging him to comply with Trump's wishes. "I was offended by what the president said, and I'm disappointed that it would result in personal insults," Grassley said. The custom has allowed senators in both parties to block nominees they opposed in their home states and ensure the White House consults with them to find acceptable picks. Senator Dick Durbin, the committee's top Democrat, during Democratic President Joe Biden's tenure resisted calls by progressive advocates to do away with blue slips when he chaired the panel. He thanked Grassley for likewise standing by the custom. "I hope it continues to be the case," he said. Grassley responded: "Yes." Trump's tirade came after New Jersey U.S. Senators Cory Booker and Andy Kim, both Democrats, effectively blocked the nomination of Alina Habba, the president's former personal lawyer, to serve as their state's top federal prosecutor by refusing to return blue slips. After judges in New Jersey also declined to appoint her to the position of U.S. attorney, the Trump administration withdrew her nomination and pursued a new maneuver to keep her in the job in an acting capacity that included firing the prosecutor whom a federal court had tapped to replace her.
Business Insider
4 minutes ago
- Business Insider
A congressional stock trading ban just got closer to becoming law
A bill to ban politicians from trading stocks in office moved one step closer to a vote — but only after an hour of intense argument and insults between Republicans. The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee passed the bill on an 8-7 vote. All Democrats voted for it, while every Republican voted against it except one: Josh Hawley of Missouri, who sponsored the bill. The legislation is broadly similar to a bill that passed the same committee last summer, but never received a Senate floor vote. This version would ban members of members of Congress, the president, and the vice president from buying stocks immediately upon enactment, and would block them from selling stocks beginning 90 days after that. It would then require lawmakers to divest entirely from their stock holdings at the beginning of their next term, and it would require the president and vice President to do so beginning in 2029 — after President Donald Trump's current term. It also would not allow for blind trusts, which sets it apart from other similar bills. "I think we have to accept that the American people think that all of us, Democrats and Republicans, are using our positions and our access to enrich ourselves," Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan said during the hearing. "People don't believe that we are here for the right reasons. We have a problem." It is unclear when or if the bill would become law — the next step would be a Senate vote. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has said that he believes current disclosure laws are sufficient, while House Speaker Mike Johnson has expressed cautious support for a ban. Trump has said that he would sign a congressional stock trading ban into law. The bill ultimately passed despite the furious objections of several GOP senators on the committee — and tense intraparty debate. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who was the CEO of a plastics manufacturing company before he was elected to the Senate, argued that the stock divestiture requirements would discourage businesspeople from seeking federal office. "We make it very unattractive for people to step up to the plate," Johnson said. "This piece of legislation, really, it's legislative demagoguery." Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, the chairman of the committee, said that existing laws banning insider trading and requiring stock trade disclosures were sufficient, calling Hawley's bill a "solution looking for publicity." Another key issue was how the bill would apply to the president and vice president — it would block them from buying and selling stocks, but wouldn't force them to divest any holdings during their current terms. Trump owns individual stocks, while Vance divested from his individual stock holdings during his Senate tenure. Paul argued that the bill would "protect Donald Trump" by not requiring divestiture before 2029, arguing that provision demonstrated that the bill was "crummy." Meanwhile, Sen. Rick Scott of Florida said the bill was an attack on Vance and Trump. "Trump has gone through unbelievable hell," Scott told reporters after the hearing, referring to his indictments and impeachments. He said the bill would "allow the Democrats to go after the President of the United States." Much of the hearing was taken up by Hawley sparring with fellow Republicans on the committee. After Scott raised a question about a provision of the bill applying to illiquid assets, Hawley snapped back at him, pointing out that he supported last year's bill. "It's the same one you voted for last year," Hawley said. At one point, during a tense exchange with Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma over the bill's elimination of blind trusts, Hawley made a passing reference to Scott's wealth. "I practice what I preach. I don't have individual stocks, I don't trade in stocks," Hawley said as Scott sat beside him. "I'm not a billionaire, unlike others on this committee." Scott, worth hundreds of millions of dollars, is one of the wealthiest members of Congress. Minutes later, he said it was "disgusting" to criticize lawmakers for their wealth. "I don't know when in this country it became a negative to make money," Scott said as he described his modest upbringing. "This idea that we're going to attack people because they make money is wrong. It's absolutely wrong."
Bloomberg
4 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's Latest Tariff Threats Now Target India
President Donald Trump is making new threats in his trade war, promising a 25% tariff on India's exports to the US starting Aug. 1. He also threatened an additional penalty over the country's energy purchases from Russia. Trump yesterday claimed in a social media post that India has tariffs that are 'among the highest' in the world. The threatened levies may dash New Delhi's hopes of preferential treatment over its Asian peers, who appear to have secured tariffs ranging from 15% to 20%. Trump, however, has repeatedly threatened tariffs against other countries and then backed down, ostensibly as party of a negotiating strategy. Indeed, the overall legality of Trump's global trade war is the subject of litigation before the US Court of Appeals in Washington.
